The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Comm Reso. Nos. 551-600RESOLUTION NO 551 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO V-300, PETER GIOVANNONI WHEREAS, the City of Cypress Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 7, 1971, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California, to consider an application for a variance to allow construction of carports within the front half of the property generally located at 9721 Graham Street, Cypress, requested by Peter Giovannoni, and known as Variance No V-300, and, WHEREAS, Peter Giovannoni, property owner, presented testimony in favor of said application* and WHEREAS, no one presented testimony against said application; and, WHEREAS, Mrs. R. D. Thomas, 9733 Graham Street, Cypress, spoke in regards to a clarification on the height of the carports; and, WHEREAS, the Commission finds that the necessary the granting of a Variance; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning No V-300 subject to the following condition: 1 Covered parking spaces numbered 1, 2, 3, and plot plan be garages. conditions do exist for Commission approved Variance 4 on the approved PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 7th day of October, 1971, by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT* 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST: CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SECR ARY IF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 552 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DENYING ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-203 INITIATED BY THE CYPRESS PLAN- NING COMMISSION WHEREAS, The Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of October 7 1971 at 7:30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-1 (Single-family Residential) to C-1 (Neighborhood Stores Zone) on property generally located on the west side of Valley View Street, Cypress, California, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission and known as Zone Change No Z-203, and, WHEREAS Thomas Van Ruiten property owner, presented testimony in favor of said application, and, WHEREAS, letters of protest from the following people were read into the record: Mr Mr Mr Mr and Mrs Claude Renner and Mrs William Pence and Mrs Joaquin Milho, Jr and Mrs, James Stone 5961 Santa Catalina Garden Grove CA 11771 Valley View St ,Garden Grove, CA 5941 Santa Catalina, Garden Grove, CA 5931 Santa Catalina, Garden Grove, CA WHEREAS, the following people presented testimony in opposition to said application. Mrs Mrs Mrs Mr Nancy Buehler Rosemarie Milho Ann Stone James Stone 5921 Santa Catalina, Garden Grove, CA 5941 Santa Catalina Garden Grove, CA 5931 Santa Catalina, Garden Grove, CA 5931 Santa Catalina, Garden Grove, CA WHEREAS, the Commission was of the opinion that this proposal does not constitute the highest and best use of the land; and, WHEREAS, the Commission was of the opinion that this use is not compatible with the adjoining residential areas, and, WHEREAS, the Commission was of the opinion that there is no need for additional commercially zoned property in this area; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission denied Zone Change No Z-203 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 1971, by the following roll call vote. AYES 2 COMMISSIONERS Ricker and Cardoza NOES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Sonju, Evans, Warren ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS• None CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRAIrARY pF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 553 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE 1990 LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of November 4, 1971, at 7.30 p m., in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress California to consider revision of the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and, WHEREAS, Mr Larry Wise of Hahn, Wise, and Associates, made a presenta- tion regarding the Land Use Element Plan; and, WHEREAS, George Putnam, representing S & S Construction Company, and asked for a clarification regarding the density south of the industrial area' and, WHEREAS, no one presented testimony against the proposed Land Use Element, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the 1990 Land Use Element of the General Plan with the land use map reflecting the current zoning and the type written minor revisions; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress recommends approval to the City Council of the Land Use Element of the General Plan PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 4th day of November, 1971, by the following roll call vote. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS. Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES' 1 COMMISSIONER• Ricker ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 554 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DENYING ZONE CHANGE NO Z-208, CALIFORNIA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of November 18, 1971, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from C-1 (Neighborhood Stores Zone) to PD (Planned Develop- ment) Zone on property generally located at the northeast corner of Denni Street and Orange Avenue Cypress, California, requested by California Pacific Development, and known as Zone Change No Z-208• and, WHEREAS, Mr White, Secretary of the Planning Commission, read a letter of withdrawal into the record from Don Vieira, President, California Pacific Development; and, WHEREAS, the Commission voted to deny the zone change as per the with- drawal request, and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission denied Zone Change No Z-208 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1971, by the following roll call vote: AYES. 5 COMMISSIONERS Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS None ATTEST y((�.�CO/ C IRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 4D4 eak±t. SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 555 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO Z-207, WOODBINE CORPORATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing ar their meeting of December 2, 1971, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from R-1 (Single-family Residential) Zone to PD (Planned Development) Zone on approximately 80 acres generally located north of Orangewood Avenue and between Holder and Knott Streets, requested by Woodbine Corporation and known as Zone Change No Z-207, and, WHEREAS, Mr Bernard McCune and George Putnam representing S & S Construction both presented testimony in favor of said application, and, WHEREAS, the following people presented testimony in opposition to said application: Mr Don Smith Mr Tom Harrison Mr Joe Hardcastle Mrs Charlotte Maletz Mr. Leonard Maletz 6783 Tiki Drive 6883 Tiki Drive 4588 Blanca Drive 4508 Lemon Circle 4508 Lemon Circle Cypress, Cypress, Cypress Cypress, Cypress, CA CA CA CA CA WHEREAS, a Planned Development Zone would allow the Planning Commission to review all permitted uses under the conditional use process, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that a Planning Development Zone is the highest and best use of the land• and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress recommends approval to the City Council of Zone Change No Z-207 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd day of December 1971 by the following roll call vote AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Cardoza NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER. Evans ATTEST :\...) SEC AR OF TH PLANNING COMMISSION ;/A45e-, 2 - CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 556 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DENYING ZONE CHANGE NO Z-209, RICHARD SEIFERT WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of December 16, 1971, at 7.30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from C-2 (General Commercial) Zone to R-4 (High Density Multiple -family Residential) Zone on property generally located at the southeast corner of Danny Avenue and Walker Street, requested by Richard Seifert, and known as Zone Change No Z-209, and, WHEREAS Mr White Secretary of the Planning Commission, read a letter of withdrawal into the record from Mr Richard Seifert, the applicant in question, and, WHEREAS the Commission voted to deny the zone change as per the withdrawal request and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission denied Zone Change No Z-209 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 16th day of December, 1971, by the following roll call vote. AYES• 3 COMMISSIONERS. Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 2 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker and Sonju CHAIRMAN OF THE P NING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 557 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-267, WOODBINE CORPORATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of December 16, 1971, at 7 30 p m in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the con- struction of a residential planned development on approximately 80 acres generally located north of Orangewood Avenue and between Holder and Knott Streets, requested by Woodbine Corporation, and known as Conditional Use Permit No C-267; and, WHEREAS, Mr Bernard McCune and George Putnam, representing Wood- bine Corporation, presented testimony in favor of said application; and, WHEREAS, the following people presented testimony in opposition to said application: Mr Don Smith 6783 Tiki Drive Cypress, CA Mr Clyde Barrens 6873 Tiki Drive Cypress, CA WHEREAS, on the basis of the evidence presented to it, the Planning Commission has found and determined that the following conditions, and each and all of them, exist• A That the use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this ordinance B That the said use is necessary or desirable for the develop- ment of the community, in harmony with the various elements or objectives of this ordinance, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located C That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use and all of the yards, setbacks walls or fences, landscaping and other features required in order to ad- just said use to those existing or possible future uses on land in the neighborhood D That the site for which the proposed use is bounded by a street or streets and highways properly designed and improved so as to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated or to be generated by the proposed use E That the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof F. That the conditions stated in the decision are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit No C-267 to the City Council subject to the following conditions• 1 Developer shall conform to all applicable provisions of the City Code. 2 Landscape plans for the common green areas shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect and approved by the Plan- ning Commission 3 Location of tot lots, play equipment, passive areas and other facilities in common green areas shall be subject to staff review and Planning Commission approval 4 C C & R 's shall be subject to approval to staff and City Attorney 5 All open off-street parking spaces shall be designated for guest parking 6 The walls separating the individually owned units must be two separately constructed one hour fire walls Also, the wall construction separating these living units shall pro- vide a sound transmission class (STC) of at least 45 Test for STC shall conform with ASTM E90 -61T 7 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with Master Plan of Drainage (Code) 8 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer (Code) 9. Drainage easements shall be dedicated to the City as required (Code) 10 Street lights shall be installed per City Standards (Code) 11 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid (Code) 12 Tree planting and landscaping on arterial and interior streets shall be to satisfaction of staff City street tree policy shall be used as a guide 13 A cash deposit of five hundred dollars ($500) shall be posted with the City of Cypress to cover the testing by a qualified agricultural laboratory to determine the organic and chemical amendments required for optimum growth in planting trees 14 Minimum street grade shall be 0 20% except in the event that dirt is required to be imported (Policy) 15 Alley grades shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer (Policy) 16 Minimum curb radius on streets shall be twenty-five (25') and all property and alley radii shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer (Policy) 17 Cul de sacs shown shall allow adequate turning radius for trash truck 18 Angle between hammerhead and centerline of alley shall be subject to approval of City Engineer 19 Orangewood Avenue, Holder Street and Knott Street shall be dedicated and fully improved in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets & Highways (Code) 20 The entrance street on Orangewood Avenue shall line up with street to south 21 The developer shall dedicate a fifteen foot (15') strip of land between the South boundary of the Stanton Storm Channel and the North boundary line of the development to the City of Cypress and area shall be developed in accordance with the Standards established by the City Staff for a Bicycle Trailway System (Policy) 22 The developer shall dedicate an additional eight foot (8') easement on Orangewood Avenue, Holder Street, and Knott Street for trailways and develop in accordance with the standards established by the City Staff for a bicycle trail - way system (Policy) 23 All vehicular access right shall be dedicated to the City of Cypress for Orangewood Avenue, Holder and Knott Streets and all vehicular and pedestrian access right shall be dedicated to the City of Cypress for that fifteen foot (15') strip North of the northerly boundary line (Policy) 24 All one hundred foot (100') streets shall be improved with eighty-four foot (84') paving curb to curb All eighty-four (84') feet streets shall be improved with sixty-four feet (64') of paving curb to curb All forty-one foot (41') streets shall be improved with forty feet (40') of paving curb to curb All alleys shall be twenty-six feet (26') minimum width (Policy) 25 Minimum street width fronting lots 1 through 8 may be thirty- one feet (31') with thirty foot (30') paving curb to curb 26 Interior street structural sections to be based on recommenda- tion and soils report by soils engineering firm acceptable to the City Engineer with street structural sections to be deter- mined by using T I of 5 for streets with forty feet (40') of paving Cul de sac streets shall be designed with a T.I. of 4 City Engineering Division will determine structural section for Orangewood Avenue, Holder Street and Knott Street per report from Orange County Road Department Materials Labora- tory Alley sections shall be per City Standards 27 There shall be five foot (5') walkway, parkway and public utility easement adjacent to curbs on all streets (Policy) 28 Adequate walkways shall be provided to allow pedestrian travel from one area to another without crossing directly into parking areas 29 Sidewalks shall be constructed in front of "Patio Garden Home" units where they are not accessible to common green belt areas 30 All streets shall be dedicated and improved within the boundaries of the development (Code) 31 Location of all street furniture shall be approved by the City Engineer (Code) 32 Water system shall be a circulating type. 33 Necessary fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Fire Department requirements and City Standards (Code) 34 All secondary and primary utility services shall be underground (Code) 35 Electrical and telephone cable runs shall be located adjacent to alleys Transformers for electrical service and distribution points for telephone service shall be located in common green areas Common trenches shall be used for TV, electrical and telephone cables 36 Installation of cable TV shall be subject to any City Ordinances or regulations which are in effect at time of recordation of each Final Map 37 A 6 ft high ornamental concrete block wall shall be constructed along the southerly boundary line of the Flood Control Channel on the northerly side of the project No fences shall be con- structed along Orangewood, Holder, or Knott Avenue All fences constructed at the entryways to the project along the side yards shall be approved by the Planning Department Staff 38 Plan check and inspection fees amounting to 31% of the public improvements shall be paid (Policy & Code) 39 A Master Plan of sewers, storm drains and street grades shall be submitted for approval Master Plan shall also show phasing and boundaries of units 40 Developer shall maintain all City sewers downstream of the area being developed within the holdings of the Woodbine Corporation until accepted by the City Plan for guarantee of sewer main- tenance and emergency service shall be submitted to City Engineer for approval prior to recordation of first Final Map 41. Garages on corner lots shall be located on lots so as to provide maximum sight distance for traffic 42 The developer shall dedicate two (2) acres for public park site or equivalent per discretion of City Staff 43 The developer shall submit a Tentative Tract Map subject to the above conditions 44 The Conditional Use Permit approval shall be subject to zone change No Z-207 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 16th day of December, 1971, by the following roll call vote. AYES• 3 COMMISSIONERS: Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS. Ricker and Sonju ATTEST: cs3 SEC1ETARY'OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1, 22/ C- ? -7/ -7 CHAIRMAN OF THE P G COMMISSION L NIN RESOLUTION NO 558 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-269, CALIFORNIA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of December 16 1971, at 7:30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress California to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of 64 garden apartment units on the northeast corner of Denni Street and Orange Avenue, requested by California Pacific Development, and known as Condition- al Use Permit No C-269• and WHEREAS, Mr White, Secretary of the Planning Commission, read a letter of withdrawal into the record from Don Vieira, President, California Pacific Development, and, WHEREAS, the Commission voted to deny the conditional use permit as per the withdrawal request; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission denied Conditional Use Permit No C-269 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 16th day of December 16 1971 by the following roll call vote' AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Warren Evans, Cardoza NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker and Sonju ATTEST. SECRETARY'OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN OF THE P G COMMISSION SION RESOLUTION NO 559 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-268, DR MARVIN L STERN WHEREAS, Mr Daniel Duff and Mr. Wilson, both representing Dr Stern, presented testimony in favor of the said application; and, WHEREAS, no one presented testimony in opposition to said application, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-268 subject to the following conditions 1 Development shall meet all applicable provisions of the City Code 2 Landscape plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect Plans co incorporate suggestions of the Town- scape Element and shall be approved by the Planning Com- mission 3 Development shall comply substantially with approved plans 4 Provision for off-street parking shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Staff 5 A block wall to be constructed along the entire length of the eastern boundary and it shall be decorative in nature and the design shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Planning Commission PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd day of December, 1971, by the following roll call vote: AYES 4 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker Sonju Warren Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER Evans C AIRMAN OF THE P ING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 560 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO V-303 LARWIN MULTI - HOUSING CORPORATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of November 18, 1971, at 7.30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California to consider an application for variance to allow an 8 foot high wall along interior property lines, on property generally located north of Lincoln and approximately 110 feet west of Grindlay in the City of Cypress, California, requested by Larwin Multihousing Corporation and known as Variance No V-303, and, WHEREAS, Mr Darrell Dalton, representing Larwin Multihousing Corp- oration, presented testimony in favor of said application; and, WHEREAS, Mr White, Secretary of the Planning Commission, stated that there had been no letters received either in favor or against the request for variance. and WHEREAS, no one presented testimony in opposition to said application, and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission finds that conditions do exist for granting a variance as set forth in Section 123.3 of the Cypress City Code and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Variance No V-303 subject to the following conditions: 1 A wall shall be constructed on all three (3) sides of the proposed development The height of the wall shall be 6 ft. of masonry block The 2 ft wood extension will pertain only to the adjacent R-1 area This will pertain also to the north as well as to the west 2 The applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of both sides of the wall PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 18th day of November, 1971, by the following roll call vote. AYES• 5 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS• None C RMAN OF THE PNG COMMISSION ATTEST. SEC TARP OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 561 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-270, PRESLEY DEVELOPMENT CO WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of November 18, 1971, at 7.30 p m in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to con- sider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of 22 single family units in a C -C (Civic Center Overlay) Zone on property generally located on the west side of Grindlay Avenue approximately 500' feet north of Orange Avenue, in the City of Cypress, California, requested by Presley Development Company, and known as Conditional Use Permit No. C-270• and WHEREAS, Mr Tom Williams representing Presley Development Company, presented testimony in favor of said application; and WHEREAS, no one presented testimony in opposition to said application, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-270 subject to the following conditions• 1 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with the Master Plan of Drainage 2 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 3 Drainage easements shall be obtained and dedicated to the City as required 4 Street lights shall be installed per City Standards 5 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid 6 Street trees (15 gal ) shall be provided in accordance with the street tree policy 7 Four (4') foot tree wells shall be required on all streets having walks adjacent to the curbs, per City Standards 8 The landscape of the parkway on Grindlay Street shall be of unique design approved by the City Staff as per the Townscape Element 9 Sidewalks adjacent to curbs shall be 5 5 feet in width, with five (5') foot parkway and public utility easements 10 Minimum street grades shall be 0 20% 11 All lots shall drain to the front with a minimum of 1% grade 12 Cul de sacs shall have forty-three and one-half (43 50') foot radius 13 Pedestrian and vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City of Cypress for those lots abutting Grindlay 14 An ornamental slump stone block wall shall be constructed along the lots abutting Grindlay Street, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Planning Commission 15 Blue border to extend to centerline of Grindlay Street 16 All fifty-one (51') foot and sixty (60') foot streets shall have forty (40') feet of paving curb to curb 17 Location of all street furniture shall be approved by the City Engineer 18 Interior street structural sections to be based on recommendation and soils report by soils engineering firm acceptable to the City Engineer with street structural sections to be determined by using T I of 4.0 on Cul de Sac Street and T I of 6 7 for. Grindlay Street 19 All secondary and primary utility services shall be underground 20. Developer to pay optional design fee in the amount of 6% of total value of land The use of these funds to be for development within this quarter section 21 Plan check and inspection fees amounting to 31% of the street improvements shall be paid 22 All existing wells to be capped as per City requirements 23 Demolition permits shall be required on all applicable buildings 24 All septic tanks and cess pools to be located and removed or filled Also any existing house sewer connections to be capped 25 Retaining walls shall be required on perimeter property lines if there is greater than a 12 inch difference in the subject property and adjoining property 26 Subdivision shall be revised to include not more than 22 lots 27 A walkway easement be provided between lots at the end of the cul de sacs at the westerly end of the property 28 One 10 ft side yard shall be required on all lots 29 A 6 foot cinder block wall shall be constructed around the entire tract except for Grindlay of a design, height and color to meet with the approval of the Secretary of the Planning Commission 30 The Planning Commission shall approve the location of the houses on the tract map 31 Not less than 10 of the large models (944 and 104) shall be constructed on the tract 32 Soil in planting areas including trees, shall be tested by a qualified agricultural laboratory to determine the organic and chemical amendments for optimum growth for the plants specified The test results shall include concentration of nitrogen phosphorus, potassium, pH, salinity, sodium status and boron saturation extract Results of these tests with rec- ommendations of the agricultural laboratory shall be furnished to the Public Works Department for approval at least 30 days prior to planting date (Policy) 33 Water system shall be a circulating type (Policy) PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 18th day of November, 1971, by the following roll call vote' AYES. 5 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES• 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS None �61&2 )72 CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST. 4 66 SECRETAR OF T E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 562 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DENYING ZONE CHANGE NO Z-210, LEO BAROLDI WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of January 6, 1972, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) Zone to C-2 (General Commercial) Zone on property generally located on the southwest corner of Holder Street and Cerritos Avenue, requested by Leo Baroldi and known as Zone Change No Z-210, and, WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the Commission that there was sufficient C-2 (General Commercial) zoning in the immediate vicinity, and, WHEREAS, it was also the consensus of the Commission that C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) zone was the highest and best use of the land, and, WHEREAS, the Commission was of the opinion that there is no need for additional commercially zoned property in this area• and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission denied Zone Change No Z-210 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of January, 1972, by the following roll call vote - AYES 4 COMMISSIONERS. Ricker, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT- 1 COMMISSIONER Sonju CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNI COMMISSION ATTEST: /12 04 / a )At.'ti.- SEC TAR"' OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 563 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-271, LARWIN MULTIHOUSING CORPORATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of January 6, 1972, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a day nursery on property generally located at 9090 Moody Street, Cypress, California, requested by Larwin Multihousing Corporation, and known as Conditional Use Permit No C-271, and, WHEREAS, Mr Darrell Dalton, representing Larwin Multihousing Corp , presented testimony in favor of said application, and, WHEREAS, there were no written communications received either in favor or against, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-271 subject to the following conditions: 1 The hours of operation shall be from 7 a m to 6 p m Monday through Friday only 2 A variance shall be obtained to allow variance from Section 125 27 C , D , E , H , and I of the City Code 3 The day nursery shall service a maximum of 25 children 4 The fenced play area comprising 2,900 sq ft as indicated on the approved plot plan shall be the only area utilized for outdoor play purposes by the Day Nursery 5 Three off-street parking spaces shall be located as indicated on the approved plot plan, and shall be marked for restricted parking during the hours of operation of the Day Nursery 6 The day nursery shall service only the children residing at Tara Hill and not outside children PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of January, 1972, by the following roll call vote: AYES. 4 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSENT 1 COMMISSIONER. Sonju CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST. ECR TA� AAA S OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 564 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO V-304, LARWIN MULTI - HOUSING CORPORATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of January 6, 1972, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to allow the operation of a day nursery on property generally located at 9090 Moody Street, Cypress, California requested by Larwin Multihousing Corporation, and known as Variance No V-304, and, WHEREAS, Mr Darrell Dalton, representing Larwin Multihousing Corp- oration presented testimony in favor of said application, and, WHEREAS, Mr White, Secretary of the Planning Commission, stated that there had been no letters received either in favor or against the request for variance. and WHEREAS, no one presented testimony in opposition to said application. and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Variance No V-304 subject to the following conditions. 1 Subject to all conditions of Conditional Use Permit No C-271 2 Approval shall be for a period of one year at the end of which it shall automatically be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The review shall include the submission of addresses of the children attending the school. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of January, 1972, by the following roll call vote AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES• 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER: Sonju CH V. RMAN OF THE3L/ ING COMMISSION S ON ATTEST. SEC ETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 565 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO 90, SECTION 122 11 NON CONFORMING LOTS, BUILDINGS, AND USES UNDER VARIANCE OR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of January 6, 1972, at 7.30 p m in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California to consider an amendment to Ordinance No 90 the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress to amend Section 122 11 Non Conforming Lots, Buildings, and Uses Under Variance or Conditional Use Permit, initiated by the City Council of the City of Cypress. and, WHEREAS, John Murphy, Assistant City Attorney, requested the following revision to be made in the ordinance. Those nonconforming lots, uses and buildings which are existing under a variance or a conditional use permit granted under this or any previous Zoning Ordinance shall be permitted to continue under the conditions and regulations imposed in said permit or variance, provided that such uses may be altered, expanded or ex- tended to permit a similar type of nonconforming use determined by the Planning Commission to be no more detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare than those uses otherwise permitted under said variance or permit; and, WHEREAS there was discussion by the Commission regarding nonconforming uses; and, WHEREAS, such other uses shall not have any different or detrimental effect upon the adjoining neighborhood area or zones than such specifically permitted uses and shall not increase the traffic and noises in the neighborhood area aid otherwise be more objectionable or obnoxious than those uses specifically permitted; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did recommend approval to the City Council of the adoption of the proposed amendment to Section 122 11 Nonconforming lots, buildings and uses under variance or conditional use permit PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of January, 1972, by the following roll call vote AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONER: Sonju (K/1-(Ii/fi >%% CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST; SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 566 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRE -ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO Z-212, WARMINGTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of February 17, 1972, at 7:30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California, to consider a pre -annexation zone change to PD (Planned Development) Zone, generally located on the south side of the 4700 block of Lincoln Avenue, initiated by Warmington Construction Company; and, WHEREAS, Mr James Warmington, representing Warmington Construction Company, spoke in favor of the pre -annexation zone change; and, WHEREAS, no one presented testimony against the proposed pre -annexation zone change, and, WHEREAS, Mr Murphy stated that the zone change would be operative on the completion of the annexation proceedings; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that a PD (Planned Development) Zone was the highest and best use of the land; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress recommends approval to the City Council of Pre -Annexation Zone Change No Z-212 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th day of February 1972, by the following roll call vote. AYES. 5 COMMISSIONERS. Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS* None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ;5/444:11_,Ji/7), CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST. SECRETARY 0I' THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 567 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS SETTING FORTH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE CONDUCT OF ITS MEET- INGS THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HEREBY RESOLVES, DETER- MINES, AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS. SECTION 1 Time and Place of Meeting. The regular meetings of the Cypress Planning Commission shall be held on the first and third Thursdays of each month at 4:00 p m , provided, however, that the majority of a quorum at any such regular meeting may, by motion or resolution, change the date and time for any of the regular meetings to be held within thirty days thereafter If for any reason the business to be considered at a regular meeting cannot then be completed, the Planning Commission may at such meeting designate the time for an adjourned meeting to consider any matter that can be properly considered at a regular meeting, and such action shall serve as adequate notice to the members present at such meeting The Secretary shall deliver or mail written notice of such adjourned meeting to all absentee members at least twenty-four hours in advance of said meeting In the event of a lack of a quorum at a regular meeting, the Chairman, Vice -Chairman, Chairman Pro Tem or Secretary of the Planning Commission may adjourn the meeting to another date and such declaration of adjournment shall serve as sufficient notice thereof to all members present The Secretary shall notify the absentees as hereinabove provided Special meetings may be called in the manner provided for in the Govern- ment Code of the State of California Unless otherwise specified by the Commission, all regular meetings of the Planning Commission shall be held at the Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California SECTION 2 Officers and Committees The officers of the Planning Commission shall be a Chairman and a Vice - Chairman and the Vice -Chairman shall serve in the absence of the Chairman In the absence of both the Chairman and the Vice -Chairman, the members present may elect a Chairman Pro Tem to serve until such time as the Chairman or Vice - Chairman is again present Pursuant to Section 2 24 of the Cypress City Code the Chairman and Vice -Chairman shall be elected at the first Planning Commission meeting in May of each calendar year The Chairman and Vice -Chairman may serve successive terms not to exceed a total of two years. The Vice -Chairman shall succeed the Chairman in the event of death, dis- ability, removal or resignation, and, in that event, a new Vice -Chairman shall be elected by the Commission for the remainder of the term In the event of the death, disability, removal or resignation of the Vice -Chairman, that office shall be filled at the next regular meeting by an election held by the Planning Commission The Chairman and/or Vice -Chairman may be removed from office at any time by a majority vote of the entire Commission Pursuant to Section 2-24 of the Cypress City Code, the Secretary of the Planning Commission shall be appointed by the City Council Fact finding and advisory committees consisting of members of the Commission may be appointed at the discretion of the Chairman or the direction of the Plann- ing Commission The duties of such committees shall be as described by the Chair- man or the Planning Commission SECTION 3 Agenda for Regular Meetings A copy of the agenda for every regular meeting of the Planning Commission shall be provided to each member not less than two days prior to the date of the meeting at which time such agenda is to be considered Items may be added to the agenda only with the unanimous consent of the members present at the meeting SECTION 4 Minutes and Records. It shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Planning Commission to keep the minutes of all official meetings of the Commission It shall also be the duty of the Secretary to maintain all other records of the Commission, includ- ing all applications made under provisions of law and the complete files of proceedings and actions taken in connection therewith The Secretary shall, not later than thirty days following any regular meeting of the Commission, transmit to each member of the Commission a full and complete copy of the minutes of such meeting, including copies of any resolutions referred to therein Formal resolutions considered by the Commission shall constitute a part of the minutes of the meeting at which such resolutions were'contidered. All resolutions shall be clearly identified by number nature of subject matter, and date, and each such resolution shall contain as a part thereof a record of the names of the Commissioners voting "aye , the names of the Commissioners voting "no", and the names of the Commissioners absent or abstaining Where action by the Commission is required to be by resolution, a motion with respect thereto when made, seconded, and passed, shall be deemed to constitute a conclusive determination as to the import of the action, and such resolution shall, by reference, be incorporated as part of the minutes as provided above. All actions of the Commission, whether by motion or by resolutions shall be considered conclusive as to the general import as of the date of such action, provided however that said motion or resolutions shall be subject to correction as to details of phraseology, etc , at the time of considering and approving the minutes of the meeting at which such action was taken SECTION 5 Hearings. Hearings conducted by the Commission shall conform to the provisions of law in the matter of public notice time number and reporting. A formal hearing before the Commission which, for any reason, cannot be completed at the time and place originally advertised, may be continued to a later date, and the announcement of such a continuance and the time and place to which the hearing has been continued shall constitute a sufficient notice to all parties concerned. The Chair should open a public hearing with a statement such as the following. Now is the time and place for a public hearing on the application of (name) for a (zone change variance, conditional use permit, etc.) We will appreciate your efforts toward maintaining orderly procedures so that the hearing may proceed in an expeditious and dignified manner. All interested persons will have an opportunity to be heard. (If there are numerous people in the audience who would like to participate on the issue, and it is known that a large group thereof represents the same opinion, it is advised that a spokesman be selected to speak for the entire group Your spokesman will thus have the opportunity of speaking for a reasonable length of time and of presenting a complete case ) It is the desire of the Commission to obtain the comments of all interested or affected individuals and organizations, and consideration will be given to all comments and suggestions made However, irrelevant and off -the -subject comments will be ruled "out of order" Proponents will be given an opportunity to present their case first This will be followed by an opportunity for the opponents to present their objections. Proponents will be given a further opportunity for rebuttal Either side may askquestions, but all questions should be directed to the Chair When the hearing has been declared closed, all audience participation is ended. The Secretary will now read the substance of the application and staff report Following the staff reports, the Chairman should state. Any member of the Commission who has made an inspection of the property or has independent knowledge of the situation under review should present his comments and findings at this time Following remarks by Commission members, if any, the Chairman should state: Those wishing to be heard in favor of the proposal will now be recognized Each speaker should step forward to the podium and state his name and address for the record The same remarks by the Chair will also apply for those wishing to speak in opposition, or rebuttal, or to ask a question. After public testimony has been presented, the, public hearing may either be continued or ordered closed If the hearing is closed, all further discussion should be limited to Planning Commission members unless and until the hearing is declared reopened. It is the responsibility of the Chair to control public debate so that repetitive or irrelevent remarks are not made, so that everyone has had a chance to speak before others speak for a second time, and so as to complete the business at hand No person shall speak more than twice during the same meeting to the same questions, nor longer than ten (10) minutes at a time, unless expressly permitted by the Chair SECTION 6 Zone Changes As a general rule it shall be the policy of the Commission to defer final action on zone changes and other decisions being specially significant to the city until at least four (4) members of the Commission are present to take action thereon SECTION 7 Conductive Business. Unless otherwise provided in this section or by law, Roberts' Rules of Order (newly revised) shall govern the conduct bf meetings of the Planning Commission PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress, at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of February , 1972 ATTEST. City Clerk Secr tar of the Planning Commission STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, DARRELL ESSEX City Clerk of the City of Cypress DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting by the following roll call vote AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES• COMMISSIONERS• ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS. RESOLUTION NO 568 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-273, BOYS CLUB OF CYPRESS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hear- ing at their meeting of March 2, 1972, at 7.30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress California, to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a Boys Club on property generally located on the northwest corner of Moody Street and Cerritos Avenue, requested by the Boys Club of Cypress, and known as Conditional Use Permit No C-273, and, WHEREAS, Mr Wynn Chapman, representing the Boys Club, presented testimony in favor of said application, and, WHEREAS, there were no written communications received either in favor or against; and, WHEREAS, there was no one wishing to give testimony against the application. and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-273 subject to the following conditions: vote: 1 The facility shall be developed in substantial conformance to the approved site plans 2 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 3. Moody Street shall be improved with driveway approaches per City standards. 4 Landscape plans shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect and approved by the Planning Commission Street trees shall be installed per City policy 5 Fencing and screening shall be installed as deemed necessary as the facility is developed, to be approved by the Planning Com- mission 6 The parking shall be in substantial conformance to the intent of Exhibit A subject to final review by the Planning Commission 7 Trash areas shall be enclosed and screened from public view 8 At such time that lighting is installed it shall be approved by the Planning Commission and directed away from adjoining properties 9 Architectural style shall be in substantial conformance to the fire station PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd day of March, 1972, by the following roll call AYES. 4 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker Warren Evans Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN. 1 COMMISSIONER. Sonju ATTEST. CRE'ARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IRMAN OF THE P N NG COMMIS ION RESOLUTION NO 569 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-272, SANDRA PLOTT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of February 3, 1972, at 7:30 p m., in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of an addition to an existing pre-school on property generally located at 4549 Cerritos Avenue, Cypress, California, requested by Sandra Plott, and known as Conditional Use Permit No. C-272, and, WHEREAS, Sandra Plott, the owner, presented testimony in favor of said application; and, WHEREAS, the following people presented testimony in opposition to said application: Mr. Robert Baker, Mrs Joyce Kelly, Mr Frank Morris, 4544 Patricia Circle, 10479 Janine Lane, 4554 Patricia Circle, Cypress, CA 90630 Cypress, CA 90630 Cypress, CA 90630 WHEREAS, Mr. Ken Wormhoudt, landscape architect for the project, spoke in favor of the application for conditional use permit; and, WHEREAS, it was stated by the applicant that she would specifically consent to proposed condition #5 as it relates to the property on which the existing day care nursery is located; and, WHEREAS, there was pertinent discussion on increasing the height of the block wall; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-272 subject to the following conditions: 1 The facility shall be constructed in substantial conformance to the approved plot plan and elevations 2 The facility shall meet the requirements of the State of California Department of Social Welfare for a day care nursery 3 The construction shall meet the requirements of Fire Zone #2. 4 Landscape plans shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect and approved by the Planning Commission prior to installations 5 A sound buffer shall be installed on the north property lines of Conditional Use Permit No C-204 and Conditional Use Permit No C-272 and on the east property line of Conditional Use Permit No C-272 The wall shall be increased a minimum of 6 ft in height from the highest finished grade and this shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Secretary of the Planning Commission 6. The time of operation of the day care nursery shall be limited to between the hours of 6:00 a m to 7.00 p m , Monday through Friday, with no activity on weekends 7 Play equipment shall be arranged in a manner that will afford the maximum privacy of adjacent property owners and be kept away from the property lines 8 A variance shall be obtained from Sec 125 27 C and 125 27 E of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress 9 There shall be massive landscape screening, minimum of 8 ft along the north property lines of Conditional Use Permits No C-204 and C-272 and the east property line of Conditional Use Permit No C-272 10 No certificate of oczupancy will be granted until all of the above conditions are complied with PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd day of February, 1972, by the following roll call vote. AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS Ricker Sonju, Warren, Evans Cardoza NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS• None 6 %? CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: (4, SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 570 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO V-305, SANDRA PLOTT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of February 3 1972, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to allow a reduction of the number of square feet of outdoor play area required per child for a pre-school on property generally located at 4549 Cerritos Avenue, Cypress, California, requested by Sandra Plott, and known as Variance No. V-305, and, WHEREAS Sandra Plott, owner, presented testimony in favor of said application; and, WHEREAS, Mr White Secretary of the Planning Commission, stated that there had been no letters received either in favor or against the request for variance, and, WHEREAS, Mr Robert Baker 4544 Patricia Circle, Cypress, addressed the Commission and asked if the wall between the two lots was going to be removed• and, and, WHEREAS, no one presented testimony in opposition to said application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Variance No V-305 subject to the following condition 1 This variance shall comply with all of the conditions as stated in Conditional Use Permit No C-272. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd day of February, 1972, by the following roll call vote: AYES• 5 COMMISSIONERS. Ricker, Sonju Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS None ATTEST: . CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ECRE ARY F THE PLANNING NING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 571 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO V-306, MARTIN LIST WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of March 2, 1972, at 7.30 p m in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to allow enclosure of a patio in the 10 feet front yard setback, on property generally located at 9951 Walker Street, Cypress, California, requested by A Robert Tabak, and known as Variance No V-306• and WHEREAS, Mr A. Robert Tabak, representing Martin List, presented testi- mony in favor of said application, and, WHEREAS Daryl Ellwart, Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Commission and stated that she urged approval of the variance She further stated that as the building now exists it is a detriment to the Cypress business district and any improvement would be desirable; and, WHEREAS Mr, White Secretary of the Planning Commission, stated that there had been no letters received either in favor or against the request for variance, and, WHEREAS, it was stated by Commissioner Sonju that she would be voting against the motion because she felt that there was no real hardship involved. and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Variance No V-306 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd day of March, 1972, by the following roll call vote. AYES• 4 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES. 1 COMMISSIONER• Sonju ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST: CiAtIL__ SECRETARY' OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION • >7) 4,Y:7)Kf CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 572 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO AMEND SECTION 109 4, ORDINANCE NO 90, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS TO CREATE AN INCENTIVE FOR THE JOINDER OF SUBSTANDARD PARCELS IN THE MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) ZONE WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of March 2 1972 at 7.30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California, to consider an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cypress amending Section 109 4 Ordinance No 90, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress, to create an incentive for the joinder of substandard parcels in the Multiple -family Residential (R-3) Zone; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission in recommending adoption of Ordinance No 462 established a two acre minimum lot area in the R-3 zone, and, WHEREAS, the two acre minimum lot area is intended to stabilize and maintain the residential qualities desired in the R-3 zone providing adequate space for cooperatively used facilities in open area, and, WHEREAS, there were at the time of recommendation of adoption of said ordinance and there are now lots within the R-3 zone that are less than two acres; and, WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Planning Commission to encourage the joinder of such lots provided the development standards and criteria set forth in the zoning ordinance are met, and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress did recommend to the City Council as follows: Subsection B of Section 109 4 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress is amended to read in full as follows* B Minimum lot area per dwelling unit. The minimum lot area per dwelling unit shall be• two thousand (2,000) square feet However, as an incentive to encourage the joinder of lots which are less than two acres in area, there shall be no minimum lot area per dwelling unit required if all of the following condi- tions have been met: 1) Two or more lots in the R-3 zone at least one of which is less than two acres in area, and neither of which is greater than four (4) acres in area have been joined together into a single lot; and, 2) The joinder of such lots took place after August 9, 1971, and, 3) All of the other provisions of this Zoning Ordinance have been complied with vote PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd day of March, 1972, by the following roll call AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Evans Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS None Zei(e/% CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST SECRETARY 0THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 573 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, BY ESTABLISHING AN R -E (RESIDENTIAL ESTATE) ZONE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of March 2, 1972, at 7.30 p m , in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, establishing an R -E (Residential Estate) Zone initiated by the City Council of the City of Cypress; and, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING. SECTION I SECTION 103 OF ORDINANCE NO 90 IS AMENDED TO READ IN FULL AS FOLLOWS Sec 103 NAMES OF ZONES In order to classify regulate, restrict, and segregate the uses of lands and buildings, to regulate and restrict the height and bulk of buildings and to regulate the area of yards and other open spaces about buildings, and to regulate the density of population, the following land use zones are established in this ordinance to be known as follows: USE ZONES A-1 General Agricultural Zone A-2 Heavy Agricultural Zone R -S Residential Suburban Zone R -E Residential Estate Zone R-1 One -family Residential Zone R-2 Two-family Residential Zone R-3 Multiple -family Residential Zone R-4 High Density Multiple -family Residential Zone C-0 Commercial Office Zone C-1 Neighborhood Stores Zone C-2 General Commercial Zone C-3 Central Commercial Zone H -C Highway Commercial Zone M-1 Light Manufacturing Zone PM Planned Manufacturing Zone PD Planned Development Zone C -C Civic Center Combining Zone R -C Recreational Zone CEM Cemetery Zone SECTION II PART 6 A , RESIDENTIAL ESTATE (R -E) ZONE, IS ADDED TO ORDINANCE NO 90, TO READ IN FULL AS FOLLOWS. PART 6 A RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ZONE (R -E ZONE) Sec 106 A 1 Description and purpose This zone is intended as an area for residential estates with minimum lot sizes of 15,000 square feet Only those additional uses are permitted that are complimentary to, and can exist in harmony with, a residential neighborhood. Sec 106 A 2 Permitted buildings and uses. Only the following buildings structures and uses are permitted in an R -E Zone No buildings or structures shall be erected, structurally altered or enlarged, or land used, except for the following purposes A One -family dwelling unit B Guest house C Home occupations D Farms for orchards, field crops, truck gardening, flower gardening, nurseries, and greenhouses The wholesale of products raised on the premises shall be permitted The retail sale of products raised on the premises shall be permitted subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit E Keeping of horses or cattle for non-commercial purposes; provided that no such animals shall be kept on a site of less than 10 000 square feet, that two adult animals may be kept on a site containing 10,000 to 15,000 square feet, that one additional such animal may be kept for each additional 10,000 square feet, and that no such animal shall be kept closer than 50 feet to any dwelling. F Keeping of not more than 5 poultry and 5 adult rabbits for non-commercial purposes, at least 75 feet from any dwelling Keeping of other domestic animals for non-commercial purposes may be permitted as an administrative act of the Planning Commission provided the public hearing is held and the Planning Commission shall determine and find as a fact that such animals are similar to those animals specifically permitted and further provided that such other animals shall not have any different or detri- mental effect upon the adjoining neighborhood area or zones that such specifically permitted animals and shall not be otherwise objectionable or obnoxious than those animals specifically permitted G Accessory buildings and uses 1 Accessory Buildings. Accessory buildings, other than those intended and used for the keeping of animals whether attached or detached, shall meet all of the requirements for location of the main structure 2 Canopies Canopies, or roofs attached to the main building or con- necting the main building with a detached accessory building, may extend into a required rear or interior side yard provided that portions of such structures extending into the yard a Shall not exceed 15 feet in height or project closer than 5 feet to an interior side or rear lot line• b Shall be entirely open on at least three sides except for necessary supporting columns, except that, a roof connect- ing a main building and an accessory building shall be open on two sides 3 Other Structures. Porches, steps, architectural features, such as eaves, awnings, and chimneys, and balconies or stairways, may project not more than 4 feet into any required front or rear yard area, nor into any required side yard area more than one- half of said required side yard H Signs may be allowed as set out in the Sign Ordinances of the City of Cypress Sec 106 A 3 Lot area and dimension Lots of record on the effective date of this ordinance whose area or dimensions are less than those required in this zone, may be occupied by uses permitted subject to all other restrictions and requirements A Lot area• The minimum lot area shall be• 15 000 square feet B Lot dimensions The minimum lot dimensions shall be Minimum widths 100 feet Minimum depth 150 feet Sec. 106 A 4 Building or structural height limitation The maximum building or structural height shall be two and one-half (21) stories or thirty-five (35) feet, whichever is the lesser Sec 106 A 5 Yard regulations Unless Optional Design Standards have been used as set out in Section 106 A 8. A Front Yard Each lot in the R -E Zone shall have a front yard extending, except for access drives and walks across the full width of the subject property, of a depth of not less than thirty (30) feet Except for access driveways and walks, there shall be no structures located in the required front yards or in the required side yard abutting the street No boat, trailer, or camper unit shall be kept in said yard for a period of time in excess of twenty-four (24) consecutive hours, nor shall it be per- mitted to dismantle, repair or keep any disabled vehicles in the front or side yard or driveway B Side Yard There shall be a side yard on each side of the lot extending from the front yard to the rear yard of ten percent (10%) of the lot width but not less than ten (10) feet in width C Rear Yard Each lot shall have a rear yard extending across the full width of the lot of not less than twenty-five (25) feet D Required front and street side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominantly of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives, and fences. All required landscaping shall be permanently maintained in a neat and orderly condition E Other yard requirements are set forth in Part 25 Sec 106 A 6 Lot Coverage The maximum coverage of the lot by all structures shall not exceed thirty-five percent (35%) of the lot area, provided that swimming pools shall not be counted, and further provided that swimming pools shall be located a minimum of ten (10) feet from the side or rear property line and thirty (30) feet from the front property line Sec 106 A 7 Walls and Fences A In any required front yard or side yard adjacent to a street a wall or fence shall not exceed three feet in height B A wall or fence not more than six feet in height may be maintained along the interior side or rear lot lines, provided that such wall or fence does not extend into a required front yard C A wall or fence adjacent to a driveway providing vehicular access to an abutting lot shall not exceed three feet in height within 15 feet of the intersection of said driveway and the street right- of-way Sec 106 A 8 Subdivision optional design and improvement standards When a development has been approved by the City Council under the optional design and improvement standards provisions of Division 2, Article V, of Chapter 25 of this Code, then such approved building sites, coverage, yards and other requirements imposed as conditions to such approval shall be considered as the requirements of this part of the zoning ordinance Sec 106 A 9 Off -Street Parking A Two parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided within a carport or garage B The parking spaces shall be improved as set forth in Part 21 SECTION III SECTION 125 21 OF ORDINANCE NO 90 IS AMENDED TO READ IN FULL AS FOLLOWS. Sec 125 21 Animals Except where specifically set out in the district, there shall be no more than three (3) dogs or cats over four (4) months of age housed on any premises and no more than one (1) per unit in any multiple "R" district No roosters shall be maintained in any R -S, R-1, R-2, R-3, or R-4 district Except where specifically set out in the district no aviaries apiaries and no fowl or animals other than cats and dogs shall be maintained in any combination of "R" district NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did recommend approval to the City Council of the adoption of the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, establishing an R -E (Residential Estate) Zone vote PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd day of March 1972 by the following roll call AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES* 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ATTEST: 67 t-er CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 574 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING VARIANCE NO V-307, STATE-WIDE DEVELOPERS, INC WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of March 16 1972, at 7:30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to allow an offsite sign (Section 23-4) on property generally lo- cated at 5242 Lincoln Avenue, in the City of Cypress, California, requested by State -Wide Developers, Inc , and known as Variance No V-307; and, WHEREAS, Mr Alex Bell, presented testimony in favor of said application, and, WHEREAS, Mr White, Secretary of the Planning Commission stated that there had been no letters received either in favor or against the request for variance, and, WHEREAS, no one presented testimony against said variance, and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Variance No V-307 subject to the following conditions' 1 That the design of the sign be approved by the Building Superintendent 2 That this variance is granted for a period of one year 3 That the location of the sign be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan 4 A cash bond in the amount of $150 shall be posted with the Building Department to guarantee the removal of subject sign PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 16th day of March, 1972, by the following roll call vote. AYES. 5 COMMISSIONERS Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Evans Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS None CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNIN --COMMISSION ATTEST. SECR TAR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 575 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-276, THOMAS L WILL, AMERICAN FAMILY STEAK HOUSE, WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of April 6, 1912, at 7.30 p m in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the sale of beer and wine for consumption on the premises of the American Family Steak House, 5591 Lincoln Avenue, Cypress, requested by Thomas L. Will, and known as Conditional Use Permit No C-276, and. and. WHEREAS Thomas L, Will presented testimony in favor of said application, WHEREAS, no one presented testimony in opposition to said application; and, WHEREAS, no written communications either in favor of or in opposition to the request have been received; and, WHEREAS, on the basis of the evidence presented to it, the Planning Commission has found and determined that the following conditions, and each and all of them, exist: A That the use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this ordinance B That the said use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community in harmony with the various elements or objectives of this ordinance, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located C That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use and all of the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping and other features required in order to adjust said use to those existing or possible future uses on land in the neighborhood, D. That the site for which the proposed use is bounded by a street or streets and highways properly designed and improved so as to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated or to be generated by the proposed use E.. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof F That the conditions stated in the decision are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-276, subject to the following condition 1 That a license for the sale of on -premises consumption of beer and wine be obtained from the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of April, 1972, by the following roll call vote AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS. Ricker Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES'. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT° 1 COMMISSIONER° Sonju ATTEST. (.6 ECRE AR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANN COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 576 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-274, HERMAN LEHNER. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of April 6, 1972 at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of an open-air trailer and boat sales and tool rental, on property generally located at 5061 5071 and 5081 Lincoln Avenue, Cypress, requested by Herman Lehner, and known as Conditional Use Permit No. C-274; and, WHEREAS, Herman Lehner, the owner, presented testimony in favor of said application, and, WHEREAS there were no written communications received either in favor or against, and, WHEREAS, there was no one wishing to give testimony against the application, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-274 subject to the following conditions• 1. The development shall be constructed in substantial conformance to the approved plot plan 2 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with Master Plan of Drainage 3 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4 A cash bond shall be posted for future street lights on Lincoln Avenue and a 11 inch P V C conduit installed 5 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid 6 Lincoln Avenue shall be dedicated and fully improved in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways A State permit is necessary 7 A cash bond shall be posted for future street trees on Lincoln Avenue in conformance with the street tree policy of the Public Works Department 8 Plan checking and inspection fees amounting to 31% of the street improvements shall be paid 9 Developer shall conform to all applicable provisions of the City Code 10 A six feet masonary block wall be provided along the north property line 11 Landscape plans be prepared by a registered landscape architect to be in substantial conformance with the Townscape Plan and approved by the Planning Commission 12 A driveway shall be kept clear to the rear of the subject property for public parking purposes. 13 Landscaped screening shall be added on to the northern property line to protect the adjacent R-1 development 14 Lighting shall be screened and directed away from the adjoining R-1 homes 15 Portions of the interior will also be landscaped to include plantings around the building The extent will be determined at the time of review of the landscape plans by the Planning Commission 16 A permanent irrigation system will be installed for all land- scaped areas. 17 Wood slatting, or a similar material, will be used at the new section of chain link fence to screen off the storage area 18 Certificate of occupancy shall not be granted until all conditions have been approved or guaranteed PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of April, 1972, by the following roll call vote: AYES• 5 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ATTEST SECRETA Y 0 THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 577 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-275, ROBERT L. TEAFORD. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of April 6, 1972, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California, to consider an application for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a muffler shop in a C -C Overlay Zone, on property located at 6142 Lincoln Avenue, in the City of Cypress, California, requested by Robert L Teaford, and known as Conditional Use Permit No C-275; and, WHEREAS, Mr John Youndin, Coldwell Banker & Company Santa Ana, California, presented testimony on behalf of the applicant, and, WHEREAS, there was discussion held with regard to the screening of the roof apparatus, the need for the development to appear to be a part of the total development, and the height of the pole sign, and, WHEREAS, there were no written communications received either in favor or against, and, WHEREAS, there was no one wishing to give testimony against the application. and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-275 subject to the following conditions: 1 The development be constructed in substantial conformance to the approved plot plan. 2 That the developer conform to all applicable provisions of the City Code 3 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4 All secondary and primary utility services shall be underground 5 That a front yard of a minimum of 25 feet be landscaped, incorporat- ing suggestions of the Townscape Element of the General Plan 6 That landscape plans be prepared by a registered landscape architect and be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval 7 Roof apparatus shall be architecturally screened 8 The trash area enclosure shall be of block wall, or material and color of the building 9 Landscaping shall be maintained 10 A permanent automatic sprinkler system shall be installed to irrigate all landscaped areas 11 Low walls shall be installed, identical to the walls adjacent to this project within the front setback area. Final location will be determined and approved by the Secretary of the Planning Commission 12 A six (6) inch raised concrete curb shall be installed at all planter areas 13 An additional planter area to include the type of trees or similar trees that have been planted in the adjacent parking lot shall be installed (Exhibit "A") 14 A certificate of occupancy shall not be granted until all conditions have been met PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of April, 1972, by the following roll call vote: AYES• 5 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None 1 ATTEST: a SECRET RY 'OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION C C CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 578 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-277 CHURCH OF CHIRST OF CYPRESS WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of April 6 1972 at 7:30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for a conditional use permit to allow the use of an existing dwelling as a church building for meetings and Bible classes, on property located at 9771 Walker Street, in the City of Cypress and known as Conditional Use Permit No C-277, and, WHEREAS Mr. Lyman Webb Minister, Church of Christ, the applicant, pre- sented testimony in favor of said application. and WHEREAS Mr Bill McCulloch, Los Alamitos, the architect, submitted photographs of the proposed church and discussed several of the proposed conditions, and, WHEREAS, the following people presented testimony in favor of said appli- cation. and Mr Darrell Clement, Mr J L O'Brien, Mr Randy McCracken, 5231 Canterbury Drive 5221 New York Avenue 1597 W. Ball Road Cypress, CA 90630 Cypress, CA. 90630 Cypress, CA 90630 WHEREAS, Chairman Evans indicated to Mr Carl Trautman, 9761 S Walker Street, Cypress, that when phase 3 of the development comes before the Plan- ning Commission, consideration will be given to a fence which would screen the parking lot from the adjacent R-1 homes; and, WHEREAS, there was no one wishing to give testimony against the application; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-277 subject to the following conditions: 1 Developer shall conform to all applicable provisions of the City Code 2 The development of phases one and two be constructed in substantial conformance to the approved plot plans 3 Construction of phase two shall commence within one year from the date of the final approval of this permit. Revised plans for phase three, which included the construction of a 300 seat sanctuary and parking shall be sumbitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission within two years of said dates Construction of phase three shall be completed within three years from said date 4 Special consideration shall be given to existing landmark trees in designing phase three of the development 5 Existing buildings shall be altered to conform to Fire Zone 2 and Group B occupancies, Division 3 of the Uniform Building Code, to be approved by the Building Department 6 With the acceptance of the Conditional Use Permit, Walker Street and Rome Avenue shall be dedicated in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways 7 Rome Avenue shall be improved in substantial accordance with the plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" or in such other manner F approved by the City Engineer and Secretary of the Planning Commission which will preserve the London Plane tree referred to in the staff report Bonds, in a form satisfactory to the City, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements required pursuant to conditions 7 through 18 hereof within two years, shall be sumbitted prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the phase one use 8 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with Master Plan of Drainage 9 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 10 All secondary and primary utility services shall be underground 11 Street lights shall be installed per City Standards 12 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid 13 All streets shall be dedicated and fully improved in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways 14 Street structural sections to be based on recommendation and soils report by soils engineering firm acceptable to the City Engineer with street structural sections to be determined by using an applicable T I. 15 Street trees (15 gal ) 40' on center shall be installed along streets in conformance to the street tree policy of the Public Works Department The type of trees shall be as required under the Townscape and Urban Design element of the General Plan 16 Soil in planting areas including trees, shall be tested by a qualified agricultural laboratory to determine the organic and chemical amendment for optimum growth for the plants specified The test results shall include concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, pH, salinity, sodium status and boron saturation extract Results of these tests with recommendations of the agricultural laboratory shall be fur- nished to the Public Works Department for approval at least 30 days prior to planting date 17 Necessary fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Fire Department requirements and City Standards. 18 Plan checking and inspection fees amounting to 31% of the street improvements shall be paid PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of April, 1972, by the following roll call vote AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Sonju Warren Evans, Cardoza NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST. SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION /,(11/.f/ CHAIRMAN OF THE PLA)N1 G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 579 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS FINDING THAT THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE IS A PROPER AND PERMITTED ALTERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-120. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of April 6, 1972, at 7:30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider a request for alteration of Dutch Pride Dairy Products Store, existing under a Conditional Use Permit, to allow sale of beer and wine for off -premises consumption and the sale of fruits and vegetables; and, WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the request for the alteration of use to allow for the off -sale of beer and wine would be considered separately from the requested sale of fruits and vegetables, and, WHEREAS, Mr Tom Van Ruiten, the applicant, presented testimony in favor of the application, and, WHEREAS the following people presented testimony in favor of said application. Mr George Robinson, 11690 Guam Circle, Cypress Mr Lee Baker, 11688 Guam Circle, Cypress Mr Ed Stibby, 11698 Guam Circle, Cypress WHEREAS, the following people presented testimony in opposition to said application: Mrs Nancy Buehler 5921 Santa Catalina Avenue, Garden Grove Mrs Ann Stone, 5931 Santa Catalina Avenue Garden Grove Mrs Rosemarie Milho, 5941 Santa Catalina Avenue, Garden Grove WHEREAS the Secretary of the Planning Commission, read letters of opposition into the record from the following people: Mrs Milho, Jr , 5941 Santa Catalina Avenue, Garden Grove Mrs. Renner 5961 Santa Catalina Avenue, Garden Grove Mr and Mrs Jim Stone, 5931 Santa Catalina, Garden Grove WHEREAS, Commissioner Sonju stated that she felt the alcoholic beverage control law requiring an individual to walk from his car in order to purchase beer and wine changed the matter of selling beer and wine She further stated that to merely get in and out of a car, in her opinion, is trying to get around the law She stated that she further concurred with the residents who felt that this alteration of the use would lead to other expansions, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did find that the sale of beer and wine is a proper and permitted alteration of Conditional Use Permit No C-120 subject to the following conditions' 1 That a license is obtained from the Alcoholic Beverage Control for the off -sale of beer and wine 2 No parking shall be allowed along the southerly property line adjacent to the R-1 property 3 Fence along the southern boundary shall be increased to a height of six feet PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of April, 1972, by the following roll call vote: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Evans, Cardoza NOES. 2 COMMISSIONERS* Sonju and Warren ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS None CHA RFIAN OF THE PLANNING -COMMISSION ATTEST. )4, LC) SECR 1; THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 580 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-253, CLAYTON-HYTER WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of June 17, 1971, at 7.30 p m , in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 21 unit apartment complex on property generally located at 9642 Walker initiated by Clayton- Hyter Development Company, and known as Conditional Use Permit No C-253, and, WHEREAS, Mr. Leon Hyter and Mr Earl Clayton, representing Clayton-Hyter Development, presented testimony in favor of said application. and WHEREAS, Mr William Reed, architect for the project, spoke on various aspects of the project. and WHEREAS, Mr James Duncan spoke in favor of the project and stated that he felt it would very beneficial for the city, and, WHEREAS, there were no written communications received either in favor or against, and, WHEREAS, there was no one wishing to give testimony against the application. and,. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-253 subject to the following conditions: 1 Compliance with all applicable conditions of the Cypress City Code 2 That the development be constructed in accordance with the approved plan 3 That a landscaping plan prepared by a registered landscape architect be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval. 4 That a permanent automatic water sprinkling system be installed 5 That all open parking spaces be striped with "double lines" 6 That bumper stops be provided in all parking spaces open or covered which abut a wall 7 Construction of the building be in accordance with FHA soundproofing standards 8 All roof apurtenances to be architecturally screened 9 That the building not be occupied or a certificate of occupancy granted until all conditions of approval have been met (Planning Director shall certify as to compliance with these conditions ) 10 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with the Master Plan of Drainage 11 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 12. All secondary and primary utility services shall be underground 13 Walker Street (42') half street shall be dedicated and fully improved in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways 1 14 Street structural sections shall be approved by the City Engineer 15 Street lights shall be installed per City Standards. 16 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid 17 Street trees (15 gal ) 40' on center shall be installed along Walker Street in conformance to the street tree policy of the Public Works Department The type of trees shall be as required under the Townscape and Urban Design Element of the General Plan 18 Plan checking and inspection fees amounting to 31% of the street improvements shall be paid 19 Necessary fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Fire Department requirements and City Standards 20 A 6 foot high block wall shall be placed on the two exterior property lines in common to Conditional Use Permits C-253 and C-258 with the provision that in the event that the two proper- ties are divided in ownership at a later date that such a wall shall be placed between the properties at that time The peri- meter wall shall be of an architectural styling compatible to the architecture 21 All trash areas shall be enclosed 22 Lighting to be averted away from adjoining properties 23. Ten percent (10%) of parking shall be designated as guest parking 24 Architectural treatment on all sides 25 Storage lockers shall be provided in carports 26 Posting of a one-year completion bond for the perimeter wall Cost to be determined by the City Engineer PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th day of June, 1971, by the following roll call vote: AYES 5 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ! CHAIRMAN QF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: .L± SECRE ARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 581 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-258, CLAYTON-HYTER DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of June 17, 1971, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for conditional use permit to allow construction of a 21 unit apartment complex on property generally located at 9622 Walker Street Cypress initiated by Clayton-Hyter Development Company, and known as Conditional Use Permit No C-258• and WHEREAS, Mr Leon Hyter and Mr Earl Clayton, representing Clayton- Hyter Development Company, presented testimony in favor of said application, and WHEREAS, Mr William Reed, architect for the project and Mr James Duncan, property owner, spoke in favor of the application, and, WHEREAS, there were no written communications received either in favor or against, and, WHEREAS there was no one wishing to give testimony against the application, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-258 subject to the following conditions. 1 Compliance with all applicable conditions of the Cypress City Code 2 That the development be constructed in accordance with the approved plan. 3 That a landscaping plan prepared by a registered landscape architect be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval 4 That a permanent automatic water sprinkling system be installed 5 That all open parking spaces be striped with "double lines" 6 That bumper stops be provided in all parking spaces open or covered which abut a wall 7 Construction of the building be in accordance with FHA soundproofing standards 8. All roof apurtenances to be architecturally screened 9 That the building not be occupied or a certificate of occupancy granted until all conditions of approval have been met (Planning Director shall certify as to compliance with these conditions.) 10 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with the Master Plan of Drainage 11 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 12 All secondary and primary utility services shall be underground 13. Walker Street (42') half street shall be dedicated and fully improved in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways 14 Street structural sections shall be approved by the City Engineer 15 Street lights shall be installed per City Standards 16 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid 17 Street trees (15 gal ) 40' on center shall be installed along Walker Street in conformance to the street tree policy of the Public Works Department The type of trees shall be as required under the Townscape and Urban Design Element of the General Plan 18 Plan checking and inspection fees amounting to 311% of the street improvements shall be paid 19 Necessary fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Fire Department requirements and City Standards 20 A 6 foot high block wall shall be placed on the two exterior property lines in common to Conditional Use Permits C-253 and C-258 with the provision that in the event that the two properties are divided in ownership at a later date that such a wall shall be placed between the properties at that time The perimeter wall shall be of an architectural styling compatible to the architecture 21 All trash areas shall be enclosed 22 Lighting to be averted away from adjoining properties 23 Ten percent (10%) of parking shall be designated as guest parking 24 Architectural treatment on all sides 25 Storage lockers shall be provided in carports 26 Posting of a one-year completion bond for the perimeter wall Cost to be determined by the City Engineer PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th day of June 1971, by the following roll call vote* AYES 5 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Sonju, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ATTEST: _d SEC TAR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 4•4 CHAIRMAN OF THE P ING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 582 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO AMEND THE ZONING OR- DINANCE NO 90, BY ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR DEDICATION OF LAND, PAYMENT OF FEES, OR BOTH FOR PARK AND RECREATIONAL LAND WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of May 4, 1972 at 7:30 p m , in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress, by establishing regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both for park and recreational land; and, WHEREAS, there was no one wishing to speak in favor or against the ordinance, and, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING: SECTION 1 The City Council of the City of Cypress does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: (a) In 1965, the Legislature of the State of California amended the Subdivision Map Act (Sections 11500 et seq of the Business and Professions Code) so as to enable cities and counties to require either the dedication of land, the payment of fees, or a combination of both, for park and recreational purposes as a condition of approval of a subdivision map (b) Residential developments other than those involving subdivisions of land also decrease the supply of open space within the City of Cypress which might otherwise be available for park and recreational purposes and, at the same time increase the demand for parks and recreational facilities (c) The public interest, convenience, health, welfare, and safety require either the dedication of land the payment of fees, or a combination of both for park and recreational purposes as a condition of approval of subdivi- sion maps and of residential developments other than those involving subdivisions (d) The City Council of the City of Cypress has adopted a general plan containing a recreational element which establishes definite principles and standards for the park and recreational facilities to serve its residents SECTION 2 Article VII, "Park and Recreational Facilities" is added to Chapter 25 of the Code of the City of Cypress to read as follows: Article VII - Park and Recreational Facilities Section 25-70 Subdividers must provide park and recreational facilities Every subdivider who subdivides land shall dedicate a portion of such land, pay a fee, or do both, as set forth in this Article, for the purpose of providing park and recreational facilities to help serve future residents of such sub- division Section 25-71 Application The provisions of this Article shall apply to all subdivisions, as that phrase is defined in the Subdivision Map Act, except subdivisions for which tentative subdivision maps have been filed within thirty (30) days after the effective date of this Ordinance, and ex- cept also industrial subdivisions. 1 0 Section 25-72 Relation of land required to population density It is hereby found and determined' (a) That the public interest, convenience, health, welfare and safety require that four (4) acres of property, for each one thousand (1,000) persons residing within this city, be devoted to park and recreational purposes (b) That said requirement will be satisfied in part by a cooperative arrangement between the city and the local school districts and local park and recreation districts to make available one and one-half (11) acres of property for each one thousand (1,000) persons residing within the City for park and recreation purposes, and, (c) That the remainder of the required four (4) acres shall be supplied by the requirements of this Ordinance and the recreation program of the City Section 25-73 Population Density Population density for the purpose of this Ordinance shall be determined in accordance with the 1960 Census of Population on Housing• Final Report PHC (1)-82 Los Angeles, Long Beach SMSA to wit' (a) Single family dwelling units, and duplexes - - 3 1 persons per dwelling unit, and (b) Multiple family dwelling units - - 2 1 persons per dwelling unit The basis for determining the total number of dwelling units shall be the num- ber of such units included in the subdivision at the time the final subdivision tract map is filed with the City Council for approval Section 25-74 Amount of land to be dedicated The amount of land required to be dedicated by a subdivider pursuant to this Ordinance, shall be based on the gross area included in the subdivision, determined by the following formula: DENSITY FORMULA: Net density per dwelling unit Percentage of the gross area of the subdivision required when park land is dedicated 1 D U per acre or more 0 60% 1 D U per i to 1 acre 1 20% 1 D U per 10,000 sq ft to 1 acre 1 73% 1 D U per 9,000 to 9,999 sq ft 2 70% 1 D U per 8,000 to 8,999 sq ft 3 01% 1 D U per 7,000 to 7,999 sq ft 3 40% 1 D U. per 6 000 to 6 999 sq. ft 3 90% 1 D U per 5,000 to 5,999 sq ft 4 58% 10 to 19 D U 's per acre 5 79% 20 to 29 D U 's per acre 9 30% 30 to 39 D U 's per acre 12 56% 40 to 49 D U 's per acre 15 58% 50 to 59 D U 's per acre 18 40% 60 to 69 D U 's per acre 21 05% 70 to 79 D U 's per acre 23 54% 80 to 89 D U 's per acre 25 85% 90 to 99 D U.'s per acre 28 00% 100 D U 's and over per acre 29 07% Section 25-75 Amount of fee in lieu of land dedication. Where a fee is required to be paid in lieu of land dedication, such fee shall bear the same ratio to the fair market value of the lands to be subdivided as the amount of land which would be dedicated pursuant to Section 25-74 if dedication were required bears to the gross area of the subdivision Fair market value shall be determined by the Secretary of the Planning Commission, provided, however that if the subdivider objects to said determination, he may, at his own expense, obtain an appraisal of the subject property by an M A I real estate appraiser The determination of said M A I appraiser may be accepted by the City Council, or the Council may obtain a second appraisal by an M A I real estate appraiser which it shall accept as the final determination of fair market value Section 25-76 Credit for private open space Where private open space for park and recreational purposes is provided in a proposed subdivision and such space is to be privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the subdivision such areas shall be credited against the requirement of dedication for park and recreation purposes as set forth in Section 25-74 hereof, or the payment of fees in lieu thereof, as set forth in Section 25-75 hereof, provided the City Council finds it is in the public interest to do so, and that the following standards are met. (a) That yards court areas, setbacks and other open areas required to be maintained by the zoning and building regulations shall not be included in the computation of such private open space, and (b) That the private ownership and maintenance of the open space is adequately provided for by written agreement, and (c) That the use of the private open space is restricted for park and recreational purposes by recorded covenants which run with the land in favor of future owners of property within the tract and which cannot be de- feated or eliminated without the consent of the City Council, and (d) That the proposed private open space is reasonably adaptable for use for park and recreational purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, access, and location of the pri- vate open space land; and (e) That facilities proposed for the open space are in substantial accordance with the provisions of the recreational element of the general plan, and are approved by the City Council Section 25-77 Choice of land or fee in lieu thereof (a) Procedure. The procedure for determining whether the subdivider is to dedicate land, pay a fee, or both shall be as follows: 1 Action by Subdivider At the time of filing a tentative tract map for approval, the subdivider shall, as a part of such filing, indi- cate whether he desires to dedicate property for park and recreational purposes, or whether he desires to pay a fee in lieu thereof If he desires to dedicate land for this purpose, he shall designate the area thereof on the tentative map as submitted 2 Action of City. At the time of the tentative tract map approval, the Planning Commission shall determine as a part of such approval, whether to require a dedication of land within the subdivision, a payment of a fee in lieu thereof or a combination of both If it shall determine to require a dedication of land, the Planning Commission shall designate the area thereof on the tentative tract map as submitted 3 Prerequisites for Approval of Final Map Where dedication is required, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the approval of the final tract map Open space covenants for private park or recreational facilities shall be submitted to the City prior to approval of the final tract map and shall be recorded contemporaneously with the final tract map (b) Determination Whether the Planning Commission accepts land dedication or elects to require payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a com- bination of both shall be determined by consideration of the following fac- tors. 1 Recreational element of the City's general plan, 2 Topography, geology access and location of land in the subdivision available for dedication. and, 3 Size and shape of the subdivision and land available for dedication. The determination of the Planning Commission as to whether land shall be ded- icated, or whether a fee shall be charged, or a combination thereof, can be affirmed modified, or reversed by the City Council pursuant to Section 25-18 The action of the City Council shall be final and conclusive (c) Subdivisions involving 50 lots or less On subdivisions in- volving 50 lots or less, only the payment of fees shall be required Section 25-78 Time of Commencement. At the time the final tract map is approved, the City Council shall designate the time when development of park and recreational facilities shall be commenced Unless otherwise specified, the City shall begin development of park and recreational faci- lities within five (5) years from the time of final inspection and acceptance of tract improvements by the City Council Section 25-79 The land and/or fees received under this article shall be used for the purpose of providing park and recreational facilities to help serve the inhabitants of the subdivision from which received and the park and recreational facilities so developed shall bear a reasonable relationship to the needs therefore generated by the future inhabitants of the subdivision SECTION 3 Part 26-A "Park and Recreational Facilities", is added to Ordinance No 90, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress, to read in full as follows: Part 26-A - Park and Recreational Facilities Section 126-A 1 Developers Must Provide Park and Recreational Facilities Every person who develops land for residential purposes within the City of Cypress shall dedicate a portion of such land, pay a fee, or do both, as set forth in this part, for the purpose of providing park and recreational facilities to help serve future residents of such development Section 126-A.2. Application The provisions of this part shall apply to all residential developments within the City of Cypress except developments on property which has been subdivided pursuant to the Cypress City Code and for which the subdivider was required, pursuant to Sections 25-70 et seq of the Cypress City Code, to dedicate land, pay a fee, or do both Section 126-A 3 Relation of Land Required to Population Density It is hereby found and determined. (a) That the public interest, convenience, health welfare and safety require that four (4) acres of property, for each one thousand (1,000) persons residing within this City, be devoted to park and recreational purposes, (b) That said requirement will be satisfied in part by cooperative arrangements between the City and the local school districts and local park and recreation districts to make available one and one-half (11) acres of property for each one thousand (1,000) persons residing within the City for park and recreation purposes, (c) That the remainder of the required four (4) acres shall be supplied by the requirements of this ordinance and the recreation program of the City Section 126-A.4 Population Density Population density for the purpose of this ordinance shall be determined in accordance with the 1960 Census of Population on Housing. Final Report PHC (1)-82 Los Angeles, Long Beach SMSA, to wit: (a) Single family dwelling units, and duplexes -- 3 1 persons per dwelling unit; and (b) Multiple family dwelling units -- 2 1 persons per dwelling unit The basis for determining the total number of dwelling units shall be the number of such units indicated on the application for a building permit Section 126-A 5 Amount of Land to Be Dedicated. The amount of land required to be dedicated by a developer pursuant to this part, shall be based on the gross area to be developed, determined by the following formula. DENSITY FORMULA: Net Density per dwelling unit Percentage of the gross area of the development required when park land is dedicated 1 D U per acre or more 0 60% 1 D U per 11 to 1 acre 1 20% 1 D U per 10,000 sq ft to z acre 1 73% 1 D U per 9,000 to 9,999 sq ft. 2 70% 1 D U per 8,000 to 8,999 sq ft 3 01% 1 D U per 7 000 to 7,999 sq ft 3 40% 1 D U per 6,000 to 6 999 sq ft. 3 90% 1 D U per 5,000 to 5,999 sq ft 4 58% 10 to 19 D U.'s per acre 5 79% 20 to 29 D U 's per acre 9 30% 30 to 39 D U 's per acre 12 56% 40 to 49 D U.'s per acre 15 58% 50 to 59 D U 's per acre 18 40% 60 to 69 D U 's per acre 21 05% 70 to 79 D U 's per acre 23 54% 80 to 89 D U 's per acre 25 85% 90 to 99 D U 's per acre 28 00% 100 D U 's and over per acre 29 07% Section 126-A 6 Amount of Fee in Lieu of Land Dedication Where a fee is required to be paid in lieu of land dedication, such fee shall bear the same ratio to the fair market value of the lands to be developed as the amount of land which would be dedicated pursuant to Section 25-74 if dedication were required bears to the gross area of the development Fair market value shall be determined by the Secretary of the Planning Commission; provided, however that if the developer objects to said determination, he may, at his own expense, obtain an appraisal of the subject property by an M A I real estate appraiser The determination of said M A I appraiser may be accepted by the City Council, or the Council may obtain a second appraisal by an M A I real estate appraiser which it shall accept as the final determination of fair market value Section 126-A 7 Choice of Land or Fee (a) Procedure The procedure for determining whether the applicant is to dedicate land pay a fee, or both, shall be as follows: 1 Applications for which dedication of land may be required Dedications of land may be required only for developments on parcels in excess of ten (10) acres in size. Only the payment of fees shall be required for all other developments 2 Applicant At the time of filing an application for a building permit for a development on a parcel in excess of ten (10) acres in size, the applicant shall, as a part of such filing indicate whether he desires to dedicate property for park and recreational purposes or whether he desires to pay a fee in lieu thereof If he desires to dedicate land for this purpose, he shall include with his application for a building permit a legal description of the land which he proposes to dedicate 3 Action of the City Prior to the issuance of such building permit, the City Council shall determine whether to require a dedication of land, payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination of both 4 Prerequisites for approval Where dedication is required it shall be accomplished in the manner prescribed by the City Attorney which manner shall be generally analogous to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act which relate to the dedication of land Where fees are required the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the approval of the building permit Section 126-A 8 Payment of Fees Where fees are required to be paid pursuant to the provisions of this part payment thereof shall be made to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit Section 126-A 9 Limitation on Use of Land and Fees The land and fees received under this part shall be used to help provide park and recreational facilities to serve the future residents, occupiers, and users of the building or structure for which received and shall bear a reasonable relationship to the needs for the park and recreational facilities generated by said future residence, occupiers, and users SECTION 4 If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part hereof The City Council of the City of Cypress hereby declares that it would have passed each section subsection, subdivision paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof irre- spective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrased be declared unconstitutional NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did recommend approval to the City Council of the adoption of the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, establishing regulations for dedication of land, pay- ment of fees, or both for park and recreational land vote. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 4th day of May, 1972, by the following roll call AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS. Ricker, Warren, Evans Cardoza NOES• 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER: Sonju �% fir/ `T OF E PLANNING.COMMISSION ATTEST. SECRETARY 4F THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 583 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO C-278, CLAYTON-HYTER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of May 4, 1972, at 7.30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an applica- tion for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a thirty- five unit apartment development on property generally located 455' south of Orange Avenue on the east side of Walker Street known as 9582 Walker Street, requested by Clayton-Hyter Development Company, 2909 S Halladay, Santa Ana, and known as Conditional Use Permit No C-278, and, WHEREAS, Mr William Reed, architect for the project, presented testimony in favor of said application and also displayed a model of the project for the Commission's consideration, and, WHEREAS, there were no written communications received either in favor or against. and, WHEREAS, there was no one wishing to speak against the application for conditional use permit. and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did approve Conditional Use Permit No C-278 subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall be constructed in substantial conformance to the approved plans 2 Landscape plans shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect and submitted to the Planning Commission for app- roval 3 All provisions of Section 125 26 and all other applicable provisions of the City Code shall be complied with 4 Drainage fees shall be paid in accordance with Master Plan of Drainage 5 Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 6 All secondary and primary utility services shall be under- ground 7 Street lights shall be installed per City Standards 8 Advance street light energy charges shall be paid. 9 All streets shall be dedicated and fully improved in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways 10 Street structural section to be based on recommendation and soils report by soils engineering firm acceptable to the City Engineer with street structural sections to be determined by using an applicable T I 11 Street trees (15 gal ) 40' on center shall be installed along streets in conformance to the street tree policy of the Public Works Department The type of trees shall be as required under the Townscape and Urban Design Element of the General Plan 12 Soil in planting areas, including trees, shall be tested by a qualified agricultural laboratory to determine the organic and chemical amendments for optimum growth for the plants specified The test results shall include concentration of nitrogen, phos- phorus, potassium, pH, salinity, sodium status, and boron sat- uration extract Results of these tests with recommendations of the agricultural laboratory shall be furnished to the Public Works Department for approval at least 30 days prior to planting date 13 Necessary fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Fire Department requirements and City Standards 14 Plan checking and inspection fees amounting to 312% of the street improvements shall be paid 15. Open wall to alley south of project to allow circulating traffic with easements for ingress and egress from one development to other Also trim wall to 3' height 20' minimum each side of alley for sight distance Opening to be minimum of 26' Such openings shall be of such a type as to accommodate only emergency, fire, and police access etc and access for trash collection services as approved by the city staff 16 A certificate of occupancy shall not be granted until all con- ditions have been met or guaranteed to the satisfaction of the City Attorney vote. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 4th day of May 1972, by the following roll call AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER• Sonju /7) ) C IRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: (flLt.�` SECRE ARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1 RESOLUTION NO 584 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO Z-213, SHAPELL IN- DUSTRIES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of May 18, 1972, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from H -C (Highway Commercial) Zone to R-4 (High -Density Multiple Family Residential) Zone on property generally located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue approximately 660' west of Holder Street, requested by Shapell Industries, 8383 Wilshire Blvd , Beverly Hills, and known as Zone Change No Z-213; and, WHEREAS, Mr George Putnam, representing Shapell Industries presented testimony in favor of said application; and, WHEREAS, two letters were presented by the Secretary of the Planning Com- mission One from the Business Development Committee of the Chamber of Commerce and the other from the North Orange County Community College District. Both letters were in regards to the zone change and whether or not they had any suggestions regarding this zone change, and, WHEREAS, there was no one wishing to present testimony against the applica- tion for zone change. and WHEREAS, there was discussion regarding the following items: the number of children generated from the complex, a discussion on the height limitations of the R-3 and R-4 ordinances, and also the number of units per acre, and, WHEREAS, it was the general consensus of the Planning Commission that R-4 (High -Density Multiple Family Residential) Zone was the highest and best use of the property, and, WHEREAS Commissioner Sonju stated that she would abstain due to the fact that she had not heard all of the testimony presented regarding the zone change and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress recommends approval to the City Council of Zone Change No. Z-213 vote: PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 18th day of May, 1972, by the following roll call AYES. 4 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSTAIN 1 COMMISSIONER. Sonju ATTEST. .60,1112) SECRETAR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION f,t(? l-(2 42) (5-/Ze7V)Al2 CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 585 A POLICY RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUN- CIL TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90, BY ESTABLISH- ING REGULATIONS FOR DEDICATION OF LAND, PAYMENT OF FEES, OR BOTH FOR PARK AND RECREATIONAL LAND WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of May 4, 1972, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress California, adopting Resolution No 582 recommending approval to the City Council to amend the zoning Ordinance No 90, by establishing regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees or both for park and recrea- tional land• and, WHEREAS, Mr Ralph D White Secretary of the Planning Commission, received a memo dated April 27, 1972, from Charles E Bryant Director of Parks and Rec- reation, which was a synopsis of action taken by the Recreation and Parks Commis- sion requesting that the Planning Commission include the placement of the Recrea- tion and Parks Commission as a reviewing and recommendation body as it relates to Section 25-77, Paragraph 2 and (b) 3 of Resolution No. 582; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission was advised by John Murphy, Assistant City Attorney, that Section 2-49 (Duties) of Article VI (Recreation and Parks Commis- sion) of the City Code states that the Recreation and Parks Commission shall advise the Planning Commission on all matters subject to the jurisdiction of such commis- sion pertaining to acquistion, development and maintenance of public parks and recreational facilities, and, WHEREAS, there are certain periods of time specified in Chapter 25 (Subdivi- sions) and in the Zoning Ordinance No 90, of the City Code which specify the time in which a Planning Commission must take action on requests for developments which would be affected by Resolution No 582, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that it shall be the policy of the Planning Commission that under Section 25-77 (2) of Resolution No 582 that any such plans be forwarded to the Park and Recreation Commission for their recommendation vote. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 4th day of May, 1972, by the following roll call AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS. Ricker, Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES* 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT 1 COMMISSIONER* Sonju CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: (1 c0S REat)- \-- . (n tl_ ARY OF THk PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 586 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DENYING ZONE CHANGE NO Z-214 C J McCORMICK WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of June 1, 1972, at 7.30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress California to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90 to change the zone of a certain parcel of land from C-1 (Neighborhood Stores Zone) to C-2 (General Commercial Zone) on property generally located on the southwest corner of Knott Street and Cerritos Avenue, requested by C J McCormick and known as Zone Change No Z-214, and, WHEREAS there were no communications received either in favor or against the application, and, WHEREAS, Mr C J McCormick the applicant presented testimony in favor of said application* and WHEREAS there was no one wishing to present testimony in favor or against the application, and, WHEREAS, Commissioner Warren stated that he felt that there was more merit in a C-2 zone than a C-1 and he further felt that this property did qualify for a zone change due to the lot size; and, WHEREAS, the majority of the Commission felt this zone should be a more restrictive zone rather than C-2 and, WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the Commission that there was no pre- sent need for C-2 zoned property at this time, and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission denied Zone Change No Z-214 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 1st day of June, 1972, by the following roll call vote* AYES 3 COMMISSIONERS. Ricker Sonju Evans NOES. 1 COMMISSIONER: Warren ABSTAIN: 1 COMMISSIONER• Cardoza ///41(1//,eJ )3) 4,!Ld-J,(9 ,/ CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST* SECT{ ARY 0 THE it, -ii ING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 587 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CYPRESS GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE CYPRESS RECREATION AND PARK GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of May 18, 1972, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to the Cypress General Plan by adopting the Cypress Recreation and Park General Plan, and, WHEREAS there was no one wishing to speak either in favor or against the request, and WHEREAS, there were no written communications received either in favor or against. and, WHEREAS, Mr White Secretary of the Planning Commission stated that the document should be adopted at this time in order to meet the State requirements for an Open Space Element by June 30, 1972, and, WHEREAS each Commissioner spoke in regards to the proposed Open Space Element and WHEREAS, Commissioner Ricker stated that he felt the Focus 2000 document was very lacking in many areas and particularly in the area of bicycle trail - ways He stated that he did not feel he could adopt a document so inadequate as the Focus 2000 and WHEREAS, Commissioner Sonju stated that she felt very strongly about this issue and she would not adopt the Focus 2000 as a recreation element of the City of Cypress as it did not contain mention of the zoo, the trail - ways the retarding basin and many other items that are presently being considered She further stated it was the consensus of the Planning Commis- sion that the Focus 2000 be adopted as a temporary measure to satisfy State requirements Because the Focus 2000 report is the result of a study only two years old and because it is presented in such a manner calling out specific areas and recreational pursuits and a budget for development of these items, she felt that, if adopted, there was a danger of it being accepted as an up to date recreation element, and, WHEREAS Commissioner Warren stated that he would be in favor of adopting the Focus 2000 document due to the shortness of time and only with the condition that the Council be made aware of the Commission's true feelings on this matter and that this matter be referred back to the Commission in order that it could be revised and WHEREAS, Commissioner Cardoza stated that he would much rather adopt the Focus 2000 document than submit the old Park and Recreation Element which was adopted in 1964, and, WHEREAS, Commissioner Evans stated that she would be willing to adopt the Focus 2000 document at this time only with the thought in mind that it would be returned to the Planning Commission for revision at a later date She stated she was not prepared to put the city in the position of not being able to issue permits. and, WHEREAS, it was the general consensus of the Planning Commission that the Focus 2000 document was inadequate, but due to the time factor and the deadline of June 30 1972 they would adopt it at this time However the Commission wanted it made perfectly clear that they wanted this matter referred back to them as soon as possible in order that an appropriate recreation element could be devised, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did recommend adoption to the City Council of the Cypress Recreation and Park General Plan subject to the following revision on Page 47, Paragraph 4 of the Townscape Plan* . The report Focus. The Year 2000 is incorporated herein and made a part hereof to the Townscape Element of the General Plan by reference vote* PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 18th day of May, 1972, by the following roll call AYES. 3 COMMISSIONERS• Warren, Evans, Cardoza NOES. 2 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker and Sonju CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST' 9/1VCW /Al/ SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1mr) RESOLUTION NO 588 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE BY THE CITY WITH SECTION 65402 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE AND SECTION 21151 OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE IN ITS VALLEY VIEW STREET IMPROVEMENT AHFP PROJECT 41632 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange has directed that Cities certify that its local planning agency has reviewed projects for conformance with the requirements of Section 65402 of the California Govern- ment Code and Section 21151 of the California Public Resources Code; and, WHEREAS, the Engineering Division of the City of Cypress has prepared a study showing that there is no significant adverse effect on the environment caused by the Valley View Street Improvement AHFP Project 41632, City Project 7202-10; and, WHEREAS, the project has been shown to be in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cypress. and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress does hereby declare and certify that the Valley View Street Im- provement Project AHFP 41632, City Project 7202-10 has been reviewed in con- formance with the requirements of Section 65402 of the California Government Code and Section 21151 of the California Public Resources Code and does further direct that a copy of this resolution be forwarded by the Engineering Division to the Orange County Road Department vote: PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of July 1972 by the following roll call AYES' 3 COMMISSIONERS. Ricker, Sonju, Evans NOES. 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER. Warren ATTEST. SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 589 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DENYING VARIANCE NO V-308, JOHN C LEAL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of June 1 1972, at 7.30 p m , in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an application for variance to allow a 10' x 10' subdivision directional sign on property located at 5962 E Ball Road, Cypress, requested by Melven Genser Outdoor Signs, Inc , and known as Variance No V-308, and, WHEREAS, Mr Gene Whitman, representing Melven Genser Signs presented testimony in favor of said application; and, WHEREAS, Mr Essex Secretary of the Planning Commission, stated that there had been no letters received either in favor or against the request for variance, and, WHEREAS, it was stated by the City Attorney that the sign ordinance did allow a maximum of two (2) 100 sq ft signs on any transitional area from five (5) to ten (10) acres, and, WHEREAS, there was discussion on the fact that there were two signs already on the property and it was suggested to the Planning Commission that they consider the two signs already on the property in violation and also non- conforming, and, WHEREAS, Commissioners Evans Cardoza and Sonju all felt that there was no hardship involved and they would be in favor of denying the request for a variance. and, WHEREAS, Commissioners Ricker and Warren were in agreement that there would be no harm in erecting the sign on the property and they stated they would be in favor of the variance, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did deny Variance No V-308 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 1st day of June, 1972, by the following roll call vote: AYES. 3 COMMISSIONERS: Sonju, Evans, Cardoza NOES• 2 COMMISSIONERS Ricker and Warren 2/2 CHAIRMAN �F' THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 590 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY NOT ADOPT THIS PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE ORDINANCE RE- GARDING APPEALS OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of July 6, 1972 at 7:30 p m., in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress regarding appeals of Plan- ning Commission actions to the City Council, and, WHEREAS, there were no written communications received either in favor or against, and, WHEREAS, there was no one wishing to give testimony either in favor or against the proposed ordinance change; and, WHEREAS, there was discussion regarding whether or not an individual councilman should pay a filing fee when appealing a decision by the Plan- ning Commission individually; and, WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission to have the ordinance remain as it is now stated with no changes, and, WHEREAS, it is currently permissible for an individual councilman member to request an appeal of any Planning Commission action as an addition to its meeting agenda for further discussion subject to the majority approval; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did recommend that they not adopt the proposed change to the ordinance with the understanding that such change would tend to militate against the prestige and stature of Planning Commission decisions PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of July, 1972, by the following roll call vote. AYES• 3 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Sonju, Evans NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER: Warren 1,-',(1_,A). /7'22 (c,(_4(,),,,„, CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST. SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 591 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90 BY PROVIDING FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CERTAIN TREES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of July 6, 1972, at 7:30 p m , in the City Council Chambers 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress California to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No 90, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress, providing for the preservation of certain trees, and, WHEREAS there was no one wishing to speak in favor or against the ordinance, and, WHEREAS there were no written communications received either in favor or against, and, WHEREAS, the Commission had requested, at previous meetings, that various changes be made regarding certain parts of the ordinance. and WHEREAS, the City Attorney investigated that matter and made the requested changes for the Commission's consideration; and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the proposed Landmark Tree Ordinance to the City Council vote PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of July 1972 by the following roll call AYES 3 COMMISSIONERS. Ricker, Sonju, Evans NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT. 1 COMMISSIONER. Warren ATTEST. SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION G Af,/ /27 2e/.%2(<(---9 CHAIRMAN OF THE PLAN G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 592 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO 90 ALLOWING FOR THE STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has held a public hearing at its meeting of July 20, 1972, at 7 30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No 90, co allow for the storage of recreational vehicles as a conditionally permitted use• and WHEREAS, the following people were present to speak in favor of having recreational vehicle storage areas in the City of Cypress. Mr Alan Roa 4891 Cerritos Avenue Cypress, Ca 90630 Mr A E Peterson 4871 Orange Avenue Cypress, Ca 90630 WHEREAS there were no written communications received either in favor or against, and, WHEREAS, there was a discussion in regards to adding a section to the proposed ordinance concerning the storage of recreational vehicles. and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has studied the matter and concluded that certain minimum standards should be maintained and the Commission has adopted these standards in the form of a policy statement. and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does recommend to the City Council that Section 120 2, Recreational Vehicle Storage Areas, be added to the City Code as a conditionally permitted use in any zone PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th day of July, 1972, by the following roll call vote. AYES• 4 COMMISSIONERS Ricker, Sonju Warren Evans NOES 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS• None CHAIRMAN OF THE PLA ATTEST. SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 593 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE BY THE CITY WITH SECTION 65402 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE AND SECTION 21151 OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE IN ITS CRESCENT AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, AHFP PROJECT 46598 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange has directed that Cities certify that its local planning agency has reviewed projects for conformance with the requirements of Section 65402 of the California Govern- ment Code and Section 21151 of the California Public Resources Code, and, WHEREAS, the Engineering Division of the City of Cypress has prepared a study showing that there is no significant adverse effect on the environment caused by the Crescent Avenue Street Improvement AHFP Project 598, City Project 7203-10, and, WHEREAS, the project has been shown to be in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cypress, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress does hereby declare and certify that the Crescent Avenue Street Improvement Project AHFP 46598, City Project 7203-10 has been reviewed in conformance with the requirements of Section 65402 of the California Govern- ment Code and Section 21151 of the California Public Resources Code and does further direct that a copy of this resolution be forwarded by the Engineering Division to the Orange County Road Department PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS day of August, 1972, by the following roll call vote. AYES• COMMISSIONERS - NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS• ATTEST: S CRETARY OF THE PL G„€/ei S SION 2%1A451,,--)2 /z47.9 CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 595 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-215, ACACIA DRIVE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of September 21, 1972, at 7:30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No 90, to change the zone of property located along Acacia Drive from R-3 Multiple -Family Residential Zone to RE Residential Estate Zone and known as Zone Change No Z-215; and, WHEREAS, the following party presented testimony in favor of the said application: Mrs John Van den Raadt, 8644 Acacia Drive, Cypress, Ca WHEREAS, the following people presented testimony in opposition to said application: Mr Cor Vander Dussen, 7492 Moody Street, La Palma, Ca G W Sinclaire, 8602 Acacia Drive, Cypress, Ca WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that a Residential Estate Zone is the highest and best use of the land; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress recommends approval to the City Council of Zone Change No Z-215 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st day of September, 1972, by the following roll call vote: AYES* 3 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Sonju, Warren NOES: 1 COMMISSIONER. Hart ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSTAIN: 1 COMMISSIONER: Davis ATTEST. SECRETARY OF THE P CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 596 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has duly considered held public hearings as required by law and duly adopted by Resolution, an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the City of Cypress, and WHEREAS this amendment to the General Plan is designed to bring the Land Use into conformance with the Official Zoning Map of the City of Cypress as required by State Law and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed proposed changes to the Land Use Map as recommended by the City Council, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress recommends approval to the City Council of this amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan PASSED AND ADOPTED this 30th day of November, 1972, by the following roll call vote: AYES' NOES. 4 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker, Sonju, Hart, Warren 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST' SECR TARY OF THE PLANNING COMMI SION CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 597 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF A NEW ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has duly con- sidered held public hearing as required by law, and duly adopted by Resolution a new Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress; and WHEREAS, this new ordinance replaces Ordinance No 90 of the Code of the City of Cypress in its entirity, and, WHEREAS, this new ordinance sets forth new land use classifications, divides the City into prohibitions and restrictions for the promotion convenience, and welfare• concerning the use of non-residential purposes, regulates and limits the height and bulk of buildings and other structures, limits lot occupancy and the size of yards and other open spaces; establishes standards of performance and design, adopts a map of said land use zones• prescribes procedures for changes of zone, conditional use permits, variances, or other permits• prescribes penalties for violations of said ordinance, and repeals all ordinances in conflict therewith• and, provisions establishing zones, imposes regulations, of health, safety, morals, land for residential and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed proposed changes to this new Zoning Ordinance as recommended by the City Council, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress recommends approval to the City Council of the new Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress PASSED AND ADOPTED this 30th day of December, 1972 by the following roll call vote' AYES. NOES• 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT 4 COMMISSIONERS Ricker, Sonju, Hart, Warren ATTEST. 0 COMMISSIONERS None CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION L'.. Am -P d SECR TARY OF THE PLANNING CO 1 SSION RESOLUTION NO 598 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF A NEW OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has duly con- sidered, held public hearings as required by law, and duly adopted by Reso- lution, a new Zoning Map of the City of Cypress, and, WHEREAS the new Official Zoning Map establishes new zone classifica- tions for the City of Cypress and designates the locations thereof and as `urther specified in the Zoning Ordinance adopted concurrently herewith, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed proposed changes to the Official Zoning Map as recommended by the City Council, and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress recommends approval to the City Council of the "Official Zoning Map for the City of Cypress PASSED AND ADOPTED this 30th day of November, 1972, by the following roll call vote. AYES. 4 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker, Sonju, Hart, Warren NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST SECR TARY OF E PLANNING COMMISSI,N r CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION C r RESOLUTION NO 599 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO 497 ZONING ORDINANCE CITY OF CYPRESS BY ADDING A NEW SECTION, SECTION 15 ENTITLED "SIGNS" WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress has duly considered, held public hearings as required by law and duly adopted by Resolution a new Sign Ordinance of the City of Cypress and, WHEREAS, this amendment provides for the regulation, construction and maintenance of signs within the City of Cypress and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress recommends approval to the City Council of this amendment to Ordinance No 497 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 30th day of November, 1972, by the following roll call vote AYES 3 COMMISSIONERS: Ricker Hart Warren NOES• 1 COMMISSIONER Sonju ABSENT. 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST SEC ETARY 0 THE PLANNING Co 1 I' SION CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 600 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO Z-217, DR. EDWARD K DISTLER WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress held a public hearing at their meeting of December 21 1972, at 7:30 p m , in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, to consider the rezoning of approximately 9 acres of land in the 4700 block of Lincoln Avenue situated on the southerly side of Lincoln Avenue opposite Sumner Place to the CH Commercial Highway Zone This is a pre -annexation zoning request whereby the zoning will become effective upon annexation of the property to the City of Cypress Said property is proposed for annexation under Annexation #72-1 and known as Zone Change No Z-217, and, WHEREAS, Mr Hawley presented Planning Staff Report PC#72-82 for the Commission's consideration, and, WHEREAS Mr Dick Barbour Dr Edward K Distler, and Mr David Hyun all spoke in fa or of the proposed zone change case• and WHEREAS, the following people presented testimony regarding the surround- ing land and how eventually it would be developed: Mr William Schaper, Mr T J Parker Mrs John Desloge, Mrs Smolinski, Mr. William Grauert, 9173 Ethel Street, 9164 Ethel Street, 9144 Ethel Street, 9143 Ethel Street, 9142 Julie Beth St , Cypress, Ca 90630 Cypress, Ca 90630 Cypress Ca 90630 Cypress, Ca 90630 Cypress, Ca 90630 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that a CH Commercial Highway Zone would be the highest and best use of the land, and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Cypress recommends approval to the City Council of Zone Change No Z-217 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st day of December, 1972, by the following roll call vote: AYES* 4 COMMISSIONERS• Ricker, Sonju Hart Warren NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS. None ABSENT 0 COMMISSIONERS• None ATTEST: SECRET Y OF 111 E PLA ,ING COMMI SION CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION