Loading...
Planning Comm Reso. Nos. 201-251■ I r RESOLUTION NO 201 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, SECTION 111 2 "PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES' WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7 30 p m in the Council Chambers,9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 111.2 by amending subsection "F" and "0" as follows* 'F Eating places, not to exceed seating capacity for thirty (30) persons - drive-ins or walk-ups, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, no sale of alcohiic beverages permitted b; Suburban service stations ' WHEREASno one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that suburban service stations are compatible in the C-1 zone and that walk-up or drive-in eating places might be allowed in some C-1 areas, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 111 2 regarding 'Permitted Buildings and Uses' be recommended for approval by the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 1964 by the following called vote* AYES* 6 COMMISSIONERS NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS• ABSENT 1 COMMISSIONER.. ATTEST: Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton, Worley and Baroldi None Harvey SECRETARY Resolution No. 201 RESOLUTION NO 202 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, SECTIONS 112 2, 113 2 and 114 2 "PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES" WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7:30 p m in the Council Chambers 9471 South Wacker Street Cypress California to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Sections 112 2, 113 2 and 114 2 by amending these sections to read as follows "Section 112.2 PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES. Only the following buildings, structures, and uses, either singly or in combination, are permitted in a community shopping center. All uses except newsstands, off-street parking, electric distribution substations, and nurseries, shall be in an entirely enclosed building unless a Conditional Use Permit is obtained No uses shall be permitted hereunder which include the service of alcoholic beverages unless a Conditional Use Permit approved by the City Council is obtained therefor No building or structure shall be erected, structurally altered, or enlarged except for the following purposes, "Section 113.2 PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES. Only the following buildings, structures, and uses, either singly or in combination, are permitted in a Central Commercial Zone All uses, except newsstands and electric distribution substations shall be in an entirely enclosed building, unless a Conditional Use Permit is obtained therefor No uses shall be permitted hereunder which include the service of alcoholic beverages unless a Conditional Use Permit approved by the City Council is obtained therefor No building or structure shall be erected, structurally altered or enlarged except for the following purposes "Section 114.2 PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES: Only the following buildings, structures, and uses either singly or in combination, are permitted in the H -C, Highway Commercial Zone No uses shall be permitted hereunder which include the service of alcoholic beverages unless a Conditional Use Permit approved by the City Council is obtained therefor No buildings or structures shall be erected, structurally altered, or enlarged except for the following purposes. WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment, one inquiry was made, and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the. Planning Commission determined that establishments which serve alcoholic beverages should be permitted only after review of the Council, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No 90 Sections 112 2, 113 2 and 114 2, regarding "Permitted Buildings and Uses" be recommended for approval by the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day 6E August, 1964 by the following called vote' AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton, Worley and Baroldi NOES' 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER: Harvey ATTEST SECRETARY Resolution No 202 RESOLUTION NO. 203 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 90, SECTION 112.2 "PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES' SUBSECTION Jj WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 112 2, Subsection Jj by amending this subsection to read as follows: "Jj. Suburban service stations, subject to the approval of the Architectural Committee " WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment, one inquiry was made, and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined a suburban service station provides for better development in the C-2 zone, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 112 2, Subsection Jj regarding "Permitted Buildings and Uses' be recommended for approval by the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1964 by the following called vote. AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton, Worley, and Baroldi NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER: Harvey ATTEST• SECRETARY Resolution No 203 RESOLUTION NO 204 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, SEFTION 114 7, A, 1, "YARD REGULATIONS, FRONT YARD" WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7.30 P M in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, Section 114.7, Subsection A, 1 by amending this subsection to read as follows "A Front Yard 1 Each lot in the H -C Zone shall have a front yard extending except for access drives and walks, across the full width of the subject property, of a depth of not less than five (5) feet In the case of a corner lot, also a yard meet ng the same requirements, along the abutting side street. Such yards shall be landscaped and permanently maintained as a condition to the use of the property " WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the front yard could be reduced since this zone is intended for highway use and will not require deep yards, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, Subsection 114.7, Subsection A, 1, regarding "Yard Regulations, Front Yard" be recommended for approval by the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1964 by the following called vote: AYES• 6 COMMISSIONERS Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton, Worley, and Baroldi NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER• Harvey ATTEST SECRETARY Resolution No 204 RESOLUTION NO 205 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, SECTION 120 2 "USES PERMITTED IN ANY ZONE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT'. WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7.30 P.M in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 120 2 amending said section by adding the following: "M. Wholesale nurseries. N Model homes for residential subdivisions " WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the proposed amendment, one inquiry was made, and one protest was heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the uses might be compatible in any zone if each location were reviewed and conformed to the surrounding areas, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 120 2 regarding "Uses Permitted in any Zone Subject to a Conditional Use Permit' be recommended for approval by the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1964 by the following called vote: AYES• 6 COMMISSIONERS• Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton, Worley, and Baroldi NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT• 1 COMMISSIONER• Harvey ATTEST: SECRETARY Resoltuion No 205 RESOLUTION NO 206 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, SECTION 124 4 "SETTING HEARING" WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7.30 P M in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 124 4 by amending Subsection A, paragraph 4, to read as follows: "The Secretary of the Commission shall set the time and place of such hearing The date of the first hearing shall be no less than ten (10) days nor more than forty (40) days from the initiation of the proceedings by the Council, by the Commission on its own motion, or by receipt of an application " WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment and one protest was heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the addition to this section is necessary to clarify who can initiate proceedings before the Planning Commission, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, Section 124.4 regarding 'Setting Hearing' be recommended for approval by the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1964 by the following called vote: AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS• Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton, Worley, and Baroldi NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER: Harvey ATTEST: SECRETARY Resolution No. 206 RESOLUTION NO. 207 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO TIIE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, SECTION 121.2 "MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS' SUBSECTION A WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning; Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7.30 P M in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Xypress, California to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 121 2, Subsection A, paragraph three (3) by amending said section to read as follows: "1 1 2 spaces per dwelling unit in a garage, and 1/2 open space for each family unit in any development where there are more than two units constructed on a lot, whether they be single-family, duplex, or multiple units. WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment, one inquiry was made, and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined the amendment clarified the parking requirements ofr multiple development NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, Section 121.2, "Minimum Requirements", Subsection A, paragraph three (3) be recommended for approval by the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1964 by the following called vote AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton, ',Worley, and Baroldi NOES* 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER: Harvey ATTEST: SECRETARY CHAIRM N Resolution No 207 202 RESOLUTION NO 208 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, SECTION 121 4" IMPROVEMENTS" WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7.30 P M in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 Section 121 4, amending said section by adding the following. "E Marking of Spaces: All parking spaces shall be permanently striped and maintained to designate parking stalls " WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment, one inquiry was made, and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that parking spaces should be marked in a permanent manner to assure availability of parking spaces as approved by the planning staff in accordance with the parking requirements NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to the Zoning ordinance No. 90, Section 121.4, regarding "Improvements" be recommended for approval by the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1964 by the following called vote: AYES 6 COMMISSIONERS NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER• ATTEST. SECRETARY Resolution No 208 Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton, Worley, and Baroldi None Harvey CHAI IAN RESOLUTION NO 209 RESOLTUION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 90, PART 21, "OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS" WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Part 21, "Off -Street Parking Requirements", amending said Part 21 by adding Section 121 6 to read as follows: "Section 121 6 PAVING OF EXISTING LOTS. All parking lots that are now in existence, but are not improved, shall be deemed to be non -conforming Such lots shall be paved to the specifications of the City of Cypress within eighteen (18) months. WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment, one inquiry was made, and no protest were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that paved lots are necessary for the safety of the community and encourage good development of commercial property, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Part 21 regarding "Off -Street Parking Requirements' be recommended for approval by the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1964 by the following called vote. AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton, Worley, and Baroldi NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER: Harvey ATTEST SECRETARY Resolution No 209 201 RESOLUTION NO 210 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, SECTION 125.8 "WALL, FENCE, OR HEDGE MAY BE MAINTAINED" WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7.30 P.M in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 125 8, paragraph one (1), amending said section to read as follows: "Section 125 8 WALL, FENCE, OR HEDGE MAY BE MAINTAINED: In any "R" Zone a wall, fence, or hedge, three (3) feet in height may be located and maintained on any part of a lot On an interior lot a wall, fence, or hedge not more than six (6) feet in height may be located anywhere on the lot to the rear of the required front yard setback line On corner lots and reverse corner lots, a six (6) foot fence may be located anywhere on the lot except in those areas comprising the required front yard or the required side yards on the side street side of such lots No barbed wire, or any fence containing glass or other object which could cut or injure a person shall be constructed in any "R" Zone No electrical fence shall be constructed in any zone " WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment, one inquiry was made, and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that fences constructed in such a manner as to injure a person are a detriment to the community, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 125 8 regarding "Wall, Fence, or Hedge May be Maintained" be recommended for approval by the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1964 by the following called vote. AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton,Worley and Baroldi NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER• Harvey ATTEST: SECRETARY Resolution No 210 RESOLUTION NO 211 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, BY ADDING SECTION 125 22 "MULTIPLE PARKING AREAS" WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1964 at 7:30 p m in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 by adding Section 125 22 to read as follows. "Section 125.22 MULTIPLE PARKING AREAS. Open parking areas required for the R-2, 3, and 4 districts may be located within any required side or rear yard provided the total requirement for all off-street parking shall exceed 4 spaces. All open parking areas in a required side or rear yard shall be enclosed by a 6' solid fence." WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the side yard can be used for light and ventilation even if cars are parked in the required yards, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, adding Section 125.22 regarding "Multiple Parking Areas' be recommended for approval by the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1964 by the following called vote. AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS'• Doerr, Ferreira, Garcia, Hamilton Worley and Baroldi NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER' Harvey ATTEST. CHAIRMAN SECRETARY Resolution No 211 V ni 206 RESOLUTION NO. 212 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-114 (AMENDED) TO CHANGE THE ZONE TO C-2 ( GENERAL COMMERCIAL) (CITY OF CYPRESS) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 17, 1964 at 7:30 p m in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to change the zone from R-1 (One -family Residential) to C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) or C-2 (General Commercial) on property generally located at the northwest corner of Walker and Cerritos, initiated by the City of Cypress, known as Zone Change No Z-114 (Amended), and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the C-2 zoning, no one appeared in favor of the C-1 zoning, and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that uses permitted in the C-2 zone would not be detrimental to the area if the landscaping plan were approved by the staff and the traffic problem solved, but would benefit the surrounding residential areas, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that approval of Zone Change No Z-114 (Amended) be recommended to the City Council to change the zone from R-1 (One -family Residential) to C-2 (General Commercial). PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of September, 1964 by the following called vote AYES. 5 COMMISSIONERS: Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey and Worley NOES• 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ACTING CHAIRMAN ATTEST. SECRETARY Resolution No 212 RESOLUTION NO 213 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DENYING VARIANCE NO V-196 (TEXACO OIL CORPORATION) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 3, 1964 at 7.30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to permit the installation of a non -conforming ground sign exceeding the height limitations of the Sign Ordinance No 185, requested by Texaco Oil Corporation, 2100 E Parific Coast Highway, Wilmington, California, known as Variance No V-196, and, WHEREAS two people appeared in favor and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined there was no deprivation of property use, there was only one other sign in the area that exceeded the height limitation, and the size and shape of the property did not justify the granting of such a variance, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Variance No V-196 be denied for the reasons previously stated above PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of September, 1964 by the following called vote. AYES• 5 COMMISSIONERS: Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, F, Worley NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST. SECRETARY CTING CHAIRMAN Resolution No 213 208 RESOLUTION NO 214 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO Z-199 (STANELY H RITTER) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 15, 1964 at 7.30 P M in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to change the zone from R-1 (One -Family Residential) to C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) or C-2 (General Commercial) on property generally located on the southwest corner of Knott Avenue and Cerritos Avenue, requested by Stanley H. Ritter, 15300 Ventura Blvd., Sherman Oaks, California, known as Zone Change No. Z-119, and, WHEREAS two people appeared in favor of the request and one protest was heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the property could not logically be developed for single-family use and the normal zoning for a service station use should be C-1 rather than C-2 since the C-2 allows much heavier uses, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-119 changing the zone to C-1 (Neighborhood Stores), be recommended for approval by the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October, 1964 by the following called vote: AYES* 6 COMMISSIONERS• Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, & Worley NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ATTEST. SECRETARY Resolution No 214 ACTING CHAIRMAN RESOLUTION NO 215 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO Z-120 (A G GARCIA & R W HELMS) WHEREAS the Cypress City Palnning Commission held a public hearing on October 15, 1964 at 7.30 P M in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to change the zone from R-1 (One -Family Residential) to C-2 (General Commercial) on property generally located at the northeast corner of Ball Road and Bloomfield Street, requested by Augustine G Garcia, 4902 Cathy A?enue, Cypress, and Robert W. Helms, 2790 Atlantic Blvd., Long Beach, California, known as Zone change No. Z-120, and WHEREAS two people appeared in favor of the request and six protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that commercial zoning was needed to serve the area due to the fact there were no existing commercial developments, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-120 be recommended for approval by the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October 1964 by the following called vote AYES 4 COMMISSIONERS. Baroldi, Ferreira, Harvey, & Worley NOES: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Doerr and Hamilton ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ATTEST. SECRETARY ACTING :' RMAN Resolution No 215 RESOLUTION NO. 216 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-176 (BENJAMIN & VIRGINIA GOOD) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 15, 1964 at 7.30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street Cypress California, to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of an additional three unit development in the R-3 zone, on property generally located at 5552 Orange Avenue, requested by Benjamin & Virginia Good, 5552 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, known as Conditional Use Permit No C-176, and, WHEREAS two people appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the application conformed to all conditions of the Zoning Ordinance and the plan provided adequate open space NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No. C-176 be approved, subject to the following conditions• 1 That the buildings be constructed as per plot plan submitted 2 All access rights on Orange Avenue be dedicated to the City excluding the proposed 15' access drive. 3 That all drainage fees be paid and all drainage approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. That all street improvements be installed or bonded according to the requirements of the City Engineer PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October, 1964 by the following called vote - AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, and Worley NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS- None ABSENT• 0 COMMISSIONERS: None AlP-1 ACTING CIRMAN ATTEST - SECRETARY Resolution No 216 RESOLUTION NO. 217 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 121 4 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 90 BY ADDING SUBSECTION "E. STRIPING" WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 15, 1964 at 7 30 p m in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, Section 121.4 by adding Subsection "E Striping", initiated by the City of Cypress, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment and no protests were heard, and WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the proposed amendment would be in the best interest of the city by providing for orderly and safe loading or unloading of passengers, parking and storage of vehicles, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 90 Section 121.4 regarding "Striping' be recommended to the City Council for approval, to amend said section by adding Subsection E as follows. "E. All parking lots provided as a requirement in a commercial or industrial district and in a multiple residential district where uncovered parking requirements exceed ten (10) spaces, except those lots in which there is attendant parking, shall arrange and mark stalls in such a manner as to provide for orderly and safe loading or unloading of passengers and parking and storage of vehicles " PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th called vote. AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS. NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS - ATTEST: day of October, 1964 by the following Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, and Worley None None l�/ SECRETARY Resolution No 217 RESOLUTION NO. 218 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RE -AFFIRMING THE COMMISSION'S PREVIOUS DECISION TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 90, SECTION 107 6 B, PARAGRAPH 2 WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 15, 1964 at 7.30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 107 6 B, paragraph 2, initiated by the City of Cypress, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the rear of the lots can be increased by requiring a larger side yard on a corner lot, which is necessary if a fence is constructed according to existing provisions of the Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission re -affirm their previous decision to amend Section 107 6 B, paragraph 2 of Zoning Ordinance No 90 to read as follows. "On any corner lot each side yard which abuts the front yard of an adjacent lot shall not be less than 20' in depth Any other side yard on the corner lot may be reduced to 10' " PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October 1964 by the following called vote: AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, and Worley NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT• 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ATTEST• SECRETARY Resolution No. 218 RESOLUTION NO. 219 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RE -AFFIRMING THE COMMISSION'S PREVIOUS DECISION TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, PART 21 BY ADDING SECTION 121 6, "PAVING OF EXISTING LOTS" WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 15, 1964 at 7:30 p m in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, Part 21, by adding Section 121.6 "Paving of Existing Lots", initiated by the City of Cypress, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that paved lots are necessary for the safety of the community and encourage good development of commercial property, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission re -affirm their previous decision to amend Part 21 of Zoning Ordinance No 90, by adding Section 121 6, "Paving of Existing Lots" to read as follows. "Section 121.6 PAVING OF EXISTING LOTS- All parking lots that are now in existence, but are not improved, shall be deemed to be non -conforming Such lots shall be paved to the specifications of the City of Cypress within eighteen (18) months " PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October, 1964 by the following called vote - AYES. 6 COMMISSIONERS. NOES- 0 COMMISSIONERS - ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, and Worley None None 4//; :;-/4.4 ACTING CHAI SECRETARY Resolution No 219 RESOLUTION NO 220 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO Z-121 (PETE & MARY VAN RUITEN) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, November 5, 1964 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone from M-1 (Light Manufacturing) to H -C (Highway Commercial) on property generally located at the southeast corner of Lincoln and Bloomfield, requested by Pete and Mary Van Ruiten, 3750 Bloomfield Street Cypress, California, known as Zone Change No Z-121, and, WHEREAS two people appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined there was little demand for M-1 zoning in this area, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined there was a need for additional H -C zoning to accelerate development of the area and add to the tax base of the community, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No. Z-121 be recommended to the City Council for approval vote• PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 1964 by the following called AYES. 6 COMMISSIONERS: Baroldi, Doerr Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, and Worley NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ATTEST: SECRETARY Resolution No 220 ACTING CdA N RESOLUTION NO 221 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE R-1 (ONE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) PORTION OF ZONE CHANGE NO Z-122 (STONEBRIDGE, INC ) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, November 5, 1964 at 7:30 p m in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street Cypress California to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to chang e the zone from R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) to R-1 (One -family Residential) on property generally located at the northwest and northeast corner of Cerritos and Denni, requested by Stonebridge, Inc , 1665 So Brookhurst, Anaheim, California, known as Zone Change No Z-122, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that there was a surplus of R-3 property in the area and that the R-1 zoning would be an extension of the existing R-1 property, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the R-1 portion of Zone Change No Z-122 be recommended to the City Council for approval PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 1964 by the following called vote: AYES• 6 COMMISSIONERS Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, and Worley NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS None ATTEST• SECRETARY Resolution No 221 RESOLUTION NO 222 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD STORES) PORTION OF ZONE CHANGE NO Z-122 (STONEBRIDGE, INC ) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, November 5, 1964 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone from R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) to C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) on property generally located at the northwest and northeast corner of Cerritos and Denni, requested by Stonebridge Inc., 1665 So Brookhurst,Anaheim, California, known as Zone Change No Z-122, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined there was sufficient land available for C-1 uses since there is property on the northwest corner of Denni and Cerritos, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that denial of the C-1 portion of Zone Change No Z-122 be recommended to the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 1964 by the following called vote. AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey and Worley NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS None (4,7-,-a7 /al\ ATTEST. SECRETARY Resolution No 222 CTING C RMAN RESOLUTION NO. 223 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-123 (ROBERT H. GRANT & COMPANY) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, November 5, 1964 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 to change the zone from C-2 (General Commercial) to R-1 (One -family Residential) on property generally located on the north side of Ball Road between Grindlay Street and Walker Street, requested by Robert H Grant, 1665 So Brookhurst Anaheim California known as Zone Change No Z-123, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard and WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined there was a surplus of land available for commercial development and there is a need for additional single-family homes NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-123 be recommended to the City Council for approval vote• PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 1964 by the following called AYES. 6 COMMISSIONERS. Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, and Worley NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ATTEST. SECRETARY ACTING CHAI Resolution No 223 RESOLUTION NO 224 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO. V-197 (STONEBRIDGE, INC ) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday November 5, 1964 at 7 30 p m in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to allow a reduction in lot sizes from 6000 sq ft to 5700 sq ft and from 6500 sq. ft to 6175 sq ft for corner lots in Tentative Tract No 5272, generally located at the northwest and northeast corner of Cerritos and Denni, requested by Stonebridge, Inc. P. 0 Box 2067, Anaheim, California, known as Variance No. V-197, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that parcels immediately to the east had the same size lots and that all setbacks were being maintained on the parcels, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Variance No V-197 be approved PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 1964 by the following called vote. AYES - NOES ABSENT: ATTEST: 6 COMMISSIONERS 0 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey and Worley None None (� /,/ ACTING CHAIRMAN SECRETARY Resolution No 224 RESOLUTION NO. 225 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO. V-198 (ROBERT H. GRANT & COMPANY) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, November 5 1964 at 7.30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance in lot sizes from 6000 sq ft to 5700 sq ft and from 6500 sq ft to 6175 sq. ft. for corner lots in Tentative Tract No. 5704, generally located on the north side of Ball Road between Grindley Street and Walker Street requested by Robert H Grant, P. 0. Box 2067, Anaheim, California, known as Variance No V-198, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the size of the parcel is such that it is necessary to reduce the lot sizes and that all setbacks are to be maintained NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Variance No V-198 be approved PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 1964 by the following called vote: AYES. 6 COMMISSIONERS Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, and Worley NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT• 0 COMMISSIONERS- None ATTEST SECRETARY /A) ACTING C RMAN Resolution No 225 RESOLUTION NO 226 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO. V-199 (STARDUST LANDS, INC ) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, November 5, 1964 at 7 30 p m in the Council Chambers, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to allow Lot 23 of Tract No. 5565 to be less than 60 ft wide and to further permit Lot 60 of said tract to be less than 65 ft wide and have an area less than 6500 sq ft , on property generally located 679' west of Moody Street on the north side of Orange Avenue, requested by Stardust Lands, Inc , P 0 Box 2067, Anaheim, California, known as Variance No V-199, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the requirements of drainage easements and flood control channel necessitates the adjustment of the lots in width and in area, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Variance No. V-199 be approved PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 1964 by the following called vote - AYES. 6 COMMISSIONERS: Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton Harvey and Worley NOES- 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST: SECRETARY Resolution No 226 RESOLUTION NO 227 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS REGARDING MEETING PLACE. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Pursuant to provisions of Section 3, Ordinance 26 of the City of Cypress, the dates, times and place for the regular meetings of the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress are hereby fixed as the first and third Thursday of each month at 7 30 p m Said meetings to be held at the place now known as the Cypress City Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress California, SECTION II. The above specified dates, time,and place of the meetings of the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress shall be effective as of December 1, 1964. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1964 by the following called vote: AYES- 5 COMMISSIONERS- Baroldi Ferreira Hamilton Harvey and Worley NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER: Doerr 11i /7Vg% ACTING CHAII ATTEST. SECRETARY Resolution No 227 RESOLUTION NO. 228 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-124 (CITY OF CYPRESS) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, December 3, 1964 at 7.30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone from R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) to C-0 (Commercial Office) on property generally located at the northeast corner of Cerritos and Denni, initiated by the City of Cypress, known as Zone Change No Z-124, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the request, one inquiry was made, and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the land was more conducive to C-0 zoning because of the area and the fact that the existing land use on the opposite corner was C-1 (Neighborhood Stores), NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-124 be recommended to the City Council for approval PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of December, 1964 by the following called vote. AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS. Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Hickey, and Worley NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER. Harvey ATTEST. SECRETARY Resolution No. 228 7/1? ACTING C IRMAN RESOLUTION NO. 229 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO V-200 (LEROY 0 FOX) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, January 7, 1965 at 7 30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to allow the distance from the property line to a new garage to be less than the required twenty (20) feet, on property generally located at 10172 Aqueduct Drive, requested by Leroy 0 Fox, 10172 Aqueduct Drive, Cypress, California, known as Variance No. V-200, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined as follows* "1 That because of special circumstances or unusual hardship applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. vote 2. That such conditions have been imposed upon the issuance of the variance as will insure that the variance thereby authorized does not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated 3 That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property and improvements in the zone and vicinity in which the property is located 4. That the granting of such a variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Master Plan or this Ordinance " NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Variance No. V-200 be approved PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1965 by the following called AYES: 7 COMMISSIONERS• Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, Hickey, and Worley NOES* 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS• None G; atKC ld<HA; ATTEST: SECRETARY Resolution No. 229 RESOLUTION NO 230 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO. V-201 (STONEBRIDGE, INC ) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, January 7, 1965 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to permit a reduction in backyard area requirements for 13 of the 60 R-1 lots in Tentative Tract No. 5272, requested by Stonebridge, Inc , 1665 So Brookhurst Road, Anaheim, California, known as Variance No V-201, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and one protest was heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined as follows. "1. That because of special circumstances or unusual hardship applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification vote: 2 That such conditions have been imposed upon the issuance of the variance as will insure that the variance thereby authorized does not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. 3. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property and improvements in the zone and vicinity in which the property is located 4 That the granting of such a variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Master Plan or this Ordinance." NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Variance No V-201 be approved PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1965 by the following called AYES* 7 COMMISSIONERS• Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey Hickey, and Worley NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSENT* 0 COMMISSIONERS• None a/7a7;1/CHAI(76+ RMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY Resolution No. 230 RESOLUTION NO 231 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 90, SECTION 117 3, "MINIMUM BUILDING SITE AND LOT WIDTH REQUIRED" (P -D, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, January 7, 1965 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider a proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 90, Section 117 3, "MINIMUM BUILDING SITE AND LOT WIDTH REQUIRED", to change the requirement that a planned unit has to be a minimum of Twenty (20) acres for total development to a requirement of Ten (10) acres, and, WHEREAS no one zppeared in favor of the proposed change, and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined this amendment is necessary to provide for better development of parcels that might be adaptable to planned development. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No 90, Section 117.3 be recommended to the City Council for approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1965 by the following called vote: AYES* 7 COMMISSIONERS Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, Hickey, and Worley NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS• None &1(71-e7)(/, CHAIRMAN ATTEST* SECRETARY Resolution No 231 RESOLUTION NO 232 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-177 (GUY J. TEDESCO & B W WRIGHT) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, December 17, 1964 at 7:30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a drive-in theater and related concession on property generally located at the southeast corner of Lincoln and Bloomfield, as requested by Guy J. Tedesco, 1104 E Marcelle, Compton, and B W Wright, 3109 Volk Ave., Long Beach, known as Conditional Use Permit No C-177, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and three protests were heard, and WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined: 1. The proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property 2 That the site is of an adequate size and shape to accommodate required setbacks, parking, and landscaping 3 That the abutting streets are of adequate width to carry the traffic. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No C-177 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That an 8' block wall fence be constructed around the entire area of the drive-in theater where automobiles will be parked 2 That all lights be constructed in order to be reflected away from the residential areas 3 That all drainage be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and all drainage fees be paid in the amount required for subdivision development in Drainage District 2-A 4 That the Master Plan of Drainage facility be installed which will include the construction of any necessary storm drains If it is necessary to acquire easements, the developer will be required to deposit funds for such acquisition 5. No speakers shall be allowed to be turned on during the daytime 6 All necessary street dedications shall be granted to the City and all street improvements installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall provide a left turn bay on Lincoln, between 400 and 500 feet east of Bloomfield, depending upon the recommendation of the City Engineer and final engineering plans. The cost of the bay construction shall be paid by the applicant 8 The applicant shall pay far the installation of a traffic signal at Bloomfield and Lincoln. 9. Right turns only shall be permitted onto Lincoln for exit from the theater 10. The applicant shall install trees abutting all existing or proposed residential properties, the type of trees and size of tree shall be approved by the staff. Resolution No. 232 11 The ten (10) foot rear yard be landscaped All speakers shall be a minimum of forty (40) feet from all R-1 zoned property 12. No speakers be allowed on the fences on the south or the east sides of the property 13 The grade of the last ramp shall not exceed two (2) feet above the existing grade or the proposed grade of the property to the south 14 The use permit shall not become effective unless the zoning on the property is changed to H -C (Highway Commercial) within ninety (90) days of the date of approval of the use permit. vote: PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1965 by the following called AYES. 7 COMMISSIONERS Baroldi, Doerr, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, Hickey, and Worley NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None f))arya ATTEST• SECRETARY CHAIRMAN Resolution No. 232 RESOLUTION NO 233 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NO. 77, REQUIRING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 17, 1964 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider a proposed amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 77 requiring underground utilities on all new subdivisions, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined underground utilities are necessary for the orderly development of the City. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance No 77, requiring underground utilities on all new subdivisions be recommended to the City Council for approval PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1965 by the following called vote AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Baroldi, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, Hickey, And Worley NOES 1 COMMISSIONERS: Doerr ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ATTEST: SECRETARY Resolution No 233 //.1/ CHAIRMAN V RESOLUTION NO. 234 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO Z-125 (LOUIS STRUIKMAN) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, January 7, 1965 and January 21, 1965 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 to change the zone from R-4 (High Density Multiple Family Residential) to R-1 (One -family Residential) on property generally located 660' south of Lincoln Avenue on the east side of Moody Street, requested by Louis Struikman, 13841 Artesia Blvd , Dairy Valley, California, known as Zone Change No. Z-125, and, WHEREAS four people appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that, due to the loss of a large portion of R-4 zoned property in the city to the junior college site, the subject property was needed as an R-4 area in order m have a balanced community. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-125 be recommended to the City Council for denial PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of January, 1965 by the following called vote' AYES• 4 COMMISSIONERS NOES. 1 COMMISSIONER. ABSENT* 2 COMMISSIONERS. ATTEST: Baroldi, Hamilton, Harvey, and Worley Ferreira Doerr and Hickey SECRETARY Resolution No. 234 RESOLUTION NO. 235 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90 WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, January 21, 1965 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined the proposed amendments were necessary to clarify existing conflicts in the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed Amendments to Zoning Ordinance No 90 be recommended to the City Council for approval, as outlined by the City Staff in the attached report. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of January, 1965 by the following called vote. AYES• 5 COMMISSIONERS• Baroldi, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey and Worley NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 2 COMMISSIONERS Doerr and Hickey ATTEST. SECRETARY Resolution No. 235 RESOLUTION NO 235' PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE The following sections should be added to, amended or deleted from Ordinance No 90, the Zoning Ordinance, as amended: Amend Section 103. NAMES OF ZONES, to read as follows "Section 103: NAMES OF ZONES. In order to classify, regulate, restrict, and segregate the uses of lands and buildings, to regulate and restrict the height and bulk of buildings and to regulate the area of yards and other open spaces about buildings, and to regulate the density of population, the follow- ing land use zones are established in this Ordinance to be known as follows: USE ZONES. A-1 General Agricultural Zone A-2 Heavy Agricultural Zone R -S Residential Suburban Zone R-1 One -family Residential Zone R-2 Two-family Residential Zone R-3 Multiple -family Residential Zone R-4 High Density Multiple -Family Residential Zone C-0 Commercial Office Zone C-1 Neighborhood Stores Zone C-2 General Commercial Zone C 3 Central Commercial Zone H -C Highway Commercial Zone M-1 Light Manufacturing Zone PM Planned Manufacturing Zone PD Planned Development Zone C -C Civic Center Combining Zone R -C Recreational Zone CEM Cemetery Zone' Amend Section 104.4 BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT, to read as follows: "Section 104.4 BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT The building height limit shall not exceed two (2) stories or thirty-five (35) feet." Amend Section 107.3 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND USES:, to read as follows. "Section 107.3 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND USES. Accessory buildings and uses shall be permitted only to the extent necessary and normal to the limited types of use permitted in this Zone Accessory buildings not used for residential purposes and not to exceed one (1) story or fifteen (15) feet in height may be located on a side lot line or rear lot line provided that such building shall be located on the rear one-half of the lot and further provided that a one hour fire wall shall be constructed on the side or rear lot line in accordance with the requirements of the Cypress building codes and further provided that a gutter or other device to prevent drainage -1- onto the adjacent lot is installed thereon If no such wall and gutter system is provided, such accessory buildings shall not be closer than five (5) feet to any lot line All accessory buildings must be separated from the main building by a horizontal distance of at least three (3) feet between the nearest part of the accessory building and the nearest part of the main building Signs may be allowed as set out in the Sign Ordinance of the City of Cypress." Amend Section 108.3 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND USES:, to read as follows: "Section 108.3 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND USES. Accessory buildings and uses shall be permitted only to the extent necessary and normal to the limited types of uses permitted in this Zone Accessory buildings not used for residential purposes and not to exceed one (1) story or fifteen (15) feet in height may be located on a side lot line or rear lot line provided that such building shall be located on the rear one-half of the lot and further provided that a one hour fire wall shall be constructed on the side or rear lot line in accordance with the requirements of the Cypress building codes and further provided that a gutter or other device to prevent drainage onto the adjacent lot is installed thereon If no such wall and gutter system is provided, such accessory buildings shall not be closer than five (5) feet to any lot line All accessory buildings which are not a part of the main building shall be separated from the main building by at least ten (10) feet Signs may be allowed as set out in the Sign Ordinance of the City of Cypress." Amend Section 109.3 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND USES:, to read as follows: "Section 109.3 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND USES. Accessory buildings and uses shall be permitted only to the extent necessary and normal to the limited types of use permitted in this Zone. Accessory buildings not used for residential purposes and not to exceed one (1) story or fifteen (15) feet in height may be located on a side lot line or rear lot line provided that such building shall be located on the rear one-half of the lot and further provided that a one hour fire wall shall be constructed on the side or rear lot line in accordance with the requirements of the Cypress building codes and further provided that a gutter or other device to prevent drainage onto the adjacent lot is installed thereon. If no such wall and gutter system is provided, such accessory buildings shall not be closer than five (5) feet to any lot line All accessory buildings which are not a part of the main building shall be separated from the main building by at least ten (10) feet. Signs may be allowed as set out in the Sign Ordinance of the City of Cypress.' Amend Section 110.3 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND USES., to read as follows. "Section 110.3 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND USES• Accessory buildings and uses shall be permitted only to the extent necessary and normal to the type of uses permitted in this zone. Accessory buildings not used for residential purposes and not to exceed one (1) story or fifteen (15) feet in height may be located on a side lot line or rear lot line provided that such building shall be located on the rear one-half of the lot and further provided that -2- a one hour fire wall shall be constructed on the side or rear lot line in accordance with the requirements of the Cypress building codes and further provided that a gutter or other device to prevent drainage onto the adjacent lot is installed thereon. If no such wall and gutter system is provided, such accessory buildings shall not be closer than five (5) feet to any lot line. All accessory buildings which are not a part of the main building shall be separated from the main building by at least five (5) feet. Signs may be allowed as set out in the Sign Ordinance of the City of Cypress.' Amend Section 111.3 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES. to read as follows. "Section 111.3 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES. Other buildings and uses may be permitted as an administrative act of the Commission provided the public hearing is held and the Planning Commission shall determine and find as a fact that such buildings and uses are similar to those listed in the section immediately preceding and further provided such other uses shall not have any different or detrimental effect upon the adjoining neighborhood area or zones than such specifically permitted uses and shall not increase the traffic and noises in the neighborhood area and otherwise be more objectionable or obnoxious than those uses specifically permitted " Amend Section 112.3 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES -2 to read as follows- - "Section 112.3 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES Other buildings and uses may be permitted as an administrative act of the Commission provided the public hearing is held and the Planning Commission shall determine and find as a fact that such buildings and uses are similar to those listed in the section immediately preceding and further provided such other uses shall not have any different or detrimental effect upon the adjoining neighborhood area or zones than such specifically permitted uses and shall not increase the traffic and noises in the neighborhood area and otherwise be more objectionable or obnoxious than those uses specifically permitted " Amend Section 112.6 BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION:. by adding the following,. "Section 112.6 BUILDING OR STRUCTURAL HEIGHT LIMITATION: The building or structural height limitation shall be fifty (50) feet, providing that a greater height may be allowed on obtaining a Conditional Use Permit, and provided that when the zone abuts a residential zone then the maximum building or structure height shall not be greater than twenty (20) feet for a distance of fifty (50) feet from the zone boundary abutting the residential zone " -3- Amend Section 113.3 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES:, to read as follows - 'Section 113.3 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES: Other buildings and uses may be permitted as an administrative act of the Commission provided the public hearing is held and the Planning Commission shall determine and find as a fact that such buildings and uses are similar to those listed in the section immediately preceding and further provided such other uses shall not have any different or detrimental effect upon the adjoining neighborhood area or zones than such specifically permitted uses and shall not increase the traffic and noises in the neighborhood area and otherwise be more objectionable or obnoxious than those uses specifically permitted." Amend Section 114.3 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES:, to read as follows. 'Section 114.3 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES: Other buildings and uses may be permitted as an administrative act of the Commission provided the public hearing is held and the Planning Commission shall determine and find as a fact that such buildings and uses are similar to those listed in the section immediately preceding and further provided such other uses shall not have any different or detrimental effect upon the adjoining neighborhood area or zones than such specifically permitted uses and shall not increase the traffic and noises in the neighborhood area and otherwise be more objectionable or obnoxious than those uses specifically permitted." Amend PART 15, Title to read as follows: "PART 15 LIGHT MANUFACTURING (M-1 ZONE)" Amend Section 115.4 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES: to read as follows "Section 115.4 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES. Other buildings and uses may be permitted as an administrative act of the Commission provided the public hearing is held and the Planning Commission shall determine and find as a fact that such buildings and uses are similar to those listed in the section immediately preceding and further provided such other uses shall not have any different or detrimental effect upon the adjoining neighborhood area or zones than such specifically permitted uses and shall not increase the traffic and noises in the neighborhood area and otherwise be more objectionable or obnoxious than those uses specifically permitted." Amend Section 115 6 LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS:, to read as follows. "Section 115.6 LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS: There are no minimum lot areas or dimensions." -4- Amend Section 115.10 FENCES AND WALLS:, to read as follows "Section 115.10 FENCES AND WALLS• Fences and walls are not required except when abutting a residential zone, or an alley which abuts a residential zone, in which case except for access drives or walks, there shall be a solid masonry wall six (6) feet in height erected along and immediately adjacent to the abutting property line that is the zone boundary. Such wall shall be erected by the developer of the industrial property Where such a zone boundary is a side property line, the wall shall be reduced in height to three (3) feet within the front yard setback area for the abutting residential zone." Amend Section 116.1 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE., to read as follows• "Section 116.1 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE The prupose of the Planned Manufacturing district is to provide a district which will insure an environment conducive to the development and protection of modern industry research institutions and administrative facilities all well designed and properly landscaped " Amend Section 116.4 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES: to read as follows. "Section 116.4 OTHER PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES: Other buildings and uses may be permitted as an administrative act of the Commission provided the public hearing is held and the Planning Commission shall determine and find as a fact that such buildings and uses are similar to those listed in the section immediately preceding and further provided such other uses shall not have any different or detrimental effect upon the adjoining neighborhood area or zones than such specifically permitted uses and shall not increase the traffic and noises in the neighborhood area and otherwise be more objectionable or obnoxious than those uses specifically permitted " Amend Section 117 0 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: to read as follows "Section 117.3 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE. The Planned Development district is to provide for an integrated community development, a complete neighborhood which will provide the necessary amenities and conveniences to protect and encourage a suitable environment for families, whether single family or multiple and to provide commercial service centers, office and research area that can appropriately be made a part of a community development." Amend Section 1.17.1 BUILDINGS AND USES.PERMITTED „ by changing to Section 117 2 Amend Section 117.2 BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT AND MAXIMUM ALLOUABLE GROSS FLOOR AREA , by changing to Section 117 3 Amend Section 117.3 MINIMUM BUILDING SITE AND LOT WIDTH REQUIRED., by changing to Section 117.4. -5- vibe Amend Section 117.4 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE COVERAGE BY ALL STRUCTURES:, to read as follows "Section 117.5 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE COVERAGE BY ALL STRUCTURES The Maximum allowable coverage by all structures shall be forty (40) percent of land area per family unit. The land area per family not less than three thousand (3000) square feet for multiple family development, or six thousand (6000) square feet per family unit for single family development, which may be a combination of exclusive plus common area if provisions of Section 117 6 are used." Amend Section 117.5 to Section 117.6. Amend Section 117.6 Amend Section 118.0 OPTIONAL DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS., by changing PARKING., by changing to Section 117 7 Amend Section 118.1 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE , by changing to Section 118 1 PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES• by changing to Section 118 2 Amend Section 118.2 BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT:, by changing to Section 118.3. Amend Amend Amend Amend Section Section Section Section 118.3 118.4 118.5 118.6 Amend Section 118.7 changing to Section FRONT YARD REQUIREMENTS., by changing to Section 118 4 SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS:, by changing to Section 118 5 REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS:, by changing to Section 118.6. PARKING:, by changing to Section 118.7 STREET DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED:, by 118.8. Amend PART 18-A CEM "CEMETERY" DISTRICT REGULATIONS in its entirety to read as follows. 'PART 18-A CEM "CEMETERY" ZONE REGULATIONS Sectionil8-A.1 USES PERMITTED Land in a cemetery zone shall only be used for the operation of a cemetery and for cemetery purposes, including columbariums, crematories, mausoleums, mortuaries, churches, flower shops, administration buildings, dwellings for persons employed on the premises storage and vault fabrication facilities tool shed, maintenance and garage buildings and other buildings and uses incidental to and located and carried on within the boundaries of the cemetery. -6- A The portion of such land not developed for cemetery purposes may be used for farming, including all types of agriculture and horticulture, EXCEPT Commercial dairies, commercial kennels, rabbit, fox goat and other animal raising farms; egg producing ranches and farms devoted to the hatching, raising, fattening and/or butchering of chickens, turkeys, and other poultry on a commercial scale, hog and other live- stock feeding ranches, and ranches operated publicly or privately for the disposal of garbage, sewage, rubbish, or offal B. No ground burial or internment of any human remains is allowed anywhere in the City except in an area approved for such purpose Within a CEM Zone, no ground burial of a human body shall be allowed closer than sixty (60) feet to the center line of the right-of-way of a major highway or closer than fifty (50) feet to the center line of the right-of-way of a primary highway or closer than forty (40) feet to the center line of a right-of-way of a secondary highway, as such highways are designated on the Master Plan of Arterial Highways of the City of Cypress, or in any other case closer than twenty—five ft. cix in: to the center line of the right-of-way of any street C Lighting or unlighted signs which are not attached to a building may only be erected to advertise the facilities on the premises under the following conditions• 1. There shall not be more than one sign for each five hundred (500) feet of frontage on a major, primary or secondary highway 2. The area of any sign facing a street shall not exceed seven hundred fifty (750) square feet maximum, exclusive of the area in cut outs 3 Any sign exceeding two hundred (200) square feet shall be an artistic painted bulletin embellished with moldings or special architectural features and ornamental landscaping. 4 No sign shall be closer than twenty-five (25) feet to any side property line. 5. No sign shall be erected at the intersection of any street in such a manner as to create a traffic hazard by obstructing vision. 6 The foregoing shall not apply to any informational or directional signs which are directed primarily to visitors to the cemetery, and located in such a manner as not to be readable from any adjoining highway. -7- Section 118-A.2 BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT. The building height limit shall be three (3) stories and not to exceed fifty (50) feet Section 118-A.3 FRONT YARD REQUIREMENTS No building other than wall crypts or signs shall be closer than one hundred ten (110) feet to the center line of the right-of-way of a major highway or closer than one hundred (100) feet to the center line of the right-of-way of a primary highway or closer than ninety (90) feet to the center line of the right-of-way of a secondary highway as such highways are designated on the Master Plan of Arterial Highways of the City of Cypress, or in any other case closer than eighty (80) feet to the center line of the right-of-way of any street, provided, however, that when any cemetery property is bounded by more than one street having a width of eighty (80) feet or more, that portion of such property fronting on the street having the greatest width shall be considered the front yard Section 118-A.4 SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS• No building shall be closer than five (5) feet to the side property line except wall crypts, one side of which forms a portion of the wall enclosing the cemetery, except where the building is located on a side yard fronting upon a street having a width greater than fifty (50) feet in which case there is no set back requirement Section 118-A.5 REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS. No building other than wall crypts and signs shall be closer than eighty-five (85) feet to the center line of the right-of-way of a major highway or closer than seventy-five (75) feet to the center line of the right-of-way of a primary highway or closer than forty (40) feet to the center line of the right-of-way of a secondary highway as such highways are designated on the Master Plan of Arterial Highways of the City of Cypress. Section 118-A.6 FENCING REQUIREMENTS• All property used for cemetery purposes shall be enclosed by a fence, wall, or structure used as a wall, of not less than six (6) feet in height. Section 118-A.7 PARKING: There shall be provided and maintained usable automobile parking spaces equal to the sum of the following. A. One (1) parking space for each three (3) persons, employed, B. One (1) parking space for each three (3) seats in any church or chapel, and C. One (1) parking space for each three hundred fifty (350) square feet of floor space used for retail sales of services or commodities -8- Section 118-A.8 STREET DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED - Anticipating that changes will occur in the local neighborhood and the City generally due to the increase in vehicular traffic, including trucking, increase in pedestrian traffic, increased noise, and other activities associated with the City's growth and development, the following dedications and improvements are deemed to be necessary to prevent congestion of the land, and these requirements must be met or complied with before any building permit may be issued: A. All required streets and alleys, both local and highways, which abut the subject property shall be dedicated, or a deed of dedication deposited in escrow with an escrow agent acceptable to the City Attorney, the delivery of which is conditioned upon the requested permit being granted, to the full width required by this Ordinance on the side of the Street highway, or alley abutting such property. B. All street, highway and alley improvements shall have either been installed or a performance bond in a reasonable amount to be determined by the City Engineer, with Sureties to be approved by the City Attorney, shall have been filed with the City Clerk, or cash in a like amount shall have been deposited with the Department of Finance to be placed in a Trust Fund Said improvements shall meet the standards established by the City Council and shall include curb, gutter, sidewalks, and street and alley paving, street trees, street signs, street lights, and all required utilities. C. The City Engineer shall not approve the issuance of a Building Permit, nor shall the Building Department issue a Building Permit, until the requirements of this Section have been met. Section 118-A.9 INCONSISTENT PROVISIONS If any of the provisions of PART 18-A of this Ordinance No. 90 are found to be inconsistent with any other provisions of said Ordinance, the provisions of PART 18-A shall prevail Amend Section 119.0 GENERAL PLAN OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS:, by changing to Section 119 1 Amend Section 119.1 BUILDING SETBACK LINE., by changing to Section 119 2 Amend Section 121.0 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE-, by changing to Section 121.1. Amend Section 121.1 LOCATION OF PARKING SPACES, COMMON FACILITIES , by changing to Section 121.2. Amend Section 121.2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS , by changing to Section 121 3 Amend Section 121.3 SPACE , by changing to Section 121 4. -9- Amend Section 121.4 IMPROVEMENTS:, by changing to Section 121.5. Amend Section 121.5 LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENTS., by changing to Section 121 6 Amend Section 121.6 OFF-STREET PARKING•, by changing to Section 121.7. Add Section 121 8 PAVING OF EXISTING LOTS: to read as follows: 'Section 121.8 PAVING OF EXISTING LOTS. All parking lots that are now in existence but are not improved shall be deemed to be non -conforming Such lots shall be paved to the specifications of the City of Cypress within eighteen (18) months." Amend Section 122.0 REGULATIONS SUBJECT TO THIS PART , by changing to Section 122 1 Amend Section 122.1 "GROUP A' NON -CONFORMING LOTS, BUILDINGS, AND USES , by changing to Section 122 2 Amend Section 122.2 'GROUP B' NON -CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES•, by changing to Section 122.3. Amend Section 122.3 NON -CONFORMING USE OF THE LAND., by changing to Section 122 4. Amend Section 122.4 NON -CONFORMING SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS., by changing to Section 122.5. Amend Section 122.5 NON -CONFORMING FENCES, HEDGES, AND WALLS., by changing to Section 122.6. Amend Section 122.6 NON -CONFORMING OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING FACILITIES , by changing to Section 122.7. Amend Section 122.7 REVERSION OF NON -CONFORMING USE:, by changing to Section 122 8 Amend Section 122.8 RECONSTRUCTION OF A NON CONFORMING BUILDING•, by changing to Section 122.9. Amend Section 122.9 ELIMINATION OF TEMPORARY NON -CONFORMING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS:, by changing to Section 122 10 Amend Section 122.10 NON -CONFORMING LOTS, BUILDINGS, AND USES UNDER VARIANCE OR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT , by changing to Section 122.11. Amend Section 122.11 PUBLIC UTILITY, FACILITIES, AND USES:, by changing to Section 122.12 -10- Amend Section 125.0 FOREGOING REGULATIONS SUBJECT TO THIS PART., by changing to Section 125 1. Amend Section 125.1 HEIGHT OF ROOF STRUCTURES., by changing to Section 125 2 Amend Section 125 2 YARD REGULATIONS., by changing to Section 125 3 Amend Section 125.3 MODIFICATION OF SIDE YARD REQUIREMENT ON COMBINED LOTS:, by changing to Section 125 4 Amend Section 125.4 YARD REQUIREMENTS WHEN MORE THAN ONE MAIN BUILDING EXISTS:, by changing to Section 125.5. Amend Section 125.5 YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPERTY ABUTTING FUTURE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY:, by changing to Section 125 6 Amend Section 125.6 VISION CLEARANCE, CORNER, AND REVERSED CORNER LOTS: by changing to Section 125.7 Amend Section 125.7 PERMITTED INTRUSIONS INTO REQUIRED YARDS:, by changing to Section 125.8. Amend Section 125.8 WALL, FENCE, OR HEDGE MAY BE MAINTAINED:, by changing to Section 125 9 Amend Section 125.9 IF ONLY ONE BUILDING ON A LOT OR BUILDING SITE IT CONSTITUTES A MAIN BUILDING:, by changing to Section 125.10. Amend Section 125.10 LOT AREA NOT TO BE REDUCED., by changing to Section 125 11. Amend Section 125.11 SUBSTANDARD LOTS PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE., by changing to Section 125.12. Amend Section 125.12 DIVISION OF LOTS OR PARCELS CONTAINING MORE THAN MINIMUM REQUIRED AREA:, by changing to Section 125 13 Amend Section 125.13 TEMPORARY REAL ESTATE OFFICE AND BILLBOARDS , by changing to Section 125.14. Amend Secticn 125.14 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION BUILDINGS., by changing to Section 125.15. Amend Section 125.15 ACTS BY DEPUTY., by changing to Section 125 16 Amend Section 125.16 NO CONFLICTING LICENSES OR PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED:, by changing to Section 125.17. -11- Alb Amend Section 125.17 Amend Section 125.18 Amend Section 125.19 Section 125.20. Amend Section 125.22 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL:, by changing to Section 125.18 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS., by changing to Section 125 19 TRAILER PARK DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS., by changing to Amend Section 125.20 Amend Section 125.21 ANIMALS:, by changing to Section 125 21 CHRISTMAS TREE SALES:, by changing to Section 125 22 MULTIPLE PARKING AREAS: by changing to Section 125 23 Amend Section 117-A.1 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE:, to read as follows. "Section 117-A.1 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE. The Combining Civic Center district is to provide a district which will insure a proper environment conducive to the development and maintenance of a Civic Center DD.kd -12- RESOLUTION NO 236 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-126 (THOMAS A. AND IRENE E BAROLDI) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, February 4, 1965 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 to change the zone from R-1 (One -family Residential) to C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) on property generally located at the southwest corner of Knott Avenue and Cerritos Avenue, requested by Thomas A. and Irene E Baroldi, 6612 Cerritos Avenue, Cypress, California known as Zone Change No Z-126, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that rezoning this property would create a parcel large enough for development of neighborhood commercial, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-126 be recommended to the City Council for approval PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 1965 by the following called vote AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, Hickey, and Worley NOES* 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Baroldi and Doerr ATTEST. SECRETARY //t/d/--e4 CHAI Resolution No 236 RESOLUTION NO 237 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-127 (CYPRESS CITY COUNCIL) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, February 4, 1965 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone from R-4 (High Density Multiple -family) to C-2 (General Commercial) on 10 6 acres generally located on the west side of Valley View St., 600 ft south of Lincoln Avenue, initiated by the Cypress City Council, known as Zone Change No. Z-127, and, WHEREAS one person addressed the Commission making inquiries about the proposed change, no one appeared in favor and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that there was a need for C-2 zoning to replace that taken by the Junior College and this parcel would be desirable due to its location on a major highway and its proximity to the Junior College, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-127 be recommended to the City Council for approval PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 1965 by the following called vote: AYES. 6 COMMISSIONERS: Baroldi, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, Hickey, and Worley NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER: Doerr ATTEST• SECRETARY Resolution No 237 vv CHAIRMAN RESOLUTION NO 238 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO Z-128 (CYPRESS CITY COUNCIL) WIIEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, February 4, 1965 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 to change the zone from R-2 (Two-family Residential) to R-3 (Multiple -family Residential) on 10 2 acres generally located at the southwest corner of Orange and Holder, initiated by the Cypress City Council, known as Zone Change No. Z-128, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that a need had been created for higher density residential development in the area adjacent to the Junior College, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-128 be recommended for approval by the City Council PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 1965 by the following called vote* AYES. NOES* ABSENT. ATTEST* 5 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS. 2 COMMISSIONERS: Baroldi, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey and Hickey None Doerr and Worley ACTING CHAIRMAN SECRETARY Resolution No 238 RESOLUTION NO 239 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO Z-129 (CYPRESS CITY COUNCIL) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, February 4, 1965 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 to change the zone from R-1 (One -family Residential) to R-4 (High Density Multiple family) on 4 75 acres generally located on the east side of Holder 330' north of Orange Avenue, initiated by the Cypress City Council, known as Zone Change No Z-129, and, WHEREAS one person addressed the Commission making inquiries about the proposed change, no one appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the size of the parcel would make it difficult to develop as R-1, but it could more realistically be developed as a high density residential area, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-129 be recommended to the City Council for approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 1965 by the following roll call vote* AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS• Baroldi, Ferreira, Harvey, and Worley NOES* 2 COMMISSIONERS: Hamilton and Hickey ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER• Doerr CHAIRMAN ATTEST. SECRETARY Resolution No 239 RESOLUTION NO. 240 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-130 (CYPRESS CITY COUNCIL) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, February 4, 1965, at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 4311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone from M-1 (Light Manufacturing) to R-4 (High Density Multiple -family) on 29 6 acres generally located 325' south of Lincoln Avenue, from 820' east of Denni St west to Denni St , initiated by the Cypress City Council, known as Zone Change No Z-130, and, WHEREAS one person addressed the Commission making inquiries about the proposed change, no one appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the area was very unlikely to develop into manufacturing uses for the following reasons• 1. Its location near residential property 2 Its lack of visibility from the highway. 3 Its lack of railroad frontage The Commission further determined that changing the zone to R-4 would compensate for R-4 area lots in the junior college site. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No. Z-130 be recommended to the City Council for approval PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 1965 by the following roll call vote AYES. 6 COMMISSIONERS: Baroldi, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, Hickey, and Worley NOES• 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER: Doerr /4/1,47,aW d/ CHAIRMAN ATTEST• SECRETARY Resolution No 240 RESOLUTION NO. 241 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-131 (CYPRESS CITY COUNCIL) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, February 4, 1965 at 7:30 p.m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 to change the zone from M-1 (Light Manufacturing) to R-4 (high Density Multiple -family) on 30 5 acres generally located 325' south Lincoln Avenue, from Denni Street west 1320', initiated by the Cypress City Council, known as Zone Change No Z-131, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the subject property was unlikely to develop into manufacturing uses due to its location near residential property, its lack of a railroad, and its lack of visibility from the highway, and the Commission further determined that changing the zone to R-4 would replace some of the high density area lost in the junior college site, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-131 be recommended to the City Council for approval PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 1965 by the following called vote: AYES 6 COMMISSIONERS. Baroldi, Ferreira, Hamilton, Harvey, Hickey, and Worley NOES• 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER: Doerr //e/a72'6( CHAIRMAN ATTEST SECRETARY Resolution No 241 RESOLUTION NO 242 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO Z-133 (CYPRESS CITY COUNCIL) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, February 4, 1965 at 7:30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 to change the zone from R-1 (One -family Residential) to P -M (Planned Manufacturing) on 51 0 acres generally located on the south side of Cerritos, east of Walker Street, initiated by the Cypress City Council, known as Zone Change No. Z-133, and, WHEREAS three people addressed the Commission making inquiries about the proposed change, no one appeared in favor of the request, and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that rezoning this property would replace the industrial zoning that had been located in the northern part of the City and was in a good location due to its proximity to a railroad and frontage on a primary highway NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-133 be recommended to the City Council for approval PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 1965 by the following called vote: AYES NOES: ABSENT. ATTEST: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 2 COMMISSIONERS 1 COMMISSIONER: Ferreira, Hamilton, Hickey,azd Worley Baroldi and Harvey Doerr SECRETARY Resolution No. 242 RESOLUTION NO 243 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PREMIT NO C-178 (DON AMBERG) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, February 4 1965 at 7:30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange, Avenue, Cypress, California to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a self-service car wash on property generally located on the east side of Valley View Street, 190' south of the centerline of Lincoln Avenue, requested by Don Amberg, 10272 Julie Beth Cypress California, known as Conditinnal Use Permit No C-178, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined 1 The proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property 2. That the site is of an adequate size and shape to accommodate required -setbacks, parking and landscaping 3 That the abutting streets are of adequate width ,.:tocarry the traffic NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No C-178 be approved, subject to the following conditions. 1 That all necessary street dedications be made and all street improvements installed 2 That all drainage fees be paid in the amount required for subdivision development in Drainage District 2-A 3. The design of the station should be suburban and the architectural plans shall be approved by the Architectural Review Committee 4 Pavement and drainage of the lot shall be in accordance with the standards of the Asphalt Institute 5 A six foot (6') block wall fence shall be installed on the south boundary of the property 6 A six foot (6') chain link fence shall be installed on the east boundary of the property with a gate being provided for the driveway 7 The sign plan shall conform to all Sign Ordinance regulations and shall be approved by the staff 8 All landscaping shall be approved by the staff 9 The property shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 1965 by the following vote. AYES. 6 COMMISSIONERS• Baroldi, Ferreora Hamilton, Harvey, Hickey and Worley NOES• 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT 1 COMMISSIONERS: Doerr / 4/10' ATTEST. s/ Darrell Dalton SECRETARY s/Wayne Worley CHAIRMAN 239 RESOLUTION NO 244 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-179 (WAYNE WORLEY) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, March 4, 1965 at 7:30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of more than one building on a multiple lot on property generally located at 6412 Orange Aveneue, Cypress, requested by Wayne Worley, 6412 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, known as Conditional Use Permit No C-179 and WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard, and WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined the applicant had provided adequate open space, more than enough parking spaces to meet the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance and conformed to all setbacks required, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No C-179 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1 The building be located as indicated on the plot plan 2 That the drainage fees be paid in the amount as required for subdivision development. 3 That the street improvements be installed or cash deposit be made, as required by the City Engineer 4 That all building, zoning, and other regulations be complied with PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of March, 1965 by the following called vote. AYES 4 COMMISSIONERS• Baroldi Ferreira, Harvey, and Hickey NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT* 1 COMMISSIONERS* Worley ATTEST* s/ Darrell Dalton s/ Robert C Harvey CICE CHAIRMAN SECRETARY RESOLUTION NO 245 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO V-202 (BARKLEY DEVELOPMENT CO ) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, March 4, 1965 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to allow the installation of a temporary directional subdivision sign on the east side of Moody, approximately 1150' south of Lincoln requested by Barkley Development Co , 1120 Fallen Leaf Road, Arcadia, California, known as Variance No V-202 and WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the request and no protests were heard and WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that due to the limited frontage and size of the property, a hardship would be created if signs were erected pont$he'Troperty, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Variance No V-202 be approved subject to the following conditions* 1. The sign shall be removed at the end of one year after the sign is erected 2 The sign shall be maintained in good repair 3 A bond of $250 shall be posted to guarantee the removal of the sign at the end of the one year period 4 The size shall conform to that required by the Sign Ordiance PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of March, 1965 by the following called vote: AYES 5 COMMISSIONERS. Baroldi, Ferreira, Harvey, Hickey, & Worley NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ATTEST: s/ Darrell Dalton z//v/ vV s/ Wayne Worley CHAIRMAN SECRETARY 241 RESOLUTION NO 246 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NO 77 SECTION 5-18, REQUIRING CERTAIN LABOR AND MATERIALS BONDS WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing on Thursday, March 4, 1965 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider a proposed amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance No 77 as amended Section 5-18 by deleting the existing Subsections (f) and (g) and adding Subsection (f) which would require certain labor and materials bonds, initiated by the Cypress City Council, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed amendment and no protests were heard and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the amendment was necessary to bring the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Cypress into conformity with the existing State Subdivision Map Act, NOW THERE FORE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposed amendment be recommedded to the City Council for Approval, to read as follows "SECTION 1 Sectopm 5-18 of Ordinance No 77 the Subdivision Ordinance as amended is hereby amended by deleting the existing Subsections (f) and (g) and adding Subsection (f) as follows "(f) To assure the City that this work will be completed a cash deposit instrument of credit from a financial institution subject to regulation by the State and Federal Government, or bonds of duly authorized corporate sureties, guaranteeing faithful performance and guaranteeing payment for labor and materials pursuant to the provisions of Section 11612 of the Business and Professions Code of California shall be furnished, the amount of this deposit, instrument of credit or bond shall be in the amounts and for the following purposes (1) An amount determined by the governing body, not less that 50 percent nor more than 100 percent of the total e estimated cost of the improvement, conditioned upon the fathful performance of the aggreement or contract and (2) an additional amount determined by the governing body, not less than 50 percent nor more than 100 percent of the total estimated cost of the improvement, securing payment to the contractor, his subcontractors and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them for the improvement "" PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of March, 1965 by the following called vote: AYES• 5 COMMISSIONERS• Baroldi Ferreira, Harvey, Hickey, & Worley NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ATTEST. 196f -t s/ Wayne Worley l+l CHAIRMAN s/ Darrell Dalton SECRETARY RESOLUTION NO 247 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-180 (GERALD M. LAYER) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Co mmission held a public hearing on Thursday, March 4 1965 and March 18, 1965 at 7 30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for condtiional use permit to allow the service of alcholic beverages on the premises at 4114 Lincoln Avenue, Cypress requested by Gerald M Layer, 2731 Whidby Lane, Anaheim, California known as Conditional Use Permit NO C-180 and WHEREAS two people appeared in favor of the proposed use and no pootests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined the proposed use was compatible with the surrounding uses and sufficient parking is available to server the existing and proposed uses NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No C-180 be recommended to the City Council for approval subject to the following conditions. 1 That the street improvements on Bloomfield and Lincoln be installed 2 That a bond be posted for all drainage fees in the amount required for subdivision development in Drainage District 2-A 3 That the Record of Survey map be completed that divides the subject property from the dental office to the south 4 That a bond inan anount to be determined by the City Engineer be posted to cover the installation of the steeet improvements required in condition number one PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1965 by the following called vote: AYES. 7 COMMISSIONERS: Baroldi, Borders, De Pietro, Ferreira, Harvey, Hickey and Worley NOES- 0 COMMISSSIONERS. None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ATTEST - '1&( /r s (%�aa ne Worley Y CHAIRMAN s/ George Putnam SECRETARY RESOLUTION NO 248 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DENYING VARIANCE NO V-203 (PAUL CRANE) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, March 18, 1965 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to allow the installation of a 10' x 25' sign three feet (12. south and six feet (6') east of the northwest corner of 4001 Myra Avenue, and extending east approximately 25 ft on said property, requested by Paul Crane, 4001 Myra Avenue, Cypress, California, known as Variance NO V-203, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the proposed variance, fourteen (14) written protests were received, no oral protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined the proposed variance would be d detrimental to the surrounding area and was not justified due to the following facts 1 The sign had been illegally erected without benefit of a building permit or necessary variance 2 Telephone complaints had been received stating it was a commercial use in a residential neighborhaood 3 Protests from fourteen (14) property owners in the vicinity of the proposed sign had been received The Commission further determined that hhe variance did not meet the conditions precedent to the grating of a variance as outlined in Section 123 3 of the Zoning Ordinance No 90, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Variance No. V-203 be denied due to the Planning Commission's determinations as listed PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1965 by the following called vote: AYES* 7 COMMISSIONERS• Baroldi, Borders, De Pietro, Ferreira, Harvey, Hickey, and Worley NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS• None s/Wayne Worley ATTEST s/ George R Putman CHAIRMAN SECRETARY RESOLUTION NO 249 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO Z-134 (FLYNN, MC BRIEN & SCALLY) WHEREAS the Cypress City Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, April 1, 1965 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress Californ.i3, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone from R-1 (One -family Residential) to C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) on property generally located on the southwest corner of Juanita and Orange, requested by Clinton H and Ruth R Flynn, Frederick R. and Suzanne I McBrien, and Lola A Scally, c/o C H and R R. Flynn, 1101 W North Street, Anaheim, California known as Zone Change No Z-134, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the request, two inquiries were made and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that the proposed change would not be in the best interest of the City for the following reasons: 1 The location fo the existing railroad line indicates great possibility for traffic congestion 2 The General Plan does not indicate any commercial needs in the area 3 The proposed R-1 subdivision immediately west of the subject property will be directly effected by the traffic, noise, lights, etc generated from the proposed uses at hhis location 4 Commercial developments of the size proposed by the applicant are normally located in the intersection of secondary, primary, and major highways and not on interior block situations off of residential collect or streets 5. The size of the proposed development would probably have little success due to the lack of present and future dwelling units within the area 6 The property would not conform to the criteria established in the "Description and Purpose' of the C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) zone NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Zone Change No Z-134 be recommended to the City Council for denial due to the reasons stipulated above PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of April, 1965 by the following called vote: AYES. 5 COMMISSIONERS: Baroldi Borders De Pietro, Harvey, and Worley ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS• Ferreira and Hickey V '% ATTEST s/ George R. Putnam SECRETARY s/ Wayne Worley CHAIRMAN 245 RESOLUTION NO 250 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS' DENYING VARIANCE NO V-204• JOHN S MAY WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing on April 1, 1965 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers, 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress California, to consider an application for variance to allow the reduction of the width and lot size of lots in an R-1 subdivision known as Tentative Tract No 5337, generally located between Grindlay and Moody Streets approximately 686' south of Lincoln Avenue on Moody and property immddiately south of the Catholic Church School property on Grindlay Street requested by John S May, 9886 Garden Grove Blvd Garden Grove California known as Variance No V-204, and, WHEREAS one person appeared in favor of the requested variance and one protest was heard, and, WHEREAS by changing the design of the streets the applicant could comply with the requirements for lot width and size and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission found and determined that the applicant did not meet the conditions necessary to the granting of a variance as set forth in Section 1123.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Variance No V-204 be denied due to the reasons stipulated above PASSED AND ADOPTED ',this 1st day of April, 1965 by the following roll call vote. AYES 5 COMMISSIONERS* Baroldi Borders De Pietro Harvey, and Worley NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS. Ferreira and Hickey /%, A1,-4/7 Worley V ATTEST s/ George Putnam SECRETARY CHAIRMAN RESOLUTION NO 251 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO MMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-181 (CYPRESS RIDERS -CORRAL 51) WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing on Thursday, April 15, 1965 at 7.30 p m in the Council Chambers 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for conditiona use permit to allow an equestrian establishment on property generally locatted at 9891 Valley View Street, requested by Cypress Riders -Corral 51, P 0 Box 7, Cypress, California, known as Conditional Use Permit No '.0-181, and, WHEREAS no one appeared in favor of the request, and no protests were heard, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined the requested use would not be a detriment to the surrounding property or hazardous to the public health, safety or general welfare, with certain conditions attached, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No C-181 be approved subject to the following conditions 1 That the application should be renewed in January 1966 2 The hours of operation should be limited from 10 00 a m to sunset on weekends and holidays only 3 It is the applicant s responsibility to water down the property to keep dust at a minimum 4. A certificate of insurance, holding the City harmless for any responsibility for accidents on the property, shall be submitted to the City within sixty (60) days 5 The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits for inspection of structures and bleachers from the Cypress Building Department 6 A business license is required for the sale of foods 7 The sound emitted by the loudspeakers shall not become objectionable to the surrounding tracts 8 The grounds shall be policed and kept in an orderly manner PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1965 by the following roll call vote AYES 6 COMMISSIONERS. Baroldi, Borders, De Pietro, Harvey, Hickey, and Worley NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONERS: Ferreira ATTEST. s/ Wayne Worley CHAIRMAN s/ George R. Putnam SECRETARY