Minutes 1977-05-19MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE CYPRESS PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD
May 19, 1977
The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was
called to order at 6.37 p m on Thursday, May 19, 1977 in the
Cypress City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress
California, Chairman Robert Van Allen presiding
PRESENT•
ABSENT
Commissioners Adler Friedmann, Mullen and
Van Allen
Commissioner Partin
Also present were Brian Hawley, Planning Director, Art Schatzeder,
Public Works Director, Don Lamm and Robert Kastenbaum Assistant
Planners, and John Murphy, City Attorney
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE• The pledge to the flag was led by
Commissioner Adler
MINUTES
It was moved by Commissioner Mullen, seconded by Commissioner
Friedmann and unanimously carried to approve the April 21 minutes
It was moved by Commissioner Friedmann, seconded by Commissioner
Mullen and unanimously carried to approve the April 28 minutes
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS•
1 Design Review - Bank of America Building
The Planning Director presented the plot plan and elevations
for the Bank of America building proposed for the last vacant
parcel in the Cypress East Shopping Center at Valley View and
Ball Road The plans are in accordance with City development
standards however two suggestions recommended by staff re-
garding restriping of two parking stalls to be designated for
handicapped parking, and relocation of the drive-through lane
signing, chain and posts further east to provide better traffic
circulation should be included in the plans He stated the
design concept is the same as for the rest of the center and
elevations for the 24 -foot -high building show stucco with wood
siding Staff recommended that the signing program be considered
separately under design review at a later date. The staff
reported that with the changes recommended by staff there
will be adequate maneuvering room for vehicles in the parking
lot and that, even with the elimination of four parking spaces
for the new planter island, there is adequate parking to satisfy
requirements for the entire center The Planning Director stated
the applicant is aware of the conditions and accepts them as
well as staff's recommended changes
It was moved by Commissioner Mullen, seconded by Commissioner
Friedmann and unanimously carried to approve the plot plan and
elevations for the Bank of America Building subject to the
following conditions and to continue the signing program for
consideration as a separate item under design review
1. The drive-through aisle on the north side of the proposed
building shall have a turning radius of twenty-eight feet
(28') on the outer pavement edge Minimum drive-through
aisle width shall be fourteen feet (14')
Planning Commission Minutes May 19, 1977
2 The proposed median island in the drive-through area shall
not extend farther west than the easterly edge of the
existing concrete drainage gutter The proposed drive-
through sign and chain and posts shall be relocated to
the east
3 The dirt area between the drive-through lane and the
northerly lot line approximately six and one-half feet
(6 1/2') in width, shall be landscaped and irrigated.
4 A minimum of two (2) existing parking stalls in the area
of the westerly bank entrance shall be restriped to
provide for the handicapped, in accordance with the State
of California Standards, and to the satisfaction of the
Building Superintendent and Planning Director
5 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer The easterly end of the proposed drive-through
aisle shall be lowered in elevation to closely match the
sidewalk elevation of Valley View Street Concrete
drainage gutters shall be installed in areas where pave-
ment slope is less than one percent (1%)
6 The curb along the south side of the building, adjacent
to the parking lot driveway aisle, shall be painted red
and also stenciled with "No Parking" in red
7 All secondary and primary utility services shall be under-
ground
8 Necessary fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance
with fire department requirements and City standards
9 The developer shall conform to all applicable provisions
of the City Code
10 The sanitary sewer connection fee shall be paid by the
developer in accordance with Orange County Sanitation
District No 3 Resolution No 303.
11 On-site signing and traffic control devices particularly
at the entrance to the drive-through, shall be established
to the specifications of the Traffic Engineer
12 A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for this
development until all landscaping and irrigation is com-
pleted in accordance with plans and specifications as
approved by the Planning Commission
13 All roof -mounted equipment, such as heating and air condi-
tioning units, shall be adequately screened from public
view, subject to the approval of the City staff
14 All existing public improvements at the development
site which are damaged, cracked, or otherwise below
standard shall be removed and replaced to the satis-
faction of the City Engineer.
15
Plans for the proposed landscape and irrigation system
shall be submitted for review and approval by the Plan-
ning Commission All required landscape and irrigation
systems shall be installed and completed prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy on this building.
16 A bond shall be posted by the applicant to guarantee
maintenance of the irrigation system so that it operates
in a manner for which it was designed, and to guarantee
2
Planning Commission Minutes May 19, 1977
maintenance of all plant materials in a healthy, growing
condition, free of weeds and litter, for a period of not
less than twelve (12) months, to the specifications of
the City staff
17 The proposed median and planter on the south side of the
building shall be landscaped and irrigated Existing
asphalt in the area of the proposed median and planter
shall be removed and replaced with fill dirt capable of
supporting plant life
18 A minimum twenty-two foot (22') wide driveway aisle
shall be maintained along the west side of the proposed
building
19 Plans for the proposed signing program to identify the
Bank of America building shall be submitted for review
and approval by the Planning Commission Approval of
these plot plans and elevations by the Planning Commis-
sion in no way implies approval or acceptance of the
signing treatment identified on the elevation plans
Commissioner Mullen stated he did not feel a freestanding sign
would increase the Bank's visibility, that it was unnecessary
and would decrease the aesthetic value of the project He
stated he might be in favor of it if he saw evidence that the
sign is necessary to identify the Bank to traffic Commis-
sioner Friedmann stated she felt the freestanding sign would
be unnecessary and detract from the overall appearance of the
center Chairman Van Allen stated the Commission might con-
sider a monument sign in that area
2 Tentative Parcel Map No 77-1 - 9351 Walker Street
The Planning Director presented the map and summarized Staff
Report #77-15 dated May 13 describing the proposed division of
a one-half acre parcel of land located on the west side of
Walker in the RS -6000 Zone into two lots The two parcels
will be arranged in tandem fashion with two 15 -foot -wide "pan-
handle" access drives providing direct access to each parcel
along the north side of the property One condition recommended
that the development be subject to design review to determine
whether the design will allow vehicles to turn around on the
property and not have to back -out onto Walker. The staff
reported that in conjunction with recent Walker Street improve-
ments, a curb cut was provided at the location where the drive-
way is proposed The Planning Director stated alternatives
for access to the property were considered and the proposal
is the most reasonable way to divide the property
Mr Andrew Koltavary, 3740 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, the
project engineer, stated the plan is just a concept and shows the
required setback lines He stated the owner did not like this
particular layout and it will be subject to further consideration
It was moved by Commissioner Friedmann, seconded by Commis-
sioner Adler and unanimously carried to approve Tentative
Parcel Map #77-1 subject to the following conditions.
1 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with the
Master Plan of Drainage
2 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer A grading plan shall be submitted for
approval
3 All secondary and primary utility services shall be
underground
Planning Commission Minutes May 19 1977
4 A street light shall be installed per City Standards.
5 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid
6 Necessary fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance
with Fire Department requirements and City Standards
7. Developer shall conform to all applicable provisions of
the City Code
8 Final parcel map filing fees shall be paid in accordance
with City of Cypress Resolution No 1713
9 All lots shall have a slope gradient of between one percent
(1%) and three percent (3%) from rear lot line to the
street
10 The sanitary sewer connection fee shall be paid by the
developer in accordance with Orange County Sanitation
District No. 3 Resolution No 303
11 A retaining wall per City of Cypress standards shall be
constructed at the property line where the grade difference
is greater than twelve inches (12")
12. A topograph of the area surrounding this development
shall be made to establish existing drainage flow patterns
If the existing natural flow of any adjoining parcel is
across the land of this development a drainage easement
shall be granted and drainage facilities provided for
that property to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
13 All existing public improvements at the development site
which are damaged cracked, or otherwise below standard,
shall be removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer
14. All requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act and
the City's Subdivision Ordinance shall be satisfied
15 A minimum six-foot (6') high block wall measured from
the highest adjacent grade shall be installed along the
north property line, except within twenty feet (20')
of Walker Street, where the fence shall be three feet
in height The existing block walls along the west
and south property line shall be maintained at a six-
foot (6') height
16 Recreation and parks fees shall be paid in accordance
with the City of Cypress Zoning Ordinance
17 The developer shall provide mailbox mounting facilities
for each residence to the satisfaction of the Public
Works Director, Planning Director and Postmaster
18 No open cuts shall be allowed on Walker Street
19 Development of the two resultant parcels shall be subject
to Design Review by the Planning Commission
20 Additional A C pavement shall be installed on Parcel
2 in the area of the proposed garage, to provide adequate
room for vehicle turn -around movements, to the satisfac-
tion of the City staff
21 The existing drive approach on Walker Street in front
of this development shall be widened to thirty feet
(30'), per City of Cypress Standards
Planning Commission Minutes
May 19 1977
22 Separate sanitary sewer laterals shall be installed for
each lot Laterals shall be located such that no sewer
easements will be necessary across either of the lots
Consideration of Walker Street Zoning Study
The Planning Director stated this matter was continued from
the April 28 public meeting at which time the Commission heard
comments from property owners and residents in the area He
transmitted copies of the minutes of that meeting and stated
no new zoning alternatives were suggested other than those
contained in staff's report He suggested three alternative
actions for the Commission• to take no action to change zoning
in the area, set a public hearing to consider rezoning to a
specific land use classification, or consider rezoning without
designating a zone classification and allow staff to make
recommendations for zoning He stated he was unaware of any
meeting held by property owners and residents of the area to
attempt to solidify their feelings regarding zoning He
reported staff received a letter from Mr. and Mrs Hubert, resi-
dents of the study area,whose priorities for zoning were• retain
the commercial zone along Walker Street, rezone the entire area
to single-family residential or rezone Karen Street to single-
family residential with the remaining area zoned for duplexes,
or rezone the entire area for duplexes
Chairman Van Allen asked if anyone wished to speak
Ms Francis Raines a realtor for Forrest Olsen and repre-
senting a property owner at 5552 Newman Street stated the
property is in escrow and the multiple -family zoning is a factor
in the sale since the buyer wishes to develop multiple -family
dwellings She was in favor of the multiple -family zoning
remaining
Mr Harvey Wilson, 5650 Camp Street, felt 90% of people in
the area favored single-family residential zoning He stated
he bought his home less than a year ago with the idea it was
a single-family neighborhood He stated multiple -family units
would change the nature of the neighborhood and that he would
prefer living next to older homes than multiple -family units
He reported many of the older homes are being fixed -up
Chairman Van Allen stated the zoning in this area is multiple -
family residential which allows single-family development
Mr Wilson stated he hoped the area is rezoned to correspond
with the type of single-family development which is occuring.
Commissioner Mullen stated he was in favor of setting a public
hearing to consider rezoning of the entire area without speci-
fying any zoning classification He stated at this time he
felt neither high-density multiple -family nor single-family is
totally appropriate for the entire area He stated if he had
to decide now he would favor duplex zoning for a large part of
the area
Mr Bailey, 3362 Huntley, Los Alamitos, stated he purchased
property on Karen Avenue last May and he is waiting to see
what he can build
Mr Gene White, 5591 Karen Avenue, stated he surveyed people
on Karen today and they are appalled at the traffic and parking
problems resulting from the apartment development He stated
he opposed anything but single-family residential zoning
Planning Commission Minutes
May 19 1977
Mr Bill Weiss, 5532 Karen Avenue, stated his property
is up for sale and the price he gets will be determined by the
zoning He felt single-family zoning would hinder development
of the area because of the high price of single-family homes
He felt zoning in the area should be multiple -family or remain
as it is
Ms Francis Raines, agreed that zoning is a factor in the
selling price of property She reported two recent sales in
the area were for $35,500 and $125,500 She stated a condition
of sale for her client is that the structure will be torn down
and replaced with a triplex She stated each of the streets
in the area have different characteristics and some homes have
been refurbished and are well maintained and it is a nice
residential area She felt Newman Street has prime income
producing properties and yet the other half of the street has
older homes
Chairman Van Allen announced that it was time to conduct the
public hearings. He opened the following hearings and continued
them until after this item
PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 77-6 -
MEB INVESTMENTS (Continued)
PUBLIC HEARING RE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 77-7 -
WILLIAM J GRIMES AND JOHN A CIPOLLONE
Ms A McClanahan, 5660 Camp Street, stated Camp Street is
a dead-end street and is crowded because of the Straight Talk
Clinic She asked if it was possible to spot zone the area
and perhaps downzone Camp Street to single-family residential
Chairman Van Allen stated the City tries to avoid spot zoning
since it gives consideration to individual problems and creates
a hodge-podge type of development
Mr Sal Otrambo Westminster, representing his father who owns
property at 5591 Newman Street, stated his father purchased the
property with the intent of developing a duplex and was in
favor of the zoning remaining as it is
It was moved by Commissioner Mullen, seconded by Commissioner
Friedmann and unanimously carried to set a public hearing to
consider an amendment to the General Plan to consider a change
in the allowable density for the Walker Street Zoning Study
area for June 16
Commissioner Friedmann stated she favors continuing the multiple -
family residential zoning on a lower density She did not feel
that single-family residential zoning would revitalize the area
or that it would be financially feasible to replace the deter-
iorating houses with single-family dwellings.
Chairman Van Allen suggested that if the property owners and
residents have any comments regarding the zoning study they
communicate them to the staff prior to the hearing
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Chairman Van Allen asked if anyone wished
to speak in regard to any matter not on the agenda
Mr. Gene White 5591 Karen Avenue, stated lately he has noticed
a great deal of speeding traffic on Karen, especially at the
S-curve, with cars crossing over into the wrong lane He felt
a divider at Peach would not solve the problem but a possible
solution might be a cul-de-sac
Planning Commission Minutes May 19, 1977
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS (Continued)
3 Review of Landscape Plans - Cypress Village Commercial
Center
4 Review of architectural plans for Building "C" - Cypress
Village Commercial Center
The Planning Director requested that these two items be con-
sidered together He presented the plot plan and elevations
for Building "C", the third commercial building at the south-
west corner of Orange Avenue and Valley View Street and stated
they are identical with the plans submitted under the condi-
tional use permit and approved by the Commission Building
"C" will contain 3500 square feet and be the same design as the
other two buildings He stated staff has no objections to the
building design and location and recommends approval
Mr. Jerry Reynolds, 2507 Lighthouse Lane, Corona del Mar,
stated the plot plans and elevations are the same as originally
submitted for the conditional use permit. He stated there
will probably be dual occupancy of Building "C" and he did
not feel the occupant would be a restaurant He stated he
would agree to a condition that the size and location of the
trash area will be based on the occupant of the building
The Planning Director stated staff would be concerned about the
trash areas only if the tenant for Building "B" or "C" was a
restaurant He suggested if the Commission has concerns in this
area, then the design size and location of the trash receptacles
could be considered at a later date, however, he did not feel
additional consideration of the trash area for Building "C"
was necessary.
Mr. Reynolds stated they would enlarge the trash area if nec-
essary depending upon the use of Building "C". The Planning
Director stated the parking and trash area for Building "C"
were adequate as shown on the plans.
The Public Wo.rks Director suggested adding a condition that
where Liquidamber trees are proposed they be located at least
five feet from the sidewalk to prevent damage by the roots
Mr. Ed Moore, Larmore Development, stated it was his under-
standing from the last meeting that the trash area for Building
"B" would remain as is unless a restaurant goes in and then the
trash area would be enlarged
Chairman Van Allen stated he would like the same condition for
the trash area for Building "C" that was placed on Building "B"
Mr Reynolds stated the condition would be acceptable
The Planning Director stated the signing program will be sub-
ject to Planning Commission review and approval later
It was moved by Commissioner Mullen seconded by Commissioner
Friedmann and unanimously carried to approve the plot plan and
elevations for Building "C" of the Cypress Village commercial
center subject to the condition that the trash area design for
Building "C" be subject to review and approval by the Planning
Commission
The Planning Director transmitted and described the landscape
and irrigation plan for the same development He reported
Liquidamber street trees are proposed along Valley View and
staff recommends that they be setback five feet from the side-
walk, ground cover will consist of white, pink and red flowering
shrubs, and mostly Sycamore with some Eucalyptus trees are proposed.
Planning Commission Minutes May 19, 1977
He stated staff has two reservations with the plan one concern
relates to the number of trees proposed in the five -foot -wide
buffer adjacent to the proposed single-family development and
the second relates to the absence of specimen trees. He
requested that the applicant provide a minimum five gallon
tree interspersed with several 15 gallon trees instead of the
one gallon trees proposed in the five foot strip and that the
applicant also provide several box trees within the development.
Mr Reynolds agreed to plant five and 15 gallon trees in the
buffer strip as recommended by staff and he stated a box tree
could be planted in the courtyard area in front of Building
"A" Commissioners Van Allen and Mullen both felt the
number of trees proposed in the five foot strip was sufficient
as long as they are five and 15 gallon size and will provide
screening
It was moved by Commissioner Mullen seconded by Commissioner
Friedmann and unanimously carried to approve the landscape
and irrigation plans for Cypress Village commercial center
subject to the conditions that any Liquidamber trees be
located at least five feet from a sidewalk and that minimum
five gallon trees with an interspersing of 15 gallon trees be
planted along the westerly wall with the number and location
of 15 gallon trees to be subject to staff approval
RECESS Chairman Van Allen called a recess at 9 00 p m The
meeting was called back to order at 9.05 p m with Commissioner
Partin absent
PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 77-6 - MEB
INVESTMENTS Chairman Van Allen announced that this was the
time and place for the continuation of the public hearing to
consider a proposal to construct a nine -unit condominium project
on a parcel of land located to the rear of Lincoln Plaza Shop-
ping Center He opened the hearing and asked for the staff
report
The Planning Director stated the hearing was continued from
the May 5 meeting and he asked that Item #1 regarding Tentative
Tract Map #9837 be considered with the hearing
The Assistant Planner summarized Staff Report #77-16 dated
May 12 describing the proposed development The nine condo-
minium units will be located between the Lincoln Plaza Shopping
Center and the 28 -unit condominium complex to the south and
will be identical in design with the 28 units He reported a
landscape belt, rather than a wall, will separate the nine units
from the 28 units and a three -foot -high wall will enclose the
patio areas He reported the location of trash areas will have
to be resolved by MEB and the owner of the shopping center prior
to recording of the final map A pedestrian access gate is
proposed on the east side of the property which can also serve
emergency vehicles Mr Lamm stated the plan submitted reflects
the requirements which staff suggested and meets all minimum
Zoning Ordinance requirements. He reported that some of the
landscaping is proposed on property owned by the shopping center
(Lot #11) and this will necessitate the granting of an easement
to the condominium homeowners' association to allow for maint-
enance of the area. Mr. Lamm presented slides of the property.
Mr Doug Powery, representing MEB Investments, 3723 Birch
Street, #23, Newport Beach, stated they and the shopping center
owner have tentatively reached an agreement regarding location
of the trash areas The trash receptacles located at the south-
east corner of the commercial building are proposed to be relo-
cated in the alley on the east side of the building for use by
Victor's Flowers and other tenants on the east side of the
building, the trash area on the west side of the property in
Planning Commission Minutes May 19, 1977
front of the commercial building will provide mutual use for
the commercial tenants on the west side of the building and for
the future restaurant Both areas will be enclosed. He reported
the easterly alley is 13 feet wide and the trash bins which are
four feet wide, will be placed against the wall and they felt
this should provide sufficient room for pedestrian access He
stated the applicant proposes to pave a portion of the landscaped
area at the southeast corner of the commercial building for
the benefit of persons dumping trash
The Planning Director suggested that the location of the trash
area on the west side of the property be determined when plans
for the restaurant are submitted Staff was suggesting that
the present trash bins at the southeast corner could be relocated
to the easterly alley.inside an enclosure, however, an appropriate
location has not been finalized Staff suggested that the trash
area could be located south of the door to Victor's Flowers
He reported that presently trash trucks use the alley for pick-
up. He added that the fire department does not require the
alley for emergency access because with the change in design
of the project, they can use the driveway The emergency pedes-
trian access will be maintained The Planning Director recommended
a condition that the location of all trash areas serving the
condominiums and commercial area shall be subject to Planning
Commission review and approval prior to the issuance of the
certificate of occupancy.
The Public Works Director recommended that the rear doors of
the commercial building be retained for emergency access
Mr Powery stated the applicant's intent is to purchase that
portion of Lot #11 at the southeast corner of the building
with a'maintenance easement granted to the homeowners' associa-
tion The City Attorney stated the easement area could be
used to satisfy the landscaping requirements In response to
several questions raised by members of the Commission, staff
described the ownership of the 13 parcels They reported the
map will require approval of both property owners involved, the
garages will be located under the condominium units, and, the
greenbelt area between the 9 units and 28 units varies from a
minimum of 18 feet to a maximum of 28 feet
Commissioner Mullen felt the project is a good use of the
property and will provide an expanded market for the commercial
area but he suggested that the hearing be continued until all
details are worked out between the two property owners
Mr Powery stated it will be to the benefit of both property
owners to resolve the trash locations. He pointed out that
the shopping center owner relies on a 40 foot wide easement
across Lot #12 to provide ingress and egress from Lot #11 (the
shopping center) and this factor can be used in negotiations
Chairman Van Allen recommended a condition that all required
landscaping and irrigation systems shall be installed prior to
issuance of a certificate of occupancy
Mr. Joe Hardcastle 4588 Blanca Drive, Cypress, recommended
that the east alley not be blocked since a fire or earthquake
could cut off access in the westerly driveway
The Commission held discussion regarding location of the trash
area
The Planning Director recommended Condition #28 to state that
the installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems
shall be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy, and Condition #29 to state that the location of trash
Planning Commission Minutes May 19 1977
areas shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning
Commission and shall be installed prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy and plans depicting the location of
the trash area shall be submitted in conjunction with submittal
of the landscape and irrigation plans He further suggested
that Condition #23 could be eliminated with the following
wording added to Condition #29 if the trash collection area
for the commercial building remains at its present location,
CC & R's shall be recorded among the different property owners
providing for reciprocal use of the trash bins
The Public Works Director asked if the tentative map would be
affected by the location of the trash area The City Attorney
indicated that if the easement for landscaping is granted to
the homeowners' association reserving the right to place trash
bins there, in compliance with Condition #29 of the C U P and
Condition #9 of the tentative tract map then there will be no
problem with the tentative map. If the property owners nego-
tiate a sale of the area resulting in different lot lines between
Lots 10 and 11, then staff could determine that the final map
is in substantial conformance with the tentative map.
Mr Powery stated he would like it understood that any modifi-
cation to the lot lines of 10 and 11 would not be a substantial
inconformity since this matter was fully discussed tonight.
The Planning Director agreed that any modification to the lot
lines either by the easement or grant deed could be considered
minor and the applicant could submit the final map
Mr Doug Rossman, 212 Chantilly, Anaheim, owner of Lincoln
Plaza Shopping Center, asked if the Commission accepted the
proposed trash location adjacent to Victor's Flowers He
was concerned about cutting off emergency access in the alley
and stated Victor's uses the alley for deliveries and it would
be inconvenient for them to lose use of the alley He felt
the greenbelt south of the commercial building could be extended
to the property line which will allow room for the trash bins
Mr Rossman stated he would not like the trash bins in front
of the property and that it would be helpful if the Commission
could decide tonight on the trash area location Mr Rossman
indicated that if the trash area is not located at the south-
east corner of the commercial building then there may be diffi-
culty in coming to an agreement with MEB
Chairman Van Alien felt the Commission was not prepared to
decide on the trash areas and he recommended continuing the
hearing until the property owners reach an agreement.
Chairman Van Allen moved to continue the public hearing re-
garding C U P #77-6 and Tentative Tract Map #9837 to June 2
The motion died for lack of a second
Mr. Rossman stated he did not wish to delay approval and sug-
gested that the Commission go ahead with its intended action
Chairman Van Allen stated he did not wish to decide on the
trash area locations tonight and he suggested that the applicant
meet with the staff to prepare their plan for the enclosures
and the entire matter could be considered at the next meeting
It was moved by Chairman Van Allen, seconded by Commissioner
Mullen and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing
regarding Conditional Use Permit #77-6 to the June 2 meeting.
It was moved by Chairman Van Allen seconded by Commissioner
Mullen and unanimously carried to continue consideration of
Tentative Tract Map #9837 to the June 2 meeting
Mr Powery stated the applicant agreed with the continuance
10
Planning Commission Minutes May 19 1977
PUBLIC HEARING RE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 77-7 - WILLIAM
J GRIMES AND JOHN A CIPOLLONE Chairman Van Alien announced
that this was the time and place for the public hearing to con-
sider a request to establish, operate and maintain a Moped and
bicycle store including the service and rental thereof at
5262 Lincoln Avenue on property located in the CH -10000 Commer-
cial Heavy Zone He opened the hearing and asked for the staff
report
The Assistant Planner summarized Staff Report #77-14 dated May
13 describing the proposed use and property The property is
50 feet wide and 127 feet deep and contains two structures
The front structure will be used for display and sales and the
rear, garage -type structure will be used for service. He
reported that no previous use on the property has been issued
a use permit and if this request is granted repairs to the
structures will be required to meet Building Code specifications
He stated the Public Works Department recommended one further
condition to require that a door be provided at the rear of the
garage to provide access to the seven -foot -wide strip of land
at the rear Mr Lamm reported that the door exists but is
sealed and it will have to be reopened
Commissioner Adler asked if there was a condition restricting
the storage of gasoline on the property. The Planning Director
stated it is an automatic condition that the use must comply
with requirements of the County Fire Marshal, and specifically,
that the storage of any flammable products is subject to the
requirements of the County Fire Marshal. He suggested adding
a condition to state that establishment of the use and develop-
ment of the property shall meet all requirements of the County
Fire Marshal He suggested another condition to state that
there shall be no sale or dispensing of gasoline products on the
subject property except as required for service of the vehicles
Mr Bill Grimes, 3702 Holden Circle, Los Alamitos, asked about
Condition #2 which requires that repairs be made and occupancy
permits obtained prior to issuance of a business license and
commencement of the business Mr Lamm stated an occupancy
permit was never issued for the property and the Building Depart-
ment has a list of several minor repairs which are necessary
involving about nine items such as illegal wiring and holes in
the walls. Chairman Van Allen advised the applicant that they
could commence business as soon as the conditions are satisfied
and the certificate of occupancy is issued. He suggested that
since the applicants are leasing the property the owner may be
cooperative in correcting the problems He stated the repairs
would be required for any type of use requiring a use permit
Mr Grimes asked if they could use the existing sign in front
of the building He indicated they would like to paint over it
and illuminate it with floodlights The Planning Director
requested that the applicant submit signing plans for review
and approval by the Commission. He stated he did not object
to their using the existing sign frame but that he would prefer
that the sign have interior illumination
Chairman Van Allen asked if anyone wished to speak in favor
or in opposition to the application. There was no one wishing
to speak in support or opposition
Mr John Cipollone, 4164 Dogwood Avenue, Seal Beach, the appli-
cant, stated their main concern has been their desire to start
business as soon as possible and that they were almost tempted
to withdraw the application after learning about the additional
repairs which are required Chairman Van Alien stated the Code
requirements would apply to any use on the property which requires
a conditional use permit
11
Planning Commission Minutes May 19 1977
It was moved by Commissioner Mullen and seconded by Commissioner
Adler to approve Conditional Use Permit #77-7 subject to the
following conditions
1. The proposed parking area shall be delineated with parking
stalls to be a minimum of 9 by 20 feet in size
2 The existing structures have not been issued occupancy
permits by the Building and Safety Department Therefore,
necessary repairs shall be made and occupancy permits
obtained prior to the issuanceof a business license or
commencement of the proposed business
3 Outdoor display of mopeds and bicycles shall be subject
to Planning Commission approval
4 The signing program for the business shall be subject to
review and approval by the Planning Commission
5 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with the Master
Plan of Drainage
6 A cash bond shall be posted for a future street tree
within the existing parkway in front of the subject
property
7 A minimum six -foot -wide landscape area shall be provided
across the frontage of the subject property and the area
irrigated and planted with landscaping to the specifica-
tions of the Planning Director
8 A door shall be installed in the rear of the frame and
stucco garage to provide access to the seven -foot -wide
strip of land which is isolated behind the existing garage
9 No sale of gasoline products or oil derivatives shall be
conducted on the subject property
10 The establishment of this use and the proposed develop-
ment shall be subject to the requirements of the County
Fire Marshal
The motion unanimously carried by the following roll call vote
AYES 4 COMMISSIONERS. Adler, Friedmann, Mullen
& Van Allen
NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT 1 COMMISSIONERS Partin
Chairman Van Allen closed the public hearing
Commissioner Friedmann asked when a status report was due
regarding the outdoor display at Wall Furniture Galleries in
the Walker/Ball shopping center The Planning Director stated
this item would be on the June 2 agenda
ADJOURNMENT Chairman Van Allen adjourned the meeting at
11 05 p m
ATTEST
E ARY
SECR 0 THE
RMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING
COMMISSION
12