Loading...
Minutes 64-11-23MINUTES OF THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD November 23, ]964 The Cypress City Council held a regular meeting on November 23, ]964, in the City Council Chamber, 9471 South Walker Street, Cypress, California, at 7:30 p.m, Mayor Frank P. Nee presiding. PRESENT: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Nee ABSENT: None Also present were City Manager/City Clerk Darrell Essex; City Attorney James Erickson; Secretary of the Planning Commission Dartell Dalton; Public Works Director Natold Neu; Police Chief O. C. Foster; and Building Superintendent Tom Nudson. MINUTES: It was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman Gorzeman~ and unanimously carried, the minutes of the November 9, 1964, City Council meeting be approved as mailed. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral commun~ations at this time. P.UBLIC [!~.ARI~G RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. ~-121; PETE.R AND MAJRY VAN ~U.I.TEN: The Mayor announced thi~ was the time and place for the Public Hearing to consider an application for amendment m the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, to change the zone from M-1 (Light Manufacturing) to H-C (Highway Commercial) on property generally located 325' south~ Lincoln Avenue to the east side of Bloomfiled, requested by Peter and Mary Van Ruiten, 3750 Bloomfield, Cypress, California, known as Zone Change No. Z-121. The City Manager advised the Council that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this zone change. The Mayor declared the Public I~aring open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed use. Mr. ~rd Wright, 3109 V~I~, Long Beach, addressed the Council, stating that as President of the firmwhich proposes to build a drive-in theater on the subject property, he is in favor of the zone change. Mr. Wright pointed out that the proposed drive-in theater would accomodate 1,800 automobiles, and would have facilities for amusement rides. There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. The City Manager pointed ou~ that the matter before the City Council is only the zoning of the property to Highway Commercial, and if a drive-in were to be constructed on the subject property, a Conditional Use Permit would be required. Discussion was held concerning the manufacturing zone now on the subject property. The Secretary of the Planning Commission stated that a recent survey of industrial areas made by Orange County determined that the subject area is n~ suitable for a manufacturing zone. In answer to an inquiry from Councilman Kanel~ Mr. Ward Wright~ representing the Drive-In Theater firm, stated that due to the ~ize of the proposed drive-in~ first-run movies~ould frequently be shown. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be readby title only, title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY CHANGING THE ZONE OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY FROM M-1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) TO H-C (HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-121 (PETE & .MARY V~N RUITEN) November 23,1964 Discussion was held concerning the revenue which the City could expect to receive from the operation of a drive-in theater. The City Manager advised that Admissions Tax would be collected for such an operation. Following further discussion concerning the proposed zone change, it was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried, the above Ordinance pass its first reading. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright,and Noe None None P.UBLIC ~tEARING RE: .ZpNE qHANGE NQ. Z-122; STONEBRIDG.EI I~C.: The Mayor announced this was the time and place to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, to change the zone from R-3 (Multiple-family Residential) Zo R-1 (One-family Residential) and C-1 (Neighborhood Stores) on property generally located at the northwest and northeast corners of Cerritos and Denni Street, requested by Stonebridge, Inc. 1665 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, California, known as Zone Change No. Z-122. The City Manager read Planning Commission Resolution No. 221 recommending approval of the R-1 zone change portion of the request, and Resolution No. 222 recommending denial of the requested C-1 zone. The Mayor declared the Public Hearing open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed uses. Mr. Richard Owen, representing Stonebridge, Inc., addressed the Council, speaking in favor of the requested zone change. Mr. Owen indicated that if the Council wished to follow the recommendation of the Planning Commisison in denying the C-2 portion of the request, he would like to see the subject area zoned for C-0 zoning with a portion of the corner zoned for a service station. There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. It was moved by Councilman McCanley, seconded by Councilman Gorzeman, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be read by title only, title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. IN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY CHANGING THE ZONE OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY FROM R-3 (~LTIPLE FA~tILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-1 (ONE-F~A~ILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-122 (STONEBRIDGE, INC.) It was moved by Councilman Wright, seconded by Councilman Kanel, and unanimously carried, this Ordinance pass its first reading. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None Following discussion, it was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Gorzeman, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be-read ~by title only, title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY CHANGING THE ZONE OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF L~ND WITHIN THE CITY MROM R-3 ([~LTIPLE F~4ILY RESIDENTIAL) TO C-1 (NEIGHBO~tOOD STORES) ZONE CHANGE NO, Z-122 (STONEBRIDGE, INC.) November 23, ]964 Following further discussion concerning the subject area, it was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman Wright, and carried, to=concur with the reco~aendation of the Planning Commission in denial of the C-1 portion of the requested Zone Change No. Z-122. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 1 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, Wright, and Noe McCarney None Councilman Gorzeman inquired of the City Attorney if the City Council could grant a different zone than that requested. The City Attorney advised that this could not be done, and that further public hearings would have to be conducted. PUBLIC HEARING RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-123; ROBERT H. GRANT: The Mayor announced this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider an application for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 90, to change the zone from C-2 (General Commercial) to R-1 (One-family Residential) on property generally located on the north side of Ball Road between Grindlay Street and Walker Street, requested by Robert H. Grant, 1665 South Brookburst, Anaheim, known as Zone Change No. Z-123. The City Manager advised the Council ~hat the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this zone change. The Mayor declared the Public Hearing open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed use. Mr. Richard Owen, representing Robert H. Grant, addressed the Council, speaking in favor of the of the proposed use, stating that it has been determined that only about 7 ½ acres of the northwest corner of Ball and Walker would be suitable for a shopping center, rather than the original ten acres as contemplated by the Grant Company. Mr. Owen outlined the plans for development of the subject shopping center area. There being no written communications and no oral protests, the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. It was moved by Coundman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Gorzeman, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be read by title only, title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY CHANGING THE ZONE OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY FROM C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO R-1 (ONE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-123 (ROBERT H. GRANT) It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Gorzeman, and unanimously carried, this Ordinance pass its first reading. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None COMMUNICATION FROM CYPRESS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION "L": The City Manager readfin full a communication dated November 9, 1964, from Director of Recreation Charles E. Bryant, expressing appreciation for City of Cypress support of Proposition "L" regarding bond monies for park and recreation land acquisition. It was moved by Councilman Wright, seconded by Councilman Gorzeman, and unanimously carried, this communication be received and filed. It was further moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried, to direct the City Manager to send a communication to the Cypress Park and Recreation District on behalf of the City Council, expressing City Council appreciation for having placed Proposition "L" on the November ballot in an attempt to provide for additional par~ and recreation facilities throughout the District, and further su gested that oopies of the communication be forwarded by the Park District to ot~er interested parties. November 23, 1964 COMMUNICATION FROM CITY OF ORANGE RE: BALLOT VOTING AT THE ANNUAL UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS: The City Manager presented a communication dated November 10, 1964, from the City of Orange, transmitting a copy of a Resolution urging that provisions be made for ballot voting at the Annual United States Conference of Mayors. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Gorzeman, and unanimously carried, this communication be received and filed. COMMUNICATION FROM ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT RE: FLIES: The City Manager presented a communication from Supervising Sanitarian Richard B. Robison of the Orange County Health Department, relative to the request of the City to investigate the fly problem in the area north of Orange Avenue between Walker and Valley View. The communication indicates that an inspection of the area revealed a lack of sufficient number of flies to warrant spraying with the large spray equipment owned and operated by the Health Department, and suggested that reduction of these common flies would be provided by tight-fitting lids on garbage cans and trash cans, disposal of dog droppings on a daily basis, and the regular removal of lawn trimmings, plus preventive measurers by the agricultural interests. It was moved by Councilman Gorzeman, seconded by Coundlman McCarney, and unanimously carried, this communication be received and filed. COMMUNICATION FROM ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD RE: TRANSFER OF ON-SALE BEER LICENSE TO THERMAN C. TILTON: The City Manager presented a communica- tion from the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, notifying the City of an application for transfer of On~Sale beer license from Percy L. Smith to Therman C. Tilton, 6072 Lincoln Avenue, C~ess. The City Manager stated that an investigation had been conducted of the applicant and no basis for protest has been found. It was moved by Councilman Gorzeman, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried, this communication be received and filed. REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT H. GRANT AND COMPANY FOR ROSE ANN CIRCLE IN TRACT NO. 4752: The City Manager stated that the City Attorney had requested consideration of this Reimbursement Agreement be continued. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried, to continue consideratinn of the Reimbursement Agreement for Rose Ann Circle in Tract No. 4752. APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSIONER: Mayor Noe stated that many applications had been received fo~ the position of Planning Commissioner and that each of the applicants werewry well qualified for the position. Mayor Noe further stated that he would like to appoint Mr. Henry Hickey, 4322 Fontainbleau Avenue, Cypress, for a term to expire on August 5, 1968. It was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman Gorzeman, and unanimously carried, to concur with Mayor Noe's appointment of Mr. Henry Hitkey to the Cypress Planning Commission for a term to expire on August 5, 1968. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUN~LMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None Councilman Kanel suggested that perhaps the individuals who had applied for the Planning Commissioner position could be added to the Civic Center Development Committee. Mayor Noe suggested that this be considered at the end of the City Council mee~ng. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5}82e PRACTICAL BUILDERSs INC.: The City Manager presented Tentative Tract Map No. 5782, consisting of 20 R-3 lots, 4.8 acres, located approximately 250' north of Cerritos Avenue on the west side of Valley View, requested by Practical Builders, Inc., 1677 West Katella, Anaheim, California. The City Manager informed the Council that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this Tentative Tract Map and listed the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. November 23~ 1964 Discussion was held concerning adding one condition requiring a fence around the parking areas fronting on the alley to allow for safety of children living in the subject tract. A representative from Practical Builders, Inc., addressed the Council, stating that he would agree to adding such a condition. It was moved by Councilman Gorzeman, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried, to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 5782 subject to the following conditions: That all public alleys be dedicated to the City and be constructed to the standards of the City Engineer. All access rights to Valley View be dedicated to the City except at street or alley intersections. All drainage be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and necessary drainage fees be paid. Street lights to be provided on public alley and sidewalks as required by the City Engineer. A lO-foot easement be dedicated at the rear of the lots for public sidewalk and public utilities. A 6-foot block wall fence be constructed on the west boundary of the tract and a 6-foot block wall fence be constructed on the north boundary where no fence is now located. A 6-foot solid fence be constructed around all parking areas which have frontage on the alley on the southern boundary. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5272~ STARDUST LANDS, INC.): The City Manager presented Tentative Tract Map No. 5272, consisting of 13.73 acres, 60 R-1 lots, located on the northeast and northwest cornem of Cerritos and Denni, requested by Stardust Lands, Inc., P. O. Box 2067, Anaheim, California. The City Manager informed the Council that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this Tentative Tract Map and listed the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. It was moved by Councilman Wright, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 5272, subject to the following conditions: That all access rights except at street intersections be dedicated to the City on Cerritos Avenue and on Denni Street. That a 5-foot tree planting easement be provided on all streets and no walls or fences be installed which would deny the access to the area for maintenance of trees by the City. All drainage be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and all dr~hage fees be paid. A five-foot drainage easement on Lots 23 and 24 be provided at the end of the cul-de-sac. Curb alignment be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer on Denni Street. Subdivider will pay for all compaction tests to assure the development of Cerritos Avenue and Denni Street to the standards of arterial high- ways required by the Division of Highways. November 23, 1964 224 The parkways on Cerritos Avenue and Denni Street shall be con- structed and provision made for tree wells. This tract shall be sewered from Cerritos Avenue unless otherwise provided by the City Engineer. A 6-foot bl~ck wall fence ~be installed along the south boundary of the tract on Cerritos Avenue to separate the commercial and residential property. 10. A 6-foot bbck wall fence be installed on the east and west side of Denni Street, on the south side of the commercial property west of Denni Street, and on the west side of the tract. i1. If a map is filed on any portion of Cerritos Avenue or Denni Street, street improvements shall be installed to the corner of Cerritos and Denni. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5704~ STARDUST LANDS~ INC.: The City Manager presented Tentative Tract Map No. 5704, consisting of 12.8 acres, 66 R-1 lots, generally located on the north side of Ball Road, 464' west of Walker, requested by Stardust Lands, Inc., P. O. Box 2067, Anaheim, California. The City Manager informed the Council that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this Tentative Tract Map and listed the conditions reconmended by the Planning Commission. It was moved by Councilman Gorzeman, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 5704 subject to the following conditions: All access rights except at the intersection be dedicated on Ball Road. All drainage be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and all drainage fees be paid. A 6-foot drainage easement be provided along the rear of Lot 13 and between Lot 12 and 13 unless a drainage easement is provided on Lot A in Tract No. 4103. $ A 5-foot tree planting easement shall be granted adjacent to all streets and shall not be fenced off to prohibit maintenance by City crews. The minimum pavement width on A and B streets shall be no less than 40-feet. The area east of the proposed R-1 subdivision shall be included in this map and shall be ]mbeled Lot 61. The curb, gutter, and pave-out nn Ball Road and the curb return shall be completed at the time any portion of a map is finanlized on Ball Road, sidewalks shall not be required until such time as the commercial property develops. The street improvements on Walker shall not be required until such time as the commercial development proceeds on Walker. A 6-foot block wall be constructed on the east property ~ne and the south boundary on Ball Road. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None November 23, 1964 CONSIDERATION OF FINAL TRAC~ MAy ~0. ~q72,.. ~O~ERT H.. GRANT..AND C~PANY.: The City Manager presented a report dated November 20, 1964, from the City Engineer concerning Pinal Tract }~p No. 5072, located north of Orange Avenue, 660-feat east of Bloomfield, 101 R-1 lots, 20.282 acres, as requested by Robert H. Grant and Company, 1665 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, California, The report frem the City Engineer indicated that Condition No. 6 placed on the Tentative Tract Hap has not been met, said condition reading as follows~ A temporary chm~nel traversing private property doomstream must be provided to cary runoff from a ten year storm over this tract and the con tributing areas on the north to a sump area between Carbon Creek Channel and Ball Road. The channel shall be designed to remove this flow by gravity under maximum water surface elevation 28° in the sump area with maximum head loss of two feet from Orange Avenue to the semp. Permanent drainage facilities will be constructed later to conform to the City~s Master Plan of Drainage," This condition has not been complied with in that a correct easement to the sump area south of Ball Ro~d has not been submitted and engineering calculations have not been provided indicating that a maximten head loss Of two feet would exist from Orange Avenue to the eump area. Due to the drainage problems and difficulty with the proposed street pattern, the City Engineer recommended that the Council not approve Final Tract Map No. 5072 and also take no action to extend the time for compliance with the tentative map conditons imposed on December 9,1963. Mr. Richard Owens, representing the Robert H. Grant Company, addressed the Council indicating that every effort had been made to comply with the conditions of the Tentative Tract Map and that the easement obtained from the Larwin Company terminated at time proposed sump area north of Ball Road, which was one of the main reasons that the Grant Company entered into the Drainage District 2-A Agreement between the City afld the Larwin Company. Mr. Owen further requested that if the City Council could not approve the Final '~ap at this time, the time for map approval may be extended· The City Engineer outlined the drainage problems in the subject area and the possibility that the street pattern may have to be altered to provide for the ultimate drainage of the tract and surrounding areas. Upon questioning, the City Attorney advised the City Council that the Council has limited Jurisdiction in t~ls matter and must approve the Final Map if it meets the conditions of the Tentative Map, and if the Council wishes to extend the time for Final Map approval, no new or additional requirements ~euld be imposed. ~lr. Richard ~qen again addressed the Council, requesting consideration of extend- ing time of approval of the Final T~Iap} indicating that ~Ir. Goldin, representing tile Larwin Company~ ]lad indicated favorable consideration would be given to extendin~ the easement to the proper area required by Condition No. 6 on the Tentative Map, ~e City Manager advised that he had received a call from T.Ir. Goldin, expressing the possibility that the drainage easement might be extended to the sump area below Ball Road, depending upon the effect this addit4onal easement would have upon the Larwin Company's property at that location. In ans%~r to a question from Councilman Corzeman regarding the time needed for additional studies in this area to determine the most effective way to solve tbe drainage problem~ the City Manager indicated that a period of 90 days will be needed to finalize any of the engineering studies provided for in the Drainage District 2-A agreement. A motion was made by Councilman Kanet to deny Final Tract Map No. 5072 based upon the conditions of the Tentative Map not be trig met, however the motion died for lack of a second· November 23, 1964 The City Council was further advised that if the Final ~ap ~re denied based on the fact that the conditons of tile Tentative Map were not met at this time, the Developer could refile a similar map at the conclusion of the drainage studies if the drainage and street pattern could be resolved without altering the existing map. Mr. Pete Van Ruiten, 9432 South Bloomfield, Cypress, addressed the Council, stating that ha hopes the City Council takes into consideration the fact that this tract is a major key to the drainage in the subject area. It was moved by Counoilman Kanel, and seconded by Councilman McCarney to deny Final Tract Map No. 5072 inasmuch as the Developer has not conformed to Condition No. 6 relative to drainage, in that a correct easement to the sump area south of Ball Road has not been submitted~ and engineering calculations have not been provided indicating that a maximum head loss of two feet would exist from Orange Avenue to the sump area. Prior to voting on this motion, further discussion was held regarding the need for additional drainage studies in the area. Mr. Arthur Anderson, 4312 Jad~ Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Council, stating that it seemed evident that if the Council were to grant an extension of this Tract Map, tile City would be required to maintain the street pattern as submitted. , The following ro 11 call vote was taken on Councilman Kanel's motion to deny Final TraCt Map No. 5072: AYES| 5 COUNCILMEN~ NOES: 0 CO~CIL~EN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None C~.TY OF CYPRE.SS PREFERE/~CE FOR P.RpPOSED.}!U~.~.INGTON BEACH FllE~Y: A report dated Novsmoker 18, 1964, was presented from the City Manager concerning the proposed locati6n of the Huntingtun Beach Freeway now under study by the State Division of Highways. The State has prepared a map suggesting four alternative routes, and th ~ity staff has favored Route A, located in the most westerly area, generally west of Knott Street, due to the favorable impact that such a proposed freeway might have upon the projected industrial area south of Cerritos on both sides of Valley View. Tile report outlined further desirable aspects of locating the Freeway on Routh A, and further stated that Route A would appear to require less expenditure in funds in terms of condemning areas already developed. Following discussion, it was moved by Councilman Gorzeman, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried, to go on record in support of selection of Route A for the proposed Huntington Beach Freeway, and instruct the City Manager to prepare a letter outlining the reasons for this action to be submitted to the State of California, Department of Public Works, Division of Highways and to AssemblS~an William Dannemeyer. AN~EXATIOi~j OF PORTION OF CY.PP~..S.S LI..~I.~.ING D~.STR.ICT OF O.R~NGE COUNTY LYIN~ L~ITHIN C.I.Ty..OF CYPRESS: A report dated November 18, 1964,.was presented from the 'City Manager, stating that during the past several months, the City Manager and Public Works Director have held nomerous meetings with the Southern California Edison Company regarding the existing street lighting systems within the City of C~ypress in an effort to develop an uniform pattern of street lighting procedures a~d asses.~ments. One of the major problems is the existence of an area north of Orange Avenue between Denni and Valley View which falls within an Orange County Lighting District. The City has performed street l~ghting service through tile formation of special districts in ~he s~bdivided areas, levying assessments against each property owner based on the benefit received from the street llghts installed as the subdivisions develop. The most economical and efficient way to collect energy charges for street lighting is to establish the energy charges on a tax ~te basis, which is accomplished by establishing a City-wide Lighting District and establishing zones within the various areas of the City based on the type and amount of street lighting available to tile various araas. November 23, 1964 Prior to establishing a Street Lighting Program of this nature, it would be required to de-annex the areas falling within the County Street Lighting District from the County and annex these areas into the over-all City Lighting District. ~e major re ason for this d~ange in Jurisdiction would be to improve the street lighting standards which are higt~'r in the City than exist in theCounty District. In order to receive the tax monies to be collected from the district, tile City must have accomplished the transfer of Jurisdiction prior to February 1, 1965. Following discussion concerning this matter, it was moved by Councilman Gorzeman, seconded by Councilman Wright,and unanimously carried~ to adopt the following Resolution, title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 531 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS RE. QUESTING EXCLUSION OF THAT PROPERTY GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS NORTH OR ORANGE AVENUE BETWEEN DENNI STREET AND VALLEY VIEW STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF CYPRESS FROM THE CYPRESS LIGHTING DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COLrNCII~IEN: ABSENT: 0 COb]qCILMEN: Gorzeman s Kanels McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None REIMBUBSED~NT FROM DRAINAGE DISTRICT 3-I FUNDS,TO S. V. H~NSAKER AND...~ONS FOR TRACT NOS. 4399 AND 4670: A report dated November 18'. 1964, was presented from the City Manager, stating thatthe developer of Tract Nos. 4399 and 4670 has paid drainage acreage fees for the subject tracts in the amount of $20,497.22 and in addition has installed drainage facilities along Cerritos Avenne in the amount of $20,023.60, The inclusion of these drainage facilities in the revised Master Plan of Drainage plan for District 3-I has resulted in an increase in the Drainage acreaRe fee from $610 to $830, resulting in total drainage fees due from these tracts of $27,889.66. Deducting the current acreage charge from the drainage fees already paid and the Master Plan construction credits, the S. V. Hunsaker and Sons Company should be reimbursed in the amount of $12,631.16. It ~as moved by Councilman Gorzeman, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried, to authorize the reimbursement to S. V. Hunsaker and Sons from Drainage District 3-I funds in the sum of $12,631.16. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COb~qCIL~EN: NOES: 0 COUNC%LSIEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCID{EN: Corzeman, Kanel, ~4cCarney, Wright, and Noe None None Np. FARKING ZONES: A report dated November 18, 1964, was presented from the City Manager, stating that the City's Traffic Commission has completed a review of the need for "No Parking" areas throughout the City and has determined that tile following locations should be established for "No Parking" zones in order to reduce the traffic hazards and prc~vide for tile most efficient pattern of traffic movement possible at this time: l, Both sides of Walker between Ball and Cerritos 2. West side of Valley ~iew from Cerritos north to the alley, or approximately 400 feet. 3. Both sides of Moody from Ball to Orange 4. Both sides of Moody between Myra and Ball 5. Both sides of Cerritos between Moody and a point 400-feet east of Angels Discussion ~as held concerning the recommendation for no parkinF on both sides of Walker between Ball and Cerritos, Wi~h reference to allowing parking for limited periods of time. ~e Pelice Chief indicated that even with the "No Parking" stgns~ it would be possible to allow parking if properly applied for and Justified for a limited time period. November 23, 1964 It was moved by Councilman Wright, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to instruct the City At[orney to prepare the required resolution to amend the City Traffic Ordinance, establishing the areas outlined above as "No Parking areas." The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None ACCEPTAN.CE OF EASEmeNT D~D FRO~ MOUNT ~ALV~R~ L~T!tERA~. ~.U~.CtI: A report dated November 18~ 1964, was presented from the City Manager, stating that the City has [eceived an Easement Deed fr~ Mount Calvary Lutheran Church~ for property located at the northwest corner of Ball Road and Valley View. This dedication is required in order for the City to proceed with the traffic signal installation at the subject intersection. It was moved by Councilman Gorzema9, seconded by Councilman McCarney~ and unanimously carried, to accept the Easement Deed from Mount Calvary Lutheran Church and authorize the City Clerk to transmit the deed to the County for recordation. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCI~{EN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCII~EN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None S]IEET MAINTENANCE. p~.IFODIS: A report dated November 19, 1964, was presented from the City Manager, recommend ing thatuniforms be provided for the members of the City S~reet Crew in order to provide for better appearance for the men, which creates better morale ~r'the employees and a more effective public image. Also, by using a standard uniform with the City of Cypress identification the Street Crew can be more readily identified. The Kleen Towel Service, which provides the City's restroom supplies, would provide two changes of miforms per week at $1.90 per week per man. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried to authorize an appropriation of $325.00 to provide uniform service for the remainder of the 1964-65 fiscal year for the r~mbers of the Street Maintenance Crew, to be obtained from Kleen Towel Service Company~ 2501 East 28th Street, Los Angeles, California. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCIkMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, ~[cCarney, Wright, and Noe None None Mp~TH~. A~TIy~Ty R~Fp~T F~ OCTpBER 1.964: It was moved by Councilman Gorzeman, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimoujly carried, the Monthly Activity Report for October 1964, be received and filed. S~COND READI~.. ORD~.ANCE BE: Z.O~, CH.A~.GE NO..,Z-84, (L~9 BABOLDI): The City Manage r presented an Ordinance approv~g Zone Change No. Z-84 for Leo Baroldi, said Ordinance having i%s first reading on July 8, 1963. The City Manager explained that this Ordinance had been continued at that time until plans are submitted by the applicant for the proposed development of tile area; however, since that time the City has proceeded on other zone changes without actual development plans. The refore~ Mr. Baroldi has requested that the second reading of tile Ordinance be held. It was moved by ~ouncilman Wright, seconded by Councilman Gorze~an, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be adopted, title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 226 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90~ TIlE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY CtlANGING TIlE ~ONE OF ~FCERTAIN PARCEL OF L~ND WI~llN TIlE CITY TO ZONE C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) ZONE CHANGE NO. Z~84 November 23, 1964 The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMElt: None SECOND READING ORDINANCE RE: ZONE CHANGE NO, Z-119 ~STANLEY. H~, RITTER/: It was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be adopted, title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 227 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY CHANGING THE ZONE OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND I.YITHIN THE CITY FROM R-1 (ONE-FAMILY BESIDENTIAL) TO C-1 (NEIGHBOPdtOOD STROES) ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-119 (STANLEY U. RITTER) The following roll call vote was taken: AxZES: 5 COUNCIL~IEN: Gorzeman~ Kanel, McCarney, Wright~ and Noe NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: None SECOND READIN~ ORDINANC~ RE: ZONIN~ O, RpINANCE, AMENDMENTS: It was moved by Councilman Wright, seconded b'y' Councilman Kanel, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be adopted, title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 228 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90~ THE ZONING ORDINANCE. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: None P~.~.SOLUTIONALLOWI~.G. ~,L,AIMS, AND DEMAN,D.S. ~.pS.. ,1913.1. .,THR, U .1..0..177 ~FAY~DLL): It was moved by Councilman Gorzeman, seconded by Councilman McCarney~ and unanimously carried, the following Resolution be adopted, title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 532 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DE~IANDS NOS. 10131 THRU 10177 The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: None RESOLUTION ALLpWI~G CLAIMS AND D.E,M~NDS NDS. 10130. AND 1.0178 T. HR.U .L0~,07 ~COMMERC.IAL ~ARRANTS): It was moved by Councilman Gorzeman, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, the following Resolution be adopted title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 533 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS ALLOW{NG CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS NOS. 10130 AND 10178 TItRU 102~7 The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: ~ COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman~ Kanel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: None November 23, 1964 AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR LIBRARY CARPETING: The City Manager stated that Architect Donald ~orker has submitted specifications for the carpeting of the Ilbrary building being constructed at Moody and Myra. The specifica~ionS dall for the opening of bids for the carpeting on Monday, December 7, 1964, at 10:00 a.m., with the contract to be awarded at the City Council meeting of December 14, 1964. It was moved by Councilman Wright, seconded by Councilman Gorzeman, and unanimously carried, m approve the specifications for ~e library carpeting and authorize the City Clerk to advertise for bids to be submitted to the City Clerk by 10:00 a.m. on December 7, 1964. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCID~EN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Gorzeman, Kanel~ McCarney, Wright, None None and Noe FIRST READING ORDINANCE LICENSING TRANSACTIONS OF BUS!~ESSES~. ETC.~: The City Manager stated that Section 58 of Ordinance No. 82, which section pertains to payment of fees by the Water Company, is in conflict with another section of this Ordinance. He further stated that discussions have been held with Water officials and the City has indicated that it would adopt the Ordinance, deleting Section 58. It was moved ~y Councilman Wright, seconded by Councilman Gorzeman, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be read by title only: OPdDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS LICENSING THE TRANSACTIONS OF BUSINESSES, TRADES, PROFESSIONS, OCCUPATIONS AND SERVICES IN THE CITY OF CYPRESS FOR THE PURPOSE OF RAISING REVENUE AND PROVIDING A PENALTY FSRTHE VIOLATION ~IEPZOF, AND RE~EAEING ALL OP~INANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINkNCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE. It was moved by Councilman Wright, seconded by Councilman Kanel, and unanimously carried, this Ordinance pass its first reading. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNC IDIEN: NOES: 0 COUNCIhMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEn: Gorzeman, K anel, McCarney, Wright, and Noe None None LETTERS OF APPRECIATION. 70..P.L~.N.NING CpMMI.S.S. IO.N.E~. ~PPL. ICANTS: Mayor Noe requested that letters be sent to the individuals applying for the position of Planning Commissioner, expressing the City' s thanks for their applications. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS~ Mr. Harry ~elcher, 5232 Marcella Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Council, inquiring concerning the City's representation on the North Orange County Junior College DiStrict Board of Trustees. Councilman Kanel inquired concerning the request of the City for the proposed Junior College to be named "Cypress Junior College"~ The=City Manager advised the Council that representatives of the Junior College District have requested that a meeting be held concerning this matter after the December election con- cerning a merger of the district. Councilman Kanel suggested the possibility that the applicants for the position of Planning Commissioner serve as additional members of the Civic Center Develop- ment Committee. Mayor Noe stated that he feels the Subcormnittee Chairman should be contacted concerning th~S possibility before the City Council takes any such action. November 23, 1964 Councilman Kanel suggested that the Council consider sending a letter of appreciation to the two Cypress citizens who urged the City Council to submit a proposal to Orange County for the erection of the library building at Moody and Myra. Following a brief discussion, it was meved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman Wright, and unanimously carried, to direct the City Manager to send a le~er to Mr. Carl De Pietro and Mr. Robert Doerr~ thanking them for their support and recommendations concerning the construction of a library at Moody and P~ra, ADJOURNMENT: The re be ing no further business to come before the City Council~ the Mayor declared the n~eting adjourned at the hour of 10:15 p.m. MAYOR ATTEST: November 23, 1964