Loading...
Resolution No. 5518 291 RESOLUTION NO. 5518 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS, OPPOSING THE ORANGE COUNTY CENTRAL PARK AND NATURE PRESERVE INITIATIVE RECITALS WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Supervisors, on October 23, 2001, completed the El Toro reuse planning process by certifying EIR 573; and WHEREAS, the so-called " Orange County Central Park and Nature Preserve Initiative", if passed, will change the land use zoning for El Toro and specifically preclude a commercial aviation reuse of El Toro; and, WHEREAS, the proponents of the "Orange County Central Park and Nature Preserve Initiative" propose a "Great Park" to be built on the 4,700 acre El Toro site instead; and, WHEREAS, South Orange County already has 78,000 acres of parkland while North Orange County has only 8,000 acres of parkland; and, WHEREAS, BBC Research & Consulting (BBC) has prepared a fiscal impact analysis of the "Great Park"; and, WHEREAS, the BBC analysis was peer reviewed by the Orange County Taxpayers Association (OCTax) and former California Auditor General, Kurt Sjoberg; and, WHEREAS, OCTax and the former California Auditor General concur in BBC's findings; and, WHEREAS, the City of Irvine claims the "Great Park" costs to be approximately $200 million; and, WHEREAS, the BBC study conservatively estimated total accumulated capital cost of creating the "Great Park" to be $2.1 billion in current dollars; and, WHEREAS, the BBC study concluded that development of the "Great Park" would require substantial tax increases within the jurisdiction that chooses to develop it; and, WHEREAS, the BBC study shows that the interim leasing plan proposed by park proponents would require more than 60 years of accumulated operating revenue before any park construction could begin; and, WHEREAS, the BBC study shows that if park construction were to be debt funded, the annual debt service would amount to $185 million; and, WHEREAS, the BBC study shows that the "Great Park" as proposed would require between $42 million and $60 million annually for gross operating costs and $245 million per year in combined operating costs and debt service; and, WHEREAS, the BBC study estimates that the impact of the total annual cost would be new or increased taxes equivalent to a 10% property tax increase if spread across all Orange County taxpayers; and, WHEREAS, the citizens of Orange County would lose the opportunity for 68,000 jobs, $7 billion in economic activity and $450 million in annual state and local government tax revenues from a profitable commercial airport operation at El Toro; and, WHEREAS, numerous toxic contamination sites at El Toro require substantial clean-up to meet environmental standards for a park; and, -1- 2 9 2 WHEREAS, the "City of Irvine's Solvents Study" concluded that close and continued exposure to soil which is excavated on Base represents a higher than acceptable health risk; and, WHEREAS, the "City of Irvine's Solvents Study" concluded that the community could be exposed to harmful levels of hazardous materials without even knowing it; and, WHEREAS, the "City of Irvine's Solvent Study" estimates that the cost to remediate the anticipated soil contamination will add between "#35 million and $350 million" to the overall cleanup cost; and, WHEREAS, the Final Report "Environmental Risks Associated with the Great Park Proposal" concludes that the existing paving at the Base acts as a cap for the contaminated soil, and limits the distribution of contaminated soil and human contact with the contaminated soil, and the Great Park will remove much of the paving on the base; and WHEREAS, the Final Report "Environmental Risks Associated with the Great Park Proposal" concludes that the soil in the area of the Great Park is contaminated and presents a health risk, and that this health risk will increase if the excavated areas are used for activities where people have contact with the contaminated soil, and, WHEREAS, the Department of Navy Environmental Policy Memorandum 95-02 states that "Communities should be encouraged to develop reuse plans that consider reusing the land in the same manner (industrial, commercial, residential) as it is being used at the time of closure. This will result in cost effective and timely clean-ups ultimately providing opportunity for quicker economic revitalization of the property;" and, WHEREAS, the feasibility of conveying El Toro to the County of Orange for a "Great Park" as a Public Benefit Conveyance (PBC) by the Department of the Navy is highly doubtful. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cypress, California, opposes the "Orange County Central Park and Nature Preserve Initiative" designed to change the land use zoning for El Toro. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Cypress at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of January, 2002. . Su jt,L) LYDIA DHI, Mayor FRANK S. McCOY, Jr., M Pro Tern TIM KEENAN, Council Member -Vile_ 724-.—k MIKE McGILL, Council Meem/� ,.mb- Zd--- 'Irr A L. PIERCY, Council Me .- ATTEST: °A.41 A . .0111 --- 4- • 11 Er Y CLERK OF THEC ITY OF CYPRESS -2- 293 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS I, JILL R. INGRAM-GUERTIN, City Clerk of the City of Cypress, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the said City Council held on the 14th day of January 2002; by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Keenan, McGill, Piercy, McCoy and Sondhi NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None << , 1 . %L1I I - -1: CITY LERK � HE CITY OF CYPRESS -3-