Loading...
Minutes 1978-08-17MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CYPRESS PLANNING COMMISSION HELD August 17, 1978 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 6.43 p m on Thursday August 17 1978 in the Cypress City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Chairman Robert Van Allen presiding PRESENT Commissioners Adler, Friedmann Mullen Partin and Van Allen ABSENT None Also present were Planning Director Brian Hawley, Public Works Director Art Schatzeder Assistant Planner Don Lamm and Attorney Tom Clark PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. Commissioner Mullen led the pledge to the flag The Planning Director requested that the minutes of August 3 be added to the agenda and an item under Administrative Matters re- garding an Interpretation of Section 12 4 of the Zoning Ordinance The Chairman added the items to the agenda MINUTES• It was moved by Commissioner Partin, seconded by Commissioner Adler and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of July 20 It was moved by Commissioner Friedmann seconded by Commissioner Mullen and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of August 3 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Chairman Van Allen asked if anyone wished to speak in regard to any matter not on the agenda No one wished to speak ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 1. Request for Interpretation of Section 12 4 of Zoning Ordinance California Conservation Corps The Planning Director reported that staff received a letter from Dr James Beckman, Chief Facilities and Procurement California Conservation Corps, which outlined the functions and purpose of the Corps and their interest in leasing Landell School which will be put out to bid on August 30 for alternate uses He reported school properties are located in the PS Zone and that zone does not speci- fically authorize uses of the type outlined in Dr Beckman's letter Section 12 4 2 J of the Zoning Ordinance lists public buildings and grounds as being uses permitted in the PS Zone subject to a C U P The Commission was requested to determine whether the California Conservation Corps can be interpreted as a permitted use in accor- dance with Section 12.4.2 J Dr Beckman elaborated on his letter of August 9 He reported the Corps is a Sunset Law operation which will go out of existence in 1980 if the legislature decides to discontinue the program He reported they received $6 4 million in Federal funds this year and by 1980 they should receive $30 million He reported on the organ- ization of the Corps and reported there are 15 centers and one training academy in operation in California Each center has about 60 Corpsmembers and 13 staff Eight more centers were authorized to open this fiscal year Planning Commission Minutes August 17, 1978 Dr Beckman reported the Cypress center would probably be the only one in Orange County It would provide a residential, 24-hour per day 7 -day per week program for 60 corpsmembers who range in age from 18 to 20, 2/3 are male, and who represent a broad ethnic mix None are in a probationary or legal hold position They are con- tinually supervised by 10 staff most of whom have had extensive youth experience. Dr Beckman reported the program is not a drug program CYA program, or convict rehabilitation program It is designed to help youths who do not have better options available at that point in their lives He reported corpsmembers are selected through the State Employment Development Department Criteria for membership are they must be between 18 and 20 California residents and not in a legal hold position Membership is voluntary, and for a one year period After a year they may remain for another year and then become specialists They are paid the Federal minimum wage He stated the program offers the potential of employment in State service Dr Beckman reported there are three components to the Corps program 40 hours or more per week are devoted to public service conservation work for the state, county cities or school districts which can include the rehabilitation of older dwellings, building or maintaining neighborhood parks and cleaning up after storms The State has requested the Corps service in conservation projects at Bolsa Chica and in upper Newport Bay He reported most of their mayor projects are about one hour's drive away from the center The second aspect is job skill training at the center which occurs during evenings and on week -ends and can include training at local junior colleges or through adult education The third component is that corpsmembers are emergency trained by the California Department of Forrestry and the State Office of Emergency Services He stated they are in the process of being certified for search and rescue missions In the past the Corps has helped with mudslides, flooding and fighting forest fires The Planning Director stated that, based on the description of the activities, the Corps program can be interpreted under Section 12 4 2 K, as well as J Dr Beckman responded to questions on the Corps activities from the Commission He described the training and recruitment of corps - members, operational procedures and supervision in the center and the Corps' interaction with other government agencies and public groups He reported on their conversion plans for the Landell School Dr Beckman stated most of the time consists of planned activities He stated some disciplinary problems can be cause for immediate termination from the program Chairman Van Allen announced that it was time to conduct the public hearings He opened the following hearings and continued them until after this item PUBLIC HEARING RE ZONE CHANGE NO 78-8 - WALKER STREET PUBLIC HEARING RE. PREANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO 78-9 - GAY STREET PUBLIC HEARING RE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 78-17 - LINDBORG-DAHL INVESTORS, INC PUBLIC HEARING RE VARIANCE NO 78-1 - MR $ MRS EDWARD E JACKS, JR Dr Beckman further described the type of projects the Corps is involved in He reported they charge cities for work performed if they must remain on a job overnight He stated he would be willing to stipulate to having a maximum of 65 corpsmembers at the Cypress center 2- Planning Commission Minutes August 17 1978 It was moved by Commissioner Friedmann and seconded by Commissioner Partin to make the interpretation that Section 12 4 2 (J) and (K) of the Zoning Ordinance would provide for the establishment of a center for the California Conservation Corps subject to the granting of a conditional use permit Chairman Van Allen asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak on this matter No one wished to speak Commissioner Adler stated he did not support the motion because he did not feel the Conservation Center was a public or semi-public use He also felt it would require more space, being so close to a residential area The motion carried with Commissioner Adler voting no Commissioner Mullen requested that staff send out press releases to major newspapers in the area publicizing the hearing on the Conservation Corps in order to get broad community input on the proposal for a center He also requested a staff report regarding other cities' experience with such centers RECESS Chairman Van Allen called a recess at 8.05 p m The meeting was called back to order at 8 15 p m with all Commissioners present 'ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: The Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in regard to any matter not on the agenda No one wished to speak. PUBLIC HEARING RE ZONE CHANGE NO 78-8 - WALKER STREET Chairman Van Allen announced that this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a proposal to rezone various lots fronting along Walker Street, generally located between Lincoln Avenue aiid Karen Street He opened the hearing and asked for the staff report The Planning Director presented Staff Report #78-33 dated August 8 which indicated the rezoning application was initiated by the City Council following their approval of General Plan Amendment #78-5 which changed the land use designation of various parcels along Walker Street between Lincoln Avenue and Karen Avenue The proposed rezoning would change the parcels currently designated CN (Commercial Neighborhood) to CG -10,000 (Commercial General), three parcels located on the east side of Walker between Newman and Karen from RS -6000 to CG -10 000, and an acreage -size parcel on the west side of Walker opposite Newman from RS -6000 to RM -20/A The Planning Director reported that while RM -20/A is the only multiple -family zoning classification, any multiple -family development would be subject to a C U P and also subject to the General Plan designation limitation of 13 units/acre Chairman Van Allen asked if anyone wished to speak in support or in opposition to Zone Change #78-8 No one wished to speak. Commissioner Mullen stated zoning of the area was discussed in depth during the General Plan Amendment hearings and the rezoning was basically bringing the zoning into conformance with the General Plan and he supported staff's recommendations It was moved by Commissioner Mullen and seconded by Commissioner Friedmann to approve Zone Change #78-8 The motion unanimously carried by the following roll call vote AYES 5 COMMISSIONERS. Adler Friedmann, Mullen, Partin $ Van Allen NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS None Chairman Van Allen closed the public hearing -3- Planning Commission Minutes August 17. 1978 PUBLIC HEARING RE. PRE -ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO 78-9 - GAY STREET The Chairman announced that this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a proposal for the appropriate zoning of approximately 2 75 acres of existing County Agriculture A-1 zoned property He opened the hearing and asked for the staff report The Planning Director presented Staff Report #78-32 dated August 3 and he presented slides of the subject property and the area along Gay Street The City Council initiated the application at their June 26, 1978 meeting in response to a request from Mr Ted Cramer, 8182 Gay Street Mr Cramer indicated a preference for RS -6000 Zoning and agreed to annex the property to the City if such zoning is granted The Planning Director indicated that two additional parcels owned by Mr Cramer and a portion of the Pacific Electric Railroad right of way have been included in the application to provide for logical annexation boundaries The Planning Director reviewed staff's justification for recommending RS -15 000 Low Den- sity Residential Zoning for the subject property and other properties along Gay Street Chairman Van Allen asked if anyone wished to speak in support of the application Mr Ted Cramer, 8182 Gay Street, Cypress, stated he is requesting pre -annexation zoning of RS -6000. He reported there is a four -lot split on his property. He stated he would like to annex to the City because he prefers the quick response of the Cypress Police Department over the County Sheriff's Department and because he is tired of living in the County Mr Carl Erickson, 5832 Crestview, La Palma, representing Walker and Lee, stated single-family residential development surrounds the subject property and the application would not prevent persons from continuing to use the iailroad right-of-way for horse riding He felt no traffic congestion problems have been created by the recent single-family tract which exits onto one residential street He felt the difference in traffic generated by seven lots under RS -6000 zoning and six lots under RS -15,000 zoning would be small He felt RS -6000 homes would not be less attractive than some of the unkept properties along Gay Street and that single-family development would result in pride of ownership which would improve the neighborhood The Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition Mr Bob Drennan, 8291 Monique Way, Cypress, reported he leases the property directly to the south of the applicant's and the owner of the property has no interest in being included in the annexation proposal Mr Drennan stated the horse stables do not generate much traffic because the owners do not come in to service the animals He stated the new single-family development creates traffic problems on Gay Street Mr Drennan stated there is a trend toward upgrading the properties along Gay Street and people enjoy the lifestyle avail- able on the street which is compatible for the keeping of animals He felt RS -15,000 zoning would be more compatible and appropriate than RS -6000 for the keeping of animals He reported that one alternative in an on-going County study is to designate properties along Gay and portions facing Crescent for low-density residential development Ms Gail Simmons 8162 Gay Street Cypress reported she owns 5 acres in front of the subject property and stated she opposes any change in zoning She reported she boards horses and she spoke on the benefits of maintaining a rural atmosphere and lifestyle She expressed concern that a change in zoning may eventually eliminate the animal related activities in the area -4- Planning Commission Minutes August 17, 1978 Mr Cramer stated the property owner directly to the south is un- decided about annexation and that Mr Drennan cannot speak for the property owner Mr Cramer noted that the new single-family devel- opment has not affected the horse activities on Gay Street or changed the lifestyle Mr Cramer stated he owns two -10,000 square foot lots on Gay Street and a half acre on Denni Street and his property is not large enough to be subdivided for RS -15,000 development Commissioner Mullen stated he supported staff's recommendation for RS -15,000 zoning and felt it was appropriate for preserving the unique rural lifestyle of the Gay Street area He felt rezoning the subject property to RS -6000 would create pressures on the City to designate all properties along Gay Street as RS -6000. Commissioner Friedmann stated she supported staff's recommendation and she felt RS -6000 zoning at the end of the street would add a lot of. traffic and create problems Commissioner Adler stated he agreed with staff's concern regarding piecemeal annexation of properties He felt it was illogical to provide City services to one small area when the rest of the street is outside the City and he felt annexation should consist of a larger area It was moved by Commissioner Mullen and seconded by Commissioner Friedmann to approve Pre -annexation Zone Change #78-9 designating the property for RS -15 000 Low Density Residential Zoning Mr Cramer discussed potential traffic generation from his property in relation to the new single-family tract across the street and he did not feel his development would substantially increase traffic The Planning Director stated staff's recommendation for RS -15,000 zoning was based on more than traffic considerations and was based on the fact that staff felt RS -15 000 was more appropriate recog- nizing the existing land uses and potential development of the area Chairman Van Allen stated it would be difficult to maintain an RS -6000 island at the end of the street He advised the applicant that the application will be considered by the City Council and that he also had the option of applying to the County for a zone change Mr Erickson stated the applicant's property would be the only one subject to change since a characteristic of the Gay Street area is high density housing. He stated many of the Gay Street lots contain more than one dwelling and open space is not being preserved The motion carried by the following roll call vote AYES• 4 COMMISSIONERS Adler, Friedmann, Mullen & Van Allen NOES 1 COMMISSIONERS. Partin ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS None Chairman Van Allen closed the public hearing RECESS The Chair called a recess at 8.40 p m The meeting was called back to order at 8.50 p m with all Commissioners present PUBLIC HEARING RE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 78-17 - LINDBORG-DAHL INVESTORS, INC Chairman Van Allen announced that this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a proposal to construct a 20 160 square foot commercial retail/office building and a 6,600 square foot light industrial building at 4552 Lincoln Avenue in the CH -10,000 (LC) Commercial Heavy (Lincoln Avenue Combining) Zone. He opened the hearing and asked for the staff report 5- Planning Commission Minutes August 17, 1978 The Planning Director presented slides of the subject property and surrounding properties and the Assistant Planner summarized Staff Report #78-34 dated August 10 which described the application. Staff also presented the plot plan and elevations Staff clarified several questions from the Commission regarding the median break in Lincoln Avenue location of the trash area, height of perimeter walls and architectural treatment of the south wall of the indus- trial building The staff reported the applicant exceeds the parking requirement by seven spaces Staff discussed Condition #1 relating to landscaping and extension of the five-foot landscaped planter and the Commissioners suggested several alternatives to increase the planter strip The Planning Director read letters from Mr and Mrs James Brooks, 4543 Rainier Cypress, and Mr and Mrs Ronaldo Pascual, 4553 Rainier Cypress, who made recommendations relative to the compatibility of their homes and the new development. The Pascuals suggested the use of barbed wire on the southerly wall The Commissioners generally expressed objection to the use of barbed wire Chairman Van Allen asked if the applicant wished to speak Mr David Dahl, representing the applicant, stated they are sensitive to the residences to the south and the site plan should not affect them He requested that parking not be decreased. With regard to Condition #6 concerning fencing along the east and west property lines, Mr Dahl asked that the fencing extend from the south property line to the south end of the commercial building, since fencing extending past the building would obscure the commercial uses from .Lincoln Avenue With regard to Condition #7 Mr. Dahl asked that they be able to maintain a minimum six -foot -high block wall He felt the six-foot wall, with the nine foot landscaped area and retention of existing trees should provide adequate protection and assurance of privacy for the residences He offered to stucco and add wood trim to the south face of the industrial building instead of extending the costly mansard treatment Mr Dahl stated they would attempt to maintain as many of the existing trees as possible Chairman Van Allen asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the application No one wished to speak in favor He asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition Mr Vic Snook, 4603 Rainier, Cypress expressed concern over the adequacy of the wall on the south property line and felt it should extend to at least six feet above the final grade He stated he would not object to the trash area at the southerly property line if it is screened by the trees and wall He stated he was concerned about the height of the landscaping and hoped the landscaping would be installed early in the development stage He stated the trees help reduce the noise from Lincoln Avenue He expressed concern over light interference from the proposed development He felt most of the neighbors would not favor the use of barbed wire on the southerly wall Mr. Snook felt most neighbors would be interested in ensuring that the new development is secure The Planning Director suggested leaving Condition #7 as is and that when the landscaping plans are submitted staff will notify the adja- cent property owners to allow for their review and comments Commissioner Mullen requested that the trash area be relocated from the southerly property line and that the trash area on the west be relocated to parking stall #49 He stated he supported the applicant's request regarding the fencing on the east and west property lines In response to questions from Commissioner Friedmann the Planning Director stated the industrial activities would be sub- ject to the restrictions of the City's Noise Ordinance and he did not feel noise would be a problem for the residences since they will face a solid wall on the industrial building and there will be no outdoor operations -6- Planning Commission Minutes August 17, 1978 It was moved by Commissioner Mullen and seconded by Commissioner Friedmann to approve Conditional Use Permit #78-17 subject to the following conditions and the findings contained in Section 17 2-7 of the Zoning Ordinance 1 A landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to the installa tion of any landscaping Existing pine trees located to the rear of the property shall be retained whenever possible to maintain screening along the southerly property line The planter width along the southerly property line shall be increased in width to nine feet by decreasing the length of the parking stalls abutting the retail/office building and utilizing the sidewalk for vehicular overhang to the specifications of City staff 2 Soil in planting areas, including trees shall be tested by a qualified agricultural laboratory to determine the organic and chemical amendments for optimum growth for the plants specified The test results shall include concentration of nitrogen phosphorus, potassium, pH, salinity, sodium status and boron saturation extract Results of these tests with recommenda tions of the agricultural laboratory shall be furnished to the Public Works Department for approval at least 30 days prior to planting date A bond shall be posted by the applicant to guarantee maintenance of the irrigation system so that it operates in a manner for which it was designed, and to guar- antee maintenance of all plant materials in a healthy growing condition free of weeds and litter, for a period of not less than twelve (12) months, to the specifications of the City staff A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for this devel- opment until all landscaping and irrigation is completed in accordance with plans and specifications as approved by the Planning Commission Street trees (15 gallon) forty feet (40') on center shall be installed along streets in conformance with the street tree policy of the Public Works Department The type of trees shall be as required under the Townscape and Urban Design Element of the General Plan 3 The developer shall give further consideration to the archi- tectural treatment of Building B The south wall shall have greater architectural relief through the use of wood trim and stucco coating subject to City staff approval 4 The trash area located along the southerly property line shall be eliminated The trash receptacle designated on the plot plan along the westerly lot line shall be relocated to parking space #49 as designated on said plot plan The final locations of all trash areas are subject to City staff approval 5 A comprehensive signing program for the commercial retail/office complex and industrial building shall be submitted for Planning Commission review and approval 6 A minimum six foot (6') high fence measured from the highest adjacent grade shall be constructed along the westerly and easterly property lines from the southerly lot line to the rear of the commercial/office complex building The material used for construction is subject to City staff approval A retaining wall per City of Cypress standards shall be constructed at the property line where the grade difference is greater than twelve inches (12 ) 7 A minimum six foot (6') high block wall measured from the highest adjacent grade shall be maintained and/or constructed along the south property line A continuous physical barrier (i e , 6" high concrete curb) shall be constructed at a minimum distance of three feet (3') from the base of all block walls exposed to vehicular traffic to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Planting may be installed in the area between the block wall and the curb -7 - Planning Commission Minutes August 17, 1978 8 On site security lighting shall be arranged so that direct rays will not shine on adjacent properties or produce glare for street traffic All roof mounted equipment, such as heating and air - conditioning units, shall be adequately screened from public view, subject to the approval of the City staff Commercial or industrial developments which adjoin residentially zoned areas shall construct noise bafflers and/or deflectors on all mechanical equipment mounted outdoors, to the satisfaction of the City staff 9 All secondary and primary utility services shall be under- ground Street lights shall be installed per City standards Necessary fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Fire Department requirements and City standards A master plan of sewers shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer 10 Lincoln Avenue shall be fully improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk driveway, paving, etc , in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways 11 All existing public improvements at the development site which are damaged cracked or otherwise below standard shall be removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 12 The street in front of this development shall be resurfaced with one -inch (1") minimum thickness asphalt concrete from curb -to -curb if it is necessary to open cut the street in more than one place Any open cut shall be back-filled per City of Cypress Standard No 110 13 The quantity, location, width, and the type of driveway shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer An effective sight distance for vehicular traffic shall be maintained at the intersection of the driveway entrances with Lincoln Avenue No landscaping will be allowed in the area of the curb returns Adequate sight distance also shall be maintained within the development at all driveway intersections to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 14 Parking lot circulation shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer Bicycle racks shall be installed The location of all bicycle racks shall be subject to the approval of the City staff 15 Wheelchair and handicap access facilities shall be installed on site and off-site in accordance with State of California and City of Cypress Building Department standards 16 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer A grading plan shall be submitted for approval A topograph of the area surrounding this development shall be made to establish existing drainage flow patterns If the existing natural flow of any adjoining parcel is across the land of this development, a drainage easement shall be granted and drainage facilities provided for that property to the satisfaction of the City Engineer A maximum lot depth of 100 feet shall be allowed to drain onto Lincoln Avenue If drainage is directed to Lincoln Avenue, drainage culverts shall be constructed underneath sidewalks to convey all on- site runoff water to the street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer All on-site drainage shall be conveyed to the street by means of an undersidewalk drain per City of Cypress standards Plan checking and inspection fees shall be paid in accordance with City of Cypress Resolution No 1713 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with Master Plan of Drainage The sanitary sewer connection fee shall be paid by the developer in accordance with Orange County Sanitation District No 3, Resolution No 303 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid -8- Planning Commission Minutes August 17 1978 17 Developer shall conform to all applicable provisions of the City Code, which includes submittal of a parcel map to combine the existing parcels into a single lot, in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and City Subdivision Ordinance The motion unanimously carried by the following roll call vote• AYES 5 COMMISSIONERS Adler, Friedmann, Mullen, Partin $ Van Allen NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS None Chairman Van Allen closed the public hearing PUBLIC HEARING RE VARIANCE NO 78-1 - MR $ MRS EDWARD E JACKS, JR Chairman Van Allen announced that this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a request for a variance to allow the encroachment of a single-family residential room addition to within ten feet of the rear yard property line He opened the hearing and asked for the staff report The Assistant Planner presented Staff Report #78-34 dated August 9 which described the proposed variance Staff recommended denial of the variance since they could not make the necessary applicable findings justifying a variance as contained in Section 17 3 7 of the Zoning Ordinance Chairman Van Allen asked if the applicant wished to speak Mr Ed Jacks, 5284 Rome, Cypress, stated he did not feel the variance would constitute a special privilege He reported they considered two alternatives to build the room addition which would not require a variance an addition on the front of their dwelling they felt would hurt the aesthetics of their home and landscaping and could not be utilized by the family in the proper way and a neighbor expressed concern that a second story addition might be an invasion of privacy Commissioner Mullen asked if approval of the variance would meet the Zoning Ordinance adjustment provision that a certain percentage of the rear yard be maintained as open space, and the Planning Director stated this requirement would be met but the adjustment provision would only allow an encroachment to within 16 feet of the rear property line on a standard size lot The Planning Director reported that properties adjacent to the applicant's have a 20 feet minimum rear yard setback He stated the applicant's property differs because of the location and siting of the dwelling where the living area is further setback from the street than adjacent dwellings and because the adjacent dwellings are not L-shaped homes The Attorney stated that findings D and E of Section 17 3 7 must be made in order to approve the variance and either A, B or C A and C were not applicable in this case. The Planning Director indicated the only circumstance which might be considered exceptional was the fact that the living area of the applicant's dwelling is set back over 40 feet from the street while adjacent properties are set back 20 to 25 feet Mr. Jacks reported the property owner to the rear has a patio room which encroaches to within 10 feet of the rear property line and he did not object to a first floor addition but had reservations about a second story addition Mr. Jacks reported one other home in the tract has the same floor plan as his dwelling but that home is located on a cul-de-sac Mr James Duncan, 9787 Rome, Cypress, stated there are two L-shaped homes in his neighborhood which have large family room additions and he felt they have a rear yard setback of about 10 feet 9 Planning Commission Minutes August 17 1978 It was moved by Commissioner Mullen and seconded by Commissioner Partin to approve Variance #78-1 subject to findings D and E of Section 17 3 7 being made and subject to finding B being made based on the fact that the shape of the dwelling and the front yard setback varies from adjacent properties and would constitute special circum- stances Commissioner Friedmann stated she agreed with the staff and could not make the necessary findings Commissioner Adler stated he did not support the motion since the applicant had other options avail- able to him and he should abide by the ordinance The Commission held further discussion on the motion The motion carried by the following roll call vote - AYES NOES ABSENT 3 COMMISSIONERS 2 COMMISSIONERS 0 COMMISSIONERS Mullen, Partin E Van Allen Adler & Friedmann None Chairman Van Allen closed the public hearing ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS (Continued) 2 Landscape Review, Tract No 9624 - Butler Housing Corporation Chairman Van Allen asked staff to request that the applicant be present at the next meeting so that he can respond to questions from the Commission It was moved by Commissioner Partin, seconded by Commissioner Mullen and unanimously carried to continue the matter to the September 7 meeting ADJOURNMENT Chairman Van Allen adjourned the meeting at 11 35 p m £H'. RMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST SECRETARY 0 THE PLANNING COMMISSION -10-