Loading...
Minutes 1968MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD January 4 1968 The Planning Commission of the City of Cypress met in regular session on Thursday, January 4, 1968 at 7:30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California Chairman Hickey presiding PRESENT Borders Holden Hickey, Smith, and Worley ABSENT None Also present were. Assistant City Attorney, Leonard A Hampel Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Arthur Schatzeder,and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Minutes of December 21, 1967, be approved as mailed ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-166, #4, LARWIN COMPANY: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for modification of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of townhouses in place of single-family residences on property generally located south of Orange Avenue, east of Bloomfield Street, north of Ball Road and west of Denni Street requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills California known as Modification of Conditional Use Permit No C-166, #4 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#67-78 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the modification of Conditional Use Permit No C-166 Mr Art Rosenthal addressed the Commission, representing the applicant, stating that the recommended conditions were acceptable to the applicant The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak against the modification There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed Discussion followed regarding the difference between the subject modification and those previously considered, proposed additional conditions and the fact that the R-1 use abutted the proposed condominium development The recommended additional cond#tions discussed and accepted by Mr Rosenthal were as follows "8 The Modification shall apply only to that portion of the development not previously recorded 9 There shall be a 10 foot setback from the rear property lines of Lots 712, 713, and 714 10 All property owners abutting the area in question shall be notified by registered mail that the change from single-family residences to townhouses is taking place prior to consideration of the Modification by the City Council It was moved by Commissioner Smith to postpone the public hearing until the next meeting of the Commission to allow sufficient time for the staff to contact the developer and notify adjacent property owners, as required by proposed condition 10 Motion died for lack of a second It was then decided that the applicant should notify the abutting property owners It was then moved by Commissioner Borders seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 403 recommending approval of Modification of Conditional Use permit No C-166 #4, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#67-78 a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department with the addition of conditions 8 through 10 as previously stated At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT: ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE. VARIANCE NO V-257, J. W. KLUG DEVELOPMENT CO , INC . The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider an application for variance from the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to allow the reduction of a required front yard setback to twelve feet (12') on property known as Lot 57 of Tract 5957, generally located on the north side of Oxford Drive, requested by J W Klug Development Company Inc 4540 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, Calif , known as Variance No V-257 The Chairman announced that the public hearing was still open The Secretary of the Commission read Stiff Report PC#67-77 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed variance Mr Jim Peters addressed the Commission representing the applicant, and explained the reason for asking for the Variance that because it is a corner lot a two story house would not be as desirable as a single -story house, therefore, they had designed a special model for this lot but it would require a variance Commissioner Borders stated that the applicant had made his own hardship by the manner in which he laid out the lots Considerable discussion followed with the general concensus of opinion being that to require various lot lots to be changed to make up the needed three feet would create quite a hardship on the applicant There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 404 approving Variance No V-257 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results AYES 4 COMMISSIONERS Borders, Hickey, Smith, and Worley NOES 1 COMMISSIONER Holden ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None I CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT-MAP-NO 5374c 4TH REVISION: LARWIN COMPANY: The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 5374 consisting of 168 P-D (Planned Development) lots and generally located south of Orange Avenue, east of Bloomfield Street north of Ball Road and west of Denni Street requested by Larwin Company 9300 Wilshire Blvd, Beverly Hills California The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#67-79 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation cf annroval Mr Art Rosenthal addressed the Commission representing the applicant, stating that the recommended conditions were acceptable to the applicant Considerable discussion ensued regarding the use of wrought iron fencing in the 6' block wall, with the Secretary advising the Commission that another recommended condition covered the wrought iron fencing to be required It was mo -:ed by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Commission recommend approval of Tentative Tract Map No 5374, 4th Revision to the City Council subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#67-79, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman all Commissio:lers present cast their vote with the following results TO WIT ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE. VACATION OF ALLEY LOCATED SOUTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE, EXTENDING FROM WALKER STREET EASTERLY 135', RUSSELL C. WENDELL JR , OF PUP N TACO DRIVE -UP: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider the vacation of the alley located south of Lincoln Avenue extending from Walker Street easterly 135', requested by Russell C Wendell Jr of Pup 'N' Taco Drive -Un, 3412 W Century Blvd , Suite 22, Inglewood, California The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#67-80, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation that the Commission find and determine that the abandonment of the alley is not in conflict with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and recommend that the Council anprove the abandonment of the alley Commissioner Smith asked the City Engineer if there were any public utilities located within the alley, to which he replied that he did not have definite information Considerable discussion ensued as to whether or not the vacation of the alley would be in conflict with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways The Assistant City Attorney reminded the Commission that, in this matter, they were acting strictly as an advisory body and should make a recommendation to the City Council There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman decalred the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Smith and seconded by Commissioner Holden that the Commission find and determine that the abandonment of the alley would be in conflict with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and recommend that the Council deny the abandonment of the alley Commissioner Worley stated he was in favor of the abandonment of the alley as it was too narrow to allow much traffic and the lots adjacent to the alley would be easier to develop if the area included in the alley reverted back to those lots, as would happen if the alley were abandoned The City Engineer informed the Commission that the present width of the alley being only 15 would prohibit two-way traffic on the alley therefore, he was recommending the abandonment At the direction of the Chairman all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results AYES• 2 COMMISSIONERS Holden and Smith NOES 3 COMMISSIONERS: Borders Hickey and Worley .'BSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS• None Motion failed to carry It was then moved by Commissioner Worley seconded by Commissioner Borders and carried that the Commission find and determine that the abandonment of the alley would not be in conflict with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and recommend that the City Council approve the abandonment of the alley At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results. AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS Borders, Hickey, and Worley NOES• 2 COMMISSIONERS Holden and Smith ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS None REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS• Commissioner Holden made the following statements: 'The City as it is being dev&loped and increasing in population is being developed under County fire ordinances Other cities around us have their own fire regulations and I feel it is due time the City of Cypress should consider looking into the County fire ordinance and perhaps set up their own ordinances The City should also locate fire stations in strategical places " ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Hickey declared the meeting adjourned at 9 45 p m ATTEST tri/AP mow SECRETA •F HE ' ANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD January 18, 1968 The Planning Commission of the City of Cypress met in regular session on Thursday, January 18, 1968, at 7.30 p m , in the Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Vice Chairman Holden presiding PRESENT. Borders, Holden, Smith, and Worley ABSENT. Hickey Also present were: Assistant City Attorney, Leonard A Hampel; Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Arthur Schatzeder• and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried that the Minutes of July 4, 1968 be approved as mailed ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO Z-162; INITIATED BY CYPRESS PLANNING COMMISSION. The Vice Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider the zoning of the area included in City of Cypress Annexation No 67-3, in the general vicinity of Lincoln Avenue easterly of Moody Street, a copy of the map and boundaries thereof on file in the Planning Department, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission, known as Zone Change No Z-162 The Vice Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#68-1 which outlined the background of the proposed zone change and the area involved, recommending the area on the north side of Lincoln be zoned H -C (Highway Commercial), the property on the south side of Lincoln Avenue be zoned H -C for a depth of three hundred (300) feet, and the property southerly of the three hundred foot depth be zoned R-4 (High Density Multiple -family Residential) The Vice Chairman asked in anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed change of zone. There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Vice Chairman declared the public hearing closed Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried the Commission adopt Resolution No 405 recommending to the City Council the approval of Zone Change No Z-162 At the direction of the Vice Chairman all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT. ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-205, J. W. KLUG DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.. The Vice Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for modification of a conditional use permit to allow the use of a single-family residence as a model home on Lot 28 of Tract No. 5957, generally located at the northeast corner of Oakmount Street and Hanover Drive, requested by J. W. Klug Development Co , Inc., 4540 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, California, known as Modification of Conditional Use Permit No C-205. The Vice Chairman declared the public hearing open. The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-2, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Vice Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed modification. No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the request There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Vice Chairman declared the public hearing closed Discussion ensued regarding the installation of street improvements in relation to occupancy of the new homes )E - Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 496 approving Modification of Conditional Use Permit No C-205, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#68-2, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Vice Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results* TO WIT• ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: REVISIONS TO MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE: INITIATED BY CYPRESS PLANNING COMMISSION: The Vice Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider proposed revisions to the Master Plan of Drainage initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission. The Vice Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#68-3, which informed the Commission that the City Engineer would present his report to the Planning Commission, which outlined the nature bf the revision to the Master Plan of Drainage The City Engineer proceeded to present a brief summary of his report, which included a summary of the costs involved, as follows. Cost of existing facilities - $1,317 500.00 Cost of proposed facilities - 2,852,300 00 Total Cost $4,169,800 00 To arrive at the recommended drainage fee the following information was included* Area in City 3823 Acres Total Cost $4,169,000.00 $4,169,800 00 = 3823 = $1,090 71 Thus arriving at the recommended drainage fee of $1,100 00 per Acre The City Engineer then requested that the Planning Commission approve the revised Plan and pass a Resolution to that effect, as prepared by the City Attorney, which would then be forwarded to the City Council He again 7* See Minutes of February 1,1968 meeting reminded the Commission that the only major change was combining the entire City into one drainage district The Vice Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed revisions No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the revision There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Vice Chairman declared the public hearing closed The City Attorney advised the Commission that their action, if they chose to approve the revision, would be to pass a Resolution approving the revisions and amendments to the Master Plan of Drainage. Commissioners Borders, Worley, and Holden expressed their approval of having the entire City within one drainage district It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 407 approving the City Engineer's report on the revision to the Master Plan of Drainage Commissioner Smith voiced his opinion, stating that he felt the staff had done an excellent job in preparing the report The City Attorney, at the request of the Commission, advised that the report did not include a specific method of financing the facilities included in the Master Plan of Drainage, only various methods that could be used At the direction of the Vice Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: TO GATHER EVIDENCE TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT TO INITIATE A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-3 (MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-1 (ONE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL): The Vice Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to gather evidence to determine whether or not to initiate a zone change from R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) to R-1 (One -family Residential) on the property located on the westerly side of Graham Street, southerly of Orange Avenue, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission The Vice Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#68-4, which reviewed the origination of the study, the reason for the public hearing, and the staff recommendation that the Commission listen to all testimony relevant to the possible rezoning of the property and upon conclusion of the hearing direct the staff to analyze the data and file a report with the Commission at the earliest possible date The Vice Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed rezoning. Mrs Johnnie, 9815 Cedar Court, Cypress, addressed the Commission, speaking as representative of some of the property owners in the "Meadows" tract, located southerly of the subject property speaking in favor of rezoning the property from R-3 to R-1 and presenting a written report supporting her viewpoint• stressing the fact that the development of the property into R-3 uses would create a traffic problem which would be very hazardous to children in the area, due to its close proximity to a school and park Mr Bill Flanigan, 9801 Graham Street, Cypress, addre3sed the Commission recommending that the zone be changed to R-1 due to the possible traffic problem that R-3 development would create Mr James Duncan, 9582 S Walker Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission, speaking as one of the property owners of the subject area, giving the history of the properties involved He stated he was not speaking against the zone change if it would benefit the City or allow the property to be developed, but he did not feel that new people moving into the City had the right to petition for a change of zone from R-3 to R-1 on property they did not own. He further stated that he did not feel that the Planning Commission should consider rezoning the property that had originally been zoned under the Master Plan, and that any such request for rezoning should come from the property owners He continued, stating that he was very much opposed to the way the subject matter had come about, that he would not be opposed to changing the zone if it would help the property develop, but the property owners would have to decide and file the request. The City Attorney advised the Commission and those present that the purpose of the public hearing was only to gather evidence and make a recommendation to the City Council as to the zoning of the area, or initiate the zone change itself. Shirley Gordon, 7762 Walker St , La Palma, addressed the Commission, speaking as a property owner on the west side of Graham Street, stating that due to the size and shape of the parcels involved, it was very difficult to develop the property. She also stated that, in the past, they had attempted to get several property owners together, but it had never worked out She further stated she did not care what the zoning of the property was, either R-3 or R-1, but would like to see the property develop. Mr. Peter Giovannoni, 1784 W Alomar, Anaheim, addressed the Commission speaking as a property owner of three parcels on Graham Street, stating he had purchased the parcels because they were zoned R-3 and planned to develop them as such. He stated he would lose money on the property if the zoning were change to R-1, therefore, he was not in favor of changing the zone Mr Ronald Lombardo, 9821 Cedar Court, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating his main objection to the R-3 zoning was the traffic that would develop on Graham Street He then suggested the possibility of closing the street at the beginning of the R-1 subdivision to avoid the traffic problem. Mr. Healy, 5951 Orange Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking as a property owner of a parcel measuring 110' x 130' on Graham Street, stating, due to the size and shape of the parcel, it would be impossible for him to develop it as R-1, therefore, he was opposed to the change of zone There being no written communications and no further oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed.;' Discussion ensued regarding consideration of the report presented by Mrs Johnnie Commissioner Borders stated he would like to direct the staff to analyze the data presented, but felt the study should be limited to the westerly side of Graham Street, and not those properties on the easterly side of Walker Street, south of Orange Avenue It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried to direct the staff to make an analysis of the information received and report back to the Commission at the earliest possible time At the direction of the Vice Chairman,all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results* TO WIT* ALL AYES The City Attorney explained to those present in the audience the next steps that would be taken in the matter* stressing the fact that there would be additional public hearings before any zone change could be approved, and those owning property within three hundred feet of the boundaries of the property would be notified of those hearings. See Minutes of February 1, 1968 meeting ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Commission, Vice Chairman Holden declared the meeting adjourned at 9:25 p m VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY • HE P NING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD February 1, 1968 The Planning Commission of the City of Cypress met in regular session on Thursday, February 1, 1968, at 7.30 p m , in the Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Hickey presiding PRESENT. Holden, Hickey, and Worley ABSENT: Borders and Smith Also present were Assistant City Attorney, Leonard A Hampel; Assistant Civil Engineer, James Williams; and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam MINUTES: Commissioner Holden pointed out that there was a minor correction to be made on page 6*,paragraph 3 of the Minutes of January 18, 1968, to add the word "Vice" to read as follows: "There being no written communications and no further oral protests the Vice Chairman declared the public hearing closed " Commissioner Holden then stated,in regard to page 2* of the Minutes under consideration of Modification of Conditional Use Permit No C-205, he had recommended that a condition be added to those recommended by the staff, which would have been condition 114, to read: "4 The developer will erect fences on the property lines " Commissioner Borders, upon making the final motion to approve the Permit, however, had deleted the condition The Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission that it would not be necessary to have this included in the Minutes because it was not something that was formally adopted, but, for purposes of completeness, if Commissioner Holden wished to amend the Minutes to include the fact that he did suggest the condition, it would be appropriate to do so. Commissioner Holden stated he would, therefore, recommend that the correction be made to show that the condition had been recommended, then deleted Chairman Hickey then announced the final action on the approval of the Minutes would have to be delayed to the next meeting, due to the lack of the required vote, there being only two Commissioners present who could vote on the approval or disapproval of the Minutes, due to the fact he had been absent from said meeting ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time CONSIDERATION OF RENEWAL OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO 29; DONALD LARIVEE: The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of a request for renewal of a home occupation permit which allowed the use of a single-family dwelling to accept phone calls and do bookkeeping for a laundry and dry cleaning machine repair business at 5702 Marcella Avenue requested by Donald Larivee, 5702 Marcella Avenue, Cypress, California, known as Home Occupation Permit No 29 The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#68-5, which outlined the past action taken on the permit, the fact that no complaints had been received from neighbors in reference to the particular use, and the staff recommendation of approval *As originally submitted to the Planning Commission Commissioner Worley asked why the staff had recommended a two year extension of time when they normally grant for only one year The Secretary explained that the staff usually recommended the one year period for the original Home Occupation Permit, however, in past cases, when the Permit has been existing for one year and is renewed, if no complaints have been received, the staff has recommended the two year time period, as they had in this case Commissioner Worley then stated he felt it was a good idea to grant the Permit for two years as long as there are no complaints and the applicant has lived up to the Home Occupation Permit Criteria It was then moved by Commissioner Worley seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to approve the renewal of Home Occupation Permit No 29, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#t68-5, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman,all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE. ZONING DETERMINATION NO 68-1; HAROLD WM WOOD, B S , D V M.: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a request for zoning determination to determine that an animal hospital is similar and would be compatible with those uses allowed in the C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) zone, requested by Harold Wm. Wood, B S , DVM , 220 E. Alondra Blvd., Compton, Calif , known as Zoning Determination No 68-1 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#68-6, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation that if the Commission determines that the use is permitted, it be provided the use is located in a new structure and subject to obtaining a Conditional Use Permit The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the request Dr Harold Wm Wood, 3281 Hedwign Rd , Los Alamitos, addressed the Commission, stating he was the applicant, and speaking in favor of the request Mr Warren Bodwell, 4931 Orange Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating that his property was located behind the property that Dr Wood was planning on developing He stated he had no objection whatsoever, in fact, he felt it would help improve the corner Chairman Hickey advised Mr. Bodwell that the Commission must decide that the use is compatible and could be allowed in any C-1 zone in the City, not any specific location There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Worley seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to find and determine that a veterinary hospital is similar to the uses allowed in the C-1 zone provided the use is located in a new structure and subject to a Conditional Use Permit At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT• ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 4137; J. W. KLUG DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.. The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 4137, consisting of 18.7 acres, and 102 R-1 (one -family Residential) lots, to be generally located on the south side of Ball Road approximately 645' west of Valley View Street, requested by J. W. Klug Development Co , Inc , 4540 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, Calif The Secretary presented a written communication from Jeffrey Millet, the developer's engineer, requesting action to be postponed to the next regular meeting in order to allow time for the engineer to finalize the plot plan of the dwelling units The Secretary explained that this requirement fell under the new Optional Design Standards- where the houses have to be plotted on the property, therefore, they c.eeded additional time to plot the houses He further stated that the staff would recommend approval of the request for continuation. It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to grant the request and postpone action on Tentative Tract Map No 4137 to the next regular meeting of the Commission February 15th PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-211, HYATT DIE CAST FOR UNION BANK: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the establishment of die casting manufacturing in an M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zone, on property generally located at 4656 Lincoln Avenue, requested by Hyatt Die Cast, 240 California St , El Segundo, for Union Bank, 445 So. Figueroa, Los Angeles, Calif , (property owner), known as Conditional Use Permit No C-211 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-6 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Secretary then presented a special report regarding the results of a field trip to existing operation of Hyatt Die Cast The Chairman then asked the Assistant City Attorney to explain the requirements which the Commission must follow when acting on a Conditional Use Permit, which he proceeded to do The Secretary then displayed the plot plan of the property, which showed the location of the existing and proposed buildings. The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed use Mr Albert Hyatt, 8221 Orange Acres Drive, Anaheim, addressed the Commission, stating he owned Hyatt Die Cast, in El Segundo, and was the applicant for the Conditional Use Permit He explained the future development he planned for the property, as mentioned in the staff report and stated that the buildings would be built to City regulations and by permit, and the people that lease or rent from him would all have to file for a Use Permit He continued, stating that, for the benefit of the people living in the residential area bordering the property, he would be willing to take an area approximately ten or twelve feet deep bordering the homes on the east and south that are presently there, and probably eventually on the west, to plant trees and other landscaping Mr Jack Leneker, 4504 Middlebury Circle, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating he would like to speak in favor of the request. He stated he had been approached by property owners adjacent to the subject property who were afraid the use might create excessive noise, smoke, fumes, fire hazards, etc , and that possible future uses on the property might be detrimental Mr. Leneker presented a report of his findings, stating that he could not discern any objectionable noise, smoke, fumes, odor, fire hazards, etc in the existing operation Mr Allen Bannick, 8741 Watson Street, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the request as long as no disturbance to the surrounding neighborhood was created- stating he felt it would be good for the community. Mr E K Cooper, 4721 Newman Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission inquiring about the sound decibel ratings and octabe frequency range He then stated that the parking for the employees would be at the rear of his property and, with the plant in operation twenty-four hours, he would not be in favor; not that he was against industry, but he was against this type. At the request of the Chairman, the Secretary advised the Commission and audience that Section 125 19 of the Zoning Ordinance stipulates frequency ranges, octabe bands, cycles per second and overall standards for sound levels, and proceeded to read portions of that Section Mr Glenn Wallace, 4671 Newman St , Cypress, addressed the Commission stating he lived directly behind the subject property and was against any operation around the clock outside the buildings, such as trucks, pull motors, etc , that might disturb the adjacent property owners. He also asked that, if the Use Permit was granted, the Planning Commission restrict the applicant from placing any building closer to the rear property lines that those that are shown on the plot plan Mr. Bill Schaeffer, 9173 Ethel St , Cypress, addressed the Commission asking questions in regard to the Commission's authority to accept or reject the operation; stating he did not feel die casting was a light manufacturing use He stated he felt the grounds of the present location of the business were in bad shape and outlined several other objections, stating he was very much opposed to the proposed operation The Assistant City Attorney again advised those present of the restrictions imposed upon the Planning Commission by the Zoning Ordinance in relation to the use being allowed in the zone, but subject to a Conditional Use Permit Mr.Hyatt at the request of the Chairman, advised the Commission and those present of the fire hazards of magnesium, stating he had no problem with his fire insurance and that magnesium was a very small part of his business. Mr. Richard Bowen '4631 Newman Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating he lived behind the subject property, speaking in opposition to the request, stating he did not object so much to operation now, but the expansion plans for the future He also asked if the adjacent propert; owners would be notified and be able to object to any Conditional Use Permits for any businesses that would sub -lease buildings from Mr Hyatt, or was it solely up to the Planning Commission The Assistant City Attorney advised that any expansion or construction other than shown on the plot plan for the original Conditional Use Permit, would require a modification of the Permit, which would bring the matter back before the Planning Commission for public hearing. Mr. Lee Bellis, 9214 Ethel, Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking in regard tb the process used in die casting and asked for a further investigation of the fumes created by this process The Secretary, at the request of the Chairman, read that portion of the Zoning Ordinance regarding fumes and odors emitted and controls of same Mr Harry Stears, 4681 Newman Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking as an adjacent property owner, stating that, when the trailer manufacturer had been at the subject location, the noise has been quite disturbing to him He also asked what the status of the zoning of the property was, as he had been informed at the time he moved into his home, by the real estate salesman, that the zoning would change when the trailer manufacturer moved or went out of business. Chairman Hickey informed Mr Stears that the salesman in this case as in many, had misinformed him Mr Roy Bennett, 4591 Lemon, Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking in opposition to the use, stating he felt it would be harder for him to re -sell his home in the future and felt the noise and fire hazards would be a nuisance 7114, See Minutes of February 15, 1968 meeting The Secretary, as a point of information, outlined the various other uses that could be placed on the property without a Conditional Use Permit Joyce Van Allen, 4641 Newman Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating she was two houses west of the factory and wished to speak in opposition to the use Mr Jim Warnemunde, 9172 Julie Beth, Cypress, addressed the Commission asking various questions regarding the testimony given and statements made. The Chairman, in answer to a question from the audience, again explained that the use was permitted in the zone and that the hearing was to consider the conditions to be imposed upon the use, not the zoning of the property Mr Harry Haught, 9161 Julie Beth, Cypress, addressed the Commission asking some questions regarding the method of changing shifts, if it was by buzzer or not, and the recourse the adjacent property owners would have if the applicant did not live up to the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit Mr. Hyatt replied, as to the change in shifts, stating that they did use a buzzer, but could work something else out if it was a problem at night The Assistant City Attorney advised Mr Haught that, if the conditions cannot be met at the inception or somewhere along the way were violated, the Conditional Use Permit could be revoked and the use in that zone would then be illegal and would have to terminate, or the operator could be subject to various sanctions of the Zoning Ordinance, one of which is a penal sanction Mr Hyatt addressed the Commission presenting his rebuttal to some of the comments and objections made, stating he would cooperate in any way possible to avoid any possible problems which might result in complaints. Mr Stears addressed the Commission, asking that, if the Commission approved the request, conditions be imposed to insulate the rear building to reduce the noise level and muffle the equipment, such as fork lifts, being used in the rear area. There being no written communications and no further oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed Considerable discussion ensued regarding the proposed conditions. It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 408 approving Conditional Use Permit No. C-211, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#68-7, amended to read as follows. 1 The following conditions shall be constructed within eighteen months after occupancy of the facility. A A six foot (6') high concrete block wall shall be constructed along the west property line adjacent to that area zoned for residential purposes, subject to staff approval B An area ten feet from the exterior east, south, and west property lines of the property, adjacent to any residentially zoned property shall be landscaped and permanently maintained with fifteen (15) gallon trees C The driveways shall be resurfaced 2. The following conditions shall be complied with upon occupancy of the facility. A. Sidewalks and street furniture in front of the property shall be constructed B. Drainage easement across the rear of the subject property running from west to east to the existing 2-A Channel located easterly of the subject property shall be provided by the owner of the property C All drainage fees shall be paid. D. All lights shall be directed onto the property and shall not bleed onto the adjoining residential property. E No outside production activity, buzzer, or loud speaker shall be allowed between the hours of 10.00 p m and 7.30 a m for six (6) days per week F No outside production shall be allowed on Sunday. G No sand casting or smelting shall be allowed H All outside storage and yard areas shall be kept in an orderly 110 manner, with no stacks of material over six feet (6') in height I. Noise buffers shall be constructed if needed. J Three -sided slag bins shall be provided, as approved by the City staff At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES CHAIRMAN HICKEY DECLARED A FIVE MINUTE RECESS AT 10:35 P M. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 10.40 P M WITH ALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT EXCEPTING COMMISSIONERS BORDERS AND SMITH CONSIDERATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VARIANCE NO. V-202, UNION BANK The Secretary asked that the Planning Commission place consideration of the extension of Variance No V-202 on the Agenda at this time. He explained that a request had been received from Union Bank, who were selling the Barkley Development tract, and had requested a six month extension of time for a billboard located approximately 1,000' from Lincoln Avenue on the east side of Moody Street. It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to place the item on the Agenda for consideration at this time. The Secretary then explained that the sign advertised the Barkley Square tract, that they did have a bond posted guaranteeing the removal of the sign; that they had met all the conditions of approval and had kept the sign in good repair, therefore, the staff was recommending approval of the six month extension of time, as requested by Union Bank It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to grant a six month extension of time on Variance No V-202 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. Mr. Jack Leneker addressed the Commission requesting a copy of the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No C-211, when available The Secretary advised Mr iseneker that he could obtain a copy if the would call at the Planning Department office within a week or ten days REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS• Commissioner Holden addressed the Commission inquiring about the status of the Street Beautification Program for the City; and stating he felt the Program should be proceeding at a faster pace The Secretary advised Commissioner Holden and other members of the Commission that the request for further action on the General Plan of Arterial Beautification should be by Minute Action to the City Council requesting them to reconsider the submitted General Plan of Arterial Beautification for the City of Cypress• due to the fact that the staff had submitted the Program to the City Council some meetings ago and it had been rejected It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried to direct a M'nute Action to the City Council requesting that they reconsider the General Plan of Arterial Beautification Program for the City of Cypress Commissioner Hickey addressed the Commission inquiring about the possibility of home occupation permits and carnivals being handled at the staff level, rather than requiring Planning Commission action The Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission that these two items would probably be included with those items to be handled by the Zoning Administrator, as previously discussed He stated he had prepared a tentative report regarding the matter and was in the process of meeting with the Planning Director in regard to it in order to consider the planner's view and make it e part of the report He indicated he would be presenting the report to the Planning Commission shortly. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Commission, it was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried, the meeting adjourn at 11.00 p m CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTES SECRETARY TH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD February 15, 1968 The Planning Commission of the City of Cypress met in regular session on Thursday, February 15, 1968, at 7.30 p m , in the Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Hickey presiding. PRESENT: Borders Holden Hickey, Smith, and Worley AB"ENT• None Also present were: City Attorney, James Erickson; Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Arthur Schatzeder; and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R. Putnam MINUTES. It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Minutes of January 18, 1968, be approved with the corrections as stipulated at the meeting of February 1, 1968 The City Attorney pointed out a correction to be made on page 6; the first line, of the Minutes of February 1, 1968, to change the name to read "Mr Richard Boe" It was then moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried to approve the Minutes of February 1, 1968 as corrected ORAL COMMUNICATIONS• There were no oral communications presented at this time. PUBLIC HEARING RE: HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 39, MRS. ELIZABETH YATES. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home for hand painting and antiquing statuary, generally located at 5832 Newman Street, requested by Mrs Elizabeth Yates, 5832 Newman Street, Cypress, California, known as Home Occupation Permit No 39 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-9, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the requested permit Mrs Rita M Smeader, 4542 Newman Ave , Cypress, addressed the Commission stating she had worked with Mrs Yates, and speaking in favor of the Home Occupation Permit Mrs Yates addressed the Commission advising them she was present and would be willing to answer any questions they might have There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed Commissioners Worley and Borders stated they were in favor of the request as long as the applicant had agreed to comply with the Home Occupation Criteria *As originally submitted to the Planning Commission It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to approve Home Occupation Permit No. 39, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#68-9, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results* TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-164; MRS. FRANK CORREIA & BIG SIX LAND COMPANY, BY LARWIN COMPANY. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ottdinance No 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-4 (High Density Multiple -family Residential) to R-1 (One -family Residential), generally located on the east side of Denni Street, approximately 320' south of Lincoln Avenue, requested by Mrs Frank Correia, 9092 Denni Street, Cypress, and Big Six Land Company, 5541 Bishop Street, Cypress, property owners, by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California, known as Zone Change No. Z-164. The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary advised the Commission that a mistake had been made in regard to the mailing of the public hearing notices, therefore, he was requesting that the item be continued to the next regular meeting Discussion arose as to whether the public hearing should remain open or be closed* with the City Attorney advising the Commission that the proper procedure would be to continue the public hearing It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing for consideration of Zone Change No Z-164 to the next regular meeting of the Commission PUBLIC HEARING RE: MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-195, 462; LARWIN COMPANY FOR DELL HOMES, INC., (PROPERTY OWNER)* The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for modification of a conditional use permit to allow the location of a trailer and ancillary construction and appurtenances for the 'Larwin Home Center", which will handle the color selection, options, and furniture sales for Larwin homes, in conjunction with the model home site generally located south of the southeast corner of Orange Avenue and Valley View Street requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California, for Dell Homes, Inc , (property owner), known as Modification of Conditional Use Permit No C-195, 462 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-11, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed modification Mr. Art Rosenthal representing the Larwin Company, applicant, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the request, and stating that they would agree to all the conditions recommended. Commissioner Holden inquired about adding a condition to require a business license for the interior decoration The City Attorney advised the Commission that it would not be necessary to add such a condition, that a business license would be required by the existing ordinances of the City He further explained that different parts of the City Code controlled the licensing of businesses He further stated he would recommend that the Commission omit any recommendation regarding business licenses There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried the Commission adopt Resolution No 409 approving Modification of Conditional Use Permit No C-195, #2, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC4168-11, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4137; J W KLUG DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC : The Chairman announced the next order of business was continuation of consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 4137, consisting of 18 7 Acres, 102 R-1 lots, to be generally located on the south side of Ball Road, approximately 645' west of Valley View Street, requested by J W Klug Development Co , Inc , 4540 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, California The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#68-8, which outlined the location of the tract, nature of request, and the staff recommendation of approval Mr. Jim Peters addressed the Commission representing Pacesetter Homes speaking in favor of the request, and requesting the deletion of recommended condition #24, regarding the location of the driveway for the dwelling unit on Lot 7 being located on the northerly side of the lot, stating it would create a hardship for them to place the driveway in that location with the unit planned. The Secretary advised the Commission that the staff would have no objection to deleting said condition #24 Mr Peters stated he had no further questions and the remainder of the conditions were satisfactory to them Commissioner Borders stated he could not find where the tract would meet the ideas of the Optional Design Standards, that it showed no unique design to him, that it was just a tract of homes on small lots, and using the fees for the improvement of a park across the street and quite a distance away, did not even come close to what he expected from the Optional Design Standards Commissioner Holden stated he felt the same as Commissioner Borders; that it was not any different than a normal size lot, other than the backyard being much smaller, that there was nothing unique in the design of the tract, and he could not approve such a design under the Optional Design He further stated that, when he first heard of Optional Design in the City he was hoping to see new concepts or a unique design for homes on smaller size lots; that he was very disappointed in what he had seen from some of the builders in the City and he was disappointed with the subject tract, that there was nothing unusual about it at all At the request of the Chairman, the City Attorney reviewed the new Optional Design Standards and the requirements for qualifying to build under said Standards; which were basically to enhance to livability of the area by means of providing open spaces and recreational areas or other public improvements in the area that would be of benefit to the general area Commissioner Hickey asked the Secretary how the 3% figure was arrived at on condition 443, as the amount of the Optional Design Fees The Secretary explained how the figure is calculated under the Optional Design section of the Ordinance Chairman Hickey stated that hh felt this was a way of saying the City was trading money for land, a certain percentage decrease in the lot size and the City gets a certain percentage of decrease in the amount of money going to the City for the development of the community park located northwesterly of the proposed subdivision Discussion ensued regarding the location of the park and the grade of the bridge over Ball Road and the flood control channel CHAIRMAN HICKEY DECLARED A RECESS AT 8:27 P M. TO ALLOW THE STAFF TIME IN WHICH TO CHECK THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR BALL ROAD TO DETERMINE THE GRADE OF THE BRIDGE THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 8 37 P M WITH ALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT The Secretary reported that the difference in grade from the center of the bridge to 250' east was 16" at the lowest point Commissioner Borders stated he felt there was a potential traffic hazard on the bridge, but his main concern was that the subdivision did not meet what he considered to be the Optional Design Standards It was then moved by Commissioner Borders to deny Tentative Tract Map No 4137 Commissioner Holden stated he wished to add to Commissioner Borders' statement, regarding the intersection being created on Ball Road. He stated that, when the property was first brought before the Commission to be rezoned, the same question came up about the traffic exhausting itself from the Tract onto Ball Road, Ball Road apparently being the only street upon which it could exit, but, at that time there was no definite forecast on how the traffic was going to flow He continued, stating that, under that assumption at that time, the Commission had denied the rezoning of that property, but the City Council chose to vote on it otherwise He further stated that even though he now could see the Tentative Tract Map laid out, he did not see the condition any better, if anything it was worse due to a traffic problem. He stated he was sorry to see it develop this way altogether, it reminded him of the intersection at Bloomfield and Lincoln, where there had been several traffic fatalities He then stated, with this is mind he would second Commissioner Borders' motion to deny Tentative Tract Map No. 4137. Mr Peters addressed the Commission in regard to whether the subdivision qualifies with the Optional Design Criteria or not, it was his understanding that if you provide for the improvement of public areas, it qualifies for Optional Design He also stated he understood that a community park would serve more than the people within the immediate block area, it would serve a good portion of the community, which would mean, undoubtedly, someone would have to cross a street to get to the park Commissioner Borders stated his concern was for the people within the community of the subdivision; he felt, according to the way he understood the Optional Design Standards; that those standards were for the people in the community that was under consideration, he did not feel crossing Ball Road would be within their community He felt something should be provided within the immediate neighborhood, open space, that would compensate for the smaller lots He further stated this was his main reason for making his motion• he did not feel there was any unique design shown to compensate for this He stated further that, if there was a green belt between the al -division and the community park, his mind would be totally changed, but there wasn't, there was Ball Road, and that was the reason for his motion Mr. Peters proceeded to explain his feelings in regard to the construction his Company was doing in the City and the requirements of the Optional Design Standards, as he understood them Commissioner Borders stated he was basing his motion on his interpretation of the Optional Design Standards and reviewed portions of the Standards; stating he could not see where any condition of the subject piece of property would require the developer to go from what he has right across to dedicating the monies to parks. He stated he felt there were a great many other ways, provided in the Ordinance, such as showing there were limited size, unusual shape, industrial development, extreme topography He further stated, in his own mind, he could not justify the small lots and donating money to the park across the street• that there were a great many other ways in developing under the Optional Design Standards for the subject piece of property other than what the developer hid-Jproposed, and that was the reason for his motion for denial At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: AYES• 3 COMMISSIONERS: Borders, Holden, and Hickey NOES• 2 COMMISSIONERS: Smith and Worley ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6219, LARWIN COMPANY. The Chairman announced the next item of business was consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6219, consisting of 18.3 acres, 99 R-1 lots, generally located on the east side of Denni Street, 325' south of Lincoln Avenue, requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#68-12, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval Mr Art Rosenthal addressed the Commission, representing the applicant, and asking questions regarding the proposed conditions. He then stated that the conditions as recommended were satisfactory Commissioner Hickey stated he felt the item should be postponed until the zone change on the subject property could also be considered. Mr Rosenthal indicated that they could wait for official approval, but would like the conditions and map discussed at this meeting Commissioner Borders asked for what public facilities would the Optional Design monies be used The Secretary outlined several items that the money could be used for in the immediate neighborhood Commissioner Borders then stated, in his opinion the proposed subdivision did not meet the requirements of the Optional Design Standards. Mr Rosenthal stated that they felt they would be doing the City a service by providing the funds to be used for the improvement of public facilities Discussion ensued regarding the interpretation of the Optional Design Standards Mr. Rosenthal asked if the Commission could see fit to approve the map with 47' and 51' streets with 6 000 square foot lots. Discussion ensued regarding the proposal presented by Mr Rosenthal Commissioner Smith stated he was in favor of the sidewalks being located adjacent to the curb with tree wells provided Considerable discussion ensued regarding the type subdivision the Commission considered to be Optional Design Mr Rosenthal stated he would work the issue out with the staff, if the Commission so desired, and come back at the next meeting with specified uses for the optional design fees, etc.- thus he would be in favor of postponing action, but, if they were going to deny the Map, he would like it done at this meeting 4 Commissioners Smith and Borders stated they would be in favor of the 6,000 square foot lots with the smaller streets The Commission generally agreed they would be in favor of the 6,000 square foot lots with the smaller streets The staff advised the Commission and Mr Rosenthal that it still would have to be an Optional Design Subdivision, if the smaller streets were allowed Mr Rosenthal akked if there wasn't some other means by which the Commission could approve the smaller streets within the subdivision 4 See Minutes of March 21, 1968 meeting The City Attorney advised the Commission and Mr Rosenthal that now, since the amendment of City Code Section 25-41, the Optional Design Subdivision procedure, under Division 2 of Article V of Chapter 25 of the City Code, is the only method by which to authorize a deviation from the Standards and Specifications for Subdivision Improvements under the preceding Article IV, Division 2 of Article V Commissioner Smith suggested that the Commission require that the storm drain facility be constructed to City standards Commissioner Borders stated he did not agree with the open drainage channel Commissioner Hickey asked the Commission if they felt it would be equitable to approve the larger lots with smaller streets and require a covered storm drain The City Attorney stated he felt enough information had been given m allow the applicant and staff to work out the problem by the next meeting It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried to continue consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6219 to the next regular meeting of the Commission, March 7, 1968. PUBLIC HEARING RE: SPECIFIC PLAN FOR PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF HOLDER STREET. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a Specific Plan for the precise alignment of Holder Street from its existing terminus southerly of Cerritos Avenue to the Garden Grove city limit line, initiated by the Secretary of the Planning Commission The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-13, which outlined the reason for the precise alignment, and the staff recommendation of approval. He then outlined the proposed alignment on the map The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the precise alignment There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 410 finding that the proposed alignment is in conformance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and recommending adoption of the precise alignment of Holder Street from its southerly terminus to the Garden Grove city limit line, to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman all Commissioners presentcast their vote, with the following results' TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: ABANDONMENT OF PORTIONS OF ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY IN TRACT NO. 6210 The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider the abandonment of portions of alley right-of-way in Tract No 6210, generally located at the southeast corner of Orange Avenue and Bloomfield Street, initiated by the Secretary of the Planning Commission The Chairman declared the public hearing open. The Secretary read the report from the office of the Public Works Director, which outlined the nature of the request and recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed abandonment 6 There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Worley seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried that the Commission find that the proposed a abandonment is in conformance with the revision #3 to Tentative Tract Map No 5374 and recommend the abandonment to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT. ALL AYES REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF COMMISSION RE: ZONING OF NORTHEAST CORNER OF BALL ROAD AND WALKER STREET: The Secretary addressed the Commission requesting that they direct the staff to set a public hearing to consider the rezoning of the property at the northeast corner of Ball Road and Walker Street from its present P -D (Planned Development) zoning to a more appropriate zoning that depitts the uses existing specifically change the residential area to R-1 (One -family Residential) and the immediate corner containing the service station and neighborhood market to C-2 (General Commercial) It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to direct the staff to initiate a zone change for the northeast corner of Ball Road and Walker Street from P -D to R-1 and C-2 REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF COMMISSION RE: ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN• The Secretary advised the Commission that the administrative intern presently working in the Planning Department was working on Socio Economic and Attitude and Goals studies for the City. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Commission, it was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried the meeting adjourn at 10.30 p m ATTEST: CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RETARY s THE LANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD March 7, 1968 The Planning Commission of the City of Cypress met in regular session on Thursday, March 7, 1968, at 7:30 p m., in the Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Hickey presiding. PRESENT. Borders, Holden, Hickey, Smith, and Worley ABSENT: None Also present were. Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel; Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Arthur Schatzeder; Civil Engineer Associate, Ray Coakley; and Secretary of the Planning Commission George R. Putnam. MINUTES' It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried the Minutes of the Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission held January 22, 1968 be approved as mailed Chairman Hickey asked if there were any corrections and/or additions to the Minutes of the regular meeting of February 15, 1968. Commissioner Holden stated he felt the question Commissioner Borders had asked Mr. Rosenthal regarding the public acceptance of the smaller rear yards and his answer to the question should be included in the Minutes of February 15, 1968, and asked the Commission's feeling regarding this The Secretary stated he did not feel the statement was made in support of any item, and it did not affect any particular item on the Agenda Commissioner Borders stated he did not care whether it was included or not. Commissioner Worley stated he felt it was a statement made not concerning any item before the Commission. It was moved by Commissioner Smith and seconded by Commissioner Worley to approve the Minutes of February 15, 1968 as mailed Commissioner Holden stated he would like to have the statement included in the Minutes because it would have an effect on the optional design tracts they might act on in the future The City Attorney advised the Commission that the statement could be added; however, the Minutes generally included only those statements relating to specific items He further stated that the motion and second could be withdrawn in order to add the statement if the Commission so desired In answer to a query from the Commission as to what his actual statement had been, Mr Rosenthal stated he felt they should check the tape for his exact words, but he felt he had said that in certain instances the twenty foot (20') rear yard is not sufficient for construction of pools, etc , and he preferred the deeper rear yards personally; however, some people did not want to maintain the larger rear yard. Commissioner Worley stated his only objection to including the statement was that it did not pertain to any specific item on the agenda. Upon a poll of the Commission, the motion to approve the Minutes of February 15, 1968 as mailed, failed to carry. The City Attorney advised the Commission that a motion to continue would be in order, if the Commission wished to check the tape for the exact wording of the statement r It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to continue consideration of the Minutes of February 15, 1968 to the next regular meeting and direct the staff to check the tape of said meeting for the exact wording of the statements made by Mr Rosenthal ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE: HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 40; ARTHUR RUDICK: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home located at 4164 Via Norte as an office for a dry cleaning service route, requested by Arthur Rudick, 4164 Via Norte, Cypress, California, known as Home Occupation Permit No 40 The Chairman declared the public hearing open. The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-14, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed permit Commissioner Borders stated he would be in favor of the Permit since the applicant had signed the application, agreeing to comply with the Home Occupation Permit Criteria. Commissioner Worley stated he felt the same as Commissioner Borders Commissioner Smith stated he was in favor of approving the Permit Commission Holden asked if the truck used in the business could be parked in the garage Mr Rudick, the applicant, stated he did park the truck in the garage There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried to approve Home Occupation Permit No. 40, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#68-14, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT• ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-164; MRS. FRANK CORREIA AND BIG SIX LAND COMPANY, INC , BY LARWIN COMPANY. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-4 (High Density Multiple -family Residential) to R-1 (One -family Residential), generally located on the east side of Denni Street, approximately 384' south of the centerline of Lincoln Avenue, requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire it Blvd , Beverly Hills, California, for Mrs Frank Correia, 9092 Denni Street Cypress, and Big Six Land Company, Inc , 5541 Bishop Street Cypress Calif , known as Zone Change No Z-164 The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open The Secretary read Staff Report PC#E68-10, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval. The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed change of zone. Mr Art Rosenthal, representing the Larwin Company, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the change of zone and offering to answer any questions the Commission might have Mr Charles Schweppe, 4561 Newman St , Cypress addressed the Commission asking what type of homes would be built on the property The Chairman advised Mr Schweppe that the Commission could not consider what type of home would be built in the consideration of the zone change. Discussion ensued regarding the piece of property measuring 120' by 110' that was left out of the zone change request, that the staff had recommended be included. Commissioner Smith asked if the lot could be included in the subject zone change or if it would require an additional hearing The City Attorney replied that it would have to be rezoned separately, with its own public hearing. He further advised that the appropriate action would be to act on the subject zone change and then direct the staff to initiate a zone change on that small piece Commissioner Worley stated he would want the lot zoned R-4 or R-1, but definitely not to be rezoned in the future to a commercial zone for a service station. Commissioner Borders stated he agreed with Commissioner Worley about not rezoning the property sometime in the future to C-1 or C-2 Commissioner Hickey stated he was concerned with the problems that might be encountered in placing an R-1 development next to H -C (Highway Commercial) and M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zoning Discussion ensued regarding those uses permitted in the H -C zone with the Secretary reading those uses permitted by the Zoning Ordinance in the H -C zone Commissioner Borders stated he felt the R-1 use would be suitable in the subject area Commissioner Hickey again stated that he wondered about backing up R-1 zoning to H -C zoning without a buffer, which has usually been a multiple use Mr Rosenthal addressed the Commission stating their intention for developing the property; also stating he did not feel they could create as good an atmosphere with a multiple development adjacent to manufacturing and H -C uses, with the possibility of two story buildings looking into those adjacent uses Considerable discussion ensued regarding buffering the R-1 use from the H -C and M-1 uses There being no written communciations and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Worley and carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 411 recommending approval of Zone Change No Z-164 to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Borders, Hickey, Smith, and Worley NOES* 1 COMMISSIONER Holden ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-165; LARWIN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) to R-1 (One -family Residential), generally located on the north side of Cerritos Avenue, approximately 660' easterly of the centerline of Bloomfield Street, requested by Larwin Development Corporation, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California, known as Zone Change No. Z-165. The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-15, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed change of zone. Mr Art Rosenthal, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the requested zone change Mr. Charles Stillwell, 4006 Churchill Court Cypress addressed the Commission stating he was Liaison Officer from the Board of Governors of Midwood Manor and he was in attendance with two other members of the Board of Governors, and would like to speak in stipulated support of the change of zone He continued, explaining that Midwood Manor had suffered dust damage from the construction of the homes to the west and the school to the south, both being in the City of Los Alamitos, therefore, they were concerned with the possibility of this occuring again with the construction of the proposed R-1 uses He stated they would like to ask that the proper measures be taken during the construction and that the City inspect and keep tight controls on the construction to avoid the dust The City Attorney advised Mr Stillwell that the Commission could not condition the zone change to require this• that such a condition could only be added at the time the tract map was considered Mr Stillwell asked that the Commission keep their request in mind and consider it at the appropriate time. Commissioner Smith stated he could see no reason why he could not approve the zone change, except for the decrease in population; however, the total amount of decrease was not that great There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Worley seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried the Commission adopt Resolution No 412 recommending approval of Zone Change No Z-165, to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT• ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 6219; LARWIN COMPANY. The Chairman announced the next order of business was continuation of consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6219, consisting of 18 3 acres, comprising 99 lots, generally located on the east side of Denni Street, 325' south of Lincoln Avenue, requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California The Secretary reviewed Staff Report PC#68-12 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval He then reminded the Commission that they had recommended approval of the change of zone on the property at this meeting The Secretary then presented the new Tentative Tract Map submitted by the applicant, and outlined the three alternatives for use of the optional design funds, which were as follows: 1. Street improvements on the east side of Denni Street, OR 2 Development of the storm drain in the 2-A system, OR 3. Development of a park on the west side of Denni Street, in the immediate area of the subdivision Commissioner Hickey stated he would like the alternatives or priorities, as listed, added to condition X622 The Secretary stated the condition could be amended to add the priorities. Commissioner Holden stated he would like a complete plot plan on the tract map, showing the location of each house on the lot At the request of the Commission, the City Attorney read Section 25-56 1 of the City Code, which outlined the information that must be included on the tract map to be considered under Optional Design Standards Discussion ensued regarding the intention of the Commission when the Optional Design Standards were considered in relation to the plot plan to be submitted; whether it was to be a plan showing the various houses plotted on each kind of lot including the most difficult situations, or whether each lot was to have the house plotted on it Commissioner Borders stated he would be in favor of approval of the Map Commissioner Worley stated he felt the same. Commissioner Hickey asked the builder to assure the Commission that the lots backing up to the H -C and M-1 zoning would have backyards deeper than 20' Discussion ensued regarding adding condition #29 to those conditions recommended, which would state: "29 All lots adjacent to H -C (Highway Commercial) zoning shall have a minimum of a twenty-eight foot (28') backyard, except Lot #11, which may have a twenty-five foot (25') backyard depth." The Secretary then asked the Commission if the Planning Department was to hold the property owners to that setback in the future if an application for a building permit for some type of structure were made, or was the Department to follow the setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance The Commission generally decided that it would be up to individual property owner after he purchased the lot as to what size rear yard he wished to maintain that the Department should follow the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance after the development of the Tract It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried that the Commission recommend approval of Tentative Tract Map No 6219 subject to the following conditions. 1 That Assessor's parcel number 78-020-12 shall be shown as a lot in Tract No 6219, or a Division of Land Map shall be submitted to the City prior to the approval of the final map, and all street improvements on Lincoln Avenue shall be constructed or a bond shall be posted with the City guaranteeing the improvements on Lincoln Avenue within a reasonable time, as determined by the City Engineer. 2 Denni Street shall be constructed in front of Assessor's parcel number 78-020-33 to ultimate width 3. Denni Street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways 4 Property line radii shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5 All vehicular and pedestrian access rights to lots siding onto Denni Street shall be dedicated to the City of Cypress on the final map 6 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with the Master Plan of Drainage. 7 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8 A block wall shall be constructed on the perimeter of the tract adjacent to any H -C (Highway Commercial) or M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zone 9 The developer shall construct the 2-A Master Plan of Drainage storm drain located southeasterly of the tract, or advance funds for the construction, at the option of the City Design and location to be approved by the City Engineer Funds for design and/or construction shall be advanced by the developer. 10. All street trees shall be of a size and type approved by the City staff 11 All streets shall be dedicated and improved within the boundaries of the tract 12 Five foot sidewalks are permitted adjacent to the curbs on all interior streets 13 Four foot tree wells shall be required in all streets having walks adjacent to the curbs, per City standards. Tree wells shall be bricked -in• to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 14 A three foot parkway easement shall be provided behind and adjacent to all sidewalks on interior streets. This parkway easement shall not be more than 8>' in depth behind the face of the curb 15 All fifty-one foot (51') streets shall be improved with forty feet (40') of paving curb to curb All forty-seven foot (47') streets shall have thirty-six feet (36') of paving curb to curb. 16 Drainage easement required to drain adjacent properties shall be provided as required by the City Engineer Drainage of parcels north of the tract to be shown on the grading plans to show the method of drainage. 17 Location of all street furniture shall be approved by the City Engineer 18 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid 19 The developer shall provide a street lighting system, approved by the City Engineer 20 The developer shall donate to the City 2% of the gross area of the tract or 2% of the value of the gross area of the tract 21 Interior street structural sections to be based on recommendations and soils report by soils engineering firm acceptable to the City Engineer with a T I of 3 5 for streets with 36' of paving and T I of 5 for streets with 40' of paving 22 The optional design fees shall be used for public facilities in the area according to the following priorities: 1 Street improvements on the east side of Denni Street 2 Development of the drain in the 2-A drainage system 3 Development of a park on the west side of Denni Street in the immediate area of the subdivision 23 If Contempo homes are to be constructed on the tract, all utility service panels and meters shall be located within the fencing of the property they serve on the Contempo Series 24 Minimum street grade shall be 2%, if possible. 25. Lots shall drain to the front street at a minimum 17. grade. 26 The fencing required along Denni Street, at the end of the cul-de-sacs shall be an ornamental wrought iron fence extending from front setback to front setback across the cul-de-sacs 27 All houses located on Lots 45, 49, 66, 70, 87, and 91 shall have their driveways located on the westerly side of the lot 28 No Final Map shall be approved until the property has been rezoned to R-1 (One -family Residential) 29 All lots adjacent to H -C (Highway Commercial) zoning shall have a minimum of a twenty-eight foot (28') backyard except Lot 411, which may have a twenty-five foot (25') backyard depth At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 6549; LARWIN COMPANY: The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6549, comprising 13 9 acres, consisting of 76 residential lots and 1 Storm Drain Easement Lot, generally located approximately 660 east of Bloomfield Street, on the north side of Cerritos Avenue, requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-16, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the Commission recommend approval of Tentative Tract Map No 6549 to the City Council, subject to the following conditions 1 Minimum street grades on "F" Street shall be .2% if the pump is allowed. 2 A six foot high block wall is required along Cerritos Avenue Wall around the curb return shall be as per City standards 3 All lots shall drain to the front with a minimum 1% slope 4 Access rights, pedestrian and vehicular, along Cerritos Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Cypress on the final map 5 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 6. Street trees types and size shall be determined by the City staff. 7 Fire hydrant location and plot plan shall be coordinated and approved by the City staff 8 The Developer shall provide a street lighting system approved by the City Engineer 9 Landscaping and automatic sprinkler system shall be installed along Cerritos Avenue. 10 All required zone changes shall be approved prior to the recordation of the final map 11 Interior street structural sections to be based on recommendation and soils report by soils engineering firm acceptable to the City Engineer, with T I of 3 5 for streets with 36' of paving and T.I of 5 for streets with 40' of paving. 12. Cerritos Avenue shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways 13 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid 14. Curb return approved by the City Engineer, shall be provided on Colgate Drive and Cerritos Avenue 15 Developer shall obtain approval of the City of Los Alamitos for the street improvement plans on Cerritos Avenue 16 The blue border of the tract'shall be shown to the City limit line on Cerritos Avenue 17 A three foot (3') parkway easement shall be provided behind and adjacent to all sidewalks on interior streets when the sidewalks are adjacent to the curb This parkway easement shall not be more than eight and one-half (811) feet in depth behind the face of the curb 18 All streets shall be dedicated and improved within the boundary of the Tract 19 In lieu of optional design fees the landscape treatment of Cerritos Avenue and the pump station shall be approved by the Planning Director 20. Tree wells shall be bricked -in, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 21 The driveways on Lots 16 20 31 35, 46 and 50 shall be located on the north side of the lot 22 Property line radii shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 23 All 51' streets shall have 40' of paving curb to curb and 47' streets shall have 36' of paving curb to curb 24 A block wall, as approved by the City staff, shall be constructed along the easterly boundary of the Tract At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: AYES• 4 COMMISSIONERS Borders, hickey, Smith, and Worley NOES. 1 COMMISSIONERS. Bolden ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None INITIATION OF ZONE CHANGE OF PARCEL ON EAST SIDE OF DENNI STREET, SOUTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE. The Chairman announced the next item before the Commission was consideration of the initiation of a zone change for the parcel measuring 120' by 110' located at the extreme southwest corner of the property considered under Zone Change No Z-164 earlier in the meeting, from R-4 to R -l. It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried to direct the staff to initiate a zone change from R-4 to R-1 on the subject parcel ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, it was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried the meeting adjourn at 10.10 p m ATTES CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ARY OF • •L N NG COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD March 21, 1968 The Planning Commission of the City of Cypress met in regular session on Thursday, March 21, 1968, at 7.30 p m ,in the Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Hickey presiding PRESENT: Borders Holden Hickey, and Worley ABSENT. Smith Also present were: Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hempel. and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam MINUTES. The Secretary of the Commission read the transcript of a taped portion of the meeting of February 15, 1968 that had been excluded from the Minutes of said meeting, which Commissioner Holden had requested be included in said Minutes; which read as follows: To be added to the 7th* page after the 14th* paragraph: "Commissioner Borders asked Mr Rosenthal what the public opinion of the twenty foot (20') rear yard setbacks on the latest tracts that Larwin had built had been Mr Rosenthal replied that they had found that they prefer the bigger, and there was much less resistance and much more acceptance of the deeper backyards, there was no question about it, and that was why, in the latest maps they had submitted,they have had the deeper backyards " Commissioner Holden stated he found the addition acceptable. COMMISSIONER SMITH ARRIVED AT 7.35 P M AND TOOK HIS CHAIR ON THE PODIUM It was then moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Borders and carried to approve the Minutes of February 15, 1968 with the addition as stated It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried to approve the Minutes of March 7, 1968 as mailed ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO Z-166; INITIATED BY THE CYPRESS CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from P -D (Planned Development) to R-1 (One -family Residential) on Lots 1 through 89 of Tract No 6289, and C-2 (General Commercial) on Lot 90 of Tract 6289, generally located at the northeast corner of Ball Road and Walker Street, initiated by the Cypress City Planning Commission, known as Zone Change No Z-166 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-17, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval *As originally submitted to the Planning Commission The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed change of zone No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the change of zone Commissioner Borders stated he felt the zone change was in order as it would be a hardship to maintain the P -D zoning and the C-2 zoning would be in keeping with the C-2 zoning being developed across the street, therefore, he would be in favor of the zone change. Commissioner Smith asked the Assistant City Attorney if one zone change could cover the change from P -D to R-1 and to C-2. The Assistant City Attorney replied that the answer was yes, it could be accomplished under one zone change at the same time. There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 413 recommending approval of Zone Change No Z-166 to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-201, J. W. KLUG DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.. The Chairman announced this was theti1ae and place for the public hearing to consider an application for modification of conditional use permit to allow a model site to be located on the west side of Valley View Street, approximately 200' north of Cerritos Avenue in the R-1 (one -family residential) zone, requested by J. W. Klug Development Co , Inc , 4540 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, California, known as Modification of Conditional Use Permit No C-201 The Chairman declared the public hearing open. The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-18, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval Commissioner Smith stated he was definitely in favor of granting the Use Permit Commissioner Holden asked if the model area was only for the tract in which it was located. The staff advised the Commission that the models would be for any Pacesetter homes being sold in the City. Commissioners Holden and Borders then stated they felt the model homes should only be used for the sale of homes within the City of Cypress. Commissioner Smith stated he also felt the models should not be used for the sale of homes outside the City Commissioner Worley stated he felt the two year time limit would take care of the problem, that they probably would be selling homes within Cypress for that length of time Commissioner Holden again stated he felt the model site should be only for the homes in Cypress, and that a one year time limit would give the Commission morecontrol of the situation. Commissioner Worley stated he would agree with Commissioner Holden on the one year limit if there was a provision for an extension of the time limit at the end of the one year, however, he felt that two years would not be too long Commissioner Borders stated he felt the two years would be fair There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed ' Following further discussion of the time limit it was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 414 approving Modification of Conditional Use Permit N,, C -2U1, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#68-18, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department, with the following addition. "6. All fencing shall be constructed on the property lines" At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results* TO WIT• ALL AYES WRITTEN COMMUNICATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VARIANCES NO. V-234 and V-235, HARRY E FULTON, FOP. LARWIN COMPANY* The Chairman announced the next order of business was a written communication from Harry E. Fulton agent for Larwin Company, requesting an extension of time for Variances No V-234 and V-235 for subdivision directional signs advertising 'Greenbrook', located on the west side of Valley View Street, approximately 250' south of Orange Avenue, and on the east side of Valley View Street, approximately 37A' north of Fred Drive The Secretary reviewed the request and explained the use and location of the signs He then advised the Co.riission that the staff suggested that the Variance be extended for an ekghteen (18) month period, subject to the original conditions of approval. It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried to grant the request for an extension of time for Variances No. V-234 and V-235, subject to the original conditions of approval, on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results* TO WIT. ALL AYES ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Commissioner Smith reported to the Commission that he had received a note from Phan Thi Hoa, one of the interpreters who accompanied the Vietnamese officials on their tour of the City, expressing their pleasure, and thanking those responsible for the visit and thanking Commissioner Smith for the photographs he had forwarded to her ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Commission, it was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried, the meeting adjourn at 8.15 p m ATTEST CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TARY T E 'LANNING COMMISSION See Minutes of April 4, 1968 meeting MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD April 4, 1968 The Planning Commission of the City of Cypress met in regular session on Thursday April 4, 1968, at 7:30 p m ,in the Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Hickey presiding PRESENT: Borders, Holden, Hickey, Smith, and Worley ABSENT. None Also present were• Assistant City Attorney Leonard Hampel; Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Arthur Schatzeder; and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam MINUTES Commissioner Holden stated he felt that the conclusions reached after the discussion of Modification of Conditional Use Permit No. C-201 and before the motion, should be included on page 3* of the Minutes of March 21, 1968. Discussion was held in reference to the conclusions reached and it was generally agreed to have the tape of the meeting transcribed to obtain the exact wording of the Commissioners' statements, which were as follows. (Following the 10th paragraph on page 3*) "Commissioner Borders stated that one argument in favor of the models being used for developments outside of the City would be that it would get the people into Cypress and he would rather have the model homes in Cypress and have the people coming here than to have it in some adjacent city; at least it was making the public more aware of the community of Cypress. He further stated that as long as the models were in Cypress he was not too much opposed to it• that the people looking at the homes might decide they like Cypress and wait until a new tract opens up in Cypress He further stated that his point was that the Commission would have two years and if the developer used the model site to a point where it was detrimental to the community then the Commission could revoke the Permit Commissioner Smith stated that an economic problem might arise• that being whether the developer would want to put the model site up for one year only• and that the one year period would not be from the time the models were built, but from the date the Planning Commission approves the Use Permit, which would be one year from this date if approved at this meeting. He further stated he felt that it would be cutting it pretty close if they would ask them to sell out the entire tract within a year He also stated that the developer could not anticipate anything the Commission might do when the Permit would come before them for an extension of time Commissioner Holden asked the Secretary if there was a charge for a request for extension of time, to which the Secretary replied there was no charge Commissioner Holden then stated that, as long as there was no charge, he could not see how the Commission would be imposing a hardship on the developer The Secretary explained to the Commission that the economic hardship would not be the $50 fee if there was one, but the chance that the Commission may deny the request for extension after the developer had spent several hundred thousand dollars on the development of the model site He then stated *As originally submitted to the Planning Commission that the staff had debated the time limit before making their recommendation and had determined that nowhere in the City has a model site become a blight or detriment to the community He further stated the staff did not consider where the homes would be that they would be selling because one of the things the Council was after was community identity and opening up the City of Cypress to prospective homebuyers and one way to get them was to have an advertisement stating "located is the City of Cypress" and ktave the public come to view the model site and, perhaps, buy a home within the City of Cypress He stated they felt the main concern of the Commission should be whether it would be a detriment to the peace, health, safety, or general welfare of the community, then the Commission should condition it accordingly. Commissioner Worley stated he felt the two years was not too long since it is from the time the Commission approves it and he starts his building until he sells out his tract Chairman Hickey asked if the Commissioners would compromise on an eighteen month time period Commissioner Smith stated he would npt agree to a compromise He stated he thought for the six months difference they were beginning to get real foolish, that they were "killing the goose that laid the golden egg". He further stated that the developer was set up for twenty-four months and if the Commission wished to curtail it because of some thought they had as a body ti.t he is going to sell outside the City, they would be jeopardizing setting up and selling the whole tract and he did not think this was very smart." It was moved by Commissioner Holdrn, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried to approve the Minutes of March 21, 1968 as corrected ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were no oral communications presented at this time. PUBLIC HEARING RE. HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 41, STEPHEN R KNIGHT: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home located at 4037 Brighton Circle, for making of handicrafts by use of a hand jig saw (power), particle board, yarn, glue, and small amounts of paint to make wall decorations, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5.00 p m for approximately three days per week, requested by Stephen R Knight, 4037 Brighton Circle, Cypress, California, known as Home Occupation Permit No 41 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-19, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval. The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed Permit No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the request. Following discussion by the Commission, there being no written communications and no oral protests,the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Worley and carried to approve Home Occupation Permit No 41, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC1168-19, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: AYES. 4 COMMISSIONERS. Borders, Hickey, Smith, and Worley NOES: 1 COMMISSIONER: Holden ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS None PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-167; EUGENE E. & LILLIE A. WADKINS, AND WILLIAM T. & ARLISS M ROGERS, BY K. E. JOHNSON. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-1 (One -family Residential) to C-1 (Neighborhood Stores), generally located north of the northwest corner of Moody Street and Orange Avenue, known as 9441 and 9451 Moody Street, requested by Eugene E. & Lillie A Wadkins, 9441 Moody Street, Cypress, and William T & Arliss M Rogers, 9451 Moody Street, Cypress, by K. E. Johnson, 8151 Orangethorpe Ave , Buena Park, Calif. known as Zone Change No Z-167. The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-20, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed change of zone. Mr. Lew Meyers 533 N Dale, Anaheim, addressed the Commission, stating he was a representative of K E Johnson, agent for the property owners, and speaking in favor of the zone change. Mr James L Bartosh, 4921 Orange Ave , Cypress, addressed the Commission regarding the proposed use of the property, stating he would not be opposed to a small animal hospital; however, he did not see how Mr Wadkins property adjoining the property which he understood was to be developed immediately, would fit into the development Commissioner Borders stated he would be in favor of including both pieces of property, not split up the area any more than it is. The Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission that one action must be taken on the application even though it includes two properties Commissioner Smith asked if he were eligible to vote on the item as he lived within a three hundred foot radius of the subject property The Assistant City Attorney stated there would be no conflict of interest as long as he was not a relative of the applicants or had an interest in the property, the decision would be up to him COMMISSIONER SMITH STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON THE MATTER AND WAS EXCUSED FROM THE PODIUM Mr Warren Bodwell, 4931 Orange Ave , Cypress, addressed the Commission stating his property bordered on the subject property and speaking in favor of both pieces of property being rezoned Mrs John Smith, 9399 Esther St , Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking for several property owners within her tract, stating they were not objecting to the C-1 zoning, but they did not want a neighborhood store to be located on the property. Mrs Gloria Segal, 9380 Esther St , Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking in opposition to any neighborhood store being located on the property Commissioner Borders suggested that the Commission look at the property for C-0 (Commercial Office) zoning, as it would be more compatible with the surrounding uses Mr Andrew Segal 9380 Esther St., Cypress, addressed the Commission stating he would be opposed to the rezoning Mr Eugene Wadkins, 9441 Moody Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating he was one of the applicants, and speaking in favor of the rezoning, stating he felt the property would develop in the future and the street improvements would be installed if it were rezoned Mr Warren Bodwell again addressed the Commission, speaking in rebuttal to Mrs. Smith and Mrs Segal, stating that no one had stated there would be a neighborhood store built on the property Commissioner Borders stated he felt a possible attraction might be created for the children attending the school across the street if a store were located on the property, therefore, to avoid the possibility of a store, he felt the solution would be to zone the property C-0 (Commercial Office) Mrs. John Smith again addressed the Commission suggesting another solution would be for the Commission to recommend to the City Council that neighborhood stores be subject to a conditional use permit in the C-1 zone The Chairman asked Mrs Smith to bring that item up under the Oral Communications section at the end of the meeting. Commissioner Worley, referring to a study previously made on the subject area and its potential, stated he was in favor of the zone change Commissioner Holden asked where an animal hospital was listed as a permitted use in the C-1 zone The Secretary and Assistant City Attorney advised Commissioner Holden that a Zoning Determination allowing said use in the C-1 zone had been approved by the Commission some meetings previous, therefore, it was a permitted use in that zone Commissioner Borders stated he felt the request was logical, however, he was not in favor of the C-1 zoning because of the possibility of an attractive nuisance being created across the street from the school if a neighborhood store or similar type use were developed. Commissioner Hickey stated he did not see C-0 zoning as the answer; he felt the C-1 zoning would be better than C-0 Commissioner Holden stated that the immediate corner was already zoned C-1 and, if C-0 zoning were placed on the subject property, it would be splitting up the zoning in the area, and he felt C-1 zoning would be the most compatible in the area. Commissioner Hickey stated he felt as Commissioner Holden, that the C-1 zoning would create an entire block of zoning in the area. He then asked where the crosswalk for the school would be located The City Engineer explained that he could not say where the crosswalks would be until the plans for the school had been submitted There being no written communications and no further oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 415 recommending approval of Zone Change No Z-167 to the City Council. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results AYES. 3 COMMISSIONERS: Holden, Hickey, and Worley NOES: 1 COMMISSIONER: Borders ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSTAIN• 1 COMMISSIONER Smith CHAIRMAN HICKEY DECLARED A FIVE MINUTE RECESS AT 8:55 P M THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:00 P M., WITH ALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT. PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-212; DR. HAROLD WM. WOOD, FOR WILLIAM T ROGERS JR . The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a small animal hospital in the C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) zone, on property generally located at 9451 Moody Street, requested by Dr Harold Wm Wood, 220 E Alondra Blvd , Compton, authorized agent for William T Rogers, Jr , 9451 Moody Street, Cypress, (property owner), known as Conditional Use Permit No. C-212. The Chairman declared the public hearing open COMMISSIONER SMITH ASKED TO BE EXCUSED, AS IN THE PREVIOUS ITEM, AS HE WAS AN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-21, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed use Dr. Harold Wm. Wood, 3281 Hedwig Road, Los Alamitos, addressed the Commission, stating he was the applicant, speaking in favor of the request. Dr Wood stated he agreed with all the conditions recommended by the staff with the exception of condition 12, which required the removal of the existing residence from the property prior to the issuance of a building permit He stated that this feature was one that had attracted him to the piece of property as it would be convenient as a residence for the night animal attendant he planned on having He then stated that if he were allowed to keep the residence he would paint and do anything required to bring it into conformance with building regulations and improve its appearance He also stated he knew a two car garage would be required, which he would plan to build into the new structure Mrs John Smith, 9399 Esther Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission asking how the soundproofing of the structure could be accomplished and if there would be any outside runs for the dogs The Secretary informed Mrs. Smith that there were construction methods that would make the structure soundproof and that the Conditional Use Permit was subject to the plot plan submitted as part of the application and there were no outside runs shown on the plot plan, therefore, there could be none Commissioner Borders stated he felt conditions 1 and 2 should remain if the Conditional Use Permit were approved Discussion ensued regarding outside activity and the boarding of dogs on the premises The Secretary suggested possible conditions regarding the boarding of dogs and outside activity Commissioner Worley stated he did not see how there would be enough room for boarding dogs after viewing the building plans, therefore, he did not feel that would be a problem. Commissioner Borders stated he would like the conditions regarding the outside activity and dog runs included if the Permit were approved Commissioner Hickey stated he did not see any need to establish a residence on the property, as proposed, that he felt it was bad planning Commissioner Worley stated he agreed- that a residence had no place in the C-1 zone, and he would be opposed to an R-1 use in a C-1 zone. Commissioner Holden stated he did know of some animal hospitals that did have attendants living on the premises Commissioner Hickey stated he was against any boarding of animals on the premises Commissioner Holden stated he could not see any provision for the attendant's residence on the plans submitted The staff advised the Commission that it had been Dr. Wood's intention to use the residence existing on the property for the attendant, therefore, the plans submitted would not show a residence in the new structure Commissioner Borders stated he felt the professional -residential zone the Commission had discussed at previous meetings would solve the problem and he would be very much in favor of it He also stated he would be in favor if a new residence for the attendant were provided in the new building, but not if the existing residence were used Commissioner Hickey stated he was still opposed to any residence existing on the property, he was 100% against any residence at all Dr. Wood addressed the Commission explaining how his present operation was conducted in relation to the night attendant There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed Commissioner Hickey suggested a condition be added prohibiting the boarding of animals Further discussion ensued regarding the proposed conditions. It was moved by Commissioner Worley and seconded by Commissioner Borders to adopt the appropriate Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No C-212, subject to conditions 1 through 17 as outlined in Staff Report PC#68-21, as amended Commissioner Borders explained the reason he had seconded the motion was that he felt the twenty-four hour operation was commendable and the location of the use was good Commissioner Hickey asked the Commission to seriously consider their decision, that he felt they would be making a very grave error to approve the Use Permit with the residence for the night attendant Commissioner Borders asked if Dr. Wood was planning on going ahead with the development is approved with the condition that the existing residence be removed, because he would rescind his motion to approve the zone change if he was not going to go ahead. Commissioner Holden suggested withholding action on the item if there was any furtharevidence, he would have to be in favor at this time Commissioner Hickey stated he had three points he wished to state: 1 The zoning study referred to in the staff report was not necessarily factual with what the study showed the first time around. That the property could be developed as R-2 as well as C-1 2 The property to the west is going to be hard to develop as R-1 because of the shape and size of the lots 3 A fence would be constructed on the west and none between the commercial uses Commissioner Worley stated he did not feel that a residence should be located in a C-1 zone, and he would like to amend his motion to show that a residence is not permitted on the premises Commissioner Borders stated he was only in favor of allowing a place for the attendant to stay overnight but not a single-family residence Dr. Wood replied that it would not meet with the original plan, therefore, he would have to give it more consideration before making a decision Commissioner Hickey stated he would be willing to postpone the item in order to give Dr Wood time to consider the possibility and revise the plans to show the facilities for the attendant to stay overnight. Commissioner Worley stated he felt the Commission should go ahead with the vote, then let Dr Wood decide what he wants to do. Commissioner Borders withdrew his second to the motion, stating he would rather postpone taking action Commissioner Worley then withdrew his motion to approve It was then moved by Commissioner Holden seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to reopen the public hearing The Chairman declared the public hearing open It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Borders, and carried to continue the public hearing for consideration of Conditional Use Permit No C-212, to the next regular meeting of the Commission COMMISSIONER SMITH RETURNED TO HIS CHAIR ON THE PODIUM. PUBLIC HEARING RE: VARIANCE NO. V-258, PASADENA NEON SIGN COMPANY, FOR LEE MARTIN The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for variance from Section 58 of Ordinance No 185, the Sign Ordinance, to allow the erection of a sign exceeding the height limitation of thirty feet (30'), on property generally located at the northwest corner of Walker Street and Ball Road, requested by Pasadena Neon Sign Company 410 South Pasadena Ave , Pasadena, for Lee Martin, 4142 Viking Way, Long Beach, Calif , known as Variance No V-258 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#68-22, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the request Mr George Ethier, 410 S Pasadena Ave. Pasadena, addressed the Commission representing Pasadena Neon Sign Company, speaking in favor of the request and offering to answar any questions the Commission might have Mr Ethier also stated he had some displays to show the Commission which would given them some idea of the concept they would be using in the sign CHAIRMAN HICKEY DECLARED A TWO MINUTE RECESS AT 10:15 P M THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 10:17 P.M. WITH ALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Mr Ethier presented the displays and plans of the proposed sign. Commissioner Borders stated he was very pleased with the graphic design and would be in favor of the request Commissioner Smith stated he felt it was very well done. Commissioner Holden asked why the extra height was necessary Mr Ethier explained that the engineers and architects who hdd worked on the sign had their own reasons for this but the main reason would be for identity of the shopping center Commissioner Bolden stated he felt it was an attractive sign, but felt the identity could be accomplished with a smaller sign because it would just be drawing customers from the surrounding neighborhoods Commissioner Worley stated he felt it was the first identity of any significance that Cypress has had, and he was very much in favor. There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 416 approving Variance No V-258, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#68-22, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT• ALL AYES ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. Commissioner Smith stated he felt the Commission should suggest to the City Council that neighborhood stores be placed under a conditional use permit The Secretary stated he would like the opportunity to bring the matter up at a staff meeting and discuss it; then bring it back to the Commission at a later meeting The Commission generally agreed. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Hickey declared the meeting adjourned at 10 40 p m CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: TARY • THE •W NING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD April 18, 1968 The Planning Commission of the City of Cypress met in regular session on Thursday, April 18, 1968, at 7:30 p m , in the Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Hickey presiding PRESENT: Borders, Holden, Hickey, and Worley ABSENT Smith Also present were: Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel, Civil Engineer Associate Ray Coakley, and Secretary of the Planning Commission George R. Putnam MINUTES. It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried to approve the Minutes of April 4, 1968 as mailed ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-168, INITIATED BY CYPRESS PLANNING COMMISSION The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-4 (High Density Multiple -family Residential) to R-1 (One -family Residential), said parcel measuring 110' by 105' and located adjacent to and north of Lots 52 and 53 of Tract No 5420, located on the east side of Denni Street, southerly of Lincoln Avenue, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission, known as Zone Change No Z-168 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-23, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed change of zone. No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the zone change Commissioner Borders stated he felt it would be a logical rezoning and he was in favor Commissioner Worley stated he was also in favor of the zone change There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 417 recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No Z-168 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-212; DR HAROLD WM WOOD, FOR WILLIAM T. ROGERS. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a small animal hospital in the C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) zone on property generally located at 9451 Moody Street, Cypress, requested by Dr Harold Wm Wood, 220 E Alondra Blvd , Compton, authorized agent for William T Rogers, Jr , 9451 Moody Street, Cypress, California, (property owner), known as Conditional Use Permit No C-212. The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open The Secretary presented the new plot plan for the animal hoppital and new building plans showing the sleeping facilities and kitchen area for the night attendant The Secretary informed the Commission that the block wall shown on the north side of the property in the plan would not be required, but the wall would be required on the west property line abutting the R-1 zone, as required by City Code Commissioner Borders stated he felt that the new plan showed that the attendant's quarters would not become a residential use on the property, therefore, he felt the problem had been solved Discussion ensued regarding the new plot plan and building plan with regard to the provision for sleeping quarters and kitchen facilities for the night attendant and treatment of that portion of the grounds not asphalted Commissioner Worley stated the new plans met with his approval in providing the residence within the structure for the attendant There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried, that the Commission adopt Resolution No 418 approving Conditional Use Permit No C-212, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#68-21, with the following additions: '16 There shall be no outside dog runs 17 There shall be no outside use of the premises for the animals." At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissions present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT• ALL AYES REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS: Commissioner Holden requested that the Traffic Committee make a study of the traffic situation at Cerritos and Knott, specifically the problem created when automobiles westbound on Cerritos, west of Knott, hold up traffic while attempting to turn left into the subdivision at the southwest corner of Knott and Cerritos He suggested the possibility of providing a left turn lane be studied The Secretary advised the Commission that the action would be to pass a Minute Action recommending this to the Traffic Committee Commissioner Borders stated he felt the same situation existed on Cerritos, west of Moody Street The Secretary advised Commissioner Borders that he thought a study of this area was being made at the present time. It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried to direct a Minute Action to the Traffic Committee requesting that a study of the traffic situation on Cerritos Avenue (westbound), west of Knott Avenue, be made to determine the feasibility of providing a left turn lane into the subdivision located at the southwest corner of Cerritos and Knott ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Commission, it was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Borders, and unanimously carried the meeting adjourn at 7.47 p m ATTEST. CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CRETARY 0 G E P AN ING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD May 2, 1968 The Planning Commission of the City of Cypress met in regular session on Thursday, May 2, 1968, at 7:30 p m , in the Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Hickey presiding PRESENT. Borders, Holden, Hickey, and Worley ABSENT: Smith Also present were. Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Arthur Schatzeder; and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R. Putnam. ELECTION OF OFFICERS. Chairman Hickey announced the first item of business was the election of Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission Chairman Hickey then turned the meeting over to the Secretary of the Commission, who announced that nominations were open for Chairman of the Planning Commission Commissioner Borders nominated Commissioner Worley. Commissioner Worley nominated Commissioner Borders Commissioner Hickey then moved the nominations be closed, which was seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried The Secretary declared the nominations closed Ballots were cast by the Commission* then the Secretary tabulated the ballots, and announced that the results were that Commissioner Worley had been elected Chairman of the Planning Commission The Secretary turned the meeting over to Chairman Worley. Chairman Worley announced that nominations for the office of Vice Chairman were open Commissioner Hickey nominated Commissioner Borders Commissioner Borders nominated Commissioner Holden Commissioner Hickey moved that nominations be closed, which was seconded by Commissioner Holden, and unanimously carried Ballots were cast by the Commission; then the Secretary tabulated the ballots, and announced that Commissioner Borders had been elected Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Borders seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried, the Minutes of April 18, 1968 be approved as mailed ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. There were no oral communications presented at this time. PUBLIC HEARING RE: HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 43, ELKE SCHLIEKERT: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home as an office for a part-time wholesale hardware business, located at 4247 Cheshire Drive, Cypress, California, known as Home Occupation Permit No 43 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#68-24, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed permit Mrs. Elke Schliekert applicant, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the requested permit, stating the hardware consisted of nuts bolts, screws, etc , and offered to answer any questions the Commission might have There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried the Commission approve Home Occupation Permit No 43 subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#68-24, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: AMENDMENT TO MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE IN THE WATSON, WALKER, AND LINCOLN AREA. INITIATED BY SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION' The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an amendment to the Master Plan of Drainage in the Watson, Walker and Lincoln area, initiated by the Secretary of the Planning Commission The Chairman declared the public hearing open. The Secretary read a report from the Public Works Director, outlining the nature of the amendment and the staff recommendation that the Commission determine that the proposed amendment is in conformance with the Master Plan of Drainage for the City of Cypress and include the storm drain facilities noted in Alternate "C" of the Glood Water Disposal Study in the Walker - Lincoln area in the Master Plan facilities, and recommend approval of said amendment to the City Council The City Engineer outlined the areas involved on prepared maps and explained each alternate to the Commission. The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed amendment No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the proposed amendment. Discussion ensued regarding the proposal and the potential development of the property in the area Commissioner Worley stated he felt Alternate "C" would be the better plan Commissioner Borders stated he also felt Alternate "C" would be the most logical to add to the Master Plan of Drainage Commissioner Holden asked about postponing action on the amendment due to the absence of Commissioner Smith Commissioner Borders stated he would be in favor of taking action at this meeting, unless the Commission felt Commissioner Smith might have a strong opinion on the matter There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried the Commission adopt Resolution No. 419 determining that the proposed amendment is in conformance with the Master Plan of Drainage of the City of Cypress and recommending approval of said amendment to the City Council, including the storm drain facilities noted in Alternate "C" of the Flood Water Disposal Study in the Walker -Lincoln area in the Master Plan facilities. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT• ALL AYES REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF COMMISSION RE: REZONING OF R-3 PROPERTY ON WEST SIDE OF GRAHAM STREET, SOUTH OF ORANGE AVENUE. The Secretary stated he had prepared a report regarding the rezoning of the R-3 property located on the west side of Graham Street, south of Orange Avenue, which the Commission had previously considered and directed the staff to study He then asked the Commission if they wished to consider the report at this time or take it under study The Commission generally agreed to consider the report at this time The Secretary proceeded to read Staff Report PC#68-25, which outlined the situation and past action involved, and the staff suggestion that the R-3 zoning be maintained with the requirement that the Architectural Control Committee approve the architecture and construction of any apartment houses on said property in regard to nature, color, and design so as not to detract from the existing single-family subdivision located southerly of the subject property Commissioner Borders stated he felt the conclusion of the staff seemed valid, but he would like further time to study the report Commissioner Hickey stated he felt the report was good and was in keeping with the Commission's previous feeling regarding the zoning, therefore, he would like to take action on the matter at this meeting Commissioner Holden stated he felt the report was very good, and he would be in favor of acting on the item at this time Commissioner Worely stated he felt it was a very good report and that the property was in its proper zone at this time Commissioner Borders stated he felt the property should remain R-3 with the Architectural Control Committee having jurisdiction over the property. It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Commission approve the report of the Secretary of the Commission and recommend that the City Council approve the report and direct architectural control over the property as it remains R-3 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT• ALL AYES krid REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF COMMISSION RE: REVIEW OF PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENT OF GENERAL PLAN: The Secretary informed the Commission that in keeping with the Commission's polity to review the elements of the General Plan to keep the Plan up-to-date, the next element to be reviewed was the Park and Recreation Element Discussion ensued regarding various aspects of the existing Park and Recreation program and future plans, with the Commission determining that various questions should be asked of the Cypress Park and Recreation District in order for the Commission to evaluate their effectiveness in the implementation of the Park and Recreation Element The suggested questions were as follows: 1 Does the Park and Recreation District have a fund in its budget used for the acquisition of park sites? 2 If there is no fund for the acquisition of park sites, would the Park and Recreation District be opposed to establishing one? 3 Does the Cypress Park and Recreation District plan on acquiring sites in conformance to the City of Cypress Master Plan of Parks and Recreation? 4 Does the Cypress Park and Recreation District anticipate the construction of any major buildings or facilities in the next two years? 5 What is the time remaining on leases in which the Park District 0 is leasing land for park purposes? It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to direct the Secretary to write a communication to the Park and Recreation District asking the five questions and requesting a reply before the date of the Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council, on May 16th In reply to a question from the Commission, the Assistant City Attorney advised that the Commission's questions would be appropriate and proper Commissioner Holden asked what would happen if they received no reply from the Park and Recreation District The Assistant City Attorney stated they would then have to go to the City Council for further action REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF COMMISSION RE: JOINT MEETING: The Secretary reminded the Commission that a Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council had been scheduled for May 16, 1968 at 4:00 p.m. INQUIRY FROM COMMISSIONER HOLDEN RE: AREA SOUTH OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, AT KNOTT AVENUE: Commissioner Holden asked who was responsible for the maintenance of the streets in the area of Knott Avenue at Orangewood Avenue going south as he had observed quite a bit of debris in the streets and weeds in the parkway The City Engineer advised Commissioner Holden that it was the Public Works Department that was responsible for maintaining the streets and L parkways in the subject area and he would have the area checked WRITTEN COMMUNICATION FROM CITY MANAGER RE: APPOINTMENT TO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT ADVISORY BOARD: The Secretary presented a written communication from the City Manager advising the Commission that the City Council had requested that the Planning Commission designate a memeber as an alternate representative for the Cypress Park and Recreation District Advisory Board. The Secretary then advised the Commission that Commissioner Borders was the present alternate It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried to place this item on the Agenda at this time Commissioner Borders nominated Commissioner Hickey as the alternate, which was seconded by Commissioner Holden, and unanimously carried ADJOURNMENT. After some discussion as to the time of the Joint Meeting and the time of the regular Planning Commission meeting, the Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission to adjourn the meeting to 4:00 p.m. on May 16th It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried that the meeting adjourn at 9.04 p m to May 16, 1968 at 4.00 p m CHAI OF THE PLANNING CO I CHAI OF THE PLANNING CO ISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY 7 TH PL NING COMMISSION MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CYPRESS PLANNING COMMISSION HELD May 16, 1968 An adjourned regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4.01 p m on Thursday, May 16, 1968, in the City Employees' Lounge of the Civic Center, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, Chairman Worley presiding PRESENT Borders, Worley, Hickey, and Smith ABSENT: Holden Also present were Members of the City Council; City Manager/City Clerk, Darrell Essex, Assistant City Attorney, Len Hampel, City Attorney, James Erickson, Administrative Assistant, Gene Poertner, Public Works Director/ City Engineer, Art Schatzeder; and Secretary of the Planning Commission George R Putnam. It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried, the Commission adjourn to Councilmanic proceedings. The City Council and Planning Commission conducted a joint meeting during which general discussion was held regarding the City Beautification Program, the community goals program and other general problems confronting the City Following the discussion, Chairman Worley declared a recess at 5:26 p m until 7:30 in the evening CALL TO ORDER. The Chairman called the meeting back to order at 7:35 p m in the Council Chambers, with the following in attendance PRESENT: Borders, Worley, Hickey, and Smith ABSENT* Holden Also present were: City Attorney, Jim Erickson; Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Art Schatzeder; and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R. Putnam. MINUTES. It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried the Minutes of May 2, 1968 be approved as mailed ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF COMMISSION RE: INITIATION OF ZONE CHANGE ON EAST SIDE OF BLOOMFIELD, SOUTH OF LINCOLN: The Secretary reported that there was existing at the present time, property on the east side of Bloomfield, south of Lincoln Avenue which was zoned M-1 (Light Manufacturing) He informed the Commission that several years prior, the City had attempted to change the zone to an R-4 (High Density Multiple -family Residential) zone, to replace some of the R-4 zoning lost when the Junior College site was chosen At that time, the Commission initiated and recommended approval of the zone change and it was sent on to the City Council At the hearing before the Council, the property owner had appeared stating they had an imminent M-1 development pending on the property, and the rezoning to R-4 would hinder the negotiations. The City Council, therefore, did not change the zone at that time The Secretary further stated that this had taken place three years ago, and, as yet no development had taken place on the property. He indicated that, due to this fact and the fact that the property to the south had developed with single-family homes and to the east with an attractive mobile home park, the staff felt that the property should be rezoned to an R-4 zone. It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Borders, and unanimously carried to direct the staff to advertise a public hearing to change the zone of the subject property from M-1 to R-4. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF COMMISSION RE. GOALS PROGRAM: The Secretary asked the Commission if they had all received a copy of the Goals Program and asked them all to review it before the next meeting if possible He stated that eventually the Commission would be asked to recommend to the City Council that they initiate the Program COMMUNICATION TO PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT: Commissioner Hickey asked the Secretary to explain to the Commission the answer he had received from the Park and Recreation District in reply to the communication directed by the Commission to the District setting forth various questions in regard to the implementation of the Park and Recreation Dlement of the General Plan. The Secretary read portions of the reply from the Park and Recreation District, which answered the Commission's questions. He then proceeded to give his views regarding the reply, stating he would like an interpretation of the answers. He stated they could ask the Park and Recreation Director to appear at the next meeting to interpret the answers Commissioner Hickey suggested that the Commission give the Secretary additional time to study the reply in order to make a recommendation to the Planning Commission The Secretary stated he would meet with Mr Bryant, Director of the Park and Recreation District, to discuss the matter further It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried to direct the Secretary to investigate the matter further and report back to the Commission at the next meeting At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote. TO WIT ALL AYES ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Commission, it was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried the meeting adjourn at 7:55 Am. CHAI OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY OF THE `'LANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD June 6, 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 7.35 p m , in Thursday, June 6, 1968, in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Worley presiding. Due to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and Commissioner Hickey not being in attendance, the Chairman declared a five minute recess The meeting was reconvened at 7:40 p.m PRESENT. Borders, Worley, Hickey, Holden, and Smith ABSENT: None Also present were: Leonard Hampel, Assistant City Attorney, Ray Coakley, Civil Engineer Associate, and George R Putnam, Secretary of the Planning Commission. MINUTES* It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Borders and carried, the Minutes of May 16 1968, be approved as mailed Commissioner Holden indicated that he abstained on the motion since he was absent from that meeting ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Mr Al Roa, 4891 Cerritos, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating that he would like to get a variance in order that he may continue living in a mobilehome which is located on his property. Chairman Worley informed Mr Roa that he would have to file an application with the Planning Department and that the Planning Commission could do nothing for him at this meeting Considerable discussion was held between Mr Roa and the Planning Commission concerning applying for a variance, however, the Planning Commission Secretary informed the Commission that Mr Roa had an equipment rental yard on the property therefore he would have to apply for a zone change, instead of a variance Further discussion was held regarding the zone change on his property, as well as the use The Secretary informed the Commissioners that the equipment rental yard had been put in use on the property after the zone had been changed, therefore, it would not be a non -conforming use, but an illegal use Commissioner Hickey again informed Mr Roa that he would have to apply for either a variance for a zone change at the Planning Department and that the Commission could not take any action on this matter at this meeting There were no further Oral Communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE. ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-169, INITIATED BY CYPRESS PLANNING COMMISSION: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the Public Hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone of certain parcels of land from M-1 (Light Manufacturing) to R-4 (High Density Multiple -family Residential), generally located on the east side of Bloomfield Street, north of the Greenbrook Tract, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission,known as Zone Change No Z-169 The Chairman declared the public hearing open and requested the staff to present its report The Secretary requested that the public hearing be continued until the next regular meeting to be held June 20 1968 It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Borders, and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing until the meeting of June 20, 1968 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE. VARIANCE NO. V-259, F.M. SMITH: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for variance from Section 107 6, A, of the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to permit the construction of a pool in the required front yard setback, including a fence a minimum of 5' in height surrounding said pool as requested by F. M. Smith, 9193 Ethel Street, Cypress, California, known as Variance No V-259 The Chairman declared the public hearing open and requested the staff to present its report. The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-26 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval. The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the requested variance In answer to a question from the property owner at 9173 Ethel, the Secretary indicated that a condition could be added stating that the front gate should be self-closing or locked Discussion was held between the members of the Planning Commission regarding the types of latches on the gare, as well as the height that the latch should be located on the gate Mr James O'Hara, 9194 Ethel, spoke in favor of the pool; however, he indicated he was concerned as to the height of the fence and of the latch on the gate The Secretary indicated that, since the fence was going inside the property line, the property owner could put up any type of fence, however, it must be a minimum of 5 feet and a maximum of 6 feet in height Considerable discussion was held regarding the fencing around the pool Upon the request of Commissioner Hickey, the Assistant City Attorney read the conditions for granting a variance from Section 123 3, A, of the Zoning Ordinance No. 90. Following further discussion, Commissioner Borders indicated th%t he was in favor of the pool in the front yard and feels that this would not be d etrimental to the area. Discussion ensued regarding the use of the front yard for the pool, following which Chairman Worley declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Holden, and unanimously carried, that the Commission adopt Resolution No 420 approving Variance No V-259, subject to the conditions outlined in Staff Report PC#68-26, with the following additions and/or corrections. "1. A five foot high fence with a self -latching gate which shall be kept locked at all times that the pool is not in use, shall be constructed perpendicular to the sidewalk along the east edge of the pool area. This fence will separate the pool area from the entryway " 115. 5. A five foot (5') sideyard setback shall be maintained along the southerly property line " At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: VARIANCE NO. V-260; PETER A. GIOVANNONI, BY THURMAN R. GLOAR. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for variance from Section 121.3, A, of the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 to allow the waiver of a total cf two required parking spaces, carports in lieu of garages, and waiver of four covered parking spaces in an R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) development, generally located on the west side of Graham Street, southerly of Orange Avenue, requested by Peter A. Giovannoni, 1784 W. Alamar, Anaheim, by Thurman R. Gloar, 11162 Bowles Avenue, Garden Grove, known as Variance No V-260 The Chairman declared the public hearing open and requested the staff to present its report. The Secretary read Staff Report PC#68-27 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the requested variance Mr John R Nelson, 9596 Garden Grove Blvd , Garden Grove, spoke in favor of the variance and indicated that all the conditions as read were acceptable Following general discussion, at which time it was pointed out that almost one half of the dwellings were one bedroom, it was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Borders, and unanimously carried, that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 421 approving Variance No. V-260, subject to the conditions as outlined in the Staff Report PC#68-27. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT• ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VARIANCE NO V-218: The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of a request for extension of time for Variance No V-218 for a sign located at the northwest corner of Valley View Street and Orange Avenue, requested by Barry E. Fulton, Agent for Columbia Outdoor Advertising Company The Secretary of the Commission read Staff Report PC#68-28, which outlined the past action taken on the Variance Commissioner Holden indicated that, due to past experiences with the Company, if the variance were extended, that the extension date should be from the time the original variance had expired Following discussion, Commissioner Hickey indicated that he would like to see a letter granting the Variance sent to the tract office with a carbon copy of the letter to go to the Sign Company as well as a copy to the Real Estate Office. The Secretary stated that since the sign was owned by Columbia Outdoor Advertising, that the original copy of the letter should be sent to them with a carbon copy to the tract office It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried to extend Variance No. V-218, subject to the staff recommendation and that the extension time be from the expiration of the original Variance STAFF REPORTS AND DISCUSSIONS. The Secretary read the report from the Traffic Committee regarding the left turn pocket on Cerritos and Ritter Commissioner Holden indicated that he was not the individual who had asked for the study on this problem and that he was not at all happy with the results of the study Ray Coakley, Civil Engineer Associate, informed the Commission that the Engineering Department and Traffic Committee had made a complete study on this matter and found that part of the street was in the City'af Anaheim Commissioner holden indicated that he would like to see the City put in complete street improvements including curb and gutter, rather than only improving the streets The Secretary informed the Commissioners that, at the present time, as the undeveloped land develops, the curb and gutters are put in and dedicated to the City He further indicated that the City does not have the funds to put complete street improvements in throughout the City. Discussion was held regarding the means of financing the street improvements The Secretary and Civil Engineer Associate outlined the means of obtaining funds for the street improvements The Civil Engineer Associate also explained the Arterial Highway Financing Program, Gas Tax Funds, and the use of County funds to the Commissioners. The Secretary informed the Commissioners of the street improvements that are planned for the next fiscal year Further discussion was Held regarding the priority of the street imprnvenents in conjunction with,the amount of funds available ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Mr James Duncan, 9582 Walker Street, Cypress, indicated that he was involved in street improvements on Walker Street and indicated that the improvements were constructed in conjunction with the property owners, City of Cypress and the County of Orange. He stated that the property owners paid for the curb and gutters and dedicated 11' of the street Discussion ensued regarding the street improvements. The Secretary explained the expenditure of County money on improvement of streets. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 10.04 p m ATTEST: E PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR}1AN OF T PLANNING CC►1MMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD June 20 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 7:33 p m , on Thursday, June 20 1968, in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California PRESENT. Worley, Hickey, Holden and Smith ABSENT: Borders Also present were James Erickson, City Attorney, Ray Coakley, Civil Engineer Associate; Gary Kariker, Administrative Intern and George R. Putnam. Secretary of the Planning Commission MINUTES. It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried, the Minutes of June 6, 1968 be approved as mailed ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE. HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO 44; WILLIAM M. GEORGE* The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home located at 10001 St. Francis Circle for an office for a mail order business in educational manuscripts, requested by William M. George, 10001 St Francis Circle, Cypress, California, known as Home Occupation Permit No 44 The Chairman declared the public hearing open. The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-29, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval. The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the request No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the requested Permit. Commissioner Hickey asked what the educational materials consisted of, and was advised by the City Attorney that his question was one that was not within the Commission's authority to ask Commissioner Smith questioned the legal status in regard to the content of the materials The City Attorney advised that the content of the materials would not be a valid consideration during the consideration of the home occupation permit Members of the Commission stated there were various questions they would like to ask the applicant therefore, it was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing for consideration of Home Occupation Permit No. 44 to the next meeting and request the applicant's appearance At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE. HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO 45; MRS WILLIAM M GEORGE: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home located at 10001 St Francis Circle, Cypress, for piano teaching requested by Mrs. William M. George, 10001 St Francis Circle, Cypress, California, known as Home Occupation Permit No 45 The Chairman declared the public hearing open. The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-30, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the request No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the requested Permit. Commissioner Holden suggested that, in the future, the surrounding neighbors be notified of the public hearing when this type of use is proposed which might create a disturbance in the neighborhood. Commissioners Smith, Hickey, and Worley stated they felt the time limits imposed by the conditions would be sufficient to control any such problem There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to approve Home Occupation Permit No 45, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-30, with the following addition* "3 No lessons shall be conducted past 8:00 p m " At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT: ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-169, INITIATED BY CYPRESS PLANNING COMMISSION. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from M-1 (Light Manufacturing) to R-4 (High Density Multiple -family Residential), generally located on the east side of Bloomfield Street southerly of Lincoln Avenue and north of Tract No 6276, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission, known as Zone Change No Z-169 The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open The Secretary reviewed the staff report and advised those present of the action taken at the past meeting He further reported that the owner of a portion of the property Mr DeSutter did have a conditional use permit for the trucking business, in an A-2 zone, which was located on the subject property, the zone was changed to M-1 in 1963, at which time the trucking business became a legal non -conforming use He further stated that, if the zone changed at this time, the trucking business would remain a legal non -conforming use, and as such could remain until May 17 1971. The Secretary further stated that the Planning Department was concerned in zoning the property with a zone that would benefit the property and act as a holding zone, due to the incompatibility of the uses that would be permitted in the existing M-1 zone with the surrounding new residential areas The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed change of zone. Mr Antoine DeSutter, 9242 Bloomfield St , Cypress, addressed the Commission advising them that he owned a portion of the subject property, the remainder of which was owned by Mrs Vandemaele his mother-in-law He then asked what the time limit was for his non -conforming use of the property The City Attorney advised Mr DeSutter as to what type of non -conforming use he would be classified under and that he could continue the existing use of the property until May 17, 1971 There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hnring closed. It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 422 recommending approval of Zone Change No Z-169 to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT• ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE. VARIANCE NO. V-261, FRANCIS W & ELBERTA L HUMPHRIES: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for variance from Section 121 3, B, of the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to allow the reduction in parking requirement for a retail sales business on property generally located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, easterly of Walker Street, in the H -C (Highway Commercial) zone, requested by Francis W & Elberta L Humphries, 9154 E Flower Ave , Bellflower, California, known as Variance No. V-261. The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-31 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Secretary then reported that one written objection had been filed by Mr A E "Pat" Arnold, P 0 Box 37, Cypress California, which stated that if the proposed building was moved to the west, he would not object Mr Francis Humphries, applicant, addressed the Commission advising them of the proposed use of the property, which would be a Louis Ward Magnavox Center and speaking in favor of the request He also stated, in regard to Mr Arnold's suggestion of moving the building to the west, he felt it would put the building too close to the Pup 'N' Taco Mr Louis E Dunn, Jr , President of the Louis Ward Corporation addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the proposal Commissioner Hickey inquired about the storage of any trash and was advised by the applicant of the procedure used in the other store locations Commissioner Holden stated, in regard to the improvement of the alley to the rear of the property, that he did not feel it was right to deny Pup 'N' Taco the use of the alley yet allow the Magnavox Center to improve and use it. Discussion ensued regarding the use of the alley, grading of the property, and construction of a wall between the subject property and the property to the west There being no further written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried the Commission adopt Resolution No 423 approving Variance No V-261, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-31, with the following additions. "6 The trash area shall be located inside the building except on trash removal days. 7 The Variance is limited to the specific use proposed by the applicant, a radio and T V sales operation The Variance shall terminate upon any change of use 8 A wall shall be constructed between the two grades (subject property and property to the west), to the approval of the City staff 9 The drainage and grading of the property shall be approved by the City Engineer." At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT. ALL AYES WRITTEN COMMUNICATION FROM L W WHEATLEY, ADMIN. ASST., NORTH ORANGE COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT RE: ADDITION TO CYPRESS JUNIOR COLLEGE SITE The Secretary presented a written communication from L. W. Wheatley Administrative Assistant of the North Orange County Junior College District informing the Planning Commission of the District's intention to purchase a thirty foot (30') strip of land leading from the Junior College northerly to Lincoln Avenue for roadway access to the Cypress Junior College and requesting the Planning Commission's approval of said acquisition and addition He then outlined the proposed acquisition on the map, and stated it would provide a secondary access to the Junior College property from Lincoln Avenue It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried that the Commission approve the proposed acquisition and addition of the proposed street to the Junior College site REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS. Commissioner Holden inquired as to the status of the Fire Service Study that had been conducted between the City of Cypress and the cities of La Palma and Los Alamitos The City Attorney advised the Commission that an informal commitment from the County had been received stating that the fire station will go in. A further stated that formal action frcm the Board of Supervisors was forthcoming ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Commission, it was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner holden and unanimously carried the meeting adjourn at 9.13 p m to Wednesday July 3, 1968, at 7 30 p m in the Council Chambers "//( OF THE PLANNING C OF T E ING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD July 3, 1968 The adjourned regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 7:34 p m , on Wednesday, July 3, 1968, in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California, Chairman Worley presiding PRESENT: Borders, Worley, Hickey, Holden and Smith ABSENT. None Also present were Leonard Hampel, Assistant City Attorney, Ray Coakley, Assistant City Engineer; Gary Kariker, Administrative Intern. and George R. Putnam, Secretary of the Planning Commission MINUTES. It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried, the Minutes of June 20, 1968 be approved as mailed ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO 44; WILLIAM M GEORGE: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home located at 10001 St Francis Circle, Cypress, for an office for a mail order business in educational manuscripts, requested by William M George, 10001 St Francis Circle, Cypress, Calif , known as Home Occupation Permit No 44 The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open The Secretary reviewed the Planning Staff Report PC#68-29, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval He then reviewed the action taken by the Commission at the last meeting The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the request Mr William M George, 10001 St Francis Circle, Cypress addressed the Commission, stating he was the applicant, and offering to answer any questions the Commission might have and presenting a sample of the manuscripts he would be mailing for the Commission's review He also stated that the only equipment he would have in his home to conduct the business would be a typewriter There being no written commuications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed Following general discussion of the facts presented it was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried, the Commission approve Home Occupation Permit No 44, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#168-29, on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT• ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: VARIANCE NO. V-262, SECURITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for variance from Section 121 3, A, of the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to allow carports in lieu of garages for an R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) development, generally located at 6141 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, requested by Security Development Company, 2020 W. Lincoln Ave , Anaheim, California, known as Variance No. V-262. The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-32, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval. Commissioner Hickey suggested that the Code be amended to allow carports to be constructed in lieu of garages in some cases in the multiple -family zones due to the frequency of variance requests being received for same r.1(' Commissioner Smith suggested that the staff, with the City Attorney, develop the suggested amendment to the Code to submit to the City Council, to allow carports as well as garages in the Multiple -family zone.7# Commissioner Worley stated he felt it was the Planning Commission's duty to consider each variance on its own merits, that each one may have a different solution There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Commissioner Borders and seconded by Commissioner holden to approve Variance No V-262, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-32, with the addition of condition number 14 Commissioner Hickey questioned closing the public hearing when no one from the audience had been asked to speak It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried to reopen the public hearing. The Chairman declared the public hearing open, and apologized if he had not asked for comments from the audience Mr Charles Christian representing Security Development Company, 2020 W. Lincoln, Anaheim, applicant, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the requested variance, stating that they concurred with the staff's recommendation There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Borders, and unanimously carried the Commission adopt Resolution No 424 approving Variance No V-262, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-32, on file in the Planning Department, with the following correction and addition. "5. The architecture shall reasonably conform to the plot plan submitted "14 A six foot high concrete block wall shall be constructed along the northerly property line At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT. ALL AYES Commissioner hickey stated, for the record, he had voted yes, but not on the basis of the developer's belief that garages invite theft, vandalism, etc , but that carports would fit into the proposed development better than garages *' See Minutes of July 18, 1968 meeting WRITTEN COMMUNICATION FROM CITY OF BUENA PARK PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: ZONE CHANGE Z-330: The Chairman announced the next item of business was a written communication from the City of Buena Park Planning Department regarding Zone Change Z-330 to be considered by the Planning Commission of Buena Park on July 10, 1968 The Secretary outlined the area involved in the subject zone change and informed the Commission that the City of Buena Park was requesting the Cypress Planning Commission to express their feelings in regard to the proposed change of zone as a courtesy, due to the subject property being adjacent to the city limits of Cypress Commissioner Smith suggested the communication be received and filed with no comments forwarded Commissioner Hickey stated he would be in favor of making no comment or concurring with the zone change. Commissioner Worley stated he felt the Commission should forward a recommendation, either in favor or against the zone change Commissioner Holden stated he felt the property fronting on Lincoln Avenue should be zoned commercially It was moved by Commissioner Smith to make no recommendation regarding the subject Zone Change Motion died for lack of a second It was then moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried that the Commission recommend to the Buena Park Planning Commission that the property facing on Lincoln Avenue should be zoned commercially, but, that the Cypress Planning Commission would accept a well planned R-2 development At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS. Commissioner Holden inquired about some use being made of the retarding basin during the time of the year that it is not in use He suggested it be offered to the local scouting organizations for camping The Secretary advised the Commission that action was presently underway on the Townscape Program (Urban Environmental Study), by the Planning Department, and that the use of the retarding basin when it is not being used for retarding purposes, was one element that was being studied Commissioner Hickey stated he had received an inquiry regarding the Walker Street widening and asked for information regarding the project The Assistant City Engineer Ray Coakley advised the Commission of the action being taken on the widening of Walker Street, and suggested Commissioner Hickey have the party in question contact the Engineering Department at City Hall to obtain more detailed information ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 9:05 p m CHAI ETARY .1' THE P NING COMMISSION OF THE PLANNING;COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD July 18, 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 7:31 p m. on Thursday, July 18, 1968, in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Worley presiding. PRESENT Borders, Worley, Hickey, Holden and Smith ABSENT: None Also present were. Leonard Hampel, Assistant City Attorney, Ray Coakley, Assistant City Engineer. Gary Kariker Administrative Intern, and George R. Putnam, Secretary of the Planning Commission MINUTES Commissioner hickey stated he would like his statement in paragraph 9 of page 2* clarified as follows. "Commissioner Hickey thought maybe the Commission should consider amending the Code to allow carports to be constructed in lieu of garages in some cases in the multiple -family zones, due to the frequency of variance requests being received for same " Commissioner Smith then stated his statement, following Commissioner Hickey's should be clarified, to state. "Commissioner Smith suggested that the staff, with the City Attorney, develop a study of a possible amendment to the Code to submit to the City Council, to allow carports as well as garages in the Multiple -family zone " It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried, the Minutes of July 3, 1968 be approved as corrected ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. There were no oral communications presented at this time CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 18, R. M. BREES. The Chairman announced the first item of business was consideration of a request for an extension of time for Home Occupation Permit No 18, requested by R M Brees, 5501 Cynthia Circle, Cypress, Calif , to use a portion of the home as an office for a microfilm service The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-33, which outlined the background of the permit and the staff recommendation of approval Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Smith seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Commission extend Home Occupation Permit No 18 for two years, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-33, on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results. TO WIT. ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 19, MARCEL E HUARD. The Chairman announced the next item of business was consideration of a request for extension of time for Home Occupation Permit No 19, requested *As originally submitted to the Planning Commission by Marcel E. Huard 5781 Lime Avenue Cypress California, to use a portion of the home as an office for a refrigeration service business. The Secretary of the Commission read Planning Staff Report PC#68-34, which outlined the background of the Permit and the staff recommendation of approval. Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey, and unanimously carried that the Commission extend Home Occupation Permit No 19 for two years, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-34, on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT. ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF REOUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR HOME OCCUPATIMPERMIT NO. 31, THEODORE I. MC KOWN The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of a request for an extension of time for Home Occupation Permit No. 31, requested by Theodore I McKown, 6421 Belle Avenue, Cypress, Calif , to use a portion of the home for the teaching of classical guitar The Secretary of the Commission read Planning Staff Report PC#68-35, which outlined the background of the Permit and the staff recommendation of approval Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner holden, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried, that the Commission extend Home Occupation Permit No 31 for two years, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-35, on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT* ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE. ZONE CHANGE NO Z-170; ROBERT W & JULIA A HELMS, BY DIVERSIFIED SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-1 (One -family Residential) to C-2 (General Commercial), generally located on the northeast corner of Ball Road and Bloomfield Street, requested by Robert W & Julia A Helms, 4417 County Club Lane, Long Beach, Calif , by Diversified Shopping Centers Inc., 4533 MacArthur Blvd , Newport Beach, Calif , known as Zone Change No Z-170 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary then presented a written communication from the applicant, requesting a continuation of the public hearing to the next regular meeting of the Commission The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed change of zone No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the change of zone It was then moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing for consideration of Zone Change No Z-170 to the next regular meeting of the Commission August 1, 1968. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results* TO WIT. ALL AYES PUBLIC BEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-171; LAWRENCE A. hARVEY, HOMER M. HARVEY, AND CARMEN WARSCHAW, BY LOUIS WARSCHAW• The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of certain parcels of land as follows: Change from P -M (Planned Manufacturing) to R-1 (One -family Residential), Parcels 1 and 2, (as described in application)• and change from R-1 (One -family Residential) to P -M (Planned Manufacturing), Parcel 3, requested by Lawrence A Harvey Homer M Harvey, and Carmen H Warschaw, 417 South Hill Street, Los Angeles, Calif , by Louis Warschaw, (same address) known as Zone Change No Z-171 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-37, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of denial of the change of zone on Parcels 2 and 3, and recommendation of a continuation of the consideration of Parcel 1 to the next regular meeting, so that information in reference to school site location can be determined The report further recommended that the Planning Commission set for public hearing, the rezoning of property located southerly of Katella Avenue, northerly of the Stanton Storm Channel, easterly of Holder Street extension, and westerly of Knott Avenue to a P -M (Planned Manufacturing) zoning district, which could have the future possible effect of balancing the industrial acreage lost in the rezoning of Parcel 1 The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the requested changes of zone Mr Duke E Watson, representing Mr Warschaw addressed the Commission stating that they would agree with the zoning plan as outlined by the Secretary He further stated that they had felt the Stanton Storm Channel would act as a natural buffer zone, but they would go along with the staff's recommendation Commissioner Smith stated he would be in opposition to the rezoning of Parcel 3 from R-1 to P -M, due to the lack of adequate fire protection in the area for a manufacturing use Commissioner Hickey stated he felt the rezoning of Parcel 2, from P -M to R-1 should be denied, but Parcels 1 and 3 should be continued Commissioner Borders stated he agreed with Commissioner Hickey and would like to see Parcel 3 continued, but felt Parcel 2 should be denied due to the noise factor because of the close proximity to the Naval Air Station. The Secretary advised the Commission that, in regard to the noise created by the Air Station, he had contacted the base commander, who had informed him that, at the present time, they were using low performance aircraft, but in the very near future were going to high performance aircraft which would increase the noise factor Commissioner Holden stated he would be opposed to the rezoning of Parcel 2 due to the noise factor of the Air Station, however, he felt Parcel 3 should be changed to P -M because it has railroad access and is bordered by two highways Commissioner Worley stated he was of the same opinion as most of the Commissioners, Commissioner Hickey asked if the applicant would agree to a continuance of the hearing on Parcel 1 and 3 and denial of Parcel 2 Mr Watson addressed the Commission, stating, since the noise factor had been pointed out in relation to Parcel 2, they felt it should be denied He further stated they would agree to a continuance of the hearing on Parcels 1 and 3 The City Attorney advised the Commission that they should take separate action on each Parcel. It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried to close the public hearing on Parcel 2 Chairman Worley declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 425, denying the rezoning of Parcel 2 of Zone Change No Z-171 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT• ALL AYES It was then moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing on Parcel 1 to the next regular meeting of the Commission August 1 1968. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results: TO WIT. ALL AYES It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried to continue the public hearing on Parcel 3 to the next regular meeting of the Commission, August 1, 1968 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results* AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS. Borders, Worley, Hickey, & Smith NOES: 1 COMMISSIONER: Holden ABSENT* 0 COMMISSIONERS: None The Secretary then inquired as to whether the Commission wished to set a public hearing to consider the rezoning of the parcel located southerly of Katella Avenue, northerly of the Stanton Storm Channel, easterly of Holder Street extension, and westerly of Knott Avenue to a P -M zoning district, as recommended in the staff's report It was moved by Commissioner holden seconded by Commissioner Hickey and carried to direct the staff to set a public hearing to consider the rezoning of the parcel, as recommended by the staff At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results* AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Borders, Worley, Hickey, & Holden NOES* 1 COMMISSIONER• Smith ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS• None PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO Z-172; LARWIN COMPANY FOR MR & MRS C. H. FLYNN AND MR. & MRS. F. R. MC BRIEN: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-1 (One -family Residential) to R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) generally located on the southwest corner of Juanita Street and Orange Avenue, requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, Calif , authorized agent for Mr & Mrs C H Flynn and Mr & Mrs F R McBrien, known as Zone Change No Z-172 The Chairman declared the public hearing open. The Secretary of the Commission read Planning Staff Report PC#68-38, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the requested change of zone. Mr. Art Rosenthal addressed the Commission representing the Larwin Company, speaking in favor of the requested zone change stating that the property owners were unable to attend the meeting, therefore, if the Commission so desired, the applicants would be willing to agree to a continuance of the public hearing Mr Vince Devaney, 4532 Marion Avenue, Cypress, Superintendent of the Cypress School District addressed the Commission asking how many units were proposed to be developed in the R-3 development The Secretary advised Mr. Devaney that no development plans had been submitted at this time Mr Phillip Sloan, 9582 Juanita Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating he lived within the immediate vicinity of the subject property and would like to request a continuation of the hearing, due to the fact he had not been notified of the public hearing Chairman Worley advised Mr Sloan that it would be up to the members of the Commission as to whether the hearing were continued Mr John Bosch 9682 Juanita Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating he felt the property should remain R-1, and asked for a continuance of the public hearing to the next meeting in order to gather evidence in opposition and opponents to the zone change Commissioner Holden asked if it were possible to extend the boundary of the area to receive notices to the south Commissioner Hickey then asked if it would be proper to do so The Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission that Section 121 5 of the City Code provided that these property owners within 300' shall be notified and that if the Commission did extend the boundary, they would have to be very careful as to where they would set the limit The Secretary then advised the Commission that they might be setting a precedent if they extended the boundary for this application farther than 300' Commissioner Borders stated he felt a continuance of the public hearing might be in order as it would give the applicants an opportunity to appear in their behalf, as well as time for the opponents to gather and present their testimony He also stated he was interested in what effect the R-3 zoning would have immediately across the street from the Junior College Commissioner Hickey suggested that the Commission direct the staff to investigate the multiple -family zoning around the Junior College as to whether it would help fulfill the need for this type of housing He then stated he would be in favor of continuing the public hearing with the consent of the applicants Commissioner Worley stated he felt the same that no further notice should be given, but he was in favor of continuing the hearing Mr. Rosenthal again addressed the Commission stating that the area was peculiar because it was more or less isolated from the R-1 area, and, if they had not felt it would be compatible with the R-1 uses, they would not have been in favor of changing the zone He also stated they felt the proposed use would not be adverse to the Junior College He stated they would accept a continuance to the next meeting if the Commission wished to do so Mr Sloan again addressed the Commission asking if it would be in order for the residents to organize a petition against the change of zone The Assistant City Attorney advised that a petition would be in order, however, the reasons for the opposition should be clearly stated in the petition, as well as being presented in testimony at the public hearing. Commissioner Hickey asked the staff if the entire frontage along Orange Avenue in the subject area should be included in the R-3 zoning. The Secretary advised Commissioner Hickey that this had been included in the staff's recommendation, that the Commission initiate proceedings to rezone the frontage lying westerly of the subject property It was then moved by Commissioner Hickey seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to continue the public heating for consideration of Zone Change No Z-172 to the next regular meeting of the Commission, August 1, 1968 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VARIANCE NO. V-237, LARWIN COMPANY. The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of a request for extension of time for Variance No V-237 for a sign located at the northeast corner of Cerritos Avenue and St Alban Street, requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Bills, Calif The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-39, which outlined the background of the Variance and the staff recommendation of approval of the extension of time It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Bolden and unanimously carried that the Commission approve the extension, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-39 on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT. ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, TO ADD SECTION 120.2.1, "USES PERMITTED IN ANY ZONE, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR"; INITIATED BY CYPRESS CITY COUNCIL. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to add Section 120.2.1 "uses permitted in any zone subject to approval of the Planning Director ', initiated by the Cypress City Council The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary explained to the Commission the content of the proposed amendment, providing that, in regard to activities such as carnivals, circuses, etc consisting of no more than five (5) days of operation, the Planning Director may approve such applications, with the provision that his decision may be appealed to a higher body The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed amendment No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the amendment Commissioner Borders stated he would be in favor of the proposed amendment There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 426 recommending approval of the proposed amendment to add Section 120 2 1, to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, to the City Council. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT. ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION RE: MEETING PLACE AND TIME OF PLANNING COMMISSION. The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of the adoption of a Resolution setting forth the meeting place and time of the Planning Commission The Assistant City Attorney read the proposed Resolution regarding the meeting place and time of the Planning Commission,and pointed out the only change was in the time, which was broken into two sessions, the first beginning at 4.00 p m , and recessing when the Commission so determines, and the second beginning at 7.30 p m It was moved by Commissioner hickey, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 427, setting forth the meeting place and time of the Planning Commission At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT: ALL AYES REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF COMMISSION RE: WORK PROGRAM & RECONNAISSANCE REPORT FOR TOWNSCAPE AND URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN: The Secretary stated the Work Program and Reconnaissance Report for the Townscape and Urban Design Element of the General Plan had been presented to the Commission for their review and requested that the Commission forward a recommendation by Minute Action, to the City Council regarding the Report Commissioner Worley stated he had reviewed the Report and would be in favor of forwarding a favorable recommendation to the City Council Commissioner Borders stated after briefly reviewing the Report, in general, he would highly recommend the action outlined in the Report. It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconddd by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council act favorably on the Work Program and Reconnaissance Report for the Townscape and Urban Design Element of the General Plan. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 9.07 p m ATTE E P ING COMMISSION CHAI OF THE PLANNINGCOMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD August 1, 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4 20 p m on Thursday, August 1, 1968 in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Worley presiding. PRESENT* Borders Worley, and Hickey ABSENT. Holden and Smith Also present were: Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley, and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R. Putnam. MINUTES. It was moved by Commissioner Hickey seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried the Minutes of July 18, 1968 be approved as mailed CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 21, OTTIS E. BRADLEY: The Chairman announced the first item of business was consideration of a request for renewal of Home Occupation Permit No 21, requested by Ottis E Bradley, 10331 Angela Ave , Cypress, to use a portion of the home as an office for a clean-up hauling and dirt moving business The Secretary of the Commission read Planning Staff Report PC#68-40, which outlined the background of the Permit and the staff recommendation of approval of the extension of time. It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried that the Permit be extended for two years, until July 1, 1970, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-40, on file in the Planning Department CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO 27; R. E. HAGELSTEIN• The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of a request for renewal of Home Occupation Permit No 27, requested by R E Hagelstein, 4251 Garnet Ave. Cypress to use a portion of the home as an office for an equipment rental business The Secretary of the Commission read Planning Staff Report PC#68-41, which outlined the background of the Permit and the staff recommendation of approval It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried that Home Occupation Permit No 27 be extended for a two year period of time subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-41, on file in the Planning Department CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 35, THOMAS B MC CARTER: The Chairman announced the next item of business was consideration of a request for renewal of Home Occupation Permit No 35, requested by Thomas B McCarter, 5742 Belle Avenue, Cypress, to use a portion of the home as an office for a part-time remodeling business. The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC4#68-42, which outlined the background of the Permit and the staff recommendation of approval. It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to approve the renewal of Home Occupation Permit No 35 for a two year period of time, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-42, on file in the Planning Department CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 37, WILLIAM J. BARRETT The Chairman announced the next item of business was consideration of a request for renewal of Home Occupation Permit No 37, requested by William J. Barrett, 5270 Cumberland Drive, Cypress, to use a portion of the home as an office for an air conditioning maintenance and service business The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-43, which outlined the background of the Permit and the staff recommendation of approval. It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner borders and unanimously carried to approve the renewal of home Occupation Permit No. 37 subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-43, on file in the Planning Department It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried to consider Item No 10 on the Agenda at this time REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF COMMISSION RE: REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-180: The Secretary reported that the City Council had requested that Gerald Layer's Use Permit for the "Hofbrau" located at Henry Neishi's shopping center at the southwest corner of Lincoln and Bloomfield be placed upon the Planning Commission's Agenda for revocation The Secretary stated that the applicant had not complied with the conditions of approval, therefore, the Council had asked that the Planning Commission set a public hearing to consider the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit lie further advised the Commission that the necessary action would be to place the item on the Agenda, as requested by the Council, calling for a public hearing at the first meeting in September It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to direct the staff to advertise a public hearing to consider the revocation of Conditional Use Permit No C-180 at the next possible Planning Commission meeting At the request of the Secretary, it was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried to consider staff reports and discussions at this time Discussion ensued regarding items of concern for the Commission as presented by the Secretary RECESS. Following the discussions Chairman Worley declared a recess at 5.30 p m , until 7.30 p m that evening CALL TO ORDER. The meeting was called back to order at 7.30 p m , with the following in attendance* PRESENT Borders, Worley, Hickey, and Holden ABSENT. Smith Also present were• Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel, Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley, Administrative Intern, Gary Kariker, and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam The Chairman informed those present that the first four items listed on the Agenda had been approved during the afternoon session It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried to consider Item No 8 on the Agenda at this time CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-172; LARWIN CO. FOR MR. & MRS. C. H. FLYNN AND MR. & MRS. F. R. MC BRIEN. The Chairman announced the next order of business was continuation of the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-1 (One -family Residential) to R-3 (Multiple -family Residential), generally located on the southwest corner of Juanita Street and Orange Avenue, requested by Larwin Company 9300 Wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills, Calif, authorized agent for Mr & Mrs C l Flynn and Mr & Mrs F R McBrien, known as Zone Change No Z-172 The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open The Secretary reviewed Planning Staff Report PC#68-38, which outlined the nature of the request users in the surrounding areas and staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor of the proposed change of zone. Mr Art Rosenthal, representing Larwin Company, addressed the Commission stating that they were the prospective purchasers of the property to the south of the subject property, speaking in favor of the zone change and outlining the plans they had for the development of the area Mr Phillip Sloane, 9582 Juanita Street addressed the Commission asking for a point of information He asked the maximum density that would be permitted if the property were rezoned to R-3 The Secretary advised Mr Sloane that approximately twenty-five units could be built according to the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance; however the staff was recommending that the Planning Commission initiate an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to increase the rear yard setback requirement for two-story buildings adjacent to an R-1 zone, and, if the amendment were adopted, it would reduce the allowable number of units on the subject property to approximately ten or twelve units Mr John Bouchette, 6301 Rosemary Drive, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating he was against the zone change because it would probably increase the traffic and not be compatible with the R-1 zoning adjacent to the subject property, that he was opposed to having anything south of Orange Avenue zoned R-3 Mr Sloane again addressed the Commission inquiring about the proposed units to be built, type of development it would he, and if there would be an alley on the southerly portion of the property The staff informed Mr Sloane that no definite plans had been submitted for development of the property, therefore, they could not answer his questions Mr A J Farren, 9732 Juanita Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking in opposition to the zone change because of the increase in traffic on Juanita Street Mr. Davon Sholly, 9809 Juanita Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the park proposed to be developed in the subdivision southerly of the subject property Mr. Tony Sagalus 6251 Rosemary Drive, Cypress, addressed the Commission stating he was opposed to the change of zone because of the parking problem that would be created by a multiple -family development, noise, and traffic problem Mr. John Bosch, 9682 Juanita Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the proposed park site in the subdivision southerly, stating, however, that he thought it should be relocated off of Juanita Street. He then stated he was opposed to the zone change because of the increase in traffic on Juanita Street Mr Paul Barry 9662 Juanita St. Cypress, addressed the Commission, stating that it appeared that Juanita Street would become a secondary highway with the increase of traffic from the proposed multiple area, therefore, he was opposed to the R-3 zoning Mr Paul Ligardi 9711 Juanita Street Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking in opposition to the change of zone Mrs Dorothy Farren, 9732 Juanita Street, Cypress addressed the Commission speaking in opposition to the rezoning of the property, stating that the neighborhood did not need a park or apartments Mr Warren Carver, 9782 Juanita Street, Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking in favor cf the proposed park- stating that one was needed in the area and inquiring about the possible traffic problem that would be created by the R-3 development The Secretary stated that if a traffic problem arose, it would be forwarded to the Traffic Committee of the City, wuo would study the problem, in any case, whether the development of the subject property took place or not Mr Carver then stated he was not in favor of the zone Change Mr Sloane again addressed the Commission asking if the Park District had sufficient funds to purchase the land for the park site, to which the Secretary replied that the District had agreed to purchase the subject property under discussion, for a park Mr John Eckle 9652 Juanita St , Cypress, addressed the Commission asking what type development the apartments would be The Secretary advised Mr Eckle that the zoning would only allow a two story development• but that he had suggested to the Commission that they amend the Code to require a 150' setback from any R-1 zone, rather than the present requirement of 50' setback for two story structures Mr Farren again addressed the Commission stating he felt that there was sufficient R-3 zoning in the City Mrs Farren asked if the zone change would be considered in conjunction with the proposed park site, or on its own merits Mr Sloane asked if the proposed development would create a police problem and tax the fire department The Secretary advised Mr Sloane that the Police Department had not indicated there would be any problem and apartments must be constructed to Fire Zone #2 requirements, which were greater than single-family homes Mrs Farren again stated she felt there was no need for a park in the area Mr Solly again addressed the Commission stating that, as evidenced by a petition signed by 59 property owners in the area, a park was needed Mrs Georgia Richie addressed the Commission stating she lived immediately across the street from the park site and asked if any block walls would be constructed in that area, as she would prefer not to have to look across the street only to view block walls. There being no written communications and no further oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed Discussion ensued regarding the Secretary's recommendation of a proposed ordinance to amend the Code to increase the setback in the rear yard for two story apartments adjacent to R-1 zoning Commissioners Borders and Hickey suggested that the Commission recommend that the City Council adopt an urgency ordinance for the increase in setback in order to allow time for a complete study of the setback requirement in t his case Commissioners Borders and Hickey then stated they were in favor of the subject zone change It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried that the Commission adept Resolution No 428 recommending approval of Zone Change No Z-172 to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT. ALL AYES It was then moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried that the Commission recommend to the City Council the adoption of an urgency ordinance for all multiple zones increasing the requirement for rear yard setback for two story apartments when abutting R-1 zoning to 150'. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT• ALL AYES It was then moved by Commissioner Holden to recommend an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to increase the sideyard setback in the R-1 zone on the side of the property having a two story structure to ten feet (10') Motion died for lack of a second Commissioners Hickey and Borders then stated they would be in favor of adding the item to the agenda for the next meeting before taking any action It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried to direct the staff to set a public hearing for the first meeting in September to consider the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to increase the rear yard setback in multiple zones for two story structures when adjacent to R-1 zoning At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT• ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6653, LARWIN COMPANY. The Chairman announced the next item of business was consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6653, consisting of 27 acres, 139 R-1 lots, generally located on the southeast corner of Orange Avenue and Valley View Street, requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-44, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval He then outlined the location of the subdivision and the park site included within the tract Commissioner Borders stated he was very much in favor of the park site Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner hickey, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Commission approve Tentative Tract Map No. 6653 subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-44, on file in the Planning Department, with the following corrections and/or additions: "33. Ornamental block wall with an opening shall be constructed on the west side of the park site, to the satisfaction of the City staff 34 The homes shall either be Greenbrook or Contempo models 35 Dedication or easement for a walkway to the park site, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be provided 36 All utility service meters and panels shall be located on the property on which they serve on the Contempo models " At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT: ALL AYES THE CHAIRMAN DECLARED A FIVE MINUTE RECESS AT 9:15 P.M. MEETING RECONVENED AT 9.20 P M , WITH ALL COMMISSIONERS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF COMMISSIONER SMITH, PRESENT CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-170, DIVERSIFIED SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.: The Chairman announced that the next item of business was continuation of the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-1 (One -family Residential) to C-2 (General Commercial) generally located on the northeast corner of Ball Road and Bloomfield Street, requested by Robert W. & Julia A. helms, 4417 Country Club Lane, Long Beach, by Diversified Shopping Centers, Inc , 4533 MacArthur Blvd , Newport Beach, Calif , known as Zone Change No Z-170 The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-36 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed change of zone Mr. Ranney Draper, representing Diversified Shopping Centers, Inc , 4533 MacArthur Blvd , Newport Beach, addressed the Commission stating they were the representatives of Dr & Mrs Helms, property owner, and speaking in favor of the proposed zone change. He then proceeded to outline the proposed development of the shopping center, studies that had gone into their decision to locate on the subject property, and listed the various leases they had finalized for the proposed shopping center. Mr. Draper then introduced Mr Ed Markson, 777 So Harbor Blvd , La Habra, representing Alpha Beta Markets, who confirmed the fact that Alpha Beta had an active lease with Diversified Shopping Centers, Inc , for a market and explained their reasons for picking this location There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Bolden and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 429 recommending approval of Zone Change No Z-170 to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT. ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-171; LAWRENCE A. HARVEY, HOMER M. HARVEY, & CARMEN H. WARSCHAW, BY LOUIS WARSCHAW: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of certain parcels of land as follows Change from P -M (Planned Manufacturing) to R-1 (One -family Residential), Parcel 1• and change from R-1 (One -family Residential) to P -M (Planned Manufacturing), Parcel 3 (as described in application), requested by Lawrence A Harvey, Homer M Harvey, and Carmen H Warschaw, 417 South Hill Street, Los Angeles, Calif., by Louis Warshcaw (same address) known as Zone Change No Z-171 The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open The Secretary then read a report from the Division of Aeronautics, State of California, which indicated that a school site could be located at the corner of Orangewood and Holder Streets or the corner of Orangewood and Knott, in the vicinity of the subject zone changes, therefore, the staff would recommend approval of the change of zone to R-1 on Parcel 1 Mr Duke Watson, 417 So Hill St , Los Angeles, addressed the Commission representing the applicants and speaking in favor of the requested zone changes, offering to answer any questions the Commission might have Commissioner Borders stated that he felt Parcel 3 should be rezoned from R-1 to P -M and, in regard to Parcel 1, he would be in favor of the change from P -M to R-1 There being no written communications and no oral protest, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner hickey, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 430 recommending to the City Council the rezoning of Parcel 3 from R-1 to P -M At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT. ALL AYES It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and carried, that the Commission adopt Resolution No 431 recommending the rezoning of Parcel 1 from P -M to R-1 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Hickey, Worley and Borders NOES• 1 COMMISSIONER• Holden ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER. Smith REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION RE: NON -CONFORMING USES, BEER BARS: The Secretary reported that the City Council had requested that the Commission consider making beer bars non -conforming uses The Assistant City Attorney then suggested that the Commission set a public hearing to consider the elimination of beer bars as a permitted use in the C-2 (General Commercial) zone Following further discussion as to the action required and whether or not they were already non -conforming uses, it was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried to postpone action on this item until the next meeting of the Commission. Commissioner Holden stated, in regard to the installation of street improvements in front of unimproved property, he had discovered that it could be done through tax assessment Ray Coakley, Assistant City Engineer, explained to the Commission that this is true, that Chapter 27 of the 1911 Act provided for tax assessment for this purpose, however, according to the provisions of this Act, the City must have the right-of-way acquired before they may use this procedure Commissioner Holden then stated he felt a study should be made to see how this could be accomplished Ray Coakley then advised the Commission of the various ways the City could improve the streets Commissioner Holden then asked about the design of the extension of Walker Street, south of Cerritos Avenue Ray Coakley advised the Commission of the progress being made and the alignment of the street, mentioning, however, that several hundred eucalyptus trees bordering the race track parking area would have to be removed due to the alignment of the extension of Walker Street Considerable discussion was held in regard to saving the trees, if possible It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to forwaid a Minute Action to the City Council recommending that the Council withhold any final approval of plans for Walker Street until the Consultants hired by the City for the Urban Environmental Plan have time to consider the problem and forward their recommendations in regard to this situation., Commissioner Holden addressed the Commission regarding the use of the retarding basin for something in addition to its specific function He recommended that any improvement of the facility include the joint use for recreational purposes Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried that the Commission forward a Minute Action to the City Council recommending that the City Council consider the feasibility of using the retarding basin as a joint use for recreational purposes and that any such use be referred back to the Planning Commission for their approval, as part of the General Plan. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m. CHAOF THE PLANNING, OMMISSION ATTE SECRETARY if THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD August 15 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4:15 p m on Thursday, August 15, 1968, in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Vice Chairman Borders presiding PRESENT: Borders, Hickey, and Holden ABSENT: Smith and Worley Also present were Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley; Adminstrative Intern, Gary Kariker; and Secretary of the Planning Commission George R Putnam. MINUTES It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Hickey and unanimously carried the Minutes of August 1, 1968 be approved as mailed ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Discussion was held in reference to the construction of the peripheral wall between the Civic Center and Tract No 6222 Commissioner Holden felt that it should be constructed at the present time to reduce the foot traffic of the workers in the tract from crossing across the landscaped area near the tract It would also reduce the amount of trucks crossing over the City's property onto Tract 6222 No action was taken by the Commission on this item. COMMISSIONER WORLEY ARRIVED AT 4:20 P M. AND TOOK HIS CHAIR ON THE PODIUM AND PRESIDED OVER THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING Commissioner Holden asked that the utility meter situation on the Contempo homes on Tract 6222 be checked into by the Building Department as he felt that the condition in reference to the approval of the Tract was not being complied with, and felt that the meter location should be corrected on the remainder of the homes in the subdivision It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to consider Item No 5 on the Agenda at this time CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 6657; WARREN BAUER: Discussion was held in reference to the proposed subdivision, following which the Commission generally agreed that any action on this item should be postponed until the evening session CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 90, TO INCREASE SIDEYARD SETBACK IN R-1 (ONE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE FOR TWO STORY STRUCTURE: The Chairman announced the next item was consideration of a possible amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to increase the sideyard setback in the R-1 (One -family Residential) zone on the side of the property having 01114 a two story structure to ten (10) feet The Secretary presented a report concerning the item, which was followed by general discussion It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Worley, and carried to take no action on the sideyard setbacks as presently set forth in the Zoning Ordinance At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Borders, Worley, and Hickey NOES. 1 COMMISSIONER: Holden ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER• Smith RECESS Chairman Worley declared a recess at 5 30 p m , until 7.30 p m that evening CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called back to order at 7:30 p m , with the following in attendance: PRESENT* Borders, Worley, Hickey, Holden, and Smith Also present were: City Attorney, James Erickson, Public Works Director Art Schatzeder, Assistant City Engineer Ray Coakley, Administrative Intern, Gary Kariker, and Secretary of the Planning Commission George R Putnam. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE: HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 46; WILLIAM I. MC COY FOR MRS. LEE SANDOVAL• The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home located at 10402 Longden Street for a phone service for a moving business, requested by William I McCoy (owner of business), for Mrs. Lee Sandoval 10402 Longden Street, Cypress, known as Home Occupatinn Permit No 46 The Chairman declared the public hearing open and requested the staff to present its report. The Secretary reviewed Planning Staff Report PC#68-45, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of denial of the application. The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor of the application. It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Smith, and unanimously carried, to close the public hearing The Chairman declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Commissioner Hickey, seconded by Commissioner Smith, and unanimously carried, to deny Home Occupation Permit No. 46. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT. ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO Z-173; INITIATED BY CYPRESS PLANNING COMMISSION• The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-1 (One -family Residential) to P -M (Planned Manufacturing), generally located southerly of Katella Avenue, northerly of the Stanton Storm Channel, easterly of Holder Street extension, and westerly of Knott Avenue, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission, known as Zone C hnge No Z-173 The Chairman declared the public hearing open and requested the staff to present its report The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-46 which outlined the zone change and staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor or in opposition to the subject zone change Mr Duke Watson, 417 South Hill St., Los Angeles, addressed the Commission in opposition to the zone change He presented maps of the subject area to the Commission for their review He further indicated that his company had been negotiating with several commercial firms regarding the P -M zone in the area however they felt this area would not support a large commercial area at this time, but would look into the matter further if the subject area were developed R-1 Discussion was held between members of the Planning Commission and Mr. Watson regarding the potential of the commercial area in relation to the R-1 zone It was moved by Commissioner Hickey and seconded by Commissioner Borders that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 432 recommending approval of Zone Change No Z-173 to the City Council Commissioner Smith indicated for the record that he was in favor of the zone change and felt that the Commission would be willing to a proposal for rezoning of the easterly half of this area to R-1 at a future date At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results* TO WIT. ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-213, PAUL W. CHRISTENSEN• The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a single-family dwelling with attached interior design studio in the H -C (Highway Commercial) zone, generally located at 9191 Bloomfield Street, requested by Paul W Christensen, 9191 Bloomfield Street, Cypress, known as Conditional Use Permit No C-213 The Chairman declared the public hearing open and requested the staff to present its report The Secretary reviewed Planning Staff Report PC#68-47 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval with recommended conditions The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the subject conditional use permit It was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Hickey, and unanimously carried to close the public hearing. The Chairman declared the public hearing closed Commissioner Borders stated that after reviewing the plans of the subject permit he felt this would be a logical use for the property and would be an asset to the area, therefore, he would be in favor of Conditional Use Permit No C-213 General discussion was held regarding the required Conditions following which it was moved by Commissioner Borders and seconded by Commissioner Hickey that the Commission adopt Resolution No 433 recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit No C-213 to the City Council, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-47, on file in the Planning Department Prior to voting on the motion, Commissioner Holden questioned regarding the number of spaces shown of the plans and questioned the need for additional parking spaces In answer to Commissioner Holden's questions, the Secretary indicated that condition No 5 indicated that 6 spaces be provided At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results: AYES 4 COMMISSIONERS Borders, Worley, Hickey and Holden NOES: 1 COMMISSIONER: Smith ABSENT* 0 COMMISSIONERS None PUBLIC HEARING RE. VARIANCE NO. V-263; JOHN R. NELSON FOR SHIRLEY M. GORDON: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for variance from Section 121 3,A, of the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to permit a reduction in the required number of parking spaces by six (6) spaces for an R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) development, generally located on the west side of Graham Street, 400' south of Orange Avenue, requested by John R Nelson, 9596 Garden Grove Blvd , Garden Grove, California, for Shirley M Gordon, 7762 Walker Street, La Palma, California, (property owner), known as Variance No V-263 The Chairman declared the public hearing open and requested the staff to present its report The Secretary reviewed Planning Staff Report PC#68-48 which outlined the nature of the request, staff recommendation of approval, and recommended conditions of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the subject Variance Mr John R Nelson, 9596 Garden Grove Blvd , Garden Grove, addressed the Commission questioning regarding the sub -standard lot The Secretary indicated that condition No 1 states that a Division of Land application shall be submitted to the Planning Department for the creation of a legal lot on the northerly pprtion of the subject property which would eliminate the sub -standard lot Commissioner Borders stated that since 40% of the dwelling units will be one -bedroom apartments, he felt that this would be a reasonable reduction and therefore, would be in favor of the request The Chairman declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Smith and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 434 approving Variance No V-263, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-48, on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results TO WIT. ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6657, WARREN BAUER: The Chairman announced the next item of business was consideration of Tentative Tract Map No. 6657, consisting of 37 42 gross acres, 213 R-1 lots, generally located at the southeast corner of Cerritos Avenue and Holder Street, requested by Warren Bauer, 12372 Foster Road Los Alamitos, Calif The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-49, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval He then outlined the location of the subdivision and the park site included within the tract In answer to questions from Commissioners Hickey and Borders, the Public Work Director indicated that condition No 10 has been required of developers, however, this is the first time it has been listed as a condition He further indicated that it is the intent to include this condition on all future tentative tract maps Commissioner Holden questioned regarding condition No. 25, following which the Secretary indicated that the second sentence would be deleted Considerable discussion was held among the Commissioners and Secretary regarding the size of the lots, the setbacks of the houses and the location of the park as provided by the developer in the subdivision Further discussion was held regarding the elevations not being shown and the possibility of having the developer correct the map. Commissioners Borders and Hickey indicated that they would like to see the map continued in order to allow the developer to redesign or rework the tentative tract map, following which it was moved by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Holden and unanimously carried to continue Tentative Tract Map No 6657 until the next meeting of the Commission, with the consent of the developer At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT• ALL AYES The Chairman indicated that Item No 6 on the agenda was considered in the afternoon session. REPORT FROM SECRETARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION RE. NON -CONFORMING USES, BEER BARS: The Secretary requested City Attorney James Erickson to present the report The City Attorney outlined the nature of the request and indicated that at the present time a beer bar is located in a C-2 zone with a Conditional Use Permit• however, if the Commission desires to change the Zoning Ordinance in order to prohibit beer bars in a C-2 zone a public hearing date would have to be set Discussion was held among the Commissioners in reference to the types of beer bars, and they expressed their concern on cleaning up the beer bars It was moved by Commissioner Smith and seconded by Commissioner Borders to set a public hearing as designated by the City Attorney Commissioner Hickey indicated that he would like to have a study made by the Planning Department regarding this matter At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT• ALL AYES ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time Commissioner Holden questioned regarding the status of the Freeway proposal The Secretary outlined the public hearing held regarding the freeway route for the Route 39 Freeway and indicated that the public hearing was closed and a decision should be made sometime in October or November Commissioner Holden indicated that the Commission should be kept abreast of this proposal for future zone changes. ADJOURNMENT: The Chairman declared the meeting adjourned at 8:55 p m CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ARY O THE I G COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD September 5, 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4.06 p m , on Thursday, September 5, 1968, in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Worley presiding PRESENT. Borders, Cardoza, Davis, Worley, and Evans ABSENT None Also present were• City Manager Darrell Essex, Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel. Public Works Director/City Engineer, Arthur Schatzeder, Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley,and Administrative Intern, Gary Kariker MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Worley and unanimously carried the Minutes of August 15, 1968 be approved as mailed. STAFF REPORTS AND DISCUSSIONS• The Chairman announced the next item of business was staff reports and discussions and asked the City Manager to present any reports not listed on the Agenda The City Manager presented the notice of tue Southern California Planning Congress meeting to the Commission and advised them to contact the Secretary in the Planning Department to make reservations if they wished to attend The City Manager then reported that the City Council had received the Planning Commission Minute Action regarding the extension of Walker Street and the existing eucalyptus trees bordering the race track He reported that the City Council had authorized the urban consultant to take a close look at that area and put it on a high priority so their report will be received prior to the final design of Walker Street The City Manager further reported that the City Council was in receipt of the Minute Action of the Planning Commission recommending a joint utilization of the sump area for recreational purposes upon its ultimate development. He reported that the City Council had requested the staff to continue with their studies in regard to the utilization of the sump area for recreational purposes In regard to the Planning Commission's Minute Action recommending the adoption of an urgency ordinance increasing the rear yard setback for two story multiple -family developments, he advised that no action was taken by the Council as they had desired further information from the Planning Director who had been on vacation, therefore, they had continued their consideration to the next meeting The City Manager then presented a written communication from the City of Buena Park Planning Department in regard to a proposed zone change from A-1 to R-2 within the City of Buena Park, but immediately adjacent to the City of Cypress, advising that the public hearing for consideration of this zone change would be held September 11, 1968, and asking for any comments of the City He advised that the location of the subject zone change was the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Holder Street, which was an area the City cf Cypress had felt should be reserved for commercial development, due to its close proximity to the Cypress Junior College and frontage on Lincoln Avenue He reported that the staff had hoped the area would be tied -in together with our Highway Commercial (H -C) zoning for a community college shopping center complex in the future He then recommended that the item be placed on the Agenda for discussion It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried to place the item on the Agenda for discussion at this time Commissioner Borders stated he felt, because of the close proximity to the junior college, the property should be maintained in a commercial zone classification, also because of the Lincoln Avenue frontage, with the high traffic count. He further stated he felt the Commission should inform Buena Park that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress feels the area should be maintained in commercial use Commissioner Worley concurred with Commissioner Borders' comments Commissioner Borders further stated he felt the City of Buena Park should be informed of the urban environmental study being conducted for the City of Cypress by the planning consultant, Eckbo, Dean, Austin, and Williams, which might have a bearing on the use of the property It was moved by Commissioner Davis, seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried that the Planning Commission advise the City of Buena Park that they were in favor of maintaining the commercial zoning presently on the property CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 30, VERA DOBSON• The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of a request for renewal of Home Occupation Permit No. 30, to permit the sewing of custom-made draperies,slip covers, and bedspreads in a home located at 4544 Patricia Circle, requested by Vera Dobson, 4544 Patricia Circle, Cypress, California The City Manager presented the Planning Staff Report PC#68-50, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carriedthat the Commission approve the renewal of Home Occupation Permit No 30, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-50, on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results* TO WIT. ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO 33, FRANK M HOLLISTER: The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of renewal of Home Occupation Permit No 33, to allow a mail order business to be conducted from a home located at 4234 Larwin Avenue, requested by Frank M Hollister, 4234 Larwin Avenue, Cypress, California. The City Manager presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-51, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval In response to a question from Commissioner Evans, the Assistant City Attorney explained the regulations governing home occupation permits Commissioner Borders inquired about discussions held in the past regarding turning the matter of approval of home occupation permits over to the Planning Director. The City Manager suggested the matter be discussed at a future joint meeting with the City Council It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried to approve the renewal of liome Occupation Permit No 33, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-51 on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results* TO WIT. ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF RENEWAL OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 38, WILLIAM M BROWN: The Chairman announced the next item of business was consideration of the renewal of Home Occupation Permit No 38, to allow the use of a portion of a home located at 10541 Diane Circle, to receive phone calls and mail in reference to the operation of his business, which is a general contractor, requested by William M Brown, 10541 Diane Circle, Cypress, California The City Manager presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-52, which outlined the background of the Permit and the staff recommendation of approval Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Evans, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza and unanimously carried to approve the renewal of Home Occupation Permit No 38, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-52 on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT ALL AYES It was generally agreed to move to discussion of Item No 6 on the Agenda which was Tentative Tract Map No 6657 The City Manager requested permission to withhold the discussion of this item until later in the meeting as the revised map had not yet been received. It was then generally agreed to move to Item No 7 on the Agenda, which was Tentative Tract Map No 6719 CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6719, LARWIN COMPANY. The City Manager presented the subject Tract Map 6719 and outlined the proposed development including the location of the tract, at the southwest corner of Orangewood Avenue and Valley View Street, the proposed park site within the tract, and special problems in regard to drainage and sewage disposal General discussion of the map ensued, following which it was recommended by the City Manager that action be withheld until the evening portion of the meeting It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza and unanimously carried to continue consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6719 until the evening portion of the meeting The revised map for Tentative Tract 6657 having been received, it was generally agreed to proceed to discussion of Item No 7 on the Agenda CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6657, CLASSIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. The City Manager presented the subject Tract 6657 and outlined the proposed development of the subdivision located at the southeast corner of Cerritos Avenue and Holder Street. Discussion ensued regarding the proposed subdivision, following which, it was generally agreed to withhold action until the evening portion of the meeting RECESS Chairman Worley declared a recess at 5:37 p.m. until 7:30 that evening. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called back to order at 7 32 p m , with the following in attendance: PRESENT: Borders, Cardoza, Davis, Worley, and Evans ABSENT: None Also present were. City Manager, Darrell Essex, Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel, Public Works Director/City Engineer, Arthur Schatzeder, Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley, and Administrative Intern, Gary Kariker INTRODUCTION OF NEW PLANNING COMMISSIONERS• Chairman Worley introduced new Planning Commissioners, Vickie Evans, "Jay" Davis, and Robert Cardoza, who had been appointed by the Mayor and City Council to fill the vacancies created by the expiration of Commissioners Henry Hickey and Ernest Holden's terms and resignation of Commissioner John Smith ORAL COMMUNICATIONS• There were no oral communications presented at this time Chairman Worley then announced that the first three items on the Agenda had been acted on at the afternoon session of the Commission meeting PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-214; CARL F TRAUTMAN (OWNER), BY AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 295: The Chairman announced the first item of business in the evening session was a public hearing to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the American Legion to use a building located at 9739 Walker Street, for a meeting hall and sale of alcoholic beverages, requested by Carl F Trautman, 9761 So Walker Street, Cypress, (owner), by American Legion Post #295, 9739 So Walker St Cypress, California, known as Conditional Use Permit No C-214 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The City Manager read Planning Staff Report PC#68-53, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff's recommended conditions, if approved The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed use Commissioner Evans inquired as to whether the alcoholic beverages would be sold only to members of the American Legion Post or also their guests The City Manager advised the Commission that the alcoholic beverage license would be exercised by the American Legion Post, but they could lease the hall to other organizations who could purchase the alcoholic beverages Commissioner Cardoza inquired about the size of the building and the limitation as to the number of people who could occupy the building at one time, and whether there was adequate parking for the use The City Manager advised the Commission that they would be required to comply with the occupancy load requirements of the Building Code, and, in reference to the parking, the Commission could add a condition to those recommended,requiring they meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance in regard to off-street parking Commissioner Borders stated he would be in favor of granting the Use Permit, subject to the conditions recommended, provided a condition be added stating "all parking requirements shall be met" There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed For the benefit of the new Commissioners the Assistant City Attorney reviewed the Criteria, set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, that the Commission must consider in their deliberation of Conditional Use Permits It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza and unanimously carried, that the Commission adopt Resolution No 435 approving Conditional Use Permit No C-214, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-53 on file in the Planning Department, with the following addition. '11 The parking space requirements of the Zoning Ordinance shall be met " At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL OSE PERMIT NO C-215; LARWIN COMPANY. The Chairman announced the next item of business was a public hearing to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a sales office and model site complex located on the west side of Valley View Street, approximately 305' north �f the City of Garden Grove, requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, Calif , authorized agent for Mr. and Mrs Ale Tuinhout, known as Conditional Use Permit No C-215 The Chairman declared the public hearing open. The City Manager presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-54, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval. The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed Permit Mr Lee Goldin representing the applicant addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the request and explaining the proposed development of the model site He then stated they would agree with all the conditions as recommended by the staff Commissioner Cardoza asked about the lighting of the parking area for the model site Mr. Goldin stated that there would be no high intensity lighting of the parking area Commissioner Borders stated that, if the proposed model site were maintained as well as the existing "Greenbrook" model site, he would be very much in favor of the request There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Commissioner Evans, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 436 approving Conditional Use Permit No. C-215 subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-54, on file in the Planning Department, with the following additions and/or corrections. "2 A bond shall be posted with the City of Cypress guaranteeing removal of the sales office any play areas parking areas, or other facilities or improvements which will not ultimately be used in conjunction with the total development of the Tract 6719 This bond amount shall be established by the City staff Delete No 9 and re -number 10 through 12 accordingly Add New #12 "12. The Conditional Use Permit is subject to the approval of Tentative Tract Map No 6719 " At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6657, CLASSIC DEVELOPMENT CORP.: The Chairman announced the next order of business was continuation of consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6657, consisting of 37.42 gross acres, 213 R-1 lots, generally located at the southeast corner of Cerritos Avenue and holder Street, requested by Classic Development Corp., P 0 Box 247, Garden Grove, Calif The City Manager read Planning Staff Report PC#68-56, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff's recommended conditions Mr. Mark Gumbiner, representing the developer of the tract, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the proposed subdivision. Mr Jack Ransford, representing Classic Development Corp , proposed developer of the subdivision, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the proposed subdivision Commissioner Evans inquired as to whether there would be a need for the developer to apply for variances on some of the lots as they did not comply with the Code requirements The Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission that, under the Optional Design Standards of the Subdivision Ordinance no variances would be required, the plan, as submitted, would be approved with the variations from the Code Commissioner Borders stated he was reluctant to approve the map allowing such small rear yards as were shown on the map in some instances. The City Manager and City Engineer stated the staff would not be in favor of the 10' rear yards depicted on some of the lots; that they felt the developer could located some of their two-bedroom homes on those lots in question, or, as suggested by the City Engineer, design a new house to fit onto the lots Commissioner Borders then stated he felt that a dangerous intersection had been created on the east side of the Tract, due to the off -set at Ferne Avenue Commissioner Borders then stated he felt that he would recommend approval, but not with the small rear yeards for some of the lots depicted on the map It was moved by Commissioner Borders to approve Tentative Tract Map No 6657, subject to conditions 1-27, as outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-56, 4427 reading as follows: "27 A one foot (1') lot shall be offered for dedication to the City on each side of the lot indicated as "Not a Part" on "B" Street "; however, not approving Model #103-C, with the 10' rear yard setbacks He then asked the applicant if they would like a postponement in order to change the layout to conform to this requirement Mr. Gumbiner stated that the developer would put six of the two-bedroom houses on the lots in question, thus conforming to the Code requirements Commissioner Davis stated he would prefer to have the street located on the easterly side of the Tract aligned with Ferne Avenue Considerable discussion ensued regarding the alignment of the street Commissioner Borders re -stated his motion The Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission that, due to the Optional Design Standards, the corrections requested on the plot plans should be more precise. He suggested that the item be continued to allow the developer to re -submit a corrected plot plan, that from a legal point of view the streets should be precisely located on the map Commissioner Borders than stated that, if the staff felt the job in the alignment of the streets would not be a detriment to the traffic flow and would not create a traffic problem, he would be in favor of approving the map as submitted, but the staff would have to assure him of these points Following further discussion Commissioner Borders withdrew his original motion and moved bo continue the item to the next meeting of the Commission. The Assistant City Attorney advised that it would be preferable to obtain the consent of the developer to the continuation Commissioner Davis then suggested relocating the street in question to the north to increase the off -set created to 46' for the 60' street Further discussion of the feasibility of the suggestion ensued, following which, it was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried to approve Tentative Tract Map No 6657, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-56, on file in the Planning Department, with the following changes and/or additions: "21 Optional design consideration shall be based on the gross area of the Tract and applied to the dedication and improvement of the park site " "27 A one foot (1') lot shall be offered for dedication to the City on each side of the lot indicated as "Not a Part" on 'B" Street 28 The model No 103-2 BDR. or equivalent meeting the Code, shall be located on the twelve (12) lots referred to as being in conflict with the setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No 90 29 The entrance of "E" Circle to Ferne Avenue shall be off -set an additional 46' to the north " At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results' TO WIT ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6719, LARWIN COMPANY. The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of Tentative Tract Map No. 6719 consisting of 58 8 gross acres, 344 R-1 lots, generally located at the southwest corner of Orangewood Avenue and Valley View Street, requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, Calif. The City Manager read Planning Staff Report PC#68-55, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval Mr Lee Goldin, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the proposed subdivision stating they agreed with the conditions recommended except for conditions 5, 7, and 15 He then presented renderings of the type of homes to be constructed in the new subdivision Commissioner Evans stated she was concerned with the dairy sales operation, indicated as Lot No 344 in the southerly portion of the Map, fronting on Valley View Street which existed under a Conditional Use Permit, and any change that might take place due to the development of the tract The Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission that the best method to control the use, if any changes occurred, would be through the modification of the conditional use permit. The City Manager advised the Commission that in checking the existing Use Permit for the dairy sales, it was determined that there would be no change in the operation or size of the property on which it is located Commissioner Davis stated, in regard to Lot No 343, it appeared to be reserved for a possible service station site, and asked the developer to explain the size and shape of the lot. Mr Goldin indicated that it was a possibility that it might be a service station; although they might want to increase the size of the area for additional commercial development other than a service station indicating that it probably would be enlarged Commissioner Borders stated he felt it was not a proper location for a service station, that he would be in favor of the map except for that corner The City Engineer stated, in regard to the developer's objection to condition number 5 requesting the T I figure for streets with 36' of paving be changed from 4 0 to 3.5• that the 4.0 figure was recommended on the basis of a recommendation from the State Division of Highways which was determined by a committee of city engineers whose concensus of opinion was to change to 4 0 as the minimum of T I for streets within subdivisions He stated after reviewing this information he had decided to adopt the recommendation and require it on all future tract maps. Mr Goldin stated he did not feel it was proper to increase the T I factor based on the information presented by the City Engineer Considerable discussion ensued regarding the recommended condition #5 Commissioner Worley and Davis stated they felt the City Engineer's recommendation should be followed. The City Manager advised the Commission that the staff would have no objection to the requested changes in recommended conditions 7 and 15 The Assistant City Attorney advised, in regard to the discussion of a possible service station site on Lot 343, that the tract map must be considered under its existing zoning which is residential• that the Commission may not anticipate a zone change on that specific lot Commissioner Cardoza stated based on the Assistant City Attorney's statement he would be in opposition to the particular design of the corner lot indicated as Lot 41343, and suggested a continuance of the matter to allow the developer to present their proposal for increasing the area, as mentioned Commissioner Borders stated he felt the overall plan was good except for that corner, which, as it existed, was unsuitable for R-1 development He stated he did not feel this was good planning, and, based on this, he was not in favor of the submitted map At the request of the Commission, the Assistant City Attorney advised them of the various actions they could consider Commissioner Cardoza asked Mr Goldin if he would consider re -submitting the map showing the development of the corner indicated at Lot 343 into R-1 lots Mr. Goldin then stated he did not feel the Commission should consider the corner until the zone change is submitted and he felt this use was proper at this time He further indicated that they could show he lots as developed into 2 lots for R-1 use Commissioner Borders stated he felt the item should be postponed to the next meeting so that the developer could present a revised plan showing the development of the piece in question as R-1 lots It was moved by Commissioner Borders to continue consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6719 to the next meeting of the Commission The Assistant City Attorney suggested that the Commission request the consent of the developer to the continuance. Mr Goldin stated he would not be happy with it, but he would consent to the continuance if the Commission so desired Mr Goldin then requested that the Commission reconsider their previous action on the Conditional Use Permit for the model site where they had imposed the condition that it be subject to the approval of the subject tract map, which would allow them to proceed with their plans for the model site Discussion ensued regarding the request, following which Commissioner Borders re -stated his motion to continue consideration of Tentative Tract Map No. 6719 to the next regular meeting of the Commission, to allow the developer to revise the map, which was seconded by Commissioner Cardoza At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results. TO WIT. ALL AYES ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 10.30 p m RMAN ATTEST: ACTING SECRETARY OP'THE PLANNING COMMISSION F THE P ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD September 19, 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4 03 p m , on Thursday, September 19, 1968, in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Vice Chairman Borders presiding PRESENT Borders, Cardoza, Davis and Evans ABSENT. Worley Also present were City Attorney, James Erickson, Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley, Administrative Intern, Gary Kariker, and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam MINUTES* It was moved by Commissioner Cardoza, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried the Minutes of September 5 1968 be approved as mailed STAFF REPORTS AND DISCUSSIONS: The Vice Chairman announced the next item of business was staff reports and discussions and asked the Secretary to present any reports not listed on the Agenda. The Secretary reported to the Commission that the City Council had requested that the Planning Commission designate one of their members to be the alternate representative to the Cypress Park and Recreation District Advisory Board to replace Ex -Commissioner Hickey He advised the Commission that they could either volunteer or go by appointment In response to a question from Commissioner Evans, the Secretary explained the function and operation of the Cypress Park and Recreation District in the City CHAIRMAN WORLEY ARRIVED AND TOOK HIS CHAIR ON THE PODIUM AND PRESIDED OVER THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING Following further discussion, Chairman Worley recommended and the Commission concurred that Commissioner Cardoza be recommended to the City Council for appointment as the alternate representative to the Cypress Park and Recreation District Advisory Board RECESS: Chairman Worley declared a recess at 5:45 p m until 7:30 p m that evening CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called back to order at 7:30 p m , with the following in attendance: PRESENT* Borders, Cardoza, Davis, Worley & Evans ABSENT None CHAIRMAN WORLEY DECLARED A FIVE MINUTE RECESS AT 7.32 P.M., TO ALLOW THE SECRETARY TO OBTAIN SOME PAPERS FROM HIS OFFICE MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 7:37 P M , WITH ALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Also present were: City Attorney, James Erickson, Assistant City Engineer Ray Coakley Detective Jack Straska, Administrative Intern, Gary Kariker, and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. Richard Gruettner, 4451 Myra Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Commission regarding the Conditional Use Permit the Commission had acted upon for the American Legion Post, stating they felt the conditions imposed by the Commission should be reconsidered, as they were out of proportion to the request as they would, in effect be asking the landlord to spend an amount almost equal to $12 000 to bring the building to meet City standards. Mr Carl Trautman, 9761 So Walker St Cypress, addressed the Commission stating he was the owner of the property and building referred to in the Conditional Use Permit for the American Legion Post He stated it would be financially impossible for him to meet the conditions imposed by the Commission, that he would be willing to make some minor changes in the building to meet the safety requirements for the number of people it would hold, but that is as far as he would want to go John Bodie, 9682 Juanita St , Cypress addressed the Commission stating he was a member of the American Legion Post and he felt that the Post had done quite a bit to contribute to the City of Cypress, therefore, they should have 0 a little more consideration in their request He stated that the building had been used for the city hall a number of years ago and met the code requirements then and he did not see why it would not meet the requirements now. Marie O'Donnell 4351 Nestle St., Cypress, addressed the Commission speaking as a member of the Post, stating she felt the Commission was hurting the American Legion Post by imposing these conditions not the property owner, because he could rent the building to someone else, that they had done a lot for the City and tried to abide by the laws by using the proper procedures to apply for the alcoholic beverage license and permits required by the City The City Attorney advised the Commission that, legally, they could not reconsider a decision previously made at the level of the Commission; that the appropriate procedure is to file an appeal to the City Council He stated that the City Council could then consider the conditions and determine the action they wish to take He continued, advising the Commission that the notice of action taken had been mailed on September 12th, therefore, the applicants would have twelve days after that through the 24th, in which to file an appeal and then be heard by the City Council PUBLIC HEARING RE. REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-180; GERALD M. LAYER: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider the revocation of Conditional Use Permit No C-180, (Gerald M Layer, 2731 Whidby Lane, Anaheim, applicant), to allow the service of alcoholic beverages on the premises at 4114 Lincoln Avenue Cypress• said revocation as provided in Section 120 8, "TERMINATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT', of the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission, upon request of Cypress City Council The Chairman declared the public hearing open. The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-57, which outlined the nature of the item, its origination and the reasons for same Detective Straske, of the Police Department, then presented a report outlining the various police problems created by the subject operation, a verbatum transcript of which is on file in the Planning Department. Chairman Worley asked how the number of complaints received regarding other beer bars in the City compared to those received on the subject beer bar Detective Straske replied that beer bars created more of a police hazard than any other business and takes up most of their time This is due to the nature of the business; that they didn't have this type of problem with the cocktail lounges or steak house -type establishments He stated he felt this was due to the type of clientele they attracted The City Attorney asked, for the record, how many years experience Detective Straske had as a peace officer, to which Detective Straske replied "six years" The City Attorney then asked what Detective Straske's functions and duties were in the Cypress Police Department. Detective Straske stated that he was working as a Detective through the Chief's office• that he conducted investigations for the Chief of Police and was representing him at this meeting. He further stated he conducted background investigations on applicants, agencies and bars The City Attorney then asked Detective Straske if he personally conducted or supervised the investigation of the beer bar under discussion to which Detective Straske replied that he had personally conducted the investigation Commissioner Borders stated that the impression he had obtained other than the fact that it is creating a problem for the Police Department in attempting to control it, was that it apparently would be classified under number 5 of Section 120.8 of the Zoning Ordinance ---"The use for which the approval was granted has been so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health or safety, or so as to constitute a nuisance " He stated that it appeared to him that the subject business has deteriorated since the time the Conditional Use Permit had been issued, therefore, he thought the revocation would be in order Chairman Worley stated he felt the same way, that he had been on the Commission at the time the Permit was granted and that the Commission had been impressed at the time with the applicant's proposal He stated that the applicant had presented drawings of the buildings and the layout of the steakhouse and had stated they wanted a family place where the wives and husbands could get together, play pool and have dinner; that it was a beautiful picture they had shown the Commission He continued, stating that he concurred with Commissioner Border's statement, that it is not what the applicant had told the Commission at that time, that they had "sold the Commission down the river", it was a fraud, it was not what they said they were going to do, therefore, he was in favor of revoking the Permit. Commissioner Cardoza stated that, although the Commission was trying to encourage business to come into the City of Cypress and promoting commercial development wherever possible, and the Section did contain the word "fraud" it seemed that it was a matter of circumstance Although the original conditions did not state what the intent was, it appeared that the original intent was that the use be more of the family type rather than what it had turned out to be, therefore, it did not appear to be favorable to continue this type of operation Chairman Worley stated that his interpretation of it being a "fraud" was based on the fact that the pictures presented to the Commission at the time the original Permit was granted never came into being, that was why he had used the term "fraud" There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 437 recommending to the City Council the revocation of Conditional Use Permit No C-180 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT• ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE: AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, AMENDING DEFINITION OF THE WORD "RESTAURANT" AND ADDING DEFINITIONS OF "COCKTAIL LOUNGE" AND "BAR": The Chairman announced the next item of business was a public hearing to consider amending the definition of the word "Restaurant" and adding definitions of "Cocktail Lounge" and "Bar", in Section 102 of Ordinance No 90, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission at the request of the City Council. The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-58, which outlined the nature of the proposed amendment and the staff recommendation of approval He then explained that the proposed amendment would, in effect, make all existing beer bars non -conforming uses and prohibit the establishment of any new beer bars Discussion ensued regarding beer bars, their operation, and problems created by them. Commissioner Borders stated his concern was whether, in the future, cocktail lounges in the City could deteriorate to the status of the beer bars Detective Straske addressed the Commission stating that it might be possible that this would happen in the future• however, at this time the cocktail lounges in the City were not creating this problem, and, at such time as they do, the Commission may have to reconsider the matter. Further discussion ensued regarding the Non -conforming Use Section of the Zoning Ordinance. There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. Commissioner Borders asked if there was some way the operation of the remaining six beer bars in the City could be controlled in a better manner The City Attorney advised the Commission that, if the Commission were to determine that any of the remaining six were detrimental to the public welfare etc , which would include the situation where they are a nuisance, then they could be terminated completely• however, under that provision they could not require any additional controls imposed on the property or the use It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 438 recommending approval of the amendment to Section 109 of Ordinance No 90, amending the definition of "Restaurant' and adding the definitions of "Cocktail Lounge" and "Bar', to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE. AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, SECTIONS 109 5 and 110.5, "BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION": The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Sections 109 5 and 110 5, "BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHrLIMITATION" to increase the setback in multiple zones for two story apartments when adjacent to R-1 (One -family Residential) zoning, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary advised the Commission that, after presenting some information he had obtained on the item, he would request that the Commission continue the public hearing to the next meeting, in order to prepare some graphic information for the Commission's review in regard to the proposed amendment He reported that the staff had contacted other cities in Orange County to determine what their structural height limitations were in regard to multiple -family dwellings adjacent to single-family dwellings, and proceeded to outline some of the results He then briefly reviewed some of the results of his study in relation to what the setback should be in relation to the structural height limitation between the multiple zones and single-family zonE. It was moved by Commissioner Cardoza, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing for consideration of the proposed amendment to the next regular meeting of the Commission At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT. ALL AYES THE CHAIRMAN DECLARED A FIVE MINUTE RECESS MEETING WAS RECONVENED WITH ALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT. CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 6719; LARWIN COMPANY: The Chairman announced the next item of business was continuation of consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6719, consisting of 60 0 Acres, 346 RT1 lots, generally located at the southwest corner of Orangewood Avenue and Valley View Street requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California The Secretary reviewed the past action taken on the subject map and reviewed the changes made in the map. Mr Lee Goldin, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission, explaining the two maps submitted by the applicant, one showing the southwest corner of Orangewood and Valley View as R-1 use and the other showing it as an enlarged commercial area He stated that the applicant's preference was the one depicting the larger commercial use and stated they were requesting the approval of that map and would agree with all the conditions recommended He further stated that, if the map with the enlarged commercial were not approved, they then would continue with the map with the corner developed into R-1 lots He then explained the location and development of the proposed park within the Tract. Discussion ensued regarding the walkway to the park site and its appearance Commissioner Borders stated he felt the walkway, bordered by block walls on each side, should at least be forty feet (40') wide and consist of a green belt to create a better appearance and provide for easier maintenance. The City Engineer reported that, from a maintenance standpoint, the concrete walkway would be much lass expensive to maintain than areas where there is landscaping, due to the weeds mowing and edging, which is considerably more expensive than maintaining the concrete walkway He suggested that possible tree wells or shrub wells could be put in the middle of the walkway to break up the appearance; stating he would rather have this than the landscaped area which would create a maintenance problem Commissioner Borders again stated he would be in favor of a wide green belt rather than the tunnel -like effect of the ten foot concreted walkway, or locating the park in the area previously discussed to avoid the concrete walkway Commissioner Evans stated she concurred with Commissioner Borders in regard to the location of the park Discussion ensued regarding the Commissioners' preference as to the location of the park site and treatment of the walkway It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Evans and carried to approve Tentative Tract Map No 6719, as illustrated with the three acre park, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PCl#68-55, on file in the Planning Deparment, with the following changes and/or additions: 1'7 Larwin Company shall dedicate approximately 3 00 acres for park site with value to be deducted from optional design contribution (a) Dedication of park site to be made concurrently with submittal of second final map (b) Assessment of drainage fees on park site subject to approval of City Manager (c) Optional design fee and park area to be based on 6% of value of gross area of tract (d) Location of park shall be approved by the Planning Director." "15 The developer shall construct the Master Plan storm drain from Bolsa Chica Channel to the west tract boundary if Master Storm Drain addition is approved by City Council The design and location of the storm drain shall be approved by the City Engineer Funds for design and construction shall be advanced by the developer, subject to a reimbursement agreement " "34. The developer or the owner shall initiate de -annexation proceedings for the area presently within the Midway Sanitation District with sewage from the entire tract area to be disposed via the sewage pump station into the Orange County Sanitation District sewer excluding the dairy store, Lot 339 (a) & (b) (Same as report ) (c) The developer shall advance funds for design and construction of sewage pump station (d) (Same as report ) (e) City's share of cost of Hump station may be deducted from optional design fee in excess of the 3 0 gross acre park site "41 Followingstreets to be 51' in width. "A" "B' "F' "G' from , > > > "A" to "I" "H" "I" from "G" to 'H' , and 'K" 42 Six foot (6') block wall fences shall be constructed on the rear property lines of those lots backing or siding to the park site At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Borders, Cardoza, Davis, & Evans NOES• 1 COMMISSIONER Worley ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 9.45 p m CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: CRETAR Z -OF T 'LANN NG COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD October 3 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4.00 p.m. on Thursday October 3 1968, in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Vice Chairman Borders presiding PRESENT: Borders Cardoza, Davis and Evans ABSENT Worley Also present were: Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley; and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam. STAFF REPORTS AND DISCUSSIONS. General discussion ensued in reference to various planning matters RECESS: Vice Chairman Borders declared a recess at 5 00 p m until 7 30 that evening CALL TO ORDER. The meeting was called back to order at 7.30 p m , with the following in attendance: PRESENT. Borders, Cardoza, Davis, Worley, and Evans ABSENT. None Also present were: Assistant City Attorney Leonard Hampel. Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley. and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza and unanimously carried to approve the Minutes of September 19 1968 as mailed ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE. HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO 47; MARVIN D CROCKER, PRES , BLUE RIBBON BUILDERS, INC : The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home located at 5170 Laurel Avenue to do general bookkeeping, phone calls, and drawing incidental plans for a general contractor, requested by Marvin D Crocker, Pres of Blue Ribbon Builders, Inc , 5170 Laurel Avenue, Cypress, California, known as Home Occupation Permit No 47 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-59, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed Permit. There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Davis, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza and unanimously carried that the Commission approve home Occupation Permit No 47, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC1#68-59 on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT: ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORD. NO. 90, SECTIONS 109 5 AND 110.5, "BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION": The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, Sections 109 5 and 110 5, "BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION', to increase the setback in multiple zones for two story apartments when adjacent to R-1 (One -family Residential) zoning, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open The Secretary then reviewed the past the results of a survey, conducted by the cities to determine their requirements in following the survey and further study by that the setback be increased to 100' for zones when adjacent to an R-1 zone action taken on the item and staff, of other Orange County such cases He then stated, the staff, they would recommend two story buildings in multiple The Secretary then recommended that the Commission direct the staff to draft the proposed amendment to increase the setback to 100' and continue the public hearing to the next meeting at which time the staff would present the revised proposed amendment Commissioner Borders suggested that the setback be increased between two story structures when the multiple zone abuts another multiple zone, as well as when it abuts an R-1 zone Discussion ensued regarding Commissioner Border's suggestion and whether there was a necessity for the increase. Following further discussion, Commissioner Borders stated he was in favor of the recommended 100' setback when adjacent to an R-1 zone. Commissioner Worley stated he concurred with Commissioner Borders There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed The Secretary recommended to the Chairman that the public hearing be reopened, then continued to allow time for the staff to draft the proposed amendment The Chairman reopened the public hearing It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing on this item to the next regular meeting of the Commission At the direction of the Chairman all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT. ALL AYES REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS: Commissioner Cardoza suggested that a study be made in regard to the required rear yard setback for R-1 zones He stated he felt the original structure should not be allowed to be built within 10' of the rear property line The Secretary outlined the action that had been taken on the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance in regard to the 10' rear yard setback provision, including the staff's, Commission's, and Council's intention in regard to the amendment Further discussion ensued regarding the rear yard setback required in the R-1 zone The Secretary informed the Commission that a public hearing had been published for the next meeting of the Commission to consider the precise alignment of Walker Street, from Cerritos Avenue south to Katella Avenue He also advised the Commission that the new alignment proposed would save the stand of eucalyptus trees bordering the easterly line of the race track The Secretary informed the Commission that the consultant for the Townscape and Urban Design Program, as requested by the Council, had forwarded a recommendation in regard to the trees, which was very emphatically in favor of saving the trees if at all possible. The Secretary advised the Commission that a public hearing to consider the abandonment of a storm drain easement on the Mt Calvary Lutheran Church property at the northwest corner of Valley View Street and Ball Road would be advertised for the first meeting in November Commissioner Borders inquired about the status of the Townscape and Urban Design Program. The Secretary informed the Commission of the progress, stating that the staff was awaiting the results of the application to the State of California for "701" funding for the program Chairman Worley informed the Commission and staff that he would be absent from the next two meetings of the Commission, as he would be out of the State. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 8.15 p m CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST TARY •F THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD October 24, 1968 The adjourned regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4:00 p m on Thursday, October 24, 1968, in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California Chairman Worley presiding PRESENT Borders Cardoza, Davis Worley & Evans ABSENT. None Also present were• Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley. and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam MINUTES. It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza and unanimously carried that the Minutes of October 3, 1968 be approved as mailed STAFF REPORTS AND DISCUSSION• The Planning Director discussed with the Commission the possibility of extending the M-1 zoning on Lincoln Avenue The Planning Commission felt that heavy M-1 or C-3 uses would be improper along the frontage of Lincoln Avenue Commissioner Cardoza stated that he was concerned with the ability of the City to improve the unimproved park sites within the City He felt that the Park and Recreation District, with its property tax, should have certain responsibilities in the acquisition and improvement of park lands and indicated that he felt a study should be undertaken in reference to the role the Park and Recreation District and the City should independently play in the park and recreation development of the community Commissioner Cardoza indicated that he felt that the feasibility of the Park and Recreation District assuming responsibilities other than for recreation should be considered by the District and that the Commission should review the Citizens' Park and Recreation Committee's facts and findings as submitted to the City Council in 1965 Commissioner Cardoza also felt that any information in reference to the Park and Recreation Element of the City of Cypress General Plan should be immediately reviewed by the Commission Further discussion was held by the Planning Commission in regards to the duplicate sewage systems located within the corporate boundaries of the City of Cypress and the two agencies responsible for the maintaining of these sewer systems, mainly the City of Cypress and the Cypress County Water District The Planning Commission felt that studies should be undertaken in regards to the understanding of the roles played by the two agencies performing this governmental function On recommendation from Commissioner Cardoza, seconded by Commissioner Davis the Planning Commission instructed the staff to present them with all available information in regards to the Park and Recreation Element of the General Plan and the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan, so that these two elements of the General Plan could be studied by the total Planning Commission RECESS. Chairman Worley declared a recess at 5:10 p.m until 7:30 that evening. Planning Commission Minutes October 24, 1968 CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called back to order at 7:30 p.m. with the following in attendance* PRESENT: Borders Cardoza, Davis, Worley, & Evans ABSENT None Also present were• Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley, and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam ORAL COMMUNICATIONS• There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-216, ROBERT DECKER: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the open air sale of campers on property generally located at 5652 Lincoln Avenue, requested by Robert Decker, 7962 La Mirada Circle, Buena Park, California, known as Conditional Use Permit No C-216. The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-60, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Assistant City Engineer stated that the Engineering Department had some additional conditions they would recommend be imposed, which were as follows: �7 Engineering and plan check fees in the amount of 32% of the improvement bond shall be paid 8 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 9 Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the installation of street lights at the time the City installs the street lights 10 A fifteen foot (15') drainage easement shall be dedicated to the City of Cypress at the rear of the property " The Secretary stated that the Planning Department had been unaware of these conditions and he had doubts as to whether all of the conditions could be imposed The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed use Discussion ensued regarding the recommended conditions There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed Commissioner Evans asked the applicant what plans he had for fencing of the operation Mr Decker stated he proposed to build a redwood fence on the east and west sides of the property and the rear was fenced with a chain link fence -2- Planning Commission Minutes October 24, 1968 It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 439 approving Conditional Use Permit No C-216 subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-60, on file in the Planning Department, and those recommended by the Engineering Department as previously stated, with the following change in condition #4: "4 A five foot (5') landscaping strip shall be installed and maintained in the front of the property, subject to the approval of the Planning Director " At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT: ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE• AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORD. NO. 90, SECTIONS 109.5 AND 110.5, "BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION". The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ord No 90, Sections 109 5 and 110 5, "BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION", to increase the setback in multiple zones for two story apartments when adjacent to R-1 (One -family Residential) zoning, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open, and asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed amendment The Secretary reported that, although they had prepared a draft of the proposed ordinance the staff would like the opportunity to present some alternate solutions to the problem, therefore, would like to request a continuation of the hearing to give them the opportunity to prepare these alternates before the next meeting It was moved by Commissioner Cardoza, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing to the next regular meeting of the Commission At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT• ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE ADOPTION OF SPECIFIC PLAN FOR PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF WALKER STREET, FROM CERRITOS AVENUE SOUTHERLY TO KATELLA AVENUE: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider the adoption of a Specific Plan for the precise alignment of Walker Street from Cerritos Avenue southerly to Katella Avenue, initiated by the Secretary of the Planning Commission The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented a report from the office of the Director of Public Works, which outlined the background of the proposal and advised the Commission that the new alignment would save all of the eucalyptus trees except a few southerly of the S P R R right-of-way He then recommended that a condition be added that the trees be included in the right-of-way obtained for the street. -3- Planning Commission Minutes October 24, 1968 The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed alignment There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Cardoza, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 440 recommending to the City Council the adoption of the Specific Plan for the precise alignment of Walker Street from Cerritos Avenue to Katella Avenue as presented, subject to the condition that the eucalyptus trees be included in the right-of-way obtained for the street. At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6559, FRANMAR DEVELOPMENT CO.* The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6559 consisting of 6 4 acres, 30 R-1 lots, generally located on the west side of Moody Street, south of Camp Street, requested by Franmar Development Co , 12681 Blackthorn St. Garden Grove, Calif The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-62, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval Mr Frank Praessler, developer of the subdivision, addressed the Commission stating he accepted the staff s recommended conditions and was requesting approval of the Map Following general discussion it was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried to approve Tentative Tract Map No 6559, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-62, on file in the Planning Department, with the following change in condition #7• '7 A six foot (6') high concrete block wall shall be constructed along the northerly and easterly tract boundary The color of the wall shall be approved by the Planning Director " The applicant stated he would agree to the change in condition #7 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT. ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5940, LARWIN COMPANY. The Chairman announced the next order of business was consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 5940, consisting of 10.0 Acres 50 R-1 lots, generally located west of the Arnold School and east of the Hampton Court tract requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills California The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-61, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval Mr Devere Anderson addressed the Commission representing the Larwin Company, stating they were in agreement with the conditions as recommended by the staff and requested approval of the Tract -4- 1 Planning Commission Minutes October 24, 1968 Following general discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Davis, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza, and unanimously carried to approve Tentative Tract Map No 5940, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-61, on file in the Planning Department, with the following changes and/or additions "6 A Lot "B" shall be offered for dedication .. "11 All street trees shall be of a size and type approved by the City staff 12 A Lot "A" for a future street shall be offered for dedication to the City of Cypress along the southerly boundary of the tract, westerly of Lot 1 The shape of Lot "A" shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer " "16 Street light layout should be submitted to the City of Cypress ' At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT• ALL AYES REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS. Chairman Worley announced that he would be absent from the next meeting Commissioner Davis inquired as to why the number of conditions recommended on various subdivisions varied so much The Secretary explained that those subdivisions being developed under the Optional Design Standards of the Subdivision Ordinance usually required a greater number of conditions than the standard subdivision ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 8:05 p m C RMAN OF THE C RMAN OF THE P -5- ING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD November 7, 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4 30 p m on Thursday, November 7, 1968, in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress California Chairman Worley presiding PRESENT Borders, Worley, and Evans ABSENT: Cardoza and Davis Also present was Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried that the Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of October 24, 1968 be approved as mailed STAFF REPORTS AND DISCUSSIONS. The Secretary presented to the Commission, copies of Report #4, Public Services and Facilities Element of the General Plan, and Report #6, Park and Recreation Element of the General Plan, plus reports from the Citizens' Advisory Committee on Parks and Recreation, for the Commission s review, as had been requested at the last meeting of the Planning Commission The Commission took the reports under submission for study for discussion at a future meeting The Secretary then presented the Commissioners with programs for the 'Youth in Government Day', sponsored by the Lions Club, to take place November 19th, and invited them to attend any or all functions taking place that day RECESS It was moved by Commissioner Borders seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried that the Commission adjourn the meeting till 7'30 that evening in the Planning Department Conference Room CALL TO ORDER* The meeting was called back to order at 7.30 p m in the Planning Department Conference Room with the following in attendance: PRESENT. Borders, Cardoza, Worley, & Evans ABSENT' Davis Also present were Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel, and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam ORAL COMMUNICATIONS' There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE' HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO 48; IRVIN L MATSALLA: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow phone calls to be received for a T V repair business at 10262 Hialeah Drive requested by Irvin L Matsalla, 10262 Hialeah Drive, Cypress, California, known as Home Occupation Permit No 48 -1- Planning Commission Minutes November 7, 1968 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-64, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the request Mr Matsalla, applicant, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the request, and requesting that he be allowed to repair some of the units in his home Commissioner Evans asked the applicant about the use of equipment in his home, to which the applicant replied that there would be none The Secretary asked if any equipment would be located in the home that would interefere with the reception of other T V 's in the neighborhood, to which the applicant replied that there would not be any such equipment The Secretary asked if one set a week would be enough to be allowed to be repaired in the home The applicant stated it would be sufficient The Staff and Commission asked about the procedure used in repairing those sets that would have to be taken to his home to be worked on Mr Matsalla explained the procedure involved in repairing such sets Commissioner Borders stated that he felt, with the proposed revision in condition 1/1, allowing the repair of one set per week in the home he would be in favor of granting the request There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Cardoza, seconded by Commissioner Borders and carried that the Commission approve Home Occupation Permit No 48, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-64 on file in the Planning Department with the following correction* "1 No more than one repair service per week shall be provided on the applicant's property for equipment other than his own " The following roll call vote was taken AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Borders, Cardoza & Worley NOES 1 COMMISSIONER Evans ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER. Davis PUBLIC HEARING RE HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 49, DONALD L. NORGREN. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the making of aircraft chocks and developmental research on possible new products, requested by Donald L Norgren, 6063 Fred Drive Cypress known as Home Occupation Permit No 49 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read Planning Staff Report PC#68-65, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed use Commissioner Cardoza stated he was concerned with the recommended time limit of 10.00 for use of the radial saw, as he felt that might be too late in the evening -2- Planning Commission Minutes November 7, 1968 There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Evans, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to approve Home Occupation Permit No 49, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-65, on file in the Planning Department The following roll call vote was taken: TO WIT. ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE• HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 50, WILLIAM E WILLIAMS: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a residence for an office for the sale and trade of new and used aircraft and aircraft components, requested by William E Williams, 4565 Maybury Circle Cypress known as Home Occupation Permit No 50 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-66, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the requested Permit There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza and unanimously carried the Commission approve Home Occupation Permit No 50, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC4#68-66, on file in the Planning Department The following roll call vote was taken. TO WIT ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE• HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 51, EDWARD L. STACK The Chairman announced that this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a home for an office operation, requested by Edward L Stack, 5461 Marion Avenue, Cypress, known as Home Occupation Permit No 51 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-67, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the requested Permit There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza and unanimously carried that the Commission approve Home Occupation Permit No 51 subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-67, on file in the Planning Department The following roll call vote was taken TO WIT. ALL AYES CHAIRMAN WORLEY DECLARED A FIVE MINUTE RECESS AT 8 00 P M THE MEETING WAS CALLED BACK TO ORDER AT 8:05 P M PUBLIC HEARING RE. PROPOSED VACATION OF STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ON PROPERTY OWNED BY MOUNT CALVARY LUTHERAN CHURCH. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider the proposed vacation of a storm drain easement in -3- Planning Commission Minutes November 7, 1968 the vicinity of the northwest corner of Valley View Street and Ball Road, on property owned by the Mount Calvary Lutheran Church, initiated by the Secretary of the Planning Commission The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary read a report from the Office of the Public Works Director, which outlined the reason for the easement being originally required, the fact that a better solution to the drainage was devised during the improvement of Valley View Street which removed the need for an easement from the Church The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed vacation There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried that the Commission adopt Resolution No 441, stating that the Commission finds that the proposed abandonment is in conformity with the General Plan and recommending the proposed abandonment to the City Council The following roll call vote was taken. TO WIT: ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE• AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORD. NO. 90, SECTIONS 109 5 AND 110 5, "BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION'. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to Zoning Ord No 90, Section 109 5 and 110 5 "BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION" to increase the setback in multiple zones for two story apartments when adjacent to R-1 (One -family Residential) zoning, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open The Secretary outlined the past action taken on the matter and requested that the public hearing be continued to the next regular meeting, as the work schedule since the last meeting had not provided sufficient time for him to prepare the alternate solutions to the matter It was moved by Commissioner Evans, seconded by Commissioner Cardoza and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing until the next regular meeting of the Commission The following roll call vote was taken. TO WIT: ALL AYES REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS• Commissioner Cardoza advised the Commission that he was leaving the country the following Monday and would be missing the next two or three meetings of the Commission The Assistant City Attorney advised him that he should give written notice of same to the Secretary of the Commission ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Commission Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 8.20 p m ATTEST. 1 CHA N OF THE PL. NG COMMISSION SECR ARY 0 HE P NNING COMMISSION -4- MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD November 21 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4.00 p m on Thursday, November 21, 1968, in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California by the Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam. PRESENT None ABSENT. Borders, Cardoza Davis Worley & Evans There being the absence of a quorum, the Secretary declared the meeting adjourned until 7.30 p m that evening CALL TO ORDER. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p m. in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress California, by Chairman Worley, with the following in attendance PRESENT Borders, Davis, Worley & Evans ABSENT. Cardoza Also present were. Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel, and Secretary of the Planning Commission George R Putnam ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. There were no oral communications presented at this time MINUTES. It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried, the Minutes of November 7, 1968 be approved as mailed PUBLIC HEARING RE. ZONE CHANGE NO Z-174; SEAGATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION• The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from C-2 (General Commercial) to R-3 (Multiple -family Residential), generally located on the west side of Juanita Street approximately 330' north of Ball Road, requested by Seagate Investment Corp , 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills California known as Zone Change No Z-174 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC1f68-68 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed change of zone Mr John Tapking Director of Land Planning for Larwin Company, applicant addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the requested change of zone and offering to answer any questions the Commission might have Mr Roger Engler, 9847 Gene Street, addressed the Commission speaking in opposition to the proposed zone change stating he felt the use would be a detriment to the neighborhood, because apartment developments were not usually maintained in a proper manner and would become an eyesore with trash, improper maintenance of the buildings etc and would create a bad traffic condition He continued, stating he felt that if the property were developed as it is presently zoned, commercially, that the businesses would alleviate the taxes in the area but he would he opposed to an apartment development Planning Commission Minutes November 21, 1968 Mr John Lawrey 9837 Gene Street addressed the Commission also speaking in opposition to the zone change He asked the differences in revenue that the City would derive if the property were rezoned for apartments rather than commercial The Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission that possible revenues were not a relevant consideration in the Commission's deliberation on a zone change Mr Lawrey stated that the present apartments existing in Cypress were not in good condition and were not maintained, that he would only be in favor if it were to be an "own your own" apartment development He also stated he felt it would create a traffic hazard on Juanita Street Mr Jim Parks, 9836 Joel Circle, addressed the Commission speaking in opposition to the requested change of zone stating he did not feel the proposed apartment zoning was compatible with the surrounding single-family residential neighborhood Chairman Worley stated that the Commission did not know at this time, what the development of the property would be, that it might be a townhouse development, which would be permitted in the requested zone, not apartments Commissioner Borders stated he felt that apartments were not necessarily a detrimental use if they were built right He stated that the General Plan had allocated a certain amount of the City for multiple -family development, and asked the staff how the present zoning of the City measured up to the amount recommended by the General Plan The Secretary replied that the supply of existing multiple -family zoning was considerably less than that called for in the Master Plan, one of the reasons being the location of the junior college on property that had been zoned for multiple -family residential Mr John Tapking again addressed the Commission stating that his company felt there was an excess of commercial zoning in the area that could be developed He then pointed out the fact that the proposed use would be separated from the existing single-family residential area by the Carbon Creek Channel, which was approximately eighty feet wide He then presented information dealing with the need for this type of development in the near future• the need being created by the fact that the majority of the population in the near future will consist of people under 34 years of age Mr Parks again addressed the Commission speaking in opposition to "kids" moving into this type of development in his neighborhood Commissioner Borders stated he felt the best use of the property would be for R-3 Mr Lawrey again addressed the Commission stating that, with the new development, traffic would increase on Juanita and create a need to increase the width of Juanita Street and the bridge over the Carbon Creek Channel, thus cost the City money Mrs Parks, 9836 Joel Circle addressed the Commission speaking in regard to the vacancy factor in apartment developments There being no written communications and no further oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed Commissioner Borders stated he felt that the traffic volume compared between R-3 and commercial zoning would be higher with commercial than R-3 for the one acre of property CHAIRMAN WORLEY DECLARED A FIVE MINUTE RECESS AT 8 10 P M MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 8:15 P M -2- Planning Commission Minutes November 21, 1968 Commissioner Borders stated that because of his concern in regard to the fact that the property could be developed with one building, thus requiring no further action from the Planning Commission, which would give the Commission no control over the architecture and overall planning of the development and might prove to be detrimental to the area; he would move to deny Zone Change No Z-174 Motion was seconded by Commissioner Davis At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. AYES• 2 COMMISSIONERS• Borders and Davis NOES. 2 COMMISSIONERS. Worley and Evans ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER• Cardoza Motion failed to carry Further discussion ensued following which it was moved by Commissioner Davis to deny Zone Change No Z-174 because it would be detrimental to the surrounding property The motion was seconded by Commissioner Borders, who again stated he was opposed because the development could be built without further action by the Commission if it were in a single building The Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission that what is to be built on the property was not a valid consideration in their deliberation on whether to grant the zone change or not, that their only consideration should be in regard to the uses generally permitted in that zone At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. AYES• 2 COMMISSIONERS* Borders and Davis NOES. 2 COMMISSIONERS. Worley and Evans ABSENT 1 COMMISSIONER Cardoza Motion failed to carry Discussion ensued regarding continuing action until the next meeting in hopes that the entire Commission would be present The Assistant City Attorney recommended that the public hearing be reopened if the Commission wished to continue the matter so further testimony could be heard It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried to reopen the public hearing for consideration of Zone Change No Z-174 It was then moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing until the next regular meeting of the Commission CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE* AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORD. NO. 90, SECTIONS 109.5 AND 110.5, 'BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION' The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ord No 90,4 Sections 109 5 and 110 5, "BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION", to increase the setback in multiple zones for two story apartments when adjacent to R-1 (One -family Residential) zoning, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission -3- Planning Commission Minutes November 21, 1968 The Chairman reminded those present that the public hearing was still open The Secretary outlined the past action taken and presented the proposed Ordinance with the suggestion that it could be modified to add the following A Conditional Use Permit is required for any reduction of the 100 foot setback " "This setback shall not apply to R-3 or R-4 uses which are separated by a dedicated public street or facility where the combined setback and public right-of-way width are equal to the required 100' setback, in which case the setbacks shall be 15' front, 5 sides, and 10' rear " Commissioners Borders and Worley stated they were in favor of the suggestion There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No 442 recommending to the City Council the approval of the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Sections 109 5 and 110 5 as presented by the Secretary At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results: TO WIT• ALL AYES THE CHAIRMAN DECLARED A RECESS AT 8 37 P M MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 8.47 P M , WITH ALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT, EXCEPT COMMISSIONER CARDOZA REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS The Secretary presented the Commission with copies of the Public Buildings Element of the General Plan for their information ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 8.48 p m �� lr/a� CH RMAN OF THE PLA ING COMMISSION ATTEST. ECRETAR OF E PLANNING COMMISSION -4- MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD December 5, 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4 00 p m on Thursday, December 5 1968 in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California by the Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam PRESENT Evans ABSENT. Borders, Cardoza, Davis & Worley There being the absence of a quorum, the Secretary declared the meeting adjourned until 7 30 p m that evening CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7.30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California by Chairman Worley, with the following in attendance: PRESENT- Borders, Worley & Evans ABSENT. Cardoza and Davis Also present were Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were no oral communications presented at this time MINUTES - It was moved by Commissioner Evans seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried the Minutes of November 21, 1968 be approved as mailed PUBLIC HEARING RE: HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 52, SHIRLEY ANN HARVIE. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home located at 9763 Cedar Court for a pick-up and delivery service for photofinishing, requested by Mrs Shirley Ann Harvie, 9763 Cedar Court, Cypress, California, known as Home Occupation Permit No 52 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-69, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval subject to the three conditions listed on the report The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against this request for home occupation permit Mrs Shirley Harvie, 9763 Cedar Court, addressed the Commission, stating she was the applicant and offering to answer any questions the Commission might have Commissioner Evans inquired of the applicant as to what would take place in the home whether it would be just a pickup and delivery service or if any other activity would take place in the home -1- Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 1968 In answer to this question Mrs Harvie replied there would be no other activity, with the exception of telephone calls, done in the home There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Evans and seconded by Commissioner Borders, to grant Home Occupation Permit No 52 to Mrs Shirley Ann Harvie, subject to the three conditions as presented by the Secretary At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE. HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO 53, SUSAN KAY MARDEN. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for home occupation permit to allow the use of a portion of a home located at 9753 Cedar Court for a pick-up and delivery service for photofinishing, requested by Mrs Susan Kay Marden, 9753 Cedar Court Cypress, known as Home Occupation Permit No 53 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-70, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval, subject to the three conditions listed in the report The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against this request for home occupation permit Mrs Shirley Ann Harvie, 9763 Cedar Court addressed the Commission stating that she was the partner of the applicant, Mrs Susan Kay Marden, 9753 Cedar Court, and also advising that the applicant was in San Francisco, therefore, could not be here to speak in favor of the permit There being no oral protests and no written communications the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried to grant Home Occupation Permit No 53 to Mrs Susan Kay Marden, 9753 Cedar Court, subject to the three conditions as presented by the Secretary At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT• ALL AYES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE. ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-174, SEAGATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION: The Chairman declared this was the time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ord No 90, to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from C-2 (General Commercial) to R-3 (Multiple -family Residential), generally located on the west side of Juanita Street approximately 330 north of Ball Road, requested by Seagate Investment Corp 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California, known as Zone Change No Z-174 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary outlined the past Planning Staff Report PC#68-68, adding additional information -2- Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 1968 The Secretary indicated this was an item held over due to a tie vote at the last meeting, and outlined the location of the proposed change, adding that the only additional information available for the Commission is the fact that the property immediately to the east, comprising 6 22 acres is presently zoned R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) and would contain approximately 155 dwelling units„ the property as proposed would have the potential for approximately 25 or 30 residential multiple -family units There was concern at the last meeting in reference to the type or appearance of the structure, which will be handled through the Architectural Review Committee of the City The property is presently zoned C-2, which would allow a rear yard setback of 10 to 15 feet, and in the Planning Department's opinion, could generate heavier vehicular traffic through this area than it would as developed with multiple -family units, which would have the peak traffic load in the morning hours and from 4 00 to 7 00 p m in the evenings The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor or against the proposed zone change Mr John Tapking, Director of Land Planning for Larwin Company, applicant addressed the Commission stating that,in addition to the information previously presented he had reviewed the Zoning Ordinance and finds that in the C-2 zone, which this property is presently zoned for a structure may be built to a height of 50 feet and within ten feet when abutting a residential zone, and under the zone requested, the building height would be restricted to 35 feet and must be 100 feet -away from the residential zone• therefore, it would be to the benefit of the adjoining areas to receive the more restricted classification Chairman Worley asked if anyone else in the audience wished to speak for or against this zone change, and then asked if the Commission had anything to add to the public hearing Commissioner Borders stated he feels that R-3 would be of better use in terms of traffic, in that there would be less traffic created on the adjacent street than there would be with C-2 zoning, and although he had spoke in opposition of this at the last meeting, he now feels that the R-3 zone change would be more suitable to the area At this time, Assistant City Attorney Hampel pointed out that since this is an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, it would require a majority of the total membership therefore, requiring three votes in favor to pass. Mr Roger Engler, 9847 Gene Street addressed the Commission speaking in opposition to the proposed zone change There being no written communications or further oral protests, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed Commissioner Borders again stated that because he felt that the R-3 zone was best suited for this piece of property although in the near future we should perhaps want to make suggestions about the manner inwhich the structures are placed on R-3 property, of which portion of the problem he was opposed to, he is now in favor of this proposed zone change It was moved by Commissioner Borders seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No 443 recommending to the City Council the approval of Zone Change No Z-174 At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results. TO WIT. ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-217, VALIANT INVESTMENT COMPANY The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a residential planned development in the P -D (Planned Development) zone, on property generally located at the southeast corner of Bloomfield St and -3- Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 1968 Ball Road, requested by Valiant Investment Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California, known as Conditional Use Permit No C-217 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-71, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval, subject to the three conditions listed in the report The Secretary further stated that this property was originally in the Tanglewood development as Tanglewood dwellings, and it was at the insistence of the City that this seven acres was deleted from the Tanglewood development to be put into commercial use However with the development of the commercial center immediately north of the subject property, the need for two shopping centers in the area did not seem to exist Therefore, the owners of the property have requested that this property be converted back to a Tanglewood residential development The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor of or against this conditional use permit Mr Art Rosenthal, Larwin Company, addressed the Commission, indicating that he felt the map was in conformance with the original concept that they had for the entire area southerly of Ball Road and a continuation of the same program, and that he believes it will be an asset to the area, as he feels the rest of the area has been There being no --written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried that Resolution No 444 be adopted recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit No C-217 to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results* TO WIT: ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE VARIANCE NO. V-264, LAWRENCE GREGOIRE, BY GEORGE WILLIAMS The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for variance from the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to allow the construction of a patio within one foot (1') of the rear property line on property generally located at 5072 Evergreen, Cypress, requested by Lawrence Gregoire, 5072 Evergreen, Cypress, by George Williams, 512 S Jackson St , Santa Ana, authorized agent, known as Variance No V-264 The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report Pd#68-72, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval, subject to the condition that the pation shall not be enclosed The Secretary further stated that there would be an additional condition after discussing this with the City Engineering division and that is that the roof structure shall be designed so that none of the run-off water would be allowed to drain into the flood control right-of-way The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor of or against this proposed variance Mr George Williams, 512 S Jackson St , Santa Ana, addressed the Commission stating he was the contractor on this project, indicating that there would be a downspout and a metal gutter, so that there will be no run-off He further stated that since the property line is so close to the southeast corner of this house, we have to put the stanchion within one foot of the property line in order to put up the patio and in other regard this will be built according to Code. -4- Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 1968 In answer to an. inquiry from Commissioner Evans regarding why the patio could not be built in the easterly yard, Mr Williams indicated that the back door which the patio will be built over, is not in the easterly yard, and the people would like it to be built so the back sliding door is under this patio Commissioner Evans stated that in order to grant a variance the Commission had to determine that this lot has a peculiar situation or circumstances no other lot in the area has After further discussion regarding this question, it was agreed that this was the only house in this particular area that has this unusual situation CHAIRMAN WORLEY DECLARED A FIVE MINUTE RECESS AT 8.00 P M MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 8 05 P M Chairman Worley asked for any further discussion regarding this Variance Commissioner Evans inquired whether the drainage ditch would be open and how wide it was The Secretary stated that the ditch was 222 ft wide and that it would be open In answer to Commissioner Evan's question as to whether the school property would be separated from this property, the Secretary stated that it would, by 50 foot ultimate right-of-way There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Evans seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No 445 granting Variance No V-264, subject to the condition stated in Planning Staff Report PC#68-72, on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT• ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE. AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING NON -CONFORMING BUILDINGS - The Chairman announced this was the time and the place for the public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, adding Section 122 13, "Repair, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Permitted,", in Part 22 of said Ordinance referring to Non -conforming Uses and Buildings, initiated by the Secretary of the Planning Commission, at the request of the City Council The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-74, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval In further explanation, the Secretary stated that this amendment would allow for ordinary maintenance and repair of non -conforming buildings, which our Code does not permit now The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor or against this amendment Commissioner Borders stated he is in favor of this amendment, especially since it does not have the effect of extending the period of abatement and feel it would be to the advantage of the City to be able to at least repair and maintain the buildings as long as it is being used, even though it is non -conforming -5- Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 1968 There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Borders seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No 446 recommending approval of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 regarding non -conforming buildings adding Section 122 13 to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT• ALL AYES PUBLIC HEARING RE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF STREET DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 Section 126 4 of Part 26 of said Ordinance, to clarify and strengthen the requirement of building permits initiated by the Secretary of the Planning Commission, at the request of the Cypress City Council The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC1168-75 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval Chairman Worley asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against this request for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Commissioner Borders inquired as to what sort of an agreement the Christmas Tree lots have to have In answer to this the Secretary stated at present these can go into any area, and there is a special Ordinance adopted by the City Council which allows Christmas Tree lots in any area, subject to staff approval which waives them from this, also Fireworks stands, Chairman Worley indicated he felt this might be a breakthrough into bringing more industry into the City There being no written communications or oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed It was moved by Commissioner Evans seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No 447 recommending approval of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, adding Section 126 4 of Part 26 to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote with the following results. TO WIT ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 6811, LARWIN COMPANY The Chairman stated this was the time for the consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6811, containing 7 012 acres consisting of 76 lots generally bounded by Larwin Avenue on the south, Bloomfield Street on the west, Ball Road on the north and Tract 6052 on the east, requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd Beverly Hills California The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC1168-73, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval, subject to the thirteen conditions listed in said report Mr Art Rosenthal, Larwin Company, addressed the Commission stating that he had reviewed the conditions and that they were satisfactory to the Larwin Company -6- Planning_ Commission Minutes December 5, 1968 In answer to an -inquiry from Commissioner Evans regarding whether or not Larwin Company would be installing sidewalks on Bloomfield and Ball Road, Mr Rosenthal stated they would,as well as landscaping Commissioner Borders indicated that he has seen a number of service stations abutting residential R-2 and R-3 areas, where the two are separated by landscaping, and that he would be interested in seeing this take place in this project, so that the service stations are actually screened from the residential areas by landscape Chairman Worley stated that he would like to have this made condition number 14, whereby landscape screening on the southerly side of the service station would be provided subject to the Planning Director's approval of materials, etc In answer to an inquiry from Commissioner Evans as to whether Larwin Company owns the gas station in question, Mr Rosenthal stated he believed it was leased Commissioner Evans then inquired of the Assistant City Attorney whether we could require any improvements on this gas station property Assistant City Attorney Hampel replied that the City would be limited to the subdivision map, as presented; however we may include as an off-site improvement, anything relating to the subdivision itself Further discussion ensued regarding the gas station property, however, no action was taken to require any improvements Commissioner Evans stated she would like to have added to condition 11 regarding the block wall to be constructed that it be a slumpstone block wall It was moved by Commissioner Borders, seconded by Commissioner Evans and unanimously carried that the Commission approve Tentative Tract Map No 6811, subject to the 13 conditions as outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-73 adding to condition 11 that it be a slumpstone block wall and adding a new condition 14, providing a landscape screen on the southerly side of the service station property, use of material, etc , to be determined by the Planning Director At the direction of the Chairman,all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT ALL AYES REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS - The Secretary stated he would like to have a public hearing set for the rezoning of the whole frontage on Orange Avenue on the south side of the street near Juanita Street from R-1 to R-3 It was moved by Commissioner Worley, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried to set the public hearing for the zone change Assistant City Attorney Hampel stated that the motion should include setting the public hearing for the next possible meeting, allowing ample time to duly publicize the public hearing At the direction of the Chairman all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results TO WIT• ALL AYES -7- Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 1968 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 8.45 p m GJ/ 4,424_4A'�CHAtRRM OF HE PL ANB�iNG COMMISSION ATTEST. S CRETARY OF, E PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD December 19, 1968 The regular meeting of the Cypress City Planning Commission was called to order at 4.00 p m , on Thursday, December 19, 1968, in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California Chairman Worley presiding PRESENT. Borders, Davis, Worley, and Evans ABSENT. Cardoza Also present were Assisstant City Engineer, Ray Coakley; and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam STAFF REPORTS & DISCUSSIONS: General discussion ensued regarding various planning matters The Planning Commission asked the staff to inquire as to which cities require building plans to be completed by A I A or A I.B.D. members RECESS. The Chairman declared a recess at 5.15 p m until 7 30 p m that evening CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7.35 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Worley presiding PRESENT: Borders, Davis Worley and Evans ABSENT Cardoza Also present were• Assistant City Attorney, Leonard Hampel, Assistant City Engineer, Ray Coakley, and Secretary of the Planning Commission, George R Putnam MINUTES: Commissioner Evans stated that she had made a statement under "REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMISSIONS" at the last meeting in regard to changing R-4 parcels to R-1 zoning, which had not been included in the Minutes of said meeting and she would like that statement included It was moved by Commissioner Borders seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried that the Minutes of December 5, 1968 be approved as corrected ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time PUBLIC HEARING RE. ZONE CHANGE NO Z-175, E J ROTHE, ET AL, BY DEREK D NIBLO: The Chairman announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-1 (One -family Residential) to R-4 (High Density Multiple -family Residential) on property generally located on the north side of Ball Road, approximately 630' easterly of Graham Street, requested by E J Rothe, et al, 13448 Valley Heart, Sherman Oaks, California, by Derek D Niblo, 121 Via Venezia, Newport Beach, California, known as Zone Change No Z-175 The Chairman declared the public hearing open The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-76, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval -1- Planning Commission Minutes December 19, 1968 The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the requested change of zone No one appeared speaking in favor or in opposition to the request Discussion ensued among the Commission in regard to the proposed zone change Commissioner Worley stated he felt the subject property was a proper area for this type of zoning Commissioner Evans stated she was concerned over the property to the north of the subject property and whether the Commission would be restricting that property to a multiple use alone, and whether it could be developed as such The Secretary and Commissioner Borders stated that the approximate thirteen acres existing northerly of the subject property could very easily be developed into a multiple use There being no written communications and no oral protests the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Commissioner Evans, seconded by Commissioner Borders and unanimously carried the Commission adopt Resolution No 448 recommending approval of Zone Change No Z-175 to the City Council At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT. ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5373, LARWIN CO.. The Chairman announced this was the time and place for consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 5373 consisting of 52 P -D (Planned Development) lots, generally located south of Ball Road and easterly of Bloomfield Street, requested by Larwin Co , 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, California The Secretary of the Commission presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-77 which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval subject to ten conditions outlined in said Report. The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the requested map Mr Art Rosenthal, Larwin Company, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the proposed development, stating that the applicant was in accord with the recommended conditions outlined, and offering to answer any questions the Commission might have General discussion ensued in regard to the proposed development being an extension of the Tanglewood Townhouse development, following which, it was moved by Commissioner Borders seconded by Commissioner Davis and unanimously carried that the Commission approve Tentative Tract Map No 5373, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-77, on file in the Planning Department At the direction of the Chairman all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. TO WIT. ALL AYES CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6823, LARWIN COMPANY. The Chairman announced the next item of business was consideration of Tentative Tract Map No 6823, consisting of 40 03 acres, 233 R-1 lots, generally located on the south side of Orangewood Avenue, approximately 330' easterly of Valley View Street requested by Larwin Company, 9300 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, Calif -2- Planning Commission Minutes December 19, 1968 The Secretary presented Planning Staff Report PC#68-78, which outlined the nature of the request and the staff recommendation of approval The Chairman asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the subject map Mr Art Rosenthal, Larwin Company, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the Map and stating that the conditions, as outlined in the report were acceptable to the applicant, and offered to answer any questions the Commission might have Commissioner Evans stated she felt the subdivider should be required to improve the portion of Orangewood Avenue westerly of the subdivision to Valley View Street as a condition of approval if it could legally be required The Assistant City Attorney advised the Commission that such a condition could be required, it was at the discretion of the Commission and City Council Discussion ensued regarding the amount of land to be dedicated for park purposes and the improvement of Orangewood Avenue Commissioner Borders stated he felt the circulation pattern of the subdivision was better than average It was moved by Commissioner Davis, seconded by Commissioner Borders and carried that the Commission approve Tentative Tract Map No 6823, subject to the conditions outlined in Planning Staff Report PC#68-78, on file in the Planning Department, with the following additions and/or corrections. "7 (Delete the following) 'along the south property line of Lot 43 ADD: '24 Any excess fees shall be allocated to the development of the park site " At the direction of the Chairman, all Commissioners present cast their vote, with the following results. AYES 3 COMMISSIONERS• Borders, Davis & Worley NOES: 1 COMMISSIONER. Evans ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER. Cardoza ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Worley declared the meeting adjourned at 8 45 p m ATTEST. C IRMAN OF THE, LANNING COMMISSION ECRETARY OF LANN NG COMMISSION -3-