Ordinance No. 1014103
ORDINANCE NO. 1014
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS ADOPTING THE
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LOS ALAMITOS
RACE TRACK AND GOLF COURSE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED PLAN PREPARED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, the City of Cypress (the "City ") is a charter city and municipal corporation
organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the Cypress Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency ") is a public body,
corporate and politic, organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment
Law, Division 24, Part 1 of the California Health and Safety Code (Health & Safety Code
§ 33000 et seq.) (the "CRL "); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City (the "City Council "), by adoption of Ordinance
No. 851 on June 18, 1990, approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Los Alamitos
Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project (the "Original Plan "); and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by adoption of Ordinance No. 932 on January 9, 1995,
approved and adopted the First Amendment to the Plan ( "First Amendment "); and
WHEREAS, the Original Plan as amended by the First Amendment is hereinafter
referred to as the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Agency and City Council have initiated proceedings for the adoption of
the Second Amendment to the Plan (the "Second Amendment "); and
WHEREAS, the Plan delineates the redevelopment project area for the Los Alamitos
Race Track and Golf Course Project (the "Project Area "); and
WHEREAS, the Second Amendment does not propose to modify the boundaries of the
Project Area but rather proposes to amend the Plan to: (i) extend the Agency's eminent domain
authority with respect to the Project Area for an additional twelve (12) year period, dating from
the date of effectiveness of this Ordinance; (ii) amend the Land Use sections of the Plan to
provide that permitted land uses within the Project Area shall conform to the City's General Plan
as it exists today or as the General Plan may be amended in the future; and (iii) make certain
other nonsubstantive revisions to the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared and presented the Second Amendment in the form
of an Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf
Course Redevelopment (the "Amended and Restated Plan ") which amends and restates the
Original Plan by incorporating into an amended and restated Plan document the revisions to the
Plan previously approved and adopted in the First Amendment and the revisions proposed by the
Second Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council consented to hold a joint public hearing with the Agency
with respect to the Second Amendment (in the form of the Amended and Restated Plan), at
which hearing any and all persons having any objections to the Second Amendment, or the
regularity of any prior proceedings concerning the Second Amendment, would be allowed to
appear before the City Council and show cause why the Second Amendment should not be
adopted; and
WHEREAS, notice of the joint public hearing of the Agency and City Council with
respect to the Second Amendment and the negative declaration prepared therefor was given in
accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the joint public hearing of the Agency and City Council was duly held on
March 26, 2001; and
1
104
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the passage of this Ordinance have occurred and
been taken in accordance with applicable law;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Cypress does Ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The purpose and intent of the City Council with respect to the Second
Amendment as set forth in the Amended and Restated Plan is to (i) extend the time limit for
Agency's exercise of eminent domain authority with respect to the Project Area, thereby
protecting and promoting the sound redevelopment of the Project Area and the general welfare of
the inhabitants of the City by providing a method of property acquisition through the potential
use of eminent domain in order for the Agency to be able to assemble parcels and redevelopment
interest by insuring its ability to deliver property for redevelopment purposes; (ii) conform the
permitted land uses under the Plan to the City's General Plan; and (iii) make certain
nonsubstantive revisions to the Plan.
SECTION 2. The City Council finds and determines that:
a. All facts set forth in the above Recitals are true and correct.
b. The City Council, in Ordinance No. 851, found and determined that the Project
Area is a blighted area, the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes
declared in the CRL. The City Council finds and determines that (i) such finding and
determination set forth in Ordinance No. 851 is final and, (ii) the Second Amendment does not
add territory to the Project Area or make any other revisions to the Plan that affects this
previously -made finding and determination, (iii) such previously made finding and determination
remains valid and effective, and (iv) no further finding or determination concerning blight is
required for the Second Amendment.
c. The Plan, as amended by Second Amendment (as set forth in the Amended and
Restated Plan), would redevelop the Project Area in conformity with the CRL and in the interests
of the public peace, health, safety, and welfare.
d. The adoption and carrying out of the Second Amendment (as set forth in the
Amended and Restated Plan) is economically sound and feasible.
e. The Second Amendment (as set forth in the Amended and Restated Plan) is
consistent with and conforms to the General Plan of the City including but not limited to the
Housing Element of the General Plan which substantially complies with the requirements of
Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the
Government Code.
f. The carrying out of the Second Amendment (as set forth in the Amended and
Restated Plan) would promote the public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the City and would
effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL.
g. The condemnation of real property, as provided for in the Plan as amended by the
Second Amendment (as set forth in the Amended and Restated Plan), is necessary to the
execution of the Amended and Restated Plan and adequate provisions have been made for
payment for property to be acquired, if any, as provided by law.
h. The City Council, in Ordinance No. 851, found and determined that the Agency
adopted a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families and persons displaced from the
Project Area, if the Plan should result in the temporary or permanent displacement of any
occupants of housing facilities in the Project Area. The City Council finds and determines that
(i) such finding and determination set forth in Ordinance No. 851 is final and conclusive; (ii) the
Second Amendment does not add territory to the Project Area or make any other revisions to the
Plan that affect this previously -made finding and determination, (iii) such previously -made
finding and determination remains valid and effective, and (iv) no further finding or
determination concerning the foregoing is required for the Second Amendment.
i. The City Council, in Ordinance No. 851, found and determined that there are or
are being provided in the Project Area, or in other areas not generally less desirable in regard to
105
public utilities and public and commercial facilities, and at rents or prices within the financial
means of the families and persons displaced from the Project Area, if any, decent, safe, and
sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to the displaced families and
persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. The City Council finds and
determines that (i) such finding and determination set forth in Ordinance No. 851 is final and
conclusive; (ii) the Second Amendment does not add territory to the Project Area or make any
other revisions to the Plan that affect this previously -made finding and determination, (iii) such
previously -made finding and determination remains valid and effective, and (iv) no further
finding or determination concerning the foregoing is required for the Second Amendment.
j. Families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation
plan pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Sections 33411 and 33411.1, and dwelling
units housing persons and families of low or moderate income shall not be removed or destroyed
prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to California Health and Safety
Code Sections 33334.5, 33413, and 33413.5.
k. The City Council, in Ordinance No. 851, found and determined that there are no
noncontiguous areas of the Project Area and therefore the City Council is not required to make
the finding set forth in Health and Safety Code Section 33367(d)(9). The City Council finds and
determines that (i) such finding and determination set forth in Ordinance No. 851 is final and
conclusive; (ii) the Second Amendment does not add territory to the Project Area or make any
other revisions to the Plan that affect this previously -made finding and determination, (iii) such
previously -made finding and determination remains valid and effective, and (iv) no further
finding or determination concerning the foregoing is required for the Second Amendment.
1. The City Council, in Ordinance No. 851, found and determined that the inclusion
of any lands, buildings, or improvements which are not detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare is necessary for effective redevelopment of the Project Area, and that any area
included is necessary for effective redevelopment and is not included for the purpose of
obtaining the allocation of tax increment revenues from the Project Area pursuant to Health and
Safety Code Section 33670 without other substantial justification for its inclusion. The City
Council finds and determines that (i) such finding and determination set forth in Ordinance No.
851 is final and conclusive; (ii) the Second Amendment does not add territory to the Project Area
or make any other revisions to the Plan that affect this previously -made finding and
determination, (iii) such previously -made finding and determination remains valid and effective,
and (iv) no further finding or determination concerning the foregoing is required for the Second
Amendment.
m. The City Council, in Ordinance No. 851, found and determined that the
elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Project Area could not be reasonably expected
to be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without the aid and assistance of the
Agency. The City Council finds and determines that (i) such finding and determination set forth
in Ordinance No. 851 is final and conclusive; (ii) the Second Amendment does not add territory
to the Project Area or make any other revisions to the Plan that affect this previously -made
finding and determination, (iii) such previously -made finding and determination remains valid
and effective, and (iv) no further finding or determination concerning the foregoing is required
for the Second Amendment.
n. At the time the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 851, the City Council was
not required to find and determine that the Project Area was "predominantly urbanized" even
though the Project Area was and remains "predominantly urbanized" as then - defined in the CRL.
The City Council finds and determines that (i) the Second Amendment does not add territory to
the Project Area or make any other revisions to the Plan that affect or require a determination as
to the urbanization of the Project Area, and (ii) no further finding or determination concerning
the foregoing is required for the Second Amendment.
o. The time limitation on commencement of eminent domain proceedings contained
in the Second Amendment as set forth in the Amended and Restated Plan is reasonably related to
the proposed projects to be implemented in the Project Area and to the ability of the Agency to
eliminate blight within the Project Area. The Second Amendment does not amend or affect any
other time limitations or amend or affect the limitation on the number of dollars to be allocated
to the Agency that are contained in the Amended and Restated Plan.
106
p. The City Council, in Ordinance No. 851, declared that it was satisfied that
permanent housing facilities will be available within three (3) years from the time residential
occupants of the Project Area are displaced, if any, and that pending the development of the
facilities there will be available to the displaced housing occupants, if any, adequate temporary
dwelling facilities at rents comparable to those in the City at the time of their displacement. The
City Council finds and determines that (i) such finding and determination set forth in Ordinance
No. 851 is final and conclusive; (ii) the Second Amendment does not add territory to the Project
Area or make any other revisions to the Plan that affect this previously -made finding and
determination, (iii) such previously made finding and determination remains valid and effective,
and (iv) no further finding or determination concerning the foregoing is required for the Second
Amendment.
q. The City Council, in Ordinance No. 851, found and determined that the effect of
the tax increment financing as used to implement the Plan will not cause a significant financial
burden or detriment on any taxing agency deriving revenues from the Project Area. The City
Council finds and determines that (i) such finding and determination set forth in Ordinance No.
851 is final and conclusive; (ii) the Second Amendment does not add territory to the Project Area
or make any other revisions to the Plan that affect this previously -made finding and
determination, (iii) such previously made finding and determination remains valid and effective,
(iv) no further finding or determination concerning the foregoing is required for the Second
Amendment, and (v) this previously -made finding is no longer required by the CRL to be made
with respect to adoption of redevelopment plans or plan amendments.
SECTION 3 The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Second Amendment as
set forth in the Amended and Restated Plan, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, and
which Second Amendment as set forth in the Amended and Restated Plan is incorporated herein
by reference, and the City Council designates the Amended and Restated Plan as the official
redevelopment plan for the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project.
SECTION 4. The City Council hereby authorizes and provides for the City of Cypress's
expenditure of money provided for the in Amended and Restated Plan.
SECTION 5. The Agency is hereby vested with the responsibility for carrying out the
Amended and Restated Plan in accordance with the provisions thereof and of applicable law.
SECTION 6 The City Council hereby declares its intention to undertake and complete
any proceedings necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the Amended and
Restated Plan.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall comply with the applicable procedures of the CRL
with respect to the transmission of a copy of this Ordinance to other public entities, if such be
required.
SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion
of this Ordinance, is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each, section subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance,
irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or
portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Ordinance to be
transmitted to the Agency.
SECTION 10 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be published as required by law.
107
FIRST READING at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 27th
day of August, 2001 and finally adopted and order posted at a regular meeting held on the 10t
day of September, 2001.
ATTEST:
Alt'
V
I
Y CLERK OF THE Y OF CYPRESS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
) SS
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS
I, JILL R. INGRAM - GUERTIN, City Clerk of the City of Cypress, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted at a regularly meeting of said City
Council held on the 10th day of September 2001; by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Keenan, McCoy, Piercy, and McGill
NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sondhi
(Mayor Pro Tem Sondhi did not participate in this action due to her ownership of property
in proximity to the project area.)