Loading...
Minutes 1976-04-15MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CYPRESS PLANNING COMMISSION HELD April 15, 1976 The regular meeting of the Cypress Planning Commission was called to order at 4:10 p.m. on Thursday, April 15, 1976 in the Cypress City Council Chambers, 5275 Orange Avenue, Cypress, California, Vice Chairman Gerald Mullen presiding. PRESENT: ABSENT: Commissioners Greenwood, Mullen, Van Allen and Walsh Chairman Hart Also present were Planning Director Brian Hawley, Public Works Director Art Schatzeder, Building Superintendent Ray Warren and Business License /Zoning Inspector Sandy Pegueros. At the Planning Director's request, Commissioner Mullen added the following matters to the agenda: Item #8, review of revised plot plan, Conditional Use Permit #76 -1, southeasterly corner of Lincoln and Denni; Item #9, consideration of request for outdoor display of merchandise, Triple T Furniture, 5262 Lincoln Avenue; Item #10, consideration of minutes of March 18, 1976. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS: 1. Sign Review, Zip'z Ice Cream, 10033 Valley View. The Planning Director reported that the owners of Zip'z Ice Cream had changed the direction of the pulsating interior lights near the entrance to the store which faces one of the main aisles of the shopping center. The lights are now directed downward. He stated staff has no objections to the lighting. Commissioner Mullen stated he visited the site and that his objections to the potential traffic hazard and unreasonable attraction of attention created by the lights have been over- come with the change in direction of the lighting. It was moved by Commissioner Van Allen, seconded by Commis- sioner Walsh and unanimously carried to receive and file the report. 2. Discussion regarding Plankhouse trash enclosure fence height and location of lights. The Planning Director summarized a memorandum dated March 18 from the Building Superintendent regarding lighting of the trash area at the Plankhouse Restaurant. The Building Super- intendent reported the fencing around the enclosure is eight feet above sidewalk level and the trash containers cannot be seen unless the lids are open. The two lights attached to the building are about nine feet above grade. He reported the trash area was neat and clean at the time of his two inspections. The Commissioners voiced their objections to the overly bright lighting of the trash area which is visible from the street and directed the Planning Director to contact the Plankhouse Restaurant and suggest that the lights be lowered below eye level of the street or that they be put on a manual switch and turned on only when needed. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 1976 3. Discussion of City street sweeping policies. General discussion was held regarding street sweeping problems created by on- street parking. The Public Works Director reported that he recommended a parking prohibition on street sweeping days to the City Council during a budget meeting but the Council was not very receptive. The signing program would cost about $9,000 or $10,000. He reported that the Traffic Commission recommended to the Council that an overnight parking ban ordinance be drafted and placed on a regular election ballot for a vote by the residents. This matter is still being studied by the staff. Commissioner Greenwood supported the signing program and parking prohibition on street sweeping days. He reported that during the recent election, about 100 of the persons he spoke with had complaints about the present sweeping policy. Commissioner Mullen stated he preferred a less effective sweeping program in favor of less restrictive parking. The Commissioners asked that their comments be transmitted to the Traffic Commission. 4. Discussion regarding time of Planning Commission meetings. Discussion was held regarding a change in the starting time of Commission meetings and Commissioner Greenwood suggested that the Commission may wish to follow the Council's policy of not having an afternoon session. He stated several Com- missioners_ who must drive a long distance may have difficulty getting to the afternoon meetings. Commissioners Walsh and Van Allen had no objections to starting at a later time. The Commission agreed to adopt a resolution changing the starting time of Commission meetings to 6:00 p.m. and to adopt the following schedule: consider administrative matters from 6 to 7:30 p.m. and schedule public hearings for 7:30 p.m. 5. Discussion regarding the practice of presenting com- mendations to local businesses. Commissioner Greenwood supported a continuance of the policy of presenting a commendation to outstanding businesses within the community. Commissioner Mullen objected to a compulsory commendation on a regular basis and felt an award should be made on the basis that a business is truly deserving of recog- nition. He recommended that the policy be left open but that any individual in the community, the Chamber of Commerce or a Planning Commissioner may nominate a business for commenda- tion. Commissioner Van Allen agreed that the award should not be made on a compulsory basis at regular intervals and that persons other than the Commissioners may suggest nominees. The Commission agreed to continue the practice of commending outstanding businesses without a regular schedule and that nominations are welcome from the Chamber of Commerce or individuals in the community. 6. Review of revised plot plan, Conditional Use Permit #76 -1, southeasterly corner of Lincoln Avenue and Denni. The Planning Director reported that the City Council scheduled a hearing April 12 to consider the appeal of C.U.P. #76 -1 and that the applicant submitted a revised plot plan to the City Council. The City Council continued the hearing to April 26 and referred the revised plot plan to the Planning Commission for their review and approval. He described the revised plot plan. The building was relocated to the south and east property lines, eliminating the southerly alley. The front setback and parking area was increased by about 20 feet. One trash storage area will be at the northeast corner of the building and a second, on the west side of the building, will be enclosed with a slumpstone wall. The slumpstone building will have a Monterey tile, mansard -type roof. 2. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 1976 Mr. William Landis, representing the applicant, Planned Development Corporation, 1180 S. Beverly, Los Angeles, stated they incorporated the suggestions of the Planning Commission into the revised plot plan. They felt elimination of the rear alley will prevent problems with children and the area from becoming a trash collector. Relocation of the building provides 20 additional feet of setback from Lincoln. He stated the wall around the trash area adjacent to Denni will be slumpstone and will be eight feet high and will look like a side of the building. Mr. Lewis Morgen, also representing the applicant, stated they tried to answer the Commission's concerns which were expressed at the March 4 meeting with the revised plot plan. He felt the Commission's comments were valid and that the revised plan was the result of trying to correct their objections. It was moved by Commissioner Greenwood, seconded by Commis- sioner Mullen and unanimously carried to recommend to the City Council approval of the revised plot plan for Conditional Use Permit #76 -1 subject to the conditions recommended by the staff and the findings contained in Section 17.2 -3 of the Zoning Ordinance and recommend to the Council that if they wish to approve the conditional use permit that it be based on the revised plot plan. 7. Consideration of request for outdoor display of merchan- dise, Triple T Furniture, 5262 Lincoln Avenue. The Planning Director reported that the City Council on April 12 approved a special permit for Mr. Terry Gideon to operate a used furniture and appliance store at 5262 Lincoln Avenue but referred the applicant's request for outdoor display to the Planning Commission for review and approval. Mr. Terry Gideon, 5262 Lincoln Avenue, Cypress, the applicant, stated he needed the outdoor display because his building is set back 60 feet from the street. He stated new and clean merchandise would be displayed during business hours in an area 10' by 20'. He felt outdoor displays were permitted since the previous furniture store at this location displayed furniture outside. Commissioner Mullen felt this request was different from the furniture store's request since the furniture store had displayed only two pieces of furniture which were new and the display was for a temporary, six month period. Commissioner Greenwood stated the previous request was for a temporary period and he did not support the outdoor display of furniture in this case. Mr. Gideon reported he could utilize a furniture dolley which would prevent a cluttered appearance and he asked the Commission to consider granting the request on a temporary basis for 30 or 60 days. He felt the success of his business depended on outdoor display and if it was not approved he would be forced to relocate the business. Mr. Gideon reported he had plans to open an auction house on the adjacent parcel. Commissioner Van Allen stated he disapproved of the outdoor display by the previous furniture store and that he did not support this request. He felt if outdoor display was a real asset the furniture store would still be in business. Commissioner Walsh felt it was unfair that the property owner is misleading tenants by implying that outdoor displays are permitted and she supported the display on a trial basis. 3. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 1976 Commissioner Walsh moved to approve the request for outdoor display of merchandise for Triple T Furniture and Appliance for a period of 30 days. The motion died for lack of a second. It was moved by Commissioner Mullen, seconded by Commissioner Van Allen and carried, with Commissioner Greenwood abstaining and Commissioner Walsh voting no, to deny the request by Mr. Gerry Gideon, Triple T Furniture and Appliance, for out- door displays. 8. Consideration of request for amendment to approved development plan, Midwood Manor, northeast corner of Cerritos and Bloomfield. Commissioner Mullen stated he visited the site and felt there was a real need for additional parking in the tract. He felt parking should be permitted in the corner paved area but that the repair of automobiles should be prohibited. He recommended that the wheel stops on the east side of the lot be moved further back and that thick shrubs be planted as a buffer for the homes to the north and east. Commissioner Greenwood felt there was a definite need for additional parking but he objected to car repairs in this area. He felt there was an invasion of privacy for the residents to the north and east since the wall is only 4'9 ". The Planning Director reported that any sounds are magnified in this area since it is surrounded by buildings which create a canyon effect and he stated landscaping does not effectively muffle sound. Commissioner Greenwood felt the Midwood Manor Homeowners' Association did not present any plans on how parking in this area could be compatible with the adjacent residences and he felt the Homeowners' Association should work out a solution with those residents. It was moved by Commissioner Van Allen, seconded by Commis- sioner Walsh and carried, with Commissioner Mullen voting no, to deny without prejudice the request by Midwood Manor Home- owners' Association for an amendment to the approved develop- ment plan. Mr. Ed Powell, 10401 Santa Elise, Cypress, a homeowner who abuts the paved area, stated he felt the lot should be closed off to vehicles and he did not feel raising the wall or addi- tional landscaping would solve the noise problem. 9. Request for Zoning Ordinance interpretation re: orna- mental iron works shop in the CH- 10,000 Zone. The Planning Director reported the applicant was not present for this matter and the Commission continued the item to the next regular meeting. RECESS: Commissioner Mullen recessed the meeting at 6:40 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Hart called the meeting back to order at 7:45 p.m. with the following Commissioners in attendance: PRESENT: ABSENT: Commissioners Greenwood, Mullen, Van Allen, Walsh and Hart None Also present were Brian Hawley, Planning Director, Art Schat- zeder, Public Works Director, Roger Grable, Deputy City Attorney and Sandy Pegueros, Business License /Zoning Inspector. 4. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 1976 MINUTES: March 18, 1976 It was moved by Commissioner Walsh, seconded by Commissioner Mullen and unanimously carried to approve the March 18 minutes. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Chairman Hart asked if anyone wished to speak in regard to any matter not on the agenda. There was no one who wished to speak. PUBLIC HEARING RE: AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN NO. 76 -2: Chairman Hart announced that this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Cypress General Plan to change the designation of the properties along Acacia Drive southerly of Crescent Avenue from the current high density residential designation to a low density, single family residential classification. He asked that the staff present its report. The Planning Director presented Staff Report PC #76 -11 dated April 9 which indicated the application was initiated by the City Council on March 22 in conjunction with their approval of Zone Change #76 -1 which reclassifies the subject property from the RM -20 /A Multiple Family Residential Zone to the RS- 15,000 Single Family Residential Zone. The subject property consists of 28 lots each averaging 30,000 square feet. Chairman Hart declared the hearing open and asked if anyone wished to speak in favor. The following persons spoke in favor of General Plan Amend- ment #76 -2: Mr. Larry Wuebker, 8661 Acacia Drive, Cypress Mr. Gene Vaughn, 8582 Acacia Drive, Cypress Mrs. Mary van den Raadt, 8644 Acacia Drive, Cypress Chairman Hart asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Mr. Everett Weerheim, 8541 Acacia Drive, Cypress, asked if a second hearing would be held on this matter before the City Council. Regarding the petition submitted to the City Council in support of the zone change, Mr. Weerheim stated one of the signatures is incorrect and should be removed from the petition. No one else wished to speak and Chairman Hart closed the hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Mullen and seconded by Commis- sioner Walsh to approve Amendment to the General Plan No. 76 -2. The motion unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Greenwood, Mullen, Van Allen, Walsh and Hart 0 COMMISSIONERS: None 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PUBLIC HEARING RE: AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 76 -1: Chairman Hart announced that this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cypress to consider possible amendments to the permitted and conditional uses and to the standards of development currently authorized in the RS- 15,000 Residential Single Family Zone. He asked for the staff report. The Planning Director summarized Staff Report PC #76 -12 dated April 9 which indicated that, in conjunction with the approval 5. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 1976 of Zone Change #76 -1 for Acacia Drive, the City Council requested that the Planning Commission study the current development standards and regulations for uses in the RS- 15,000 Zone particularly those relating to the keeping of horses and other animals and commercial activities. The staff proposed several amendments to the zoning regulations to better regulate agri- cultural -type uses in this zone. The Planning Director reported no oral or written communications were received regarding the proposed amendments. Commissioner Mullen asked if the amendments would remove existing uses on the property which are non - conforming. The Planning Director reported that the zone change will bring some of the agricultural - related uses into conformance with the Zoning Ordinance, with or without the proposed amendments. Commissioner Mullen recommended that the word "such" be inserted before "animals" in items #2 b - d. Chairman Hart inquired about Item #1 which recommended that all types of agricultural and horticultural uses be permitted and that the sale of products be permitted subject to the granting of a conditional use permit. Commissioner Van Allen recommended that Item #1 be divided into la and lb to cover the two separate activities. Chairman Hart inqui .red if anyone wished to speak in favor. No one wished to speak in favor. He asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Mr. Everett Weerheim, 8541 Acacia Drive, Cypress, reported that he complied with a City ordinance adopted in 1961 which required him to liquidate his chicken ranch. He felt the intent of this ordinance was to eliminate all types of animal operations in the City. He reported that several of the former chicken ranches on Acacia had reverted to horse stables and he felt it was unfair that he was forced out of business when other horse operations were allowed to remain. The Planning Director reported that he spoke with Mr. Weer - heim's attorney and suggested that they meet with the City Attorney to determine what ordinances were in effect at the time Mr. Weerheim went out of business. He reported he was unaware of any City ordinance which required the elimination of chicken ranches and the only similar ordinance provided for the amortization of dairies. He stated the current Zoning Ordinance, which has been in effect for about three and a half years, contains provisions allowing riding acad- emies and commercial stables in the RS- 15,000 Zone subject to a conditional use permit and the recommended amendments do not propose to change this provision. Chairman Hart closed the hearing and then reopened it for additional speakers. Mr. Larry Wuebker, 8661 Acacia Drive, Cypress, inquired if the proposed amendments replace the current Zoning Ordinance provisions for the RS- 15,000 Zone and the Planning Director advised him that they did. Mr. Wuebker suggested that Item #5 be changed so that it covers concerns such as those expressed by Mr. Weerheim. He suggested that the keeping of more than 12 poultry and 12 rabbits for non - commercial purposes be subject to a conditional use permit. Chairman Hart closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Van Allen and seconded by Com- missioner Walsh to approve the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance provisions for the RS- 15,000 Zone as recom- 6. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 1976 mended by the staff with the following changes: Item #1 be divided into la and lb; la stating that all types of agricul- tural and horticultural activities are permitted and lb stating that the sale of products raised on the premises shall be permitted subject to the granting of a conditional use permit; that the word "such" be inserted before "animal" in Items #2 b through d, and that Item #5 be divided into 5a and 5b; 5a stating that the keeping of not more than 12 poultry and 12 rabbits for non - commercial purposes at least 50 feet from an adjoining dwelling is permitted and 5b stating that the keeping of more than 12 poultry and 12 rabbits for non - commercial purposes at least 50 feet from an adjoining dwelling is per- mitted subject to a conditional use permit. The motion unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Greenwood, Mullen, Van Allen, Walsh and Hart None Non e PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #76 -5 - THOMAS BAROLDI: Chairman Hart announced that this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a proposed condi- tional use permit to establish, operate and maintain a recrea- tional vehicle storage facility on a parcel of land situated on the southerly side of Cerritos Avenue adjacent to the Baroldi /Sycamore Park in the RS -6000 Residential Single Family Zone. Included with this request is a proposal to waive the required setback and landscaped area from Cerritos Avenue. The Planning Director summarized Staff Report PC #76 -9 dated April 7 regarding the proposal to establish a recreational vehicle storage area for 40 vehicles on an acre parcel of land located on the south side of Cerritos Avenue, adjacent to Baroldi /Sycamore Park. A 20 -25 foot wide strip of City - owned land along the entire westerly and southerly lot lines, which is leased by the applicant, is part of the subject property. Single - family homes are adjacent to the south, west and north across Cerritos Avenue, and Baroldi /Sycamore Park is adjacent to the east. The applicant is requesting a waiver of the required setback and landscaping requirements along Cerritos Avenue. The Planning Director read two letters in opposition to the application from Mr. William Pryor, 6663 Teakwood, Cypress, and Mr. Lee Hamilton, 6673 Teakwood, Cypress. Chairman Hart opened the hearing and asked if the applicant wished to speak. Mr. Thomas Baroldi, 6616 Cerritos Avenue, Cypress, agreed with all conditions and agreed to the setback requirement for Cerritos Avenue. He did not feel the double wall around the perimeter of the property was necessary since this would be a temporary use (five years). He felt a fast - growing shrub would be a sufficient buffer. Chairman Hart asked if anyone wished to speak in support. No one wished to speak in favor. He asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Mr. Arnold Anderson, 3406 Claremore, Long Beach, an adjacent property owner, read a statement signed by 27 out of 35 home- owners in the immediate area urging the Commission to deny the permit. Mr. Anderson stated he strongly opposed the granting of the permit and felt the use would downgrade surrounding properties. Mr. Bill Castle, 6554 Teakwood, Cypress, opposed the use because he felt it would increase burglaries and vandalism in the neighborhood. He reported the neighborhood has had experience with burglaries and vandalism recently. 7. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 1976 Mr. Patrick Duffy, 6563 Teakwood, Cypress, opposed the use because he felt it was inappropriate in a residential zone and would lower property values. He felt it might cause an increase in burglaries and vandalism. He objected to the fact that persons would be in and out of the property at odd hours and he did not feel the lighting could be adequately screened from adjacent properties. He felt the dump would create health problems and stated the property was not main- tained prior to this time. He felt the use would detract from the residential character of the neighborhood. Mr. Eugene Morgen, 6574 Teakwood, Cypress, urged the Commission to deny the permit and preserve the residential area. He supported the construction of tennis courts on the property as were shown on the original plans. Mr. Thomas Baroldi expressed his desire to maintain his residence on the property which would prevent a trade with City property and the construction of the tennis courts. He did not feel the use would attract burglaries or vandalism since the property would be well lighted and someone would be on the property at all times. Hours of the operation would be 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. He did not feel there would be excessive activity on the property since persons did not take their recreational vehicles out every day. He felt use of the property would eliminate the annual weed problem and he felt there was a need in the City for a recreational vehicle storage area. Commissioner Greenwood inquired if residential development was feasible on the property and the Public Works Director reported it would be impossible to develop standard -size residential lots without Mr. Baroldi selling his property. Mr. Eugene Morgen, 6574 Teakwood, Cypress, stated he did not feel it would be practical to restrict the hours of operation to 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. Chairman Hart closed the hearing. Commissioner Greenwood felt the proposed use was inappropriate in a residential area and stated he did not support it since the property could be used for better purposes. He anticipated problems with the five -year lease. Commissioner Walsh agreed that the storage area is not the highest and best use of the property. She did not feel the use would be harmonious or complementary to the residential neighborhood. Commissioner Mullen stated he did not support the use and felt there was no way to prevent it from being a nuisance to adjacent homes. He did not feel it was possible to maintain a sufficient buffer between the homes and park. It was moved by Commissioner Walsh and seconded by Commis- sioner Greenwood to deny Conditional Use Permit #76 -5. The motion unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Greenwood, Mullen, Van Allen, Walsh and Hart 0 COMMISSIONERS: None 0 COMMISSIONERS: None 8. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 1976 PUBLIC HEARING RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #76 -6 - MICHAEL BROWN: Chairman Hart announced that this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider a proposed conditional use permit to construct a nine -unit apartment project on a parcel of land at 9561 Graham Street situated on the westerly side of Graham Street 330 feet south of Orange Avenue in the RM -20 /A Residential Multiple Family Zone. Included within this proposal is a request for variances from the site area, lot width, side yard and lot coverage requirements of the RM -20 /A Zone. He asked for the staff's report. The Planning Director summarized Staff Report PC #76 -10 dated April7 and presented the plot plans and elevations. Chairman Hart asked if the applicant wished to speak. Mr. Michael Brown, 32242 Azores, Laguna Niguel, California, reported that as owner and builder he was interested in the long -term potential of a quality development. He reported the units would be a condominium or studio -type design, would be two -story and each would have an enclosed, two -car garage with an automatic door opener. He described the design and amenities of the project such as central heating and air - conditioning, and a washer and dryer in each unit. Chairman Hart closed the hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Mullen and seconded by Commis- sioner Walsh to approve Conditional Use Permit #76 -6 subject to the following conditions and finding that the development complies with Sections 17.2 -7 and 17.3 -7 of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. Development of the property shall conform to the plot plans, floor plans and elevations submitted with this request and as reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 2. Landscape and irrigation plans for all areas proposed for landscaping shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to final building in- spection. All required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. All construction shall be in accordance with conditions established in Fire Zone 2. 4. Location of fire extinguishers will be marked by Orange County Fire Marshal and installed before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. All mechanical equipment placed on the roof shall be screened from view. 6. A six -inch (6 ") block wall, six feet (6') above highest grade shall be installed along the side and rear property lines where required. 7. Drainage shall be solved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A grading plan shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer. All on -site runoff shall be con- veyed to the street by means of an under - sidewalk culvert. 8. All secondary and primary utility services shall be underground. 9. A street tree, 15 gallon minimum size, shall be installed in the existing treewell in front of this development per City of Cypress Standard No. 211. 9. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 1976 10. Soil in planting areas, including trees, shall be tested by a qualified agricultural laboratory to determine the organic and chemical amendments for optimum growth for the plants specified. The test results shall include concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, pH, salinity, sodium status and boron saturation extract. Results of these tests with recommendations of the agri- cultural laboratory shall be furnished to the Public Works Department for approval at least 30 days prior to planting date. 11. Necessary fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Fire Department requirements and City standards. 12. Plan checking and inspection fees amounting to 3 1/2% of the street improvements shall be paid. 13. Developer shall conform to all applicable provisions of the City Code. 14. A retaining wall shall be installed where the grade differential each side of the property line is greater than twelve inches (12 ") . 15. A six -inch (6 ") high curb shall be installed along the north and west property line to protect the walls from vehicular traffic. Curbing shall be installed a minimum of two and one -half feet (2 1/2') measured horizontally from the base of the wall. 16. Adequate "No Parking - Fire Lane" signs shall be posted in the driveway per California Vehicle Code No. 22658 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and County Fire Marshal. 17. A bond shall be posted by the applicant to guarantee maintenance of the irrigation system so that it operates in a manner for which it was designed and to guarantee maintenance of all plant materials in a healthy, growing condition, free of weeds and litter, for a period of not less than twelve (12) months to the specifications of the City staff. The motion unanimously carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Greenwood, Mullen, Van Allen, Walsh and Hart 0 COMMISSIONERS: None 0 COMMISSIONERS: None The Planning Director advised the Commission that the City Council, at its meeting of April 12, 1976, held a hearing on the appeal of Conditional Use Permit #76 -3 and approved the conditional use permit for a mini - warehouse storage facility on the south side of Lincoln, west of Holder. The front 200 feet of the property was deleted from the development to allow for a commercial retail use and the applicant will be submitting a revised plot plan and a parcel map. The Planning Director reported that at the April 12 meeting the City Council continued the hearing on the appeal of Conditional Use Permit #76 -1 (corner of Lincoln and Denni) to the next meeting. ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Hart declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. to Thursday, April 22 at 7:30 p.m. ATTEST: CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING OMMISSION