Loading...
Minutes 70-02-09MINUTES OF A REGUALR MEETING OF THE CYPRESS CITY COUNCIL HELD February 9, 1970 The regular meeting of the Cypress City Council was called to order at 4:00 p.m., on Monday, February 9, 1970 in the City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Mayor Delno G. Kanodepresiding. PRESENT: Councilmen Bowen, Kanel and Kenode ABSENT: Councilmen Harvey and Nee Also present were City Manager/City Clerk Dartell Essex, City Attorney James E. Erickson, and the followin8 members of the City Staff: Dunlap, Grissom, Peerthor and Schatzeder~ MINUTES: It was moved by CouncilmanKanel, seconded by Councilman Bowen and unanimously carried to defer consideration of the Minutes of the meetings of January 24, 1970 and January 26, 1970 until the evening session of the City Council meeting. COUNCILMAN HARVEY ARRIVED AT 4:02 P.M. AND TOOK HIS PLACE ON THE PODIbM. Upon the request of the City Manager, it was moved by Councilman Bowen, seconded by Councilman Kanel and unanimously carried to place consideration of an agreement between the Larwin Company and the City of Cypress for inclusion of the improvements required to be installed by Larwin Company on Moody Street in the City's Street Improvements Project on the agenda at this time. The City Manager indicated that Larwin Company is required to improve a section of Moody Street as a condition of approval of Division of Land No. 19 and has requested that the City include the improvements required to be installed by Larwin Company in its street improvement project for this area. Larwin Company will advance funds in the amount of $6,100 to cover the costof their improvements and this amount will be deducted from the original bond amount posted to guarantee im- provements in connection with Division of Land No. 19. The City Attorney advised that he has reviewed the form of the proposed Agreement and finds it satisfactory. In response to an inquiry from Councilman Bowen, the Public Works Director reviewed the scheduling of the City's Arterial Highway Financing Project on Moody. It was moved by Councilman Bowen and seconded by Councilman Kanel to approve the Agreement with Larwin Company for inclusion of the street improvements required in connection with Division of Land No. 19 in the City's Arterial Highway Financing Project on Moody Street, Phase II of Street Project No. 6901-10-0445, and to authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest the Agreement on behalf of the City. The motion was uz~animously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMAN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel and Kanode None. Nee It was moved by Councilman Kanel and seconded by Councilman BoweO to authorize a reduction in the a~ount of the bond posted in connection with DivSsion of Land No. 19 in the amount o~ $6,100, which is the cost of the M~ody Streetimprovements, which has been forwarded by Larwin Company. The motion was unanimously carried by the following rollcall vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel and Kenode NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMAN: Nee The City Manager advised that the term of Mr. Jerry Mullet as a member of the Advisory Traffic Comittee would expire on March 11, 1970, following which it was moved by City Council Minutes February 9, 1970 Councilmmn Harvey, seconded by Councilman Bowen and unanimously carried to place this matter on the agenda for consideration at this time. Mayor Kanode indicated that he would wish to reappoint Mr. Jerry Mullen to the Advisory Traffic Committee for a two-year term. It was moved by Councilman Bowen and seconded by Councilman Harvey to concur in the Mayor's reappointment of Mr. Jerry Mullen to the Advisory Traffic Committee for a two-year term to expire on March 11, 1972. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel and Kanode NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMAN: Noe The City Manager reviewed a request which has been received from the Larwin Company for authorization to erect a proto-type house within the City Of CypresS. This type of structure is an attempt to develop and test new types of materials, portions of which will be prefabricated. The City Manager indicated that since many of the materials which will be tested in this proto-type house are not covered in the specific code sections utilized by the City, Larwin Company has been requested to post a bond in the amount of $3,000 for removal of the structure in the event the proto-type house does not meet the requirements imposed on general construction. At this time, the City Manager reviewed a memorandum from the Building Superintendent explaining the concept of the proto-type house and suggesting various conditions and methods of control to be in~osed upon the construction of this type of structure. The City Attorney indicated that while experimental materials do not fall within the Building Code, there is a provision that building officials can permit slternate materials to be used if they feel that they are similar to those authorized by the Building Code. He further reviewed the provisions of the proposed Agreement which indicated that the proto-type house would not be sold prior to the end of a five-year testing period. General discussion ensued in regard to the concept of a proto-type house and the effect it would have on the property values and general aesthetics in the area in which it was to be located. In response to an inquiry from Councilman Kanel, the City Manager advised that the $3,000 bond would cover the cost of relocating the dwelling in the event it was not considered a compatible type of construction. The City Manager further explained that this house could not be sold during the five-year experimental period. In response to an inquiry from Councilman Harvey, the City Manager advised that the tenant of the house would be aware that it was an experimental structure and that continuous inspections would be made of the house. Councilman Harvey expressed his concern over potential problems of incompatibility which later may be raised in regard to a house of this type if inspections were not properly conducted. In response to an inquiry from Councilman Kanel, the City Attorney advised that a factory-designed and constructed structure would be subject to State inspection; however, the subject proto-type house would be subJect only to inspection by City officials. In response to a question from Councilman Harvey relative to the criteria to be established which would provide Justification for the house being removed or allowed to remain, the City Manager advised that the periodical inspections made by the Building Department would provide evidence as to whether or not the materials used in the house would be compatible with the surrounding homes in the community. He further advised that the only way in which this determination could be made would be through the development of the experimental house. The City Manager also explained that the reason for removing such a house would be that it is structurally unsound; however, the City Council may impose any other criteria for removal. - 2 - City~qf~cil Minutes February 9, 1970 FollOwing general discussion as to the criteria which could be established for Justification for removalof the homes, it was generally agreed that this matter would be.continued until the next City Council meeting with tha various conditions which could be imposed upon this structure to be presented at that time for considera- tion by the City Council. The,CityManager presented the Council with the Statement of Financial Interest forms tobe submitted to the County Clerk by all city officials, along with the City Attorney's Opinion regarding these statements. The City Attorney reviewed differences which have arisen between his opinion, which was the opinion agreed upon by all Orange County City Attorneys, the County Counsel and the District Attorney, and the opinion which has been given by the State Attorney General. Basically, the Orange County City Attorneys have agreed that an individual need not list the actual value of an investment over $10,000, while the State Attorney General feels that the exact amount should be indicated~ Also, the Attorney General has indicated that if an official does not have assets over $10,000 he need not file a financial statement, while the Orange County City Attorneys feel that an individual should file the financial statement regardless of whether he has assets over $10,000. The City Attorney further indicated that a case regarding this matter is pending in the City of Carmel which when decided will clarify some of the provisions of the newly-enacted State Law. The City Attorney also reviewed the requirements for filing not only the financial disclosure statement but also the political contributions and ca~aign statements which are required to be filed by City Council candidates. He further advised that the Council would be apprised of any additional information which occurs in regard to the filing requirements of these statements. Mr. Charles Bryant, Director of the Cypress Recreation and Park District, addressed the Council introducing Mr. Marvin DiCarlo, the Intern for the Cypress Recreation and Park District~ who is completing his requirements in the Recreation Study Program at Fresno State College~ The City Manager reviewed the rasults of the meeting held to form a citizens' committee in support of the propose~ Park Bond Issue and indicated' that several questionnaires were received during and after the meeting, which indicated that a number of citizens were interested in supporting the Park Bond Issue° General discussion ensued relative to the formation of a citizens' committee in favor of the Park Bond Issue and it was generally agreed to contact Messrs~ Earl Zynda and Jerry Mullen to determine their interest in serving as co-chairmen of this committee. Discussion was held relative to the effect the recent Los Angeles Times' article regarding the proposal for the Naval Air Station to close its operation would have on the City's attempts to relocate the Naval Air Station and it was agreed that the City would continue its efforts to relocate the facility in view of the possibility of the Navy appealing the decision of the Defense Department in this metter~ The City Manager indicated that the recent announcement has had no impact on the Veterans and Federal Housing Administrations' decision to refuse to finance the construction of Tract 6657, which is near the landing pattern of the Air Station. Hefurther indicated that the announcement has had no impact on the Los Alamitos Naval Air Station officials' plans to proceed with the extension of the runways° Upon the request of the Mayor, it was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilmen Bowen and unanimously carried to place consideration of a communication dated February 5, 1970 from the Woman's Club of Cypress on the agenda for considera- tion at this time. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM THE WOMAN'S CLUB OF CYPRESS RE: PROCLAMATION OF BEAUTIFICATION WEEK AIqD BEAUTIFICATION DEDICATION SUNDAY: The Mayor read in full a communication dated February 5, 1970, from Mrs. 3ohn C, Leneker, President of the Woman's Club of Cypress, requesting the City Council to proclaim the week of April 12-19, 1970, as "Beautification Week" and to declare April 19, 1970 as "Beautification Dedication Sunday" in the City of Cypress. - 3- City Co~mcil Minutes February 9, 1970 It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Kanel and unanimously carried to proclaim April 12-19, 1970, as "Beautification Week" and to proclaim April 19, 1970 as "Beautification Dedication Sunday" in the City of Cypress. Mayor K~node reviewed the recent action taken by the Executive Connnittee of the Orange County Division of the League of California Cities relative to the Orange County Harbor District. He further indicated that the Orange County officials have commenced a review of the provisions of the Bill proposed by Assemblyman Cory whereby the Orange County Harbor District would be enlarged to include parks. It was generally agreed that Mayor Kanode would restate the City Council's original position on this matter in seeking the dissolution of the Orange County Harbor District. RECESS: It was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman Bowen and unanimously carried to recess at 5:29 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. that evening. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called back to order at 7:30 p.m., with the following in attendance: PRESENT: ABSENT: Councilmen Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Nee and Kanode None Also present were City Manager/City Clerk Darrell Essex, City Attorney James Erickson, and the following members of the City Staff: Putnam, Schatzeder, Poertner, Dunlap, Grissom, Robertson. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Cypress Boy Scout Troop NO. 206 led the City Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. MINUTES: It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Kanel and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of January 24, 1970 as mailed. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Nee and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of January 26, 1970 as mailed. ORAL COMMIINICATIONS: Mr. Jim Lockridge~ 5314 Vista Del Sol, Cypress, addressed the Council stating that he is a member of the Citizens' Advisory Committee for Cypress School Improvements, and was particularly concerned with the lack of sidewalks for the children to use while walking to and from school. Mr. Lockridge also inquired about the property located on Orange and Grindlay Street, west of the Civic Center. l~ae City Manager advised that there are plans for this particular property, and that if developed, sidewalks would be installed along the subject property. The City Manager also advised that a meeting with the Cypress School Superintendent and representatives of the Citizens' Advisory Committee is scheduled for February 16, 1970, at which time the possibility of cooperative street improvements between the school district and the City will be discussed. Discussion ensued as to the various assessment procedures, available for construction of street in~provements, at which time the City Attorney reviewed the procedures to be followed in requiring the installation of street in~rovements under the provisions of the 1911 and 1913 Assessment District Acts. Mr. C. J. Hellis, 5657 Pine Court, addressed the Council stating that he was representing homeowners in his neighborhood who were concerned with the location of the proposed Teen Center. Mr. Hellis indicated that the homeowners had expressed anxiety in regard to the noise which could result from large groups at the Center, as well as problems which could result because of bright lighting, and further stated that he felt that parking would be too limited at the facility, which would result in cars parking along Graham Street. -4- City Council Minutes February 9, 1970 A{ the suggestion of Councilman Kanel, the Park and Recreation Director, Mr. Charles Bryant, addressed the Council stating that he did not feel that there would be any problem with the parking, in that 72 spaces should be more than adequate. He further stated that the Park and Recreation District has been working with the Cypress Junior Women's Club in an effort to establish programs at the Teen Center, and in his opinion, the programs are not the type that would be disturbing. In response to an inquiry from Councilman Harvey, Mr. Bryant stated the youth in the community, along with the Cypress Junior Women's Club felt that the site because of the ample space for parking; the little difficulty which would be encountered in having utilities connected; and the location of the site near the center of the community. Mayor Kanode announced that it was 8:00 p.m., and time to proceed to the Public Hearings. It was moved by Councilman Kanel, seconded by Councilman Harvey and unanimously carried to continue the matter involving the Teen Center until after the Public Hearings. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMt~qT TO CHAPTER 23 OF CYPRESS CITY CODE REGARDING ROOF SIGNS: The Mayor announced this was the time and place for the continuation of the Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Cypress City Code regarding roof signs, initiated by the Cypress Planning Commission. The Mayor announced the Public Hearing was open, and requested the Staff to present its reports. The City Manager presented a report dated February 4, 1970, which stated that the affidavit of posting of the Notice of Continuation is on file in the office of the City Clerk, and that the Planning Director will give a presentation of his further investigations. In response to an inquiry by Councilman Bowen, the City Attorney advised that it was not necessary to take the Public Hearings in order. It was moved by Councilman Bowen, seconded by Councilman Harvey and unanimously carried to continue this Public Hearing after item no. 2 on the agenda is heard. PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION FOR LIVE ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT-- UNICORN RESTAURANT: The Mayor announced this was the time and place for the consideration of an application for a Live Entertainment Permit, requested by Mr. Allan Roberts, 3251 Mainway Drive, Los Alamitos, proprietor of the Unicorn Restaurant. The Mayor declared the Public Hearing open, and requested the Staff to present its report. The City Manager presented a report dated February 5, 1970, which indicated that the affidavits of publication, posting and mailing of the Public Hearing notices on this matter are on file in the office of the City Clerk, and that no written communications either in favor of or in oppposition to the granting of this permit have been received. The report further stated that the Live Entertainment Permit would permit a pianist and band at the Unicorn Restaurant, 5960 Cerritos Avenue, Cypress. The Police Department has completed its investigation as required by the City Code and finds no cause to protest the application. In response to an inquiry from Councilman Kanel, the City Manager stated that the band ~ould probably be a three-piece unit as the Unicorn Could not accomodate a much larger group. Mr. Allan Roberts, proprietor of the Unicorn Restaurant, addressed the Commission, and in answer to an inquiry from Councilman Bowen stated that he does have plans to remodel the restaurant. Councilman Harvey expressed concern that if the equipment was to be amplified, perhaps it would create a disturbance. Discussion ensued, and it was the general feeling of the Council that this would probably not be a problem in this case, as the restaurant is not located in a residential area. Mrs. Jane Ginns, 4573 Rainier Drive, Cypress, addressed the Council suggesting that the Public Hearing be postponed until the Unicorn REstaurant is remodeled. Mayor Kanode explained that the permit would be subject to annual review. -5 - City Council Minutes February 9, 1970 Councilman Harvey stated that he was not aware of any previous complaints for permits issued to Mr. Roberts in the past and it would appear that the applicant is atter~pting to comply with the requirements of the Live Entertainment Permit. There being no written communications and oral protests, the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. It was moved by Councilman Kanel and seconded by Councilman Noe that the Live Entertainment Permit for a pianist and band at the Unicorn Restaurant be approved for a period of one year. Discussion ensued, and it was requested by Councilman Harvey that the motion be amended to approve the Live Entertainment Permit for a period of six months, after which time it would be extended to one year providing that complaints have not been filed. Following discussion, it was agreed by Councilman Kanel and Councilman Noe to amend the motion to read as follows: It was moved by Councilman Kanel and seconded by Councilman Noe that the Live Entertainment Permit for a pianist and band at the Unicorn Restaurant be approved for a six month period, at which time the Permit would be extended to one year, providing there have been no complaints filed. The motion carried unanimously by the following roll call vote; AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kanode None None CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 23 OF CYPRESS CITY CODE REGARDING HOOF SIGNS: The Mayor announced that the Public Hearing was open and requested the Planning Director to give his presentation. The Planning Director presented several slides of a variety of shops and businesses in the Cypress area, comparing the location of the signs. The Planning Director then gave diagrams to the Council which clarified where signs would be located according to the various roof slopes. Following discussion, the Mayor asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor or against the proposed sign amendment. Mr. Bruce Smith, 10272 Mardel Drive, Cypress, addressed the Council and inquired as to whether this Ordinance would prohibit roof signs such as ones currently used by several of the restaurant chains. The Planning Director replied these signs would be prohibited. Discussion ensued as to time limitations on the amortization of non-conforming signs, and in response to an inquiry by Councilman Harvey, the Planning Director stated that he did not feel that many businesses in the newer shopping centers would be in violation. Following discussion, the City Attorney advised that the amortization periods in the sign ordinance are reasonable, and further advised that the Council may proceed without a special ordinance regarding amortization. Mr. Richard Koppang, 4024 Berwick Cto, Cypress, addressed the Council stating that he was very much in favor of the proposed Ordinance, and that he felt that it would be very compatible with other community programs such as the Urban Townscape. It was moved by Councilman Bowen and seconded by Councilman Harvey to read the following Ordinance by title only. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: -6 - City Council Minutes February 9, 1970 AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kanode ~ NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: None Title of the Ordinance is as follows: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING SECTION 23-17 OF CHAPTER 23 OF THE CYPRESS CITY CODE, "EXTENSION OVER ROOF LINE." It was moved by Councilman Bowen and seconded by Councilman Harvey to approve the first reading of this Ordinance. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: RECESS: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kanode None None Mayor Kanode declared a recess at 9:05 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 9:15 p .m. with all Councilmen in attendance. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: (Continued) Further discussion on the Teen Center resumed, at which time the City Manager reviewed the plans for the construction of the Teen Center facility, including landscaping, and explained the type of recreational programs planned for the facility which would be designed to handle small groups of teenagers. The City Manager further explained that the large teenage functions would be held at other facilities within the community. In response to an inquiry by Councilman Kanel, the City Manager stated that the Teen Center will be a public recreational facility controlled by the City. Discussion ensued as to the location of the facility in relationship to the residential area. The Planning Director stated that all openings faced away from the residential area; that low-lighting will be installed; and that the lights for the outdoor activity court will not be facing the residential area. Mr. C. J. Hollis stated that the information had cleared his doubts, and that he had not seen a diagram of the proposed Teen Center before. Councilman Noe suggested that Mr. Hollis take a copy of the diagram, which perhaps would be beneficial to his neighbors. In response to an inquiry by Mr. Hollis, the City Manager advised that improvements to Graham Street are not planned for this year, but the City will plan for improve- ments as they are needed. COMMUNICATION FROM THE ORANGE COUNTY MOSQUITO .ABATEMENT DISTRICT: The City Kimball, District Manager of the e q Abatement District, transmitting a copy of the Minutes of the Board of Trustees Meeting held January ~ 5, 1970. It was moved by Councilman Noe, seconded by Councilman Bowen, and unanimously carried to receive and file this communication. COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION ADVISING OF HEARING TO CONSIDER EXCLUSION OF CITY OF LA PALMA FROM THE CYPRESS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT AND THE FORMATION OF THE LA PALMA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT: The City Manager reviewed a report dated January 27, 1970 from Mr. Richard T. Turner, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission, advising that the hearing to consider the proposed exclusion of the City of La Palma from the Cypress Park and Recreation District and the formation of the La Palma Recreation and Park District has been scheduled for February 11, 1970 at 2:00 p.m. City Council Minutes February 9, 1970 The report further stated that in the event the withdrawal is approved, the City of Cypress would be in a position to reevaluate its position with the District since the City would be the only incorporated area served by the District. It would appear at this time that withdrawal of the City of La Palma from the Cypress Park ~nd Recreation District would not have an adverse effect on the City. Councilman Noe stated that he wished the record to reflect that since he is a member of the Local Agency Formation Commission, he would not enter into the discussion, and would abstain from voting, both on the exclusion of the City of La Palma from the Cypress Park and Recreation District, and the proposed Hoffman Annexation to the City of Buena Park, which is the next item for consideration. It was moved by Councilman Harvey and seconded by Councilman Bowen that the City Manager notify the Local Agency Formation Commission that the City Council of the City of Cypress has no objection to the proposed reorganization submitted by the City of La Palma, as outlined in the report. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSTAINED: 1 COUNCILMAN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel and Kanode None None Noe COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION ADVISING OF A HEARING TO CONSIDER A PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF BUENA PARK: The City Manager reviewed a report dated February 5, 1970 which stated that the City had received a communication dated January 30, from Mr. Richard T. Turner, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission, advising that the hearing to consider a proposed annexation to the City of Buena Park, known as Hoffman Annexation No. 5, has been scheduled for February 25, 1970. The report further stated that the annexation consists of approximately 10 acres of uninhabited land located on the north side of Lincoln east of Hoffman Street, and that the proposal appears to be a logical extension of the City of Buena Park's boundaries. Following a discussion of the alignment of boundaries between the City of Cypress and the City of Buena Park, the City Manager indicated that a communication would be sent to the City of Buena Park requesting consideration of city boundary adjustments on Holder Street, between Valley View and Orange Avenue. It was moved by Councilman Harvey and seconded by Councilman Bowen to authorize the City Manager to notify the Local Agency Formation Commission that the Council has no objection to the proposed annexation to the City of Buena Park, as outlined in the report. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSTAINED:i COUNCILMAN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel and Kanode None None Noe .~QNSIDERATION. OF ACCE~_~TAN~E OF AND RELEASE OF BONDS--TRACT NO. 6053: The City Manager presented a report from the Public Works Director dated February 5, 1970 which indicated that the public improvements within Tract 6053 have been satisfactorily completed and could be accepted by the City Council at this time. It was moved by Councilman Noe and seconded by Councilman Harvey to accept the improvements within Tract 6053 as having been satisfactorily completed in accordance with plans and specifications and authorize the City Clerk to release the Monumen- tation Bond, and Labor and Materials Bond upon the expiration of the required lien period providing no mechanics liens have been filed, and to hold the Performance Bond for a period of one year to guarantee against any defects in material and workmanship. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 5 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kanode 0 COUNCILMEN: None 0 COUNCILMEN: None -8- City Council Minutes February 9, 1970 CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF SIDEWALK BOND: The City Manager presented a report from the Public Works Director dated February 5, 1970 which stated that Tract 5704 Sidewalk Bond improvements on the north side of Ball Road, 464 feet west of Walker Street have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with plans and specifications. It was moved by Councilman Noe and seconded by Councilman Kanel to accept the iraprovements and to authorize the City Clerk to release the bonds guaranteeing construction of said improvements after the required period has passed provided no liens have been filed. The motion carried unanimously by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kanode None None CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF BONDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS FRONTING 6452 ORANGE AVENUE, VARIANCE NO. V-256~ SPECIAL PROJECT N0.90: The City Manager presented a report from the Public Works Director dated February 9, 1970 which stated that the public improvements constructed as a Condition of Approval of Variance #256 located at 6452 Orange Avenue, have been completed in accordance with plans and specifications and have been recommended for acceptance by the Public Works Director. The report further stated that one street light remains to be installed; however, a letter from the Southern California Edison Company has been received which states that all charges have been paid, and construction should begin on February 15, 1970. It was moved by Councilman Harvey and seconded by Councilman Bowen to accept the public improvements fronting 6452 Orange Avenue, and to authorize the City Clerk to release the Labor and Materials Bond upon expiration of their required lien period providing no Mechanics Liens have been filed with the Performance Bond to be held for one year from the date of acceptance to guarantee against any defects in material and workmanship. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kanode None None CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF BONDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WALKER STREET AND ORANGE AVENUE: The City Manager reviewed a report from the Public Works Director dated February 5, 1970, stating that the total~nprovements at the southwest corner of Walker and Orange Avenue have been completed in accordance with plans and specifications. It was moved by Councilman Kanel and seconded by Councilman Harvey to accept the public improvements on Walker Street and Orange Avenue as being satisfactorily completed in accordance with the plans and specifications, and to authorize the City Clerk to release the Labor and Materials Bond upon the expiration of the required lien period providing no mechanics liens have been filed, and to hold the Performance Bond for a period of one year in order to guarantee against defects in mate~iaI and workmanship in the public improvements. The motion was carried unanimously by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kanode None None CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF BONDS FOR PHASE II OF PROJECT NO. 7008-90, TREE PLANTING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY: The City Manager reviewed a report from the Public Works Director dated February 5, 1970, which stated that work of supplying and planting trees was satisfactorily completed by the contractor in accordance with plans and specifications on January 14, 1970. It was moved by Councilman Noe and seconded by Councilman Bowen to accept Project #7008-90-0000, Phase II, tree planting, as being satisfactorily completed -9 - City Council Minutes February 9, 1970 in accordance with plans and specifications, and to authorize the release of labor and materials bond at the end of the lien period, and to release the faithful performance bond at the end of one year from the date of completion of the contract. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kenode None None CONSIDERATION OF ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BALL ROAD AND WALKER STREET (CYPRESS PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER): The City Manager reviewed a report from the Public Works Director dated February 5, 1970, stating that the City Council, at its regular meeting of October 14, 1969, adopted Resolution #1012, which ordered the abatement of the nuisance on the property located at the northwest corner of Walker Street and Ball Road. The report further stated that the owner did not comply with the order within thirty days from the date of mailing, and did not abate the nuisance within the thirty day time period allowed by the Council; therefore, a purchase order was awarded to the low bidder in the amount of $1,675.00 to abate the nuisance as described in the Resolution #1012. The work of abatement was completed on November 21, 1969 with final leveling and clean up completed on December 1, 1969, with administrative costs in the amount of $251.25 added to the charge from the contractor to cover the City's cost of preparing legal notices, resolutions, obtaining bids, and awarding and administering the contract. The report further stated that the property owner was invoiced and requested to pay the costs of the abatement, but failed to do so; therefore, a resolution has been prepared declaring the costs of the abate- ment to be a special assessment and lien on the parcel and directing the collection thereof. It was moved by Councilman Harvey and seconded by Councilman Noe to confirm the costs of abatement in the amount of $1,675.00 as stated in the written report showing such costs submitted to the City Council in accordance with Section 13-20 of the Cypress City Code. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kanode None None It was moved by Councilman Harvey and seconded by Councilman Noe to adopt the following Resolution by title only, title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 1042 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS DECLARING THE COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF A NUISANCE AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AND LIEN lIPON CERTAIN LAND WITHIN THE CITY, AND DIRECTING THE COLLECTION THEREOF. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kanode None None CONSIDERATION OF SUPPLEMENTING LOS ALAMITOS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: The City Manager presented a report dated February 5, 1970 which indicated that the Los Alamitos City Council is requesting the County Fire Warden to include in the next Fiscal Year's Budget Fire Service Area, the employment of two full-time firemen at the Los Alamitos Fire Station, to be employed effective July 1, 1970, rather than January 1, 1971 which was their previous request. Following discussion, it was moved by Councilman Noe and seconded by Councilman Harvey to authorize the City Manager to notify the Orange County Fire Warden's office that the City Council has no objection to supplementing the Los Alamitos Volunteer Department by the additional two men, effective July 1, 1970, in the event it is determined by the County Fire Warden's office that additional manpower is required prior to January 1, 1971. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: - 10 - City Council Minutes February 9, 1970 ~ _1.~ AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kenel, Noe and Kenode None None CQNSIDERATION. OF RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF ARGUMENTS AND APPROVING TP~_TAX STAT~NT_FQR _T~tE PARK BOND ISSUE: The City Manager reviewed a report dated FebrUary 5, 1970 which explained that pursuant to the requirements of the EleCtions Code, the City Council is required to adopt a Resolution authorizing certain of its members to file a written argument for the park bond measure inthe amount 0f$!,250i000, which was approved to be consolidated with the General Municipal Election of April 14, 1970. The report further indicated that the Elections Code provides that a tax statement be approved and authorized to be mailed to the voters of the City in the form of a Resolution. Following discussion as to the merits of having the City Council filing the arguments in favor of the bond proposal, rather than allowing a Citizens' Support Group to submit the favorable arguments, it was moved by Councilmen Harvey, seconded by Councilman Noe, and unanimously carried to proceed with the remainder of the items on the agenda before taking action on this item, CQ~SIDERATION OF ENDING CITY CODE REGARDING THE TIME FOR ACTION OF THE PLANNING CQMMIS~ION AND CITY COUNCIL UPON TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAPS: The City Manager reviewed a report dated February 5, 1970 which stated that the City Attorney, in comparing the current provisions of the City of Cypress Code with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act regarding the time required for action on tentative subdivision maps by both the Planning Commission end City Council, has recommended that the City Code be consistent with the State Code in this regard, end indicated that the attached Ordinance will clarify this matter. It was moved by Councilman Noe end seconded by Councilmen Harvey to read the following Ordinance by title only. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kenode None None Title of the Ordinance is as follows: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AMENDING SECTIONS 25-17 AND 25-18 OF THE CYPRESS CITY CODE REGARDING THE TIME OF ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL UPON TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAPS° It was moved by Councilmen Noe and seconded by Councilman Bowart to approve the first reading of this Ordinance. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kanode None None CONSIDERATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME OF THE TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT OF FRANK BIRKINSHAW: The City Manager presented a report dated February 5, 1970, which stated that pursuant to budget authorization, the City employed Mr. Frank Birkinshaw as a temporary Public Works Inspector on July 1, 1969, for the primary purpose of assisting in inspecting the maJ or storm drain system which was to be under construction during this time period. The report further stated that the Personnel Resolution of the City authorizes a temporary appointment of this type to be approved by the Department Head and City Manager for a period not exceeding 180 days, after which, additional thirty day extensions can be approved only by a 4/5 vote of the City Council. The report stated that based on this requirement, the City Council, at its regular meeting of January 12, 1970, approved the first 30 day extension to February 12, 1970. - 11- City Council Minutes February 9, 1970 It was moved by Councilman Noe and seconded by Councilman Harvey to confirm the second 30 day extension on this appointment to March 9, 1970. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Fanel, Noe and Fanode NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: None CONSIDERATION OF EMPLOYMENT LIST FOR POLICE AGENT: The City Manager presented a report dated February 5, 1970 reviewing the results of an open competitive examination which has been conducted for the position of Police Agent. It was moved by Councilman Bowen and seconded by Councilman Noe to certify the employment list for the position of Police Agent~ The motion was unanimously eartied by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Fanel, Noe and Fanode None None CONSIDERATION OF EMPLOYMENT LIST FOR POLICE DISPATCHER: The City Manager presented a report dated February 5, 1970 reviewing the results of an open competitive examination which has been conducted for the position of Police Dispatcher. It was moved by Councilman Harvey and seconded by Councilman Bowen to certify the employment list for the position of Police Dispatcher° The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNICLMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Fanel, Noe and Fanode None None CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL WARRANT LIST FOR WARRANTS N0.23203 T~ROUGH 23345: It was moved by Councilmen Bowen and seconded by Councilman Noe to approve the Commercial Warrant List for Warrants 23203 through 23345 in the total.amount of $126,29.48o The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll dall vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noes and Fanode None None SECOND READING OI{DINANCE RE: GRANTING FRANCHISE TO PACIFIC LIGHTING SERVICE COMPANY T~ LAy AND USE PIPES AND APPURTENANCES FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING GAS: It was ~oved by Councilman Bowen and seconded by Councilman Noe to read the following Ordinance by title onlyo The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Fanel, Noe and Fanode None None Title of the Ordinance is as follows: ORDINANCE NO, 420 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING =O PACIFIC LIGHTING SERVICE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, THE RIGHT, PRIV%LEGE AND FRANCHISE TO LAY AND USE PIPES AND APPURTENANCES FORTRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING GAS FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES UNDER, ALONG, ACROSS OR UPON THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES, AS THE SAME NOW OR MAY HEREAFTER EXIST, WITHIN SAID MUNICIPALITY° - 12 - C~ Gouncil Minutes February 9, 1970 It was moved by Councilman Noe and seconded by Councilman Harvey to approve the second reading of this Ordinance. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kenode None None SECOND READING ORDINANCE RE: ORDERING~ CALLINGI PROVIDING FOR AND GIVING NOTICE 'OFTA SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON APRIL 141 1970 FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING A PROPOSITION TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS BY SAID CITY FOR A CERTAIN MITNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL' ELECTION: It was moved by Councilman Noe and seconded by Councilman B~Wen to read the following Ordinance by title only. Thhmotion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kenode None None Title of the Ordinance is as follows: ORDINANCE NO o 421 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING, CALLING, PROVIDING FOR AND GIVING NOTICE OF A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON APRIL 14, 1970, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF SAID CITY A PROPOSITION TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS BY SAID CITY FOR A CERTAIN MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SAID DATE° It was moved by Councilman Noe and seconded by Councilman Bowen to approve. the second reading of this Ordinance° The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowone Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kenode None None CONT!NUATION OF CQNSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE TAN STATEMENT TO BE MAILED TO VOTERS WITHIN THE CITY: It was moved by Councilman Bowen and seconded by Councilman Noe to adopt the following Resolution by title only, title as follOws: RESOLUTION NOo 1043 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE TAX STATEMENT TO BE MAILED TO VOTERS WITHIN THE CITY. The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEN: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEN: Bowen, Harvey, Kanel, Noe and Kenode None None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: There were no oral communications at this time. At the request of Councilman Harvey, it was moved by Councilman Noe, seconded by Councilman Bowen and unanimously carried to place on the agenda at this time, consideration of sending a letter of commendation to the citizens who participated in the planting of grass at the park located on Juanits Street. - 13 - City Council Minutes February 9, 1970 It was moved by Councilman Noe, seconded by Councilman Bowen that the City Manager send letters of commendation to ~he various individuals who participated in the plax~ti~g of g[a_Seat the Juanits Street Park. C~un~ilman Harvey requested the list of proposed park names prepared by the c~tizens' Cqnnn~tee for Park Names, in order that he might pollthe area adjacent te the park on Juanits Street to determine the most appropriate'namefor the park, 'CeNTtNUATIONOF CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION OF THE CITY~C0UNCIL AUTHORIZING CERTAIN 0FITSMEMBERS TO FILE A ~RITTEN ~RGUMENT FOR A CITY MEASURE: The City Attorney advised that t~e proposed Resolution is required in the event the City Council w~shesto file the arguments for the bondissue. He further advised that CitiZens' Support Groups or individuals could file arguments in the event the Councildoes not adopt the resolution~ In response roan inquiry by Councilman Kanal, the Ciry Attorney advised that .alc~mbination of names was not possible unless the Councilman signed as an ~individual rather than as Councilman. The closing date for filing the' arguments has been set for February 20, 1970. ~Fetlowing discussion, it was suggested thatno action be taken on the Resolution until nextMonday, which would provide an opportunity for aCi~izens' Support!Group to organize and determine whether or not they wish to file an argument in favor of the park bond issue. It was moved by Councilman. Noe, seconded.by CouncilmanBowen and unanimously carried to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 p,m., until February 16, 1970 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers. ATTEST: MAYOR OF ~}E CITY OF CYPRESS CITY CLE~/( OF T~E~ITY/OF CYPRESS - 14 -