Loading...
Minutes 66-05-23MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS HELD May 23, 1966 The City Council held a regular meeting on May 23, 1966, in the City Council Chambers,: 5311 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California~at 3:00 p.m., Mayor Frank P. Noe presiding. PRESENT: Councilmen Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe ABSENT: None Also present were City Manager/City Clerk Darrell Essex, City Attorney James Erickson, Administrative Assistant Darrell Dalton, Public Works Director Arthur Schatzeder, Building Superintendent Tom Nudson, and Secretary of the Planning Commission George Putnam. MINUTES: It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried, the minutes of the meeting of May 2, 1966, be approved as mailed. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, the minutes of the meeting of May 9, 1966, be approved as mailed. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Jack Leneker, Acting President of the Cypress Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Council on behalf of the Chamber concerning the economic problems faced by the numerous service stations now located within the City of Cypress. Mr. Leneker requested the City Council to refrain from approving any additional service stations on Lincoln Avenue until a study now under way by the Chamber of Commerce is completed. With reference to this request, the City Manager advised Mr. Leneker that service stations are an allowed use in several zones and no further control could be exercised by the Council without amending existing Ordinances. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, to proceed to Item No. 5 on the agenda at this time, since Items No. 1-4 are Public Hearings scheduled for 7:30 p.m. COMMUNICATION FROM DIEHL~ EVANS~ AND COMPANY~ TRANSMITTING AUDIT REPORT FOR PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31~ 1966: The City Manager presented a communica- tion dated April 25, 1966, from Diehl, Evans, and Company, transmitting the Audit Report for the period ending March 31, 1966. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, this communication be received and filed. COMMUNICATION FROM NORTH ORANGE COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT RE: TRAFFIC AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO CYPRESS JUNIOR COLLEGE: The City Manager presented a communication dated April 27, 1966, from Mr. Elton W. Ward, Director of Physical Plant and Facilities of the North Orange County Junior College District concerning traffic and street improvement recommendations made by the City. The City Manager also presented a memorandum dated May 18, 1966, from the Director of Public Works which commented on the items outlined in the communication from the North Orange County Junior College District. In the subject memorandum, the Public Works Director proposed that the storm drain system to be constructed on the Junior College property should not be extended past a point approximately 580 feet west of Holder Street. The report of the Public Works Director indicates that the extension of the Master Plan of Drainage facilities beyond that point would not be required for either draining the developed property on the Junior College site or to accept the drainage waters now originating outside of the Cypress City limits. The deletion of this portion of the 2-A Master Plan of Drainage facilities would remove an estimated $29,000.00 from the Drainage Reimbursement Agreement with the North Orange County Junior College District. May 23, 1966 The Public Works Director indicates that these monies could be used for other drainage facilities in the 2-A District which are more vital to the 2-A drainage system. Following further discussion on the drainage needs in the 2-A District, it was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried to concur in the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the Master Plan of Drainage facilities to be constructed by the North Orange County Junior College District be terminated at a point approximately 580 feet west of Holder Street, and that any facilities constructed beyond that point would not be subject to a reimbursement agreement. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried,~to proceed to items No. 11 and 15 on the agenda at this time. COMMUNICATION FROM DAIRY QUEEN FARMS RE: CONNECTION TO CITY OF BUENA PARK WATER LINE: The City Manager presented a communication dated May 11, 1966, from Mr. Phillip L. Barnhard, representing Mr. and Mrs. John Van den Raadt, asking that the City of Cypress request permission of the City of Buena Park to use the existing water line on Ball Road for the proposed~ive-in dairy located immediately east of the All-American Market on Ball Road. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, to approve the request of Mr. Barnhard and to direct the City Manager to communicate with the City of Buena Park, requesting permission for Mr. and Mrs. Van Den Raadt to use the existing Buena Park water line on Ball Road for the proposed drive-in dairy. COMMUNICATION FROM O.W. LOUDERBACH, STANDARD OIL COMPANY~ RE: SERVICE S'~ATION AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LINCOLN AND WALKER: The City Manager presented a communication dated May 17, 1966, from Mr. O.W. Louderbach, Property Representative for the Standard Oil Company of California, outlining the problems of development of the southeast corner of Walker and Lincoln for a serviCe.station and submitting various recommendations as to the manner in which the property would be developed. Upon the recommendation of the City Manager, it was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, to refer the subject communication to the staff for further study and report to the Planning Commission, which would be requested to forward a recommenda- tion to the City Council. COMMUNICATION FROM ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RE: FLOOD CONTROL BOND ISSUE: The City Manager presented a cor~nunication dated May 2, 1966, from Mr. H.G. Osborne, Chief Engineer of the Orange County Flood Control District, transmitting a copy of the Engineer's Report for the issuance of $46,400,000 of Flood Control and Water Conservation Work Bonds to be submitted to the voters on June 7, 1966, and suggesting that the City Council adopt a Resolution endorsing the Flood Control Bond Issue. Following a review of the projects which would be constructed within the City of Cypress if the bond ~sue is approved, it was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, the following Resolution be adopted, title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 695 A RESOLUTION OF THF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS ENDORSING THE PROPOSED $46,400,00 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE FOR 1966 The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None May 23, 1966 199 COMMUNICATION FROM ORANGE COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT TRANSMITTING MINUTES OF APRIL MEETING: The City Manager presented a communication dated May 3, 1966, from the Orange County Mosquito Abatement District Manager, transmitting a copy of the Minutes of the Board of Trustees meeting of April 21, 1966. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, this communication be received and filed. COMMUNICATION FROM ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE OF CITIES RE: PARTICIPATION IN LEAGUE ACTIVITIES: The City Manager presented a communication from the Orange County League of Cities, outlining the activities of the Orange County League and inviting members of the City Council to participate in League programs. It was moved by Councilman Bowen, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, this communication be received and filed. COMMUNICATION FROM ASSEMBLYFa~Iq DON A. ALLEN RE: ABUSES OF CREDIT SALES: The City Manager presented a communication dated May 10, 1966, from Assemblyman Don A. Allen, announcing the introduction of H.R. 634, calling for an investigation of abuses of credit sales of freezers and other home appliances, consumer goods, and services. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried, this communication be received and filed. COMMUNICATION FROM DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL RE: ON-SALE BEER LICENSE AT THE RED ROOSTER: The City Manager presented a communica- tion from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, notifying the City of a change in the on-sale beer license for the Red Rooster, 6072 Lincoln Avenue, adding Kenneth M. Brandyberry to the license now held by Rita M. Brandyberry. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, this communication be received and filed. COMMUNICATION FROM ORANGE COUNTY FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION RE: PROCLAMATION OF FIREMEN'S DAYS: The City Manager presented a communication dated May 13, 1966, from Mr. William H. A_nson, Co-Chairman of the Orange County Firemen's Association Fire Show Committee, requesting that the Mayor proclaim June 18 and 19 as Orange County Firemen's Days. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried, to grant this request, whereupon Mayor Noe proclaimed June 18 and 19, 1966, as Orange County Firemen's Days in the City of Cypress. COMMUNICATION FROM R. M. GALLOWAY RE: REFUND OF VARIANCE APPLICATION FEE: The City Manager presented a communication dated May 16, 1966, from Mr. R. M. Galloway, requesting the refund of fees for the Variance applica- tion for the model home area in Tract No. 6194, since the application has been withdrawn. Upon the advise of the City Attorney, the City Council took no action on this request since ~e City Code does not provide for ~e refund of Variance application fees. COMMUNICATION FROM CITY OF DAIRY VALLEY RE: JOINT MEETING CONCERNING FERTILIZER PLANT LITIGATION: The City Manager presented a communication dated May 18, 1966, from Mr. William J. Stark, Dairy Valley City Manager, suggesting a meeting of interested parties involved in the law suit with the Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc. The City Attorney suggested that an executive session be held to discuss the pending litigation. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, to declare a recess at 3:50 p.m. in order to meet in executive session with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning pending litigation. The Mayor called the meeting ~ck to order at 3:58 p.m., all City Councilmen being present. May 23, 1966 20O RECESS: It was moved by Counmlman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried, to declare a recess at 3:58 p.m. in order for the City Council to attend the ground breaking ceremonies for the Cypress Civic Center. The meeting was called back to order at 4:45 p.m., all City Councilmen being present. CONTINUATION OF COMMUNICATION FROM CITY OF DAIRY VALLEY RE: JOINT MEETING CONCERNING FERTILIZER PLANT LITIGATION: Further discussion was held concerning the suggestion of the City of Dairy Valley that a meeting be held of the parties involved in the law suit with the Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, to direct the City Manager to advise the City of Dairy Valley that due to the schedules of trials on this matter, a joint meeting at this time would not be possible; however, the City Council would be willing to meet with the City of Dairy Valley at some future date. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Mayor Noe stated that he would like to appoint Mr. John Smith, 9399 Esther Street, Cypress, to fill the unexpired term of Carl De Pietro on the Cypress Planning Conm~ission. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, to approve the appointment of Mr. John Smith, 9399 Esther Street, Cypress, to fill the unexpired term of Carl De Pietro on the Cypress Planning Commission, said term expiring on August 5, 1966. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None Mayor Noe further stated that he would like to appoint Mr. Ernest Holden, 10711Ritter Street, Cypress, to fill the unexpired term of Robert Harvey on the Planning Commission. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, to approve the appointment of Mr. Ernest Holden, 10711Ritter Street, Cypress, to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Robert Harvey on the Cypress Planning Commission, said term expiring on August 5, 1968. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO CITY COLORS, MOTTO, AND CITY ENTRANCE SIGN COMMITTEE: Upon the request of the Mayor, the following persons were named to serve on the City Color, Motto, and Entrance Sign Committee: Councilman Robert Harvey selected Mrs. Janet Taylor, 6612 Reefton; Councilman McCarney selected Mrs. Roger York~ 9522 Walker; Councilman Bowen selected Mrs. Jean Smith, 9399 Esther; Councilman Kanel selected Mr. Robert Cardoza, 6091 Lee Drive; and Mayor Noe selected Mr. Clarence Parker, 10172 Angela. 1966-67 BUDGET FOR 2107 GAS TAX FUNDS: A report dated May 19, 1966, was presented from the City Manager, outlining the budget for the estimated expenditures to be made from the 2107 gas tax funds for the next fiscal year, and recommending a~option of the Resolutions which establish the budgets for maintenance, construction, and engineering funds. May 23, 1966 Following discussion concerning the proposed budgets, it was moved by Councilman Bowen, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to adopt the following Resolution, title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 696 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS ADOPTING AND SUBMITTING A BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE }IIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: None It was moved by Councilman Bowen, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried, to adopt the following Resolution, title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 697 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS ADOPTING AND SUBMITTING A BUDGET FOR' EXPENDITURE OF STATE ALLOCATED (ENGINEERING) FUNDS. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: None APPROVAL OF PLd~NS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS--MOODY AND MYRA PARK SITE DEVELOPMENT: A report dated May 19, 1966, was presented from the City Manager, outlining the mxt phase of development of the Moody and Myra Park site, which includes the installa- tion of the complete drainage system, earth walks, redwood headers, and turfing. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, to approve the Plans and Specifications for this work and authorize the City Clerk to advertise for bids to be received on June 10, 1966, at 10:00 a.m. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN CYPRESS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT AND CITY OF CYPRESS RE: PURCHASE OF FENCING: A report dated May 19, 1966, was presented from the City Manager, stating that the City Attorney has prepared the amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement between the Cypress Park and Recreation District and the City of Cypress for the purchase of outfield fencing for the ball fields at the Community Sports Center, as requested at the last City Council meeting. The report further outlined a recent suggestion by the Park and Recreation District Director that snow fencing supported by metal stakes <'c~uld be used in the same manner at a considerable savings to the City. Councilman Bowen stated that he is familiar with the snow fencing and feels it would be adequate at this time since the ultimate development plans for the park have not yet been finalized. Councilman Kanel stated that representatives from one of the organization's presently using the Community Sports Center would be presentat the evening portion of the City Council meeting and suggested continuing this matter until that time. May 23, 1966 Councilman Harvey suggested that since the Federal Little League had originally offered to contribute to the purchase of the outfield fencing, that perhaps the lower price of the snow fencing would enable them to purchase the fencing themselves. Councilman Kanel took exception to this suggestion, stating that he feels individual groups should not purchase equipment to be used on government property. Following further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and carried, to continue consideration of this matter until the 7:30 p.m. portion of the meeting. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 3 NOES: 2 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: Bowen and Harvey COUNCILMEN: None STUDY OF RELOCATION ORDINANCE: A report dated May 19, 1966, was presented from the City Manager, stating that the Planning Commission has requested that a recommendation be forwarded to the City Council to authorize the staff to conduct a study of the provisions of the existing sections of the City Code relating to the relocation of buildings, for possible revisions to the Code. It was moved by Councilman Bowen, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to direct the staff to make a complete study of the need for amendment to the City Code relating to the relocation of buildings. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO CITY PERSONNEL SYSTEM: A report dated May 19, 1966, was presented from the City Manager, reviewing various changes recommended in the Personnel Chapter of the City Code and in the Resolutions establish- ing the rules and regulations for the administration of the personnel system and providing for the basic compensation plan for City employees. The City Manager further advised that the proposed changes to the City Code and the Personnel Resolution require a Public Hearing prior to adoption. The proposed amendment to the wage and salary Resolution, which does not require a public hearing, provides that all existing overtime must be either paid or compensatory time off be taken on or before July 1st of each fiscal year, thereby eliminating the costly accumulation of overtime. Discussion ensued concerning the overtime po~cies of the City. Police Chief George Savord outlined the problem of accumulated overtime in the POlice Department. Following further discussion, it was moved by' Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to continue consideration of this matter until the 7:30 p.m. portion of the meeting and to declare a recess at the hour of 5:46 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. CALL ~0 ORDER: The Mayor called the meeting back to order at 7:30 p.m. with the following in attendance: PRESENT: Councilmen Bowen, Harvey, McCarney, and Noe ABSENT: Councilman Kanel Also present were City Manager/City Clerk Darrell Essex, City Attorney James Erickson, Public Works Director Arthur Schatzeder, Administrative Assistant Darrell Dalton, Building Superintendent Tom Nudson, Police Chief George Savord, and Planning Commission Secretary George Putnam. The City Manager reviewed the actions taken by the City Council at the 3:00 p.m. session of the meeting. COUNCILMAN KANEL ARRIVED AT 7:32 P.M. AND~3OK HIS CHAIR ON THE PODIUM ........ MaJg3~ 1966 203 CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: FLY BREEDING AT 6411-6461 ORANGE AVENUE: The Mayor announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the Public Hearing to determine whether the breeding of flies at 6411-6461 Orange Avenue, Cypress, is in violation of Chapter 13, Article II Fly Control, of the Cypress City Code, and to further determine whether nor not the Health Officer may abate said condition, as requested by Joe Mello, 6411-6461 Orange Avenue, Cypress. The Mayor declared the Public Hearing open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the fly abatement. The City Manager reviewed the actions of the City Council at the May 2nd meeting, at which time Mr. Mello had indicated that the dairy operation at the subject location would be removed by May 20, 1966. Mr. Fred King, Supervising Sanitarian for the Orange County Health Department, addressed the Council, stating that the dairy was abandoned as of May 20, 1966, however Mr. King advised that there is still manure on the property containing sufficient moisture to cause a fly breeding problem. He further indicated that the present owners, the North Orange County Junior College District, had indicated an interest in spreading the manure in other areas of the proposed junior college Site, which would be an acceptable solution to the problem. Mr. Wheatley, representing the North Orange County Junior College District, addressed the Council, stating that the District is in the process of awarding a contract for site development and work would be underway almost immediately. Mr. Wayne Worley, 6412 Orange Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Council, stating that he lives across from the subject property and has noticed a great reduction in the amount of flies. There being no further oral communications and no written communications, the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. It was moved by Councilman McCarney.and seconded by Councilman Bowen to determine, on the basis of the report from the Health Department representative, that no abatement proceedings will be required on the property at 6411-6461 Orange Avenue, Cypress, if the present owner distributes the manure in a manner acceptable to the Health Department. Prior to voting on this motion, further discussion was held. Councilman Kanel stated he was not in favor of this motion in that the dairy had already been given three weeks to l~PLove the situation and in his opinion the manure should be removed. Councilman Harvey stated that since Mr. King is a professional man, he would be willing to accept his description and recommendation concerning the subject property. Councilman Kanel stated that Mr. King had also ~dicated that a fly breeding problem does exist on the property. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 NOES: 1 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, McCatney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: Kanel COUNCILMEN: None PUBLIC HEARING RE: SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE UNICORN RESTAURANT: The Mayor announced this was the time and place for the Public Hearing to consider an application for Special Permit to allow dancing by the patrons at the Unicorn Restaurant, 5960 Cerritos Avenue, Cypress, as requested by Allan Roberrs, 3251 Mainway Street, Los Alamitos, California. The Mayor declared the Public Hearing open and requested the City Manager to submit his report concerning the subject application. A report dated May 19, 1966, was presented from the City Manager, stating that inasmuch as the original application was submitted without complete information, the Police Department has not been able to complete its investigation of the persons who would be in charge of the restaurant and cocktail lounge while dancing is taking place, and for this reason the Police Department has requested that this Public Hearing be continued until June 13, 1966, at which time a complete report will be available. May 23, 1966 The Mayor asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the subject application. Mr. Allan Roberts, applicant, addressed the Council, stating that he felt the Police Department had enough time to complete their investigation and questioned what additional information would be required. Mr. John Leneker, Acting President of the Cypress Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Council, stating that he feels dancing at the Unicorn Restaurant would be beneficial to the City of Cypress in providing the citizens with a local establishment in which to dance. In answer to questions from Councilman Kanel, the applicant, Mr. Roberts, explained the location of the proposed ~nce floor, stating that i~ would be a portable floor. Further discussion was held concerning the investigation required prior to issuance of the permit for dancing. The City Manager expl~ined that all persons responsible for the management or supervision of the business must be investigated and further stated that the Police Department has not been able to obtain sufficient information concerning all of the individuals involved in the operation of the Unicorn Restaurant. Mr. Allan Roberrs again addressed the Council, reviewing occasions in the past relating to the installation of a sign, the painting of the curbs adjacent to his place of business, and the operation of the Police Department in relation to his business, stating that in his opinion ~e City has fought him and that he would not pay graft to anyone. Mr. Roberrs also stated that the City Manager had told him that there were other ways of handling his request. The City Manager stated that he wished to clarify the statements made by Mr. Roberts, regarding the processing of his request for a dance permit. Mr. Roberts had originally requested this dance permit at a time when the zoning ordinance prohibited dancing in a C-2 zone in which the Unicorn Restaurant property was located. An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance allowing dancing in the C-2 zone was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council and in an effort to accommodate Mr. Roberts, he was advised that the application would be accepted following the second reading of the Ordinance amendment relating to dancing. Under this procedure, the City Council if it determined that the permit was to be granted could approve the application subject to the effective date of the Zoning Ordinance amendment. Mr. Essex further emphasized that at no time was any statement made to Mr. Roberts that the dance permit could be obtained in any manner other than through the City Council under the procedures ~et forth in the Special Permit Ordinance. Councilman Kanel stated that he has known Mr. Roberts for some time and felt that the inferences made by Mr. Roberts were not intended. Mr. Jack Leneker ag~h addressed the Council, stating that he felt the inferences made by Mr. Roberrs could be attributed to his character as an aggresive businessman seeking a permit and requested that the City Council give favorable consideration to his reqhest. The City Manager requested Police Chief Savord to present additional information on the status of the required investigation. Police Chief Savord addressed the Council, stating that he had requested a continuation of the subject Public Hearing in order to obtain information from Mr. Roberts concerning his employees which is required in order to comply with the Special Permit Ordinance. He stated that the Police Department investigators had been unsuccessful in their attempts to obtain the required information from Mr. Roberts. Chief Savord emphasized that the Police Department has no allegations to make against Mr. Roberts, but simply need additional time to investigate the application. Mrs. May Roberts addressed the Council, stating that she felt the investigation conducted by the State in issuing the Alcoholic Beverage License should be sufficient and in her opinion the employees should not be involved in the investigation. The Police Chief replied that the City Code requires an ~vestigation by the Police Department of all persons involved in the management or operation of the establishment. May 23, 1966 City Attorney James Erickson reviewed the City Ordinance regulating the issuance of Special Permits by the City Council, with particular reference to the investigation required by the Police Department. He also adViSed that according to the Ordinance, the City Council must take action on the request within 30 days of the filing of the application. The Police Chief advised the Council that on the original application, a great deal of the required information was not included by Mr. Roberts, and for this reason the application had been returned for more complete information. The Police Chief suggested the possibility of the City Council continuing this matter until later in the meeting, to allow him an opportunity to determine if the required information has now been submitted to the Police Department. It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried, to continue this Public Hearing until later in the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING RE:~ REVISION TO DRAINAGE DISTRICT 3-SQ OF THE MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE: The Mayor announced this was the time and place for the Public Hearing to consider a proposed revision of Drainage District 3-SQ of the Master Plan of Drainage, which District is bounded generally on the northwest by the Bolsa Chica Channel; on the north by a line approximately 600 feet north of the centerline of Orangewood Avenue~ onthe east by Knott Street~ and on the south and west by the Cypress City boundary, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission. The Mayor declared the Public Hearing open and requested the staff to present its report concerning the proposed amendment. The City Manager reported that the affidavits of publication and posting of the Notice of the Public Hearing were on file in the Office of the City Clerk and no communications had been received concerning the subject amendment to the Master Plan of Drainage. Public Works Director Art Schatzeder reviewed the engineering study completed by the Public Works Department and summarized the following recommendations for~avisions to Drainage District 3-SQ: (1) Installation of an underground conduit system rather than an open channel; (2) Deletion of the underground box conduit in Orangewood Avenue from the ~lsa Chica Channel to approximately 1,320 feet west of Valley View, since this facility will be installed by the Orange County Flood Control District; (3) updating of construction costs to conform with revised facilities; and (4) deletion of portions of the present District which are outside of the City limits. He further indicated that the estimated total cost of the facilities ncessary for the underground drainage system would be $342,400.00, which would provide for an acreage charge in this district of $1,070.00 as compared to the present $660.00 per acre ~harge for the construction of an open channel. In answer to questions from Councilman Harvey, the Public Works Director stated that ~he alternate to the proposed underground system would be an ~en channel, with a $960 per acre charge, assuming that the City could obtain the required dedication. Further discussion ensued concerning the advantages of an underground system. The b~yor asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposed Amendment to Drainage District 3-SQ. Mr. Anthony Palmitessa, 10182 Pimlico, Cypress, addressed the Council, inquiring as to the need for this amendment. The PuBlic Works Director reviewed the City's Master Plan of Drainage and the manner of assessment of drainage fees. Mr. Palmitessa stated that he is in favor of the amendment since it will not be a cost to the City. There being no oral protests and no written communications, the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman Kanel inquired concerning the Planning Commission's discussions on the ~oposed amendment, noting that the Resolution recommending approval of the amendment had not been adopted by a unanimou~ vote of the Planning Commission. Secretary of the Planning Commission George Putnam indicated that the difference of opinion partially concerned the recommendation for an underground system and the possibility that the higher drainage fee could discourage development of the property. May 23, 1966 Following further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, the following Resolution be adopted, title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 698 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THAT PORTION OF THE MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE AFFECTING DRAINAGE DISTRICT 3-SQ The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be read by title only, title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING SECTION 25-23 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS TO AMEND THE DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT FEE FOR DRAINAGE DISTRICT 3-SQ AND RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO. 3-6 It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, this Ordinance pass its first reading. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 NOEB: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None PUBLIC HEARING RE: OBJECTIONS TO 1966 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM: The Mayor announced this was the time and place for the Public Hearing to consider any objections to the proposed removal of we~ds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt, as noted in Resolution No. 689 declaring public nuisances and the intention to abate. The Mayor declared the Public Hearing open and requested the City Manager to present his report concerning this matter. The City Manager stated that the affidavits of publication a~d posting of the Notice of Public Hearing were on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and that written communications had been received from the following (1) Edwin F. and Bernice McKell Brown, stating that arrangements had been made for the cleaning of their property; (2) North Orange County Junior College District, requesting deferment of weed abatement on the Cypress Junior College property since development work on the site will begin shortly; and (3) Mr. D. L. Norgren, 6063 Fred Drive, Cypress, stating that the weed problem on his property had been abated. In addition the Public Works Director has received verbal notification from the Larwin Company and the Cypress School District that their properties will be cleaned. The City Manager further reported that he had received a verbal request from Mr. Pete Van Ruiten that he be allowed to do his own abatement work sometime following the date on which the City contractor will begin work. Mrs. Mason Boston addressed the Council, stating that she does not object to the City's removal of weeds on her property, however last year the weed abatement contractor removed rock, dirt, and fill, and she does not want this type of material removed this year. Mr. Leonard Malitz, 4508 Lemon, Cypress, addressed the Council, stating that he had removed the wee~ from his property and was in the process of landscaping his yard. Mr. Wayne Worley, 6412 Orange Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Council, inquir- ing as to who is responsible for theposting of properties which require weed abatement, stating that the property next to his at 6452 Orange should have been posted. The Public Works Director advised Mr. Worley that the weed abatement contract is responsible for posting of the property. Mr. Worley emphasized that the subject property is a definite fire hazard in its present condition. ........... ~La~ 23~ 1966 In answer to an inquiry from Mrs. Mason Boston, the City Manager reviewed the unit prices for weed abatement work to be performed by the weed abatement contractor. Mr. Leonard Malitz, 4508 Lemon, again addressed the Council, stating that property at the intersection of Denni and Orange contains a large pile of rubbish. The Public Works Director replied that this property had been posted for abatement. In answer to a question from Mr. Bob Smith, of the Anaheim Bulletin, the City Manager stated that the Weed Abatement Contract is under the control of the City and that photographs of each lot are taken prior to the actual start of cleaning operations and in addition an inspection is made by the City's Public Works Inspector to ascertain the need for cleaning of each parcel. In answer to a question from Mr. Anthony Palmitessa, 10182 Pimltco, Cypress, the City Attorney advised that the weed abatement contractor can enter private property due to the fact that the existence of weeds and rubbish constitutes a public nuisance, which therefore gives the City the authority to enter the property for removal of the nuisances. Mr. Nick Ermolemko, 4291 Myra Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Council, inquiring as to the size weeds must reach prior to being considered a nuisance. The City Attorney explained that there is no exact size, but they must be such that the inspector determines that they would constitute a fire hazard or a nuisance. Mr. Ermolemko stated that he has planted his lot twice without success and has recently been attemptl~g to remove the weeds, so would request an additional three weeks in which to complete the removal. At the request of the City Council, the City Manager read into the record Page 4 of the proposed Resolution ordering theabatement of the nuisances, said page having been inadvertently~itted from the material submitted to the City Council for consideration. Mr. R. J. Callanan, 4422 Marion Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Council, stating that h~ front yard is landscaped and his back yard is planted with various types of greenery, including tomatoes, 1 rhubarb, and beans. Mr. Callanan stated that an error had been made in posting his property. There being no further oral protests and w~itten communications, the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. The City Manager requested that the City Council express its desire concerning the action to be taken on those properties discussed during the Public Hearing. With reference to the requests from the School Districts, he stated that the staff feels that such public agencies should be allowed to complete their own work if desired. He also suggested the possibility of bonds being posted by other property owners to guarantee the weed abatement work. Further discussion ensued concerning the time periods involved for cleaning of the weeds. Councilman Harvey stated he feels individuals who have contacted the City expressing a desire to do the work themselves should be given some consideration. Councilman Kanel suggested the possibility of defering work on those properties mentioned in the Public Hearing for approximately 20 days; however, the Public Works Director pointed out that this would be an additional burden upon the Weed Abatement Contractor. The Public Works Director stated that he understands portions of the Junior College site are not included in their pending contract for development, and inquired if these should be subject to abatement. Mr. Wheatley, representing the Junior College District, advised that the only area not included in the pending development was located in the un~nzorporated area of the County. Further discussion ensued concerning the various properties discussed during the public hearing, following which it was moved by CQuncilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, to adopt the following Resolution, deleting the following from Exhibit "A" of the Resolution: May 23, 1966 208 Roll No. Owner Lot Code Map Page Parcel Book 159 Palmitess~ Anthony 162 19-006 78 443 21 178 Callanan, Richard J. 123 19-004 78 544 2 361 Stardust Lands, Inc.(Malitz) 21 19-001 244 013 30 Title of the Resolution is as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 699 A RESOLUTION OF Tile CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DECLARING THAT WEEDS GROWING UPON AND IN FRONT OF, AND RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT UPON AND IN FRONT OF CERTAIN PRIVATE PROPERTY IN THE CITY ARE A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND ORDERING THE ABATEMENT THEREOF The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: Nnne COUNCILMEN: None Following further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to determine that abatement has taken place as provided for by Resolution No. 699 if either a cash deposit or bond is posted, or in the case of the Public Districts there is ample evidence of a contract to remove the weeds, on the property owned by the following: Mr. D. L. Norgren, Mr. and Mrs. Edwin F. Brown, Mr. Peter Van Ruiten, Mr. Nicholas Ermolemko, the North Orange County Junior College District, the Cypress School District, and the Larwin Company. The bond shall be posted within ten days, guaranteeing that the work will be completed within 20 days from the date of this hearing. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None The City Attorney advised that with this action, if a bond is not posted within the ten days, the contractor can proceed to remove the weeds from the subject properties. In answer to a question from the City Manager, the City Attorney stated that the provision for a bond being posted would only be allowed for those individuals listed in the motion, and not for individuals which may request future consideration. RECESS: Mayor Noe declared a recess at the hour of 9:53 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 10:00 p.m., all City Councilmen being present. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW DANCING AT THE UNICORN RESTAURANT: The Mayor announced this was the time for continuation of the Public Hearing to consider an application for Special Permit to allow dancing by the patrons at the Unicorn Restaurant, and requested the Police Chief to present his finds on this matter. Police Chief Savord stated that during the week of May 9, 1966, he received the application for a Special Permit to allow dancing, and determining that the application was incomplete and returned the form for further details to be included. On May 17th, the POlice Department received the completed application, following which the Detective contacted Mr. Roberts to obtain additional information concerning the various individuals listed on the application as being charged with the management and operation of the Unicorn. Mr. Roberrs advised that he was too busy and requested the detective to come back at another time. Further attempts to contact Mr. Roberrs being unsuccessful, the Police Department by utilizing another method, proceeded to conduct a background check on the various employees, some of which have not yet been completed. Chief Savord emphasized that it was not his intention to inconvenience Mr. Roberts, but merely wanted additional time in which to adequately comply with the Ordinance which required investigation. May 23, 1966 209 It was moved by Councilman Harvey and seconded by Councilman McCarney, to continue the Public Hearing concerning this matter until the City Council meeting of 3une 13, 1966. Prior to voting on this motion, further discussion was held. In answer to a question from the City Manager, the City Attorney stated that the 30 day time period in which the City Council must take action could be deemed, in this case, to begin as of May 16, 1966, the date ou which the completed application was filed. Councilman Harvey's motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe None None CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN CYPRESS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT AND CITY OF CYPRESS RE: PURCHASE OF FENCING: A report dated May 19, 1966, was again presented from the City Manager concerning the amendment authorized to the Joint Powers Agreement between the Cypress Park and Recreation District and the City for the purchase of outfield fencing for the ball fields at the Community Sports Center, and outlining the recent suggestion by the Park and Recreation District Director that snow fencing could be used in the same manner at a lesser cost to the City. In answer to an inquiry from Councilman Harvey, the City Manager stated that he understands that the snow fencing can be used in other areas if the additional holes and staking materials were available. Mr. Robert Lopez, 5602 Bishop Street, Cypress, addressed the Council, stating that the proposed snow fencing is merely a picket fence secured with woven wire, and indicated that the City could not ~ expected to gain more than two years of use out of this type of fencing. He also stated that the snow fencing is a hazard for children. In answer to a question from Councilman Kanel, Mr. Louis Selby, 5204 Melbourne Drive, Cypress, President of the Federal Little League, addressed the Council, stating that Mr. Bryant, Director of the Park and Recreation District was in favor of the permanent type of outfield fencing approved at the last City Council meeting. He stated that since that time, Mr. Bryant had reconsidered this matter and suggested the snow fencing. Further discussion ensued concerning the possibility of a parking lot being installed by the Federal Little League at the Community Sports Center. Mr. Tom Fitzgerald, 10211Angela Avenue, Cypress, addressed the Council, stating that he feels a parking lot should not be installed on property which may never be available for purchase. Mr. Selby again addressed the Counc~, outlining future plans for a permanent recreation building being built on the property. Mr. Fitzgerald addressed the Council, outlining the malicious mischief which has occurred in the community sports center as of this time, and stated that the proposed snow fencing would probably not last long. Mr. Fitzgerald stated that the Federal Little League had offered to pay for half of the permanent outfield fencing if the City would purchase the remainder. In answer to a question from Councilman Harvey, Mr. Fitzgerald indicated that the Federal Little League would be eligible for tournament play if the fencing is installed. Mr. Louis Selby again addressed the Council, stating that there is a possibility of the North Orange County Junior College District utilizing the Community Sports Center for the baseball diamonds. He also stated that there were various facilities which had been allocated in the budget for development of the Community Sports Center which to date have not been completed. Following further discussion, it was moved by Councilman McCarney and seconded by Councilman Kanel to authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement providing for the $4,000 appropriation for the purchase of outfield fencing for the Community Sports Center. Prior to voting on this motion, further discussion was held. May 23, 1966 Councilman Harvey inquired if the Little League had investigated the possibility of obtaining the use of private property for development of little league diamonds. Mr. Selby stated that this would be an ideal situation but he had not found individuals who would be willing to initiate such a development. Councilman Harvey suggested that the Federal Little League officials contact the City of Long Beach to see what condi- tions were imposed on the little league to permit the erection of diamonds, with reference to purchase of fencing, equipment, etc. Councilman Harvey further stated that he feels the expenditure of $4,000 for the purchase of fly spray equipment, which would be of benefit to the entire community, would be more appropriate than expendiDg it for a small group of little league individuals. He emphasized that he is not opposed to fencing the little league diamonds, but would prefer to see the less expensive snow fencing. Councilman Kanel inquired if the new Councilmen had been advised of the recent negotiations concerning moneys received by the City for recreational purposes, indicating that he felt this should be taken into consideration in this decision. Councilman McCarney's motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 2 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Kanel, McCarney, and Noe Bowen and Harvey None Mr. Louis Selby again addressed the Council, emphasizing that there has been good cooperation among the various community organizations concerning the use of the Community Sports Center. CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO CITY PERSONNEL SYSTEM: A report dated May 19, 1966, was again presented from the City Manager, outlining various proposed amendments to the Ordinance and Resolutions concerning the City's Personnel System. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to instruct the City Clerk to advertise for a Public Hearing concerning the proposed amendments to the Personnel sections of Chapter 18 of the Cypress City Code and concerning Resolution No. 379 establishing the personnel rules and regulations for the City, said Public Hearing to be held at the City Council meeting of June 13, 1966, and also to continue to the same meeting, consideration of the Resolution amending Resolution No. 607, Section 4, regarding the Basic Compensation Plan of all employees. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe None None MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR APRIL 1966: It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to receive and file the Monthly A~ivity Report for April 1966. MONTHLY VARIANCE REPORT OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES FOR APRIL 1966: It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to receive and file the Monthly Variance Report of Receipts and Expenditures for April 1966. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL WARRANT LISTw WARRANTS NO. 14222 AND 14224 THROUGH 14280: It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried, to approve the Payroll Warrant List for the Period ending May 15, 1966, Warrants No. 14222 and 14224 through 14280, in the total amount of $13,998.42. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe None None APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL WARRANT LIST~ WARRANTS NO. 14223 and 14281 THROUGH 14318: It was moved by Counc~man Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, to approve the Commercial Warrant List for Warrants No. 14223 and 14281 through 14318 in the total amount of $16,923.20. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe None None ........... M. ay 23, 1966 SECOND READING ORDINANCE RE: FLY CONTROL: It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be read by title only, title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 311 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE II OF THE CYPRESS CITY CODE, RELATING TO FLY CONTROL AND PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH It was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried, this Ordinance be adopted. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe None None SECOND READING ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90 RE: FENCES ON REVERSE CORNER LOTS: It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, the following Ordinance be read by title only, title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 312 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, "SECTION 125.9 WALL, FENCE OR HEDGE MAY BE MAINTAINED:" BY ADDING A PROVISION ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION AND/OR MAINTENANCE OF A WALL, FENCE OR HEDGE ON THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE ON THE STREET SIDE OF A REVERSE CORNER LOT It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, this Ordinance be adopted. The following roll call vote was taken: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, McCarney, and Noe None None RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION AND PRESENTATION OF CO~4UNITY SERVICE PLAQUE TO FORMER COUNCILMAN PETER D. GORZEMAN: The City Manager advised that Mr. Gorzeman could not be present to personally accept the Resolution and Plaque commending this community service, and recommended that the City Council proceed to adopt the Resolution. It was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and unanimously carried, the following Resolution be adopted, title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 700 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS COMMENDING MR. PETER D. GORZEMAN FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY COMMUNICATION FROM CITY CHAIRMAN FOR "RONALD REAGAN FOR GOVERNOR" RE: WELCOME OF CANDIDATE TO CYPRESS: It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Kanel, and unanimously carried, to consider this communication at this time. The City Manager presented a communication dated May 21, 1966, from Dr. Harris Shapero, City Chairman for Ronald Reagan for Governor, inviting the City Council members and City staff to meet Ronald Reagan on his visit to Cypress on May 28, 1966, at 3:00 p.m. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman McCarney, and carried, this communication be received and filed. In answer to a question from Councilman Kanel, the City Manager stated that this invitation was for the Councilmen who wish to attend and welcome Mr. Reagan to the City. Councilman Kanel stated he felt it would be proper for the Mayor to officially greet him on a non-partisan basis. May 23, 1966 212 Councilman Kanel requested the staff to investigate the statements that were made during the meeting regarding the facilities which have been budgeted for but not purchased for the Community Sports Center. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications presented at this time. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the City Council, it was moved by Councilman McCarney, seconded by Councilman Harvey, and unanimously carried, the meeting adjournat 10:58 p.m. E CIT~ OF CYPRESS ATTEST: CITY~C~-~K'~gF~THE tITY OF CYPRESS May 23, 1966